No UC admissions data on file for Long Barn High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Long Barn High

· Tuolumne County · Summerville Union High · Public

Public Tuolumne County 🏛 Summerville Union High → CDS 5572413…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: Bottom 14% of US high schools
  • 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 24% (Bottom 4% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

💡

How Long Barn High compares for families

What families should know about Long Barn High.

  • vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: South Fork High, Cold Springs High, Mountain High and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

For Parents

📬

Follow Long Barn High

Get an email when Long Barn High's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21
SAT/ACT test-takers
0
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
0.0
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

Bottom 4% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate

50th 90th
4-year graduation rate
24%
Single-point estimate
4-year cohort size
9
Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years
Compared against
17,988
US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

Title I Schoolwide eligible

≥40% FRPL — qualifies for Title I Schoolwide program

66.7%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

40-74% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. The district can use Title I funds across the whole school under federal Schoolwide Program rules.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 80% +40.0
Hispanic / Latino 20% -10.0

Program subgroups

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
90.9%
10 of 11 students

Absenteeism is down 9.1 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Tuolumne County median
24.5% · school is worse than 100% of 4 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
9 (2018)10 (2026)
+11.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
6 (2018)8 (2026)
+33.3%

If this trend holds (+3.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~10 +0 $0
3 yr (2029) ~11 +1 $0
5 yr (2031) ~12 +2 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Long Barn High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 33% (6→8 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of +0%.

Enrollment projection

10 students (2026)
~10 projected (2029)
at +1.3%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Long Barn High Public 10 +33%
Peer-group median +0%
South Fork High Public 4 +0%
Cold Springs High Public 3 +0%
Mountain High Public 4 +0%
Coulterville High Public 5 -67%
Dario Cassina High Public 40 +4%
Calaveras River Academy Public 21 +67%
Vista High (continuation) Public 16 -25%
Dickens (billy Joe) High (continuation) Public 17 -43%
Vallecito Continuation High Public 36 -38%
Pride Continuation Public 18 +7%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Tuolumne County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Tuolumne County (+33.3% vs. -5.7%), but 5 of 12 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 90.9% (up -9.1 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+33.3%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-5.7%  Tuolumne County baseline
+39.0pp  gap vs. county
58.3%  retention (county median 76.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
58.3%
7 of 12 students

5 of 12 students who enrolled at Long Barn High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (41.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Tuolumne County median
76.8% · school is in the 25th percentile of 4 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 21st percentile of 1,688 HS

Nearest peer high schools

South Fork High 33.3% Cold Springs High 20.0% Mountain High 33.3% Coulterville High 44.4% Dario Cassina High 26.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Summerville Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$14.3M
-13.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$22,670
631 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 48.0%
Local: 46.3%
Federal: 5.7%
Instruction share
52.5%
of current spending · $8,022/pupil
Long-term debt
$16.3M
0.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Summerville Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Long Barn High

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 3.1%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Long Barn High?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →