No UC admissions data on file for Tioga High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Tioga High

· Tuolumne County · Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified · Public

Public Tuolumne County 🏛 Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified → CDS 5575184…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • 🔢 1 calculus classes · 1 chemistry
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: Bottom 22% of US high schools
  • 📝 SAT/ACT participation: Bottom 10% by test-taker volume
  • 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 75% (Bottom 21% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

💡

How Tioga High compares for families

What families should know about Tioga High.

  • vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Don Pedro High, Dario Cassina High, Theodore Bird High and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

For Parents

📬

Follow Tioga High

Get an email when Tioga High's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

🎓 Academic rigor

AP + advanced-course offerings

Limited — narrow advanced curriculum

Bottom 22% of US high schools

50th 90th ↑ this school
Less rigorMore rigorMost rigor
Students taking AP courses
8
≈16 per 100 students · uptake, not just offerings
Advanced math classes
2
1 calculus · 1 advanced
Lab science classes
1
0 physics · 1 chemistry
Other rigor signals
No dual-enrollment or gifted program reported

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21

Bottom 10% by test-taker volume

50th 90th
SAT/ACT test-takers
6
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
12.2
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12
Compared against
18,426
US high schools reporting SAT/ACT participation

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

Bottom 21% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate

50th 90th
4-year graduation rate
75%
Range: 50–100%
4-year cohort size
15
Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years
Compared against
17,988
US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

Title I Schoolwide eligible

≥40% FRPL — qualifies for Title I Schoolwide program

49.0%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

40-74% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. The district can use Title I funds across the whole school under federal Schoolwide Program rules.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2024

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 16
31.2%
incl. 6.2% exceeded
-30.5 pts vs. Tuolumne County median (61.7%) · CA median 52.4% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 78.4%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 16
6.2%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-20.2 pts vs. Tuolumne County median (26.5%) · CA median 18.5% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 52.1%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 76% -11.2
Hispanic / Latino 11% +5.4
Black / African Am. 4%
Pacific Islander 4%
American Indian 4%

Program subgroups

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
48.1%
25 of 52 students

Absenteeism is up 16.5 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Tuolumne County median
24.5% · school is worse than 75% of 4 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
45 (2018)45 (2026)
+0.0%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
9 (2018)8 (2026)
-11.1%

If this trend holds (-1.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~45 +0 $0
3 yr (2029) ~44 -1 $0
5 yr (2031) ~43 -2 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Tioga High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 11% (9→8 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +43%.

Enrollment projection

45 students (2026)
~45 projected (2029)
at +0.0%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Tioga High Public 45 -11%
Peer-group median +43%
Don Pedro High Public 42 +43%
Dario Cassina High Public 40 +4%
Theodore Bird High Public 63 +44%
Monarch Academy Public 37 +100%
Spring Hill High (continuation) Public 37 +1600%
Connections Visual And Performing Arts Academy Public 111 -52%
Vallecito Continuation High Public 36 -38%
Evergreen High School Public 45 +91%
Ahwahnee High School Public 50 +156%
Adelante High Public 33 -41%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Tuolumne County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Bleeding from both ends.

Enrollment down 11.1% vs. county -5.7%, AND stability (70.9%) below the county median. Fewer families are choosing the school, and the ones who do aren't staying through year-end. Chronic absenteeism is also at 48.1% (up +16.5 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-11.1%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-5.7%  Tuolumne County baseline
-5.4pp  gap vs. county
70.9%  retention (county median 76.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
70.9%
39 of 55 students

16 of 55 students who enrolled at Tioga High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (29.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Tuolumne County median
76.8% · school is in the 50th percentile of 4 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 24th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

White (46) 71.7%
Socio. disadvantaged (31) 64.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Don Pedro High 74.4% Dario Cassina High 26.9% Theodore Bird High 26.5% Monarch Academy 90.0% Spring Hill High (continuation) 28.6%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$8.6M
+20.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$30,920
278 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 16.7%
Local: 70.8%
Federal: 12.5%
Instruction share
51.4%
of current spending · $12,003/pupil
Long-term debt
$8.7M
-10.4% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Tioga High

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently -1.1%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Tioga High?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →