No UC admissions data on file for Alpine County Opportunity.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Alpine County Opportunity
· Alpine County · Alpine County Office of Education · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Coulterville High → Mountain High → South Fork High → Cold Springs High → Sierra Pass (continuation) → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Alpine County Opportunity compares for families
What families should know about Alpine County Opportunity.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Coulterville High, Mountain High, South Fork High and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.
For Parents
Follow Alpine County Opportunity
Get an email when Alpine County Opportunity's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
🏛️ Federal Title I context
Lower-need school
Not Title I eligible (FRPL < 25%)
<25% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. Well below the Title I threshold; expect a higher-income student body on average.
Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+58.1%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~8 | +3 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~20 | +15 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~49 | +44 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Alpine County Opportunity — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+58.1%/yr); projects to ~20 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine County Opportunity | Public | 5 | — | — |
| Peer-group median | — | +0% | ||
| Coulterville High | Public | 5 | — | -67% |
| Mountain High | Public | 4 | — | +0% |
| South Fork High | Public | 4 | — | +0% |
| Cold Springs High | Public | 3 | — | +0% |
| Sierra Pass (continuation) | Public | 3 | — | -67% |
| Divide High | Public | 9 | — | -38% |
| Cold Stream Alternative School | Public | 10 | — | +0% |
| Long Barn High | Public | 10 | — | +33% |
| Yosemite Park High | Public | 2 | — | +0% |
| Calaveras River Academy | Public | 21 | — | +67% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Alpine County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
2 of 5 students who enrolled at Alpine County Opportunity this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (40.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Alpine County Office of Education (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 12.6%
Federal: 13.9%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Alpine County Office of Education as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for Alpine County Opportunity
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 58.1%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals