No UC admissions data on file for Mt. Lassic High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Mt. Lassic High (continuation)

· Trinity County · Southern Trinity Joint Unified · Public

Public Trinity County 🏛 Southern Trinity Joint Unified → CDS 5373833…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: Bottom 6% of US high schools

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

💡

How Mt. Lassic High (continuation) compares for families

What families should know about Mt. Lassic High (continuation).

  • vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Southern Trinity High, Casterlin High, Northern Summit Academy and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

For Parents

📬

Follow Mt. Lassic High (continuation)

Get an email when Mt. Lassic High (continuation)'s numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21
SAT/ACT test-takers
0
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
0.0
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

Student composition — 2023-24

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment.

Race / ethnicity

White 100%

Program subgroups

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2023-24 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
1 (2018)1 (2024)
+0.0%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
2 (2019)1 (2024)
-50.0%

If this trend holds (+2.5%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2025) ~1 +0 $0
3 yr (2027) ~1 +0 $0
5 yr (2029) ~1 +0 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Mt. Lassic High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 50% (2→1 from 2019 to 2024), trailing the peer-group median of -40%.

Enrollment projection

1 students (2024)
~1 projected (2027)
at +0.0%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Mt. Lassic High (continuation) Public 1 -50%
Peer-group median -40%
Southern Trinity High Public 7 -75%
Casterlin High Public 5 +0%
Northern Summit Academy Public 3
Valley High Public 11 -40%
Mattole Triple Junction Hs Public 5 +0%
Whale Gulch High Public 7 -50%
Round Valley Continuation Public 12 -50%
Leggett Valley High Public 13 +50%
Tehama Oaks High Public 13 -67%
Alps View High (continuation) Public 20 +200%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2023-24

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Trinity County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -50.0% vs. county -7.1% AND stability (0.0%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem.

-50.0%  school enrollment (2019–2024)
-7.1%  Trinity County baseline
-42.9pp  gap vs. county
0.0%  retention (county median 85.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2019
Stability rate
0.0%
0 of 1 students

1 of 1 students who enrolled at Mt. Lassic High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (100.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Trinity County median
85.3% · school is in the 0th percentile of 3 HS
Statewide median
86.4% · in the 0th percentile of 1,704 HS

Nearest peer high schools

Southern Trinity High 69.2% Casterlin High 60.0% Valley High 30.0% Mattole Triple Junction Hs 66.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2023-24. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Southern Trinity Joint Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$3.1M
+3.7% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$35,930
86 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 50.3%
Local: 39.0%
Federal: 10.7%
Instruction share
47.6%
of current spending · $13,441/pupil
Long-term debt
$2.4M
-3.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Southern Trinity Joint Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Mt. Lassic High (continuation)

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 2.5%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Mt. Lassic High (continuation)?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →