Kipp Esperanza High School

East Palo Alto · San Mateo County · Sequoia Union High · Public

Public San Mateo County 🏛 Sequoia Union High → ~57 seniors CDS 4169062…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • Program details not reported to CRDC
Academic signals
  • Academic signals not yet ingested for this school

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

🎓 Where grads go

7.0% UC Reach — top-6 UC admits per 100 seniors in the Class of 2025. Counts each campus admit, so multi-admits count more than once.

UC admits by campus · Class of 2025

UCD
4 admitted

Source: University of California Office of the President, Admissions by Source School. Full campus-by-campus breakdown below.

💡

How Kipp Esperanza High School compares for families

Real college outcomes data available below.

  • Statewide7.0% UC Reach — 11.1 points below the California median of 18.1%.
  • vs Similar SchoolsTrails the peer median (7.0% UC Reach vs 10.9% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.

For Parents

📬

Follow Kipp Esperanza High School

Get an email when Kipp Esperanza High School's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 40
47.5%
incl. 22.5% exceeded
-12.5 pts vs. San Mateo County median (60.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 40
32.5%
incl. 10.0% exceeded
On the San Mateo County median (32.5%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 93% -4.2
Pacific Islander 3% +2.0
Black / African Am. 2% +1.0
Asian 1%
Two or more 1%
Not reported 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 94% +2.5
English learners 35% -1.5
Socioeconomically disadv. 20%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
37.3%
76 of 204 students

Absenteeism is up 23.5 pp since 2020-21. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Mateo County median
20.1% · school is worse than 79% of 28 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
106 (2021)178 (2026)
+67.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
72 (2024)44 (2026)
-38.9%

If this trend holds (+8.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~192 +14 $0
3 yr (2029) ~224 +46 $0
5 yr (2031) ~261 +83 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Kipp Esperanza High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · East Palo Alto · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • On UC Reach, Kipp Esperanza High School sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #4 of 5): 7% vs. a peer median of 11%.
  • Its UC Reach has risen 3 points since 2024.
  • Senior-class enrollment is down 39% (72→44 from 2024 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -19%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+10.9%/yr); projects to ~243 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

178 students (2026)
~243 projected (2029)
at +10.9%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Kipp Esperanza High School Public 178 7.0% -39%
Peer-group median 10.9% -19%
Tide Academy Public 199 10.3% -43%
East Palo Alto Academy Public 245 4.4% -9%
Everest Public High School Public 224 11.5% -46%
Redwood High Public 157 -32%
Mission Early College High Sch Public 190 40.7% +92%
Robertson High (continuation) Public 162 +1%
San Jose Conservation Corps Charter Public 185 -29%
Opportunity Academy Public 202 +450%
Oxford Day Academy Public 82 +60%
Brenkwitz High Public 139 -35%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Mateo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -38.9% vs. county -16.1% AND stability (82.8%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 37.3% (up +23.5 pts from 2020-21) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-38.9%  school enrollment (2024–2026)
-16.1%  San Mateo County baseline
-22.8pp  gap vs. county
82.8%  retention (county median 93.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2024
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
82.8%
173 of 209 students

36 of 209 students who enrolled at Kipp Esperanza High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (17.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Mateo County median
93.0% · school is in the 21st percentile of 28 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 36th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (199) 82.9%
Socio. disadvantaged (196) 85.7%
English learners (92) 69.6%
Students w/ disabilities (47) 83.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Tide Academy 95.4% East Palo Alto Academy 93.1% Everest Public High School 89.7% Redwood High 41.3% Mission Early College High Sch 96.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Sequoia Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$274.6M
+23.6% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$29,134
9,424 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 16.6%
Local: 79.5%
Federal: 3.9%
Instruction share
53.6%
of current spending · $11,688/pupil
Long-term debt
$494.2M
+37.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Sequoia Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

📊 Key takeaway · Class of 2025

Kipp Esperanza High School sent 71 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 5.6% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 7.0%11.1 percentage points below the California median of 18.1%, higher than 7% of California high schools..

University of California outcomes · Class of 2025
UC Reach
7%
4 admits / 57 seniors
-3.9 pp vs. peer median (10.9%) · Ranked #4 of 5 similar schools
5-year trend
2024 · 4.2% 2025 · 7.0%
Where this sits on the California curve
CA median
18.1%
Peer median
10.9%
Top 10%
51.2%
This school
7.0%
0%50%100%
CA median 18.1% Top 10% ≥ 51.2% This school 7.0%

Higher than 7% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)

📊 What this number means

Kipp Esperanza High School's UC Reach of 7.0% is below the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.

But in San Mateo County, where the local median is 31.9% and the top-10% bar is 64.6%, this score is mid-pack rather than exceptional — typical of its market rather than a standout.

Overall, Kipp Esperanza High School's UC Reach is higher than 7% of California high schools (978 ranked).

UC Application Reach
124.6%
71 applications
Most seniors are applying to at least one of the six most selective UCs (applications counted at each campus).
In context: CA median 74.9% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 241.0% · San Mateo Co. Top 10% ≥ 344.3% · higher than 71% of CA HS.
UC Admit Rate
5.6%
4 / 71 applications
In context: CA median 26.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 40.5% · higher than 0% of CA HS.
UC Yield Rate
N/A
None enrolled of 4 admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
N/A
None enrollees / 57 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
A-G Completion
100%
60 of 60 graduates · 2024-25 cohort
In context: CA median 55.9% · +44.1 pp above · San Mateo Co. 66.7%.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
N/A
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
N/A
Senior Class Size
57
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
194
All grades · CDE Census Day
Avg. Applicant GPA · top-6 UCs
3.62

UC Outcomes Trend — 2024–2025

UC Admit Rate %
UC Reach % (where available)
UC Admits (count, right axis)

Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.

Campus Breakdown — 2025

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Berkeley → Elite 14 3.74
UCLA → Elite 6 3.55
UC San Diego → Selective 9 3.44
UC Santa Barbara → Selective 9 3.63
UC Irvine → Selective 9 3.58
UC Davis → 24 4 16.7% 7.0% 3.64
= UCOP-suppressed (count below 3 students, hidden for privacy — actual value is 0, 1, or 2, not necessarily zero). Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once; Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

A large share of the senior class applies to UC, indicating strong college-going culture and UC pipeline development.
A large share of the class applies to UC, so the admit rate runs lower than the application volume alone might suggest — expected when many students apply broadly, including to reach campuses. UC Reach (which credits every admit relative to the class) is the truer read of how the class fares: a strong Reach alongside a moderate admit rate is healthy, not a contradiction.
Fewer than 15% of seniors are earning UC admission. This may reflect a high non-UC college-going rate, significant A-G completion gaps, or an early-stage UC pipeline. A deeper review of A-G readiness and counseling capacity is warranted.
Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Compare with other schools → See San Mateo County rankings →

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Kipp Esperanza High School

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your UC Reach (7.0%) ranked head-to-head against your closest competitor schools
  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 8.0%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Kipp Esperanza High School?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →