No UC admissions data on file for Lincoln (abraham) High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Lincoln (abraham) High

· San Francisco County · San Francisco Unified · Public

Public San Francisco County 🏛 San Francisco Unified → CDS 3868478…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📘Top 25% Math · SBAC (CA) 📚AP rigor: Top 3.7% nationally 📖17 AP courses

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • 📚 17 AP courses offered — Elite
  • ✅ Dual-enrollment program (college credit while in HS)
  • ✅ Gifted & talented program
  • 🔢 9 calculus classes · 20 physics · 5 chemistry
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: Top 3.7% of US high schools
  • 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 93% (67th percentile nationally)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

💡

How Lincoln (abraham) High compares for families

Among the nation's most academically rigorous high schools.

  • StatewideAP rigor sits in the top 3.7% of US high schools with 17 AP courses.
  • Locally📘 Top 6 in San Francisco County on ELA proficiency — plus 1 more top-rank.
  • vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Lowell High School, Galileo High, Balboa High School and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

For Parents

📬

Follow Lincoln (abraham) High

Get an email when Lincoln (abraham) High's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

🎓 Academic rigor

AP + advanced-course offerings

Elite — exceptional AP + advanced course breadth

Top 3.7% of US high schools

50th 90th ↑ this school
Less rigorMore rigorMost rigor
AP courses offered
17
Math ✓ · Science ✓
Students taking AP courses
612
≈30 per 100 students · uptake, not just offerings
Advanced math classes
16
9 calculus · 7 advanced
Lab science classes
25
20 physics · 5 chemistry
Other rigor signals
✅ Dual-enrollment program
✅ Gifted/talented program

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21
SAT/ACT test-takers
0
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
0.0
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

67th percentile nationally

50th 90th
4-year graduation rate
93%
Single-point estimate
4-year cohort size
508
Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years
Compared against
17,988
US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

Title I Schoolwide eligible

≥40% FRPL — qualifies for Title I Schoolwide program

54.5%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

40-74% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. The district can use Title I funds across the whole school under federal Schoolwide Program rules.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 455
64.0%
incl. 38.0% exceeded
+9.5 pts above San Francisco County median (54.5%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 446
47.3%
incl. 21.5% exceeded
+26.1 pts above San Francisco County median (21.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Asian 45%
Hispanic / Latino 26% -1.5
White 9% -1.2
Two or more 6%
Black / African Am. 6% +1.1
Filipino 4% +1.0
Not reported 3%
Pacific Islander 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 53%
Socioeconomically disadv. 15% +1.9
English learners 14% -3.0
Homeless 5%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
18.8%
410 of 2,181 students

Absenteeism is up 18.8 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Francisco County median
39.8% · school is better than 82% of 17 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
2,067 (2018)2,069 (2026)
+0.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
511 (2018)508 (2026)
-0.6%

If this trend holds (+0.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~2,069 +0 $0
3 yr (2029) ~2,069 +0 $0
5 yr (2031) ~2,070 +1 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Lincoln (abraham) High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 1% (511→508 from 2018 to 2026), tracking the peer-group median of -0%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+0.0%/yr); projects to ~2070 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

2069 students (2026)
~2070 projected (2029)
at +0.0%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Lincoln (abraham) High Public 2069 -1%
Peer-group median 44.7% -0%
Lowell High School Public 2589 70.6% -5%
Galileo High Public 1806 -15%
Balboa High School Public 1195 38.0% +3%
Westmoor High School Public 1273 25.2% -21%
Alameda High School Public 1843 51.2% +5%
Oakland Technical High School Public 1815 45.4% -4%
Redwood High School Public 1745 54.5% +8%
Jefferson High School Public 1041 13.8% +9%
Burlingame High School Public 1627 44.7% +18%
South San Francisco Hs Public 1224 14.5% -26%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Francisco County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Healthy
Holding share of a shrinking market.

Lincoln (abraham) High's enrollment is tracking San Francisco County's baseline (-0.6% vs. -1.6%), and 88.6% stability is elite. The demographic tide is the headwind; you're holding your share.

-0.6%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-1.6%  San Francisco County baseline
+1.0pp  gap vs. county
88.6%  retention (county median 86.2%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
88.6%
1,990 of 2,246 students

256 of 2,246 students who enrolled at Lincoln (abraham) High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (11.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Francisco County median
86.2% · school is in the 67th percentile of 18 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 57th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (1,154) 87.6%
Asian (965) 94.2%
Hispanic / Latino (610) 82.6%
English learners (356) 80.6%
Students w/ disabilities (326) 87.4%
White (215) 89.3%

Nearest peer high schools

Lowell High School 98.0% Galileo High 86.6% Balboa High School 88.7% Westmoor High School 89.0% Alameda High School 96.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — San Francisco Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$1228.3M
+17.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$23,716
51,790 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 36.3%
Local: 56.0%
Federal: 7.8%
Instruction share
53.2%
of current spending · $9,747/pupil
Long-term debt
$969.8M
+0.1% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the San Francisco Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Lincoln (abraham) High

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 0.0%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Lincoln (abraham) High?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →