Hayfork High School
Hayfork · Trinity County · Mountain Valley Unified · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Laytonville High School → Agnes J. Johnson Charter → Salisbury High (continuation) → Six Rivers Charter School → Shasta Collegiate Academy → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- 📚 3 AP courses offered — Limited
- 🎓 AP rigor: Bottom 29% of US high schools
- 📝 SAT/ACT participation: Bottom 11% by test-taker volume
- 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 90% (Bottom 49% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate)
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
🎓 Where grads go
UC admits by campus · Class of 2025
Source: University of California Office of the President, Admissions by Source School. Full campus-by-campus breakdown below.
How Hayfork High School compares for families
Real college outcomes data available below.
- ▸ Statewide12.5% UC Reach — 5.6 points below the California median of 18.1%.
- ▸ Locally🎯 #1 in Trinity County on Attendance (lowest chronic absenteeism) — plus 2 more top-ranks.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsBeats the peer median (12.5% UC Reach vs 9.2% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
For Parents
Follow Hayfork High School
Get an email when Hayfork High School's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
🎓 Academic rigor
AP + advanced-course offerings
Limited — narrow advanced curriculum
Bottom 29% of US high schools
Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).
SAT / ACT participation
CRDC federal data · 2020-21Bottom 11% by test-taker volume
Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.
🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts
What % of students graduate on time?
Bottom 49% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate
Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.
🏛️ Federal Title I context
High-poverty school
Title I Schoolwide eligible
≥75% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. These schools qualify for the highest tier of federal Title I funding and typically receive extra wraparound services. Academic outcomes vary widely — check the state assessment + grad-rate tiles.
Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Low and stable absenteeism — students are engaged and showing up. The leading indicator is healthy.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+3.3%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~93 | +3 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~99 | +9 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~106 | +16 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Hayfork High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Hayfork · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach Score, Hayfork High School sits near the top of its similar-school group (ranked #2 of 3): 12 vs. a peer median of 9.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 38% (16→22 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -1%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+2.1%/yr); projects to ~96 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach Score | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hayfork High School | Public | 90 | 12 | +38% |
| Peer-group median | 9 | -1% | ||
| Laytonville High School | Public | 96 | — | -7% |
| Agnes J. Johnson Charter | Public | 79 | — | +0% |
| Salisbury High (continuation) | Public | 104 | — | +21% |
| Six Rivers Charter School | Public | 107 | — | +21% |
| Shasta Collegiate Academy | Public | 75 | — | -48% |
| North Valley High | Public | 75 | — | +0% |
| Northcoast Preparatory And Performing Arts Academy | Public | 109 | — | -29% |
| East High (continuation) | Public | 74 | — | -2% |
| Round Valley High School | Public | 110 | 14 | +5% |
| Trinity High School | Public | 279 | 5 | -21% |
UC Reach Score = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100 when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Trinity County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Hayfork High School outperformed Trinity County on enrollment (school +37.5% vs. county -21.6%) AND maintains 89.9% stability. Replicable model — worth documenting what's working.
10 of 99 students who enrolled at Hayfork High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (10.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Mountain Valley Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 31.4%
Federal: 14.7%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Mountain Valley Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
Hayfork High School sent 11 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 27.3% were admitted, producing a UC Reach Score of 12 — 6 points below the California median of 18, higher than 29% of California high schools..
+3 pts above peer median (9) · Ranked #2 of 3 similar schools
18
9
51
12
Higher than 29% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Hayfork High School's UC Reach Score of 12 is below the California median (18). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51 or higher.
Overall, Hayfork High School's UC Reach is higher than 29% of California high schools (978 ranked).
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach Score | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 6 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.87 | —† |
| UC Davis → | 5 | 3 | —† | 60.0% | 12 | — | 3.84 | —† |
What This Means
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for Hayfork High School
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your UC Reach Score (12) ranked head-to-head against your closest competitor schools
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 3.3%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals