Kipp Esperanza High School

East Palo Alto · San Mateo County · Sequoia Union High · Public

Public San Mateo County 🏛 Sequoia Union High → ~57 seniors CDS 4169062…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • Program details not reported to CRDC
Academic signals
  • Academic signals not yet ingested for this school

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

🎓 Where grads go

UC Reach Score
7
Below the CA median below the state median
Top-6 UC admits per 100 seniors in the Class of 2025 — counts each campus admit, so a student admitted to several UCs counts more than once (which is why a strong school can score over 100).

UC admits by campus · Class of 2025

UCD
4 admitted

Source: University of California Office of the President, Admissions by Source School. Full campus-by-campus breakdown below.

💡

How Kipp Esperanza High School compares for families

Real college outcomes data available below.

  • Statewide7.0% UC Reach — 11.1 points below the California median of 18.1%.
  • vs Similar SchoolsTrails the peer median (7.0% UC Reach vs 10.9% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.

For Parents

📬

Follow Kipp Esperanza High School

Get an email when Kipp Esperanza High School's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 40
47.5%
incl. 22.5% exceeded
-12.5 pts vs. San Mateo County median (60.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 40
32.5%
incl. 10.0% exceeded
On the San Mateo County median (32.5%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 93% -4.2
Pacific Islander 3% +2.0
Black / African Am. 2% +1.0
Asian 1%
Two or more 1%
Not reported 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 94% +2.5
English learners 35% -1.5
Socioeconomically disadv. 20%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
37.3%
76 of 204 students

Absenteeism is up 23.5 pp since 2020-21. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Mateo County median
20.1% · school is worse than 79% of 28 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
106 (2021)178 (2026)
+67.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
72 (2024)44 (2026)
-38.9%

If this trend holds (+8.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~192 +14 $0
3 yr (2029) ~224 +46 $0
5 yr (2031) ~261 +83 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Kipp Esperanza High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · East Palo Alto · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • On UC Reach Score, Kipp Esperanza High School sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #4 of 5): 7 vs. a peer median of 11.
  • Its UC Reach Score has risen 3 points since 2024.
  • Senior-class enrollment is down 39% (72→44 from 2024 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -19%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+10.9%/yr); projects to ~243 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

178 students (2026)
~243 projected (2029)
at +10.9%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Score Enroll. trend
Kipp Esperanza High School Public 178 7 -39%
Peer-group median 11 -19%
Tide Academy Public 199 10 -43%
East Palo Alto Academy Public 245 4 -9%
Everest Public High School Public 224 12 -46%
Redwood High Public 157 -32%
Mission Early College High Sch Public 190 41 +92%
Robertson High (continuation) Public 162 +1%
San Jose Conservation Corps Charter Public 185 -29%
Opportunity Academy Public 202 +450%
Oxford Day Academy Public 82 +60%
Brenkwitz High Public 139 -35%

UC Reach Score = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100 when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Mateo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -38.9% vs. county -16.1% AND stability (82.8%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 37.3% (up +23.5 pts from 2020-21) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-38.9%  school enrollment (2024–2026)
-16.1%  San Mateo County baseline
-22.8pp  gap vs. county
82.8%  retention (county median 93.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2024
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
82.8%
173 of 209 students

36 of 209 students who enrolled at Kipp Esperanza High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (17.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Mateo County median
93.0% · school is in the 21st percentile of 28 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 36th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (199) 82.9%
Socio. disadvantaged (196) 85.7%
English learners (92) 69.6%
Students w/ disabilities (47) 83.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Tide Academy 95.4% East Palo Alto Academy 93.1% Everest Public High School 89.7% Redwood High 41.3% Mission Early College High Sch 96.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Sequoia Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$274.6M
+23.6% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$29,134
9,424 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 16.6%
Local: 79.5%
Federal: 3.9%
Instruction share
53.6%
of current spending · $11,688/pupil
Long-term debt
$494.2M
+37.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Sequoia Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

📊 Key takeaway · Class of 2025

Kipp Esperanza High School sent 71 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 5.6% were admitted, producing a UC Reach Score of 711 points below the California median of 18, higher than 7% of California high schools..

University of California outcomes · Class of 2025
UC Reach Score
7
Below the CA median Top 93% of CA high schools
4 admits / 57 seniors
-4 pts vs. peer median (11) · Ranked #4 of 5 similar schools
5-year trend
2024 · 4 2025 · 7
Where this sits on the California curve
CA median
18
Peer median
11
Top 10%
51
This school
7
050100
CA median 18 Top 10% ≥ 51 This school 7

Higher than 7% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)

📊 What this number means

Kipp Esperanza High School's UC Reach Score of 7 is below the California median (18). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51 or higher.

But in San Mateo County, where the local median is 32 and the top-10% bar is 65, this score is mid-pack rather than exceptional — typical of its market rather than a standout.

Overall, Kipp Esperanza High School's UC Reach is higher than 7% of California high schools (978 ranked).

UC Application Reach Score
125
71 applications
Most seniors are applying to at least one of the six most selective UCs (applications counted at each campus).
In context: CA median 75 · Top 10% statewide ≥ 241 · San Mateo Co. Top 10% ≥ 344 · higher than 71% of CA HS.
UC Admit Rate
5.6%
4 / 71 applications
In context: CA median 26.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 40.5% · higher than 0% of CA HS.
UC Yield Rate
N/A
None enrolled of 4 admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach Score
N/A
None enrollees / 57 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what share ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
A-G Completion
100%
60 of 60 graduates · 2024-25 cohort
In context: CA median 55.9% · +44.1 pp above · San Mateo Co. 66.7%.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
N/A
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
N/A
Senior Class Size
57
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
194
All grades · CDE Census Day
Avg. Applicant GPA · top-6 UCs
3.62

UC Outcomes Trend — 2024–2025

UC Admit Rate %
UC Reach Score (where available)
UC Admits (count, right axis)

Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.

Campus Breakdown — 2025

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Score Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Berkeley → Elite 14 3.74
UCLA → Elite 6 3.55
UC San Diego → Selective 9 3.44
UC Santa Barbara → Selective 9 3.63
UC Irvine → Selective 9 3.58
UC Davis → 24 4 16.7% 7 3.64
= UCOP-suppressed (count below 3 students, hidden for privacy — actual value is 0, 1, or 2, not necessarily zero). Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once; Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

A large share of the senior class applies to UC, indicating strong college-going culture and UC pipeline development.
A large share of the class applies to UC, so the admit rate runs lower than the application volume alone might suggest — expected when many students apply broadly, including to reach campuses. UC Reach (which credits every admit relative to the class) is the truer read of how the class fares: a strong Reach alongside a moderate admit rate is healthy, not a contradiction.
Fewer than 15% of seniors are earning UC admission. This may reflect a high non-UC college-going rate, significant A-G completion gaps, or an early-stage UC pipeline. A deeper review of A-G readiness and counseling capacity is warranted.
Note: the UC Reach Score sums campus-level admits across the top-six UC campuses, so a student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted at each. It reflects competitive admit volume relative to class size — admit-events, not distinct students — which is why a Score can exceed 100.
Compare with other schools → See San Mateo County rankings →

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Kipp Esperanza High School

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your UC Reach Score (7) ranked head-to-head against your closest competitor schools
  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 8.0%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Kipp Esperanza High School?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →