No UC admissions data on file for Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii
· Tulare County · Stone Corral Elementary · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Valley Life Charter → Farmersville High School → Exeter Union High School → Visalia Charter Independent Study → Mt. Whitney High → Compare all similar →How Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii compares for families
What families should know about Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Valley Life Charter, Farmersville High School, Exeter Union High School and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.
For Parents
Get alerts when Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii's numbers change
New admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores — a few alerts a year, no spam. Your email also saves your list across devices.
Objective, government-grade data — no school pays us for placement.
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 18.1 pp since 2017-18. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+10.6%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~932 | +89 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~1,139 | +296 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~1,393 | +550 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
How does Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii really compare on getting kids to college?
Unlock a head-to-head snapshot of Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii against its 10 most similar nearby schools — matched on size, location, type. See exactly where it stands on the college pipeline.
Your similar-school group includes
Valley Life Charter · Farmersville High School · Exeter Union High School · Visalia Charter Independent Study · Mt. Whitney High · Woodlake High School · +4 more
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Tulare County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment growth is beating Tulare County (+230.8% vs. +2.2%), but 555 of 1301 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 50.1% (up +18.1 pts from 2017-18) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.
555 of 1,301 students who enrolled at Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (42.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for Crescent Valley Public Charter Ii
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 10.6%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals