No UC admissions data on file for Sierra Foothill Charter.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Sierra Foothill Charter
· Mariposa County · Mariposa County Unified · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Come Back Charter → Independence High (alternative) → Glacier High School Charter → Sequoia High → Mountain Vista High → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Sierra Foothill Charter compares for families
What families should know about Sierra Foothill Charter.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Come Back Charter, Independence High (alternative), Glacier High School Charter and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.
For Parents
Follow Sierra Foothill Charter
Get an email when Sierra Foothill Charter's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.
Absenteeism is down 5.5 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-0.3%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~130 | +0 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~129 | -1 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~128 | -2 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Sierra Foothill Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸We don't yet have enough UC-outcome or enrollment history for Sierra Foothill Charter to build a full trend — but its similar-school comparison is below.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sierra Foothill Charter | Public | 130 | — | — |
| Peer-group median | 3.6% | +25% | ||
| Come Back Charter | Public | 105 | — | +384% |
| Independence High (alternative) | Public | 94 | — | +95% |
| Glacier High School Charter | Public | 97 | — | -23% |
| Sequoia High | Public | 82 | — | — |
| Mountain Vista High | Public | 123 | — | +0% |
| Chawanakee Academy Charter | Public | 164 | — | -43% |
| Monarch Academy | Public | 37 | — | +100% |
| Mariposa County High School | Public | 459 | 3.6% | +45% |
| Minarets Charter High School | Public | 173 | — | +4% |
| Roberts Ferry Charter School Academy | Public | 169 | — | — |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Mariposa County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
13 of 145 students who enrolled at Sierra Foothill Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (9.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Mariposa County Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 59.6%
Federal: 10.1%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Mariposa County Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for Sierra Foothill Charter
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently -0.3%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals