No UC admissions data on file for Cache Creek High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Cache Creek High (continuation)

· Yolo County · Woodland Joint Unified · Public

Public Yolo County 🏛 Woodland Joint Unified → CDS 5772710…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • ✅ Gifted & talented program
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: Bottom 14% of US high schools
  • 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 77% (Bottom 25% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

💡

How Cache Creek High (continuation) compares for families

What families should know about Cache Creek High (continuation).

  • vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: New Technology High, American Legion High (continuation), Discovery High and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

For Parents

📬

Follow Cache Creek High (continuation)

Get an email when Cache Creek High (continuation)'s numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21
SAT/ACT test-takers
0
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
0.0
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

Bottom 25% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate

50th 90th
4-year graduation rate
77%
Range: 75–79%
4-year cohort size
93
Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years
Compared against
17,988
US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

High-poverty school

Title I Schoolwide eligible

83.8%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

≥75% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. These schools qualify for the highest tier of federal Title I funding and typically receive extra wraparound services. Academic outcomes vary widely — check the state assessment + grad-rate tiles.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 76
9.2%
incl. 1.3% exceeded
-43.6 pts vs. Yolo County median (52.8%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 78
5.1%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-15.3 pts vs. Yolo County median (20.4%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 80% -4.3
White 14%
Two or more 4% +2.9
Black / African Am. 1%
American Indian 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 88% -1.9
Socioeconomically disadv. 26% +8.7
English learners 9% -12.1

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
86.1%
167 of 194 students

Absenteeism is up 5.0 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Yolo County median
20.4% · school is worse than 86% of 14 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
136 (2018)138 (2026)
+1.5%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
91 (2018)98 (2026)
+7.7%

If this trend holds (+2.6%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~142 +4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~149 +11 $0
5 yr (2031) ~157 +19 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Cache Creek High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 8% (91→98 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -12%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+0.2%/yr); projects to ~139 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

138 students (2026)
~139 projected (2029)
at +0.2%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Score Enroll. trend
Cache Creek High (continuation) Public 138 +8%
Peer-group median 8 -12%
New Technology High Public 141 -14%
American Legion High (continuation) Public 130 -60%
Discovery High Public 104 -10%
Arthur A. Benjamin Health Professions High Public 176 +11%
Washington Middle College Hs Public 206 9 +371%
Elinor Lincoln Hickey Jr./Sr. High Public 112 +134%
Esparto High School Public 287 8 -24%
Yolo High Public 90 -5%
Vista Nueva Career And Technology High Public 102 -29%
Sava - Sacramento Academic And Vocational Academy Public 250 -94%

UC Reach Score = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100 when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Yolo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Yolo County (+7.7% vs. -1.9%), but 101 of 198 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 86.1% (up +5.0 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+7.7%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-1.9%  Yolo County baseline
+9.6pp  gap vs. county
49.0%  retention (county median 91.2%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
49.0%
97 of 198 students

101 of 198 students who enrolled at Cache Creek High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (51.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Yolo County median
91.2% · school is in the 21st percentile of 14 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 16th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (175) 47.4%
Hispanic / Latino (157) 50.3%
Students w/ disabilities (60) 51.7%
English learners (32) 53.1%
White (31) 48.4%

Nearest peer high schools

New Technology High 80.0% American Legion High (continuation) 26.8% Discovery High 35.1% Arthur A. Benjamin Health Professions High 82.8% Washington Middle College Hs 92.6%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Woodland Joint Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$149.3M
+14.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$15,455
9,658 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 56.6%
Local: 30.9%
Federal: 12.4%
Instruction share
57.9%
of current spending · $7,590/pupil
Long-term debt
$20.0M
-28.7% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Woodland Joint Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Cache Creek High (continuation)

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 2.6%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Cache Creek High (continuation)?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →