No UC admissions data on file for Ridgway High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Ridgway High (continuation)

Santa Rosa · Sonoma County · Santa Rosa High · Public

Public Sonoma County Santa Rosa High → CDS 4970920…

Shareable scorecard →

Data Year

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Technology High School → Pathways Charter School → Calistoga High School → Credo High School → Saint Helena High School → Compare all similar →

At a glance

Academic signals

AP rigor: Bottom 6% of US high schools
4-yr grad rate: 87% in 2019 (Bottom 39% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts graduation data, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

How Ridgway High (continuation) compares for families

What families should know about Ridgway High (continuation).

▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Technology High School, Pathways Charter, Calistoga High School and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

You've seen Ridgway High (continuation). What are your child's real college odds? Check any college in 10 seconds — no email needed — then get the free Family Decision Report: Reach / Competitive / Match / Likely + the real cost range for every college on their list. Check odds →

For Parents

Get alerts when Ridgway High (continuation)'s numbers change

New admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores — a few alerts a year, no spam. Your email also saves your list across devices.

Objective, government-grade data — no school pays us for placement.

California College-Going Rate

22.9% of the 2022-23 graduating class enrolled in college within a year.

The share of 2022-23 graduates who enrolled at a college anywhere in the U.S. within 12 months, per the National Student Clearinghouse match the California Department of Education publishes.

Within 12 months

22.9%

of 131 graduates

Give the same class four more months and 26% had enrolled — CDE publishes a 16-month window alongside the 12-month one, 34 students.

Up 3.6 points from the 2021-22 class (19.3%).

Where the 2022-23 class enrolled

In California — 30 students (22.9%)

University of California 0.0% 0

California State University 0.0% 0

California Community College 22.9% 30

California private college 0.0% 0

Out of state — 0 students (0.0%)

Out-of-state 4-year 0.0% 0

Out-of-state 2-year 0.0% 0

CDE puts each graduate in one bucket only — whichever kind of college they were enrolled in longest — so these add up to the rate above. That is a different count from the UC Reach Score on this page, which counts a student at every UC campus that admitted them.

Source: California Department of Education, College-Going Rate (DataQuest) ↗, cohort 2022-23, posted 17-Sep-2025. Data file: cgr12mo23.txt ↗ (and the 16-month file ↗). CDE builds the rate by matching California high school completers to National Student Clearinghouse enrollment records; we publish CDE’s aggregates and hold no student-level data.

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21

SAT/ACT test-takers

11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test

Test-taking intensity

0.0

takers per 100 students in grades 9-12

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

Bottom 39% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate

4-year graduation rate

87%

Range: 85–89%

4-year cohort size

196

Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years

Compared against

17,988

US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

Federal Title I context

Title I Schoolwide eligible

≥40% FRPL — qualifies for Title I Schoolwide program

56.7%

FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).

0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

40-74% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. The district can use Title I funds across the whole school under federal Schoolwide Program rules.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

College readiness

Getting ready for college

These come from the state and federal files, not from UC — so they are here whether or not Ridgway High (continuation) has a UC admissions record.

Student-Counselor Ratio ⓘ

Counseling here is unusually well-staffed — about 90 students per counselor, near what experts recommend.

90:1

2.8 FTE counselors · 252 students

In context: CA median 337:1 · 247 fewer students per counselor · ASCA target 250:1.

A-G Completion ⓘ

Fewer than 1 in 10 graduates finish the courses UC and CSU require — below the state norm. Worth asking how course access and planning work here.

2024-25 cohort

In context: CA median 55.9% · -55.9 pp vs. median · Sonoma Co. 42.8%.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

About 1 in 10 students read and write at grade level — below the state norm — worth asking what extra support looks like.

Fewer than 1 in 10 students do math at grade level — below the state norm — worth asking what extra support looks like.

ELA — met or exceeded

n = 116

12.1%

incl. 1.7% exceeded

-40.1 pts vs. Sonoma County median (52.2%) · CA median 54.5% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.4%

Math — met or exceeded

n = 105

3.8%

incl. 1.9% exceeded

-19.8 pts vs. Sonoma County median (23.6%) · CA median 21.4% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 73% -1.4

White 14% -1.1

Two or more 4% +1.4

American Indian 3% +1.3

Asian 2%

Black / African Am. 2%

Pacific Islander 1%

Program subgroups

Socioeconomically disadv. 75% +23.9

Students w/ disabilities 32% +4.0

English learners 15% -4.6

Homeless 5%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

66% of students miss 10%+ of school days — above the state's ~23%. Ask what the school is doing about engagement.

Chronic absent

66.0%

243 of 368 students

Absenteeism is down 18.1 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Sonoma County median

24.4% · school is worse than 94% of 18 HS

Statewide median

22.8%

Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)

257 (2018) → 252 (2026)

-1.9%

Grade 12 (graduating class)

208 (2018) → 200 (2026)

-3.8%

If this trend holds (-1.2%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon	Projected Total enrollment	Change	Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027)	~249	-3	$0
3 yr (2029)	~243	-9	$0
5 yr (2031)	~237	-15	$0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

How does Ridgway High (continuation) really compare on getting kids to college?

Unlock a head-to-head snapshot of Ridgway High (continuation) against its 10 most similar nearby schools — matched on size, location, type. See exactly where it stands on the college pipeline.

The full head-to-head table — every peer school's UC Reach, side by side.

Enrollment trend + 3-year projection — is this school growing or quietly shrinking?

The plain-English read on what it all means for your family.

Your similar-school group includes

Technology High School · Pathways Charter · Calistoga High School · Credo High School · Saint Helena High School · Northwest Prep Charter School · +4 more

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sonoma County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

44% of students who start the year finish it here — more churn than most CA schools. Ask what's behind the turnover.

Critical

Bleeding from both ends.

Enrollment down 3.8% vs. county -0.1%, AND stability (44.1%) below the county median. Fewer families are choosing the school, and the ones who do aren't staying through year-end. Chronic absenteeism is also at 66.0% (up -18.1 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-3.8% senior class, grade 12 (2018–2026)

-0.1% Sonoma County baseline

-3.7pp gap vs. county

44.1% retention (county median 91.9%)

Senior class (grade 12) — indexed to 100 at 2018

Stability rate by year (raw %)

Stability rate

44.1%

166 of 376 students

210 of 376 students who enrolled at Ridgway High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (55.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Sonoma County median

91.9% · school is in the 11th percentile of 19 HS

Statewide median

87.3% · in the 14th percentile of 1,734 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (275) 42.9%

Socio. disadvantaged (267) 41.9%

Students w/ disabilities (93) 71.0%

English learners (60) 35.0%

White (55) 47.3%

Nearest peer high schools

Technology High School 96.8% Pathways Charter 64.4% Calistoga High School 91.5% Credo High School 91.6% Saint Helena High School 96.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Ridgway High (continuation)

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently -1.2%/yr) with the revenue at stake
✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals

See a sample report →