No UC admissions data on file for Williams Junior/Senior High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Williams Junior/Senior High

· Colusa County · Williams Unified · Public

Public Colusa County 🏛 Williams Unified → CDS 0661622…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

🎓97% 4-yr grad rate

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • 📚 3 AP courses offered — Moderate
  • ✅ Dual-enrollment program (college credit while in HS)
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: Bottom 50% of US high schools
  • 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 97% (90th percentile nationally)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

💡

How Williams Junior/Senior High compares for families

Solid mid-tier academic profile.

  • vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Colusa High School, Pierce High School, Sutter High School and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

For Parents

📬

Follow Williams Junior/Senior High

Get an email when Williams Junior/Senior High's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

🎓 Academic rigor

AP + advanced-course offerings

Moderate — some AP / advanced course access

Bottom 50% of US high schools

50th 90th ↑ this school
Less rigorMore rigorMost rigor
AP courses offered
3
Subject breadth not reported
Students taking AP courses
47
≈12 per 100 students · uptake, not just offerings
Advanced math classes
2
0 calculus · 2 advanced
Lab science classes
6
2 physics · 4 chemistry
Other rigor signals
✅ Dual-enrollment program

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21
SAT/ACT test-takers
0
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
0.0
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

90th percentile nationally

50th 90th
4-year graduation rate
97%
Range: 95–100%
4-year cohort size
84
Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years
Compared against
17,988
US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

High-poverty school

Title I Schoolwide eligible

92.2%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

≥75% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. These schools qualify for the highest tier of federal Title I funding and typically receive extra wraparound services. Academic outcomes vary widely — check the state assessment + grad-rate tiles.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 86
36.0%
incl. 8.1% exceeded
-10.1 pts vs. Colusa County median (46.1%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 88
4.5%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-11.1 pts vs. Colusa County median (15.6%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 96%
White 3%
Asian 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 91% -6.6
English learners 21% -10.9
Socioeconomically disadv. 6% -6.5
Homeless 3%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
21.4%
87 of 406 students

Absenteeism is up 10.5 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Colusa County median
12.3% · school is worse than 75% of 4 HS
Statewide median
22.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
558 (2018)591 (2026)
+5.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
90 (2018)101 (2026)
+12.2%

If this trend holds (+0.6%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~594 +3 $0
3 yr (2029) ~601 +10 $0
5 yr (2031) ~608 +17 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Williams Junior/Senior High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 12% (90→101 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +24%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+0.7%/yr); projects to ~604 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

591 students (2026)
~604 projected (2029)
at +0.7%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Williams Junior/Senior High Public 591 +12%
Peer-group median 5.5% +24%
Colusa High School Public 413 2.8% +31%
Pierce High School Public 440 8.9% +21%
Sutter High School Public 733 4.4% -13%
Live Oak High School Public 598 32.9% +20%
Sutter Peak Charter Academy Public 804 +115%
Gridley High School Public 685 2.8% +36%
Willows High School Public 419 5.5% +0%
Lower Lake High School Public 986 11.5% +44%
Kelseyville High School Public 507 5.5% +2%
Marysville High School Public 972 5.8% +26%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Colusa County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment +12.2% vs. county +24.8% AND stability (86.2%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem.

+12.2%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+24.8%  Colusa County baseline
-12.6pp  gap vs. county
86.2%  retention (county median 90.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate
86.2%
355 of 412 students

57 of 412 students who enrolled at Williams Junior/Senior High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (13.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Colusa County median
90.8% · school is in the 25th percentile of 4 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 46th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (581) 86.4%
Socio. disadvantaged (566) 86.2%
English learners (211) 76.8%
Students w/ disabilities (79) 94.9%

Nearest peer high schools

Colusa High School 87.6% Pierce High School 93.9% Sutter High School 95.8% Live Oak High School 88.3% Sutter Peak Charter Academy 87.5%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Williams Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$21.6M
+18.8% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,177
1,338 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 62.1%
Local: 22.9%
Federal: 15.0%
Instruction share
53.5%
of current spending · $7,213/pupil
Long-term debt
$16.1M
+42.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Williams Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Williams Junior/Senior High

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 0.6%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Williams Junior/Senior High?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →