Menlo Atherton High School

Atherton · San Mateo County · Sequoia Union High · Public

Public San Mateo County 🏛 Sequoia Union High → ~571 seniors CDS 4169062…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

🎓30% UC Reach 📘Top 25% ELA & Math · SBAC (CA) 📖22 AP courses

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • 📚 22 AP courses offered — Elite
  • ✅ Dual-enrollment program (college credit while in HS)
  • 🔢 7 calculus classes · 14 physics · 30 chemistry
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: 73th percentile nationally
  • 📝 SAT/ACT participation: 86th percentile by test-taker volume
  • 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 89% (Bottom 44% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

🎓 Where grads go

30.1% UC Reach — top-6 UC admits per 100 seniors in the Class of 2025. Counts each campus admit, so multi-admits count more than once.

UC admits by campus · Class of 2025

UCB
23 admitted
10 enrolled
UCLA
15 admitted
8 enrolled
UCSD
25 admitted
5 enrolled
UCSB
44 admitted
7 enrolled
UCI
16 admitted
UCD
49 admitted
14 enrolled

Source: University of California Office of the President, Admissions by Source School. Full campus-by-campus breakdown below.

💡

How Menlo Atherton High School compares for families

Above-average college outcomes statewide.

  • Statewide30.1% UC Reach12.0 points above the California median of 18.1%. Ahead of 74% of California high schools.
  • Locally🧮 Top 9 in San Mateo County on Math proficiency.
  • vs Similar SchoolsTrails the peer median (30.1% UC Reach vs 54.2% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.

For Parents

📬

Follow Menlo Atherton High School

Get an email when Menlo Atherton High School's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

🎓 Academic rigor

AP + advanced-course offerings

Elite — exceptional AP + advanced course breadth

73th percentile nationally

50th 90th ↑ this school
Less rigorMore rigorMost rigor
AP courses offered
22
Subject breadth not reported
Students taking AP courses
716
≈33 per 100 students · uptake, not just offerings
Advanced math classes
21
7 calculus · 14 advanced
Lab science classes
44
14 physics · 30 chemistry
Other rigor signals
✅ Dual-enrollment program

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21

86th percentile by test-taker volume

50th 90th
SAT/ACT test-takers
333
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
15.4
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12
Compared against
18,426
US high schools reporting SAT/ACT participation

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

Bottom 44% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate

50th 90th
4-year graduation rate
89%
Single-point estimate
4-year cohort size
583
Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years
Compared against
17,988
US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

Mixed-income school

Below Title I eligibility threshold (FRPL < 35%)

33.0%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

25-34% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. Below the federal Title I threshold but a meaningful share of the population is income-eligible for free lunch.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 453
69.3%
incl. 44.1% exceeded
+9.3 pts above San Mateo County median (60.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 460
50.9%
incl. 34.8% exceeded
+18.4 pts above San Mateo County median (32.5%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 43% +2.9
White 32% -5.8
Asian 9% +1.3
Two or more 6% +2.7
Pacific Islander 4%
Black / African Am. 3% -1.1
American Indian 1%
Filipino 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 42% +2.7
Socioeconomically disadv. 14%
English learners 14% -2.8

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
17.6%
389 of 2,215 students

Absenteeism is up 3.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Mateo County median
20.1% · school is better than 64% of 28 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
2,450 (2018)2,152 (2026)
-12.2%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
549 (2018)545 (2026)
-0.7%

If this trend holds (-2.2%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~2,105 -47 $0
3 yr (2029) ~2,015 -137 $0
5 yr (2031) ~1,929 -223 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Menlo Atherton High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · Atherton · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • On UC Reach, Menlo Atherton High School sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #7 of 9): 30% vs. a peer median of 54%.
  • Menlo Atherton High School's UC Reach has stepped down from a peak of 36% in 2020 to 30% in 2025 — a 6-point decline worth tracking.
  • Senior-class enrollment is down 1% (549→545 from 2018 to 2026), tracking the peer-group median of -2%.
  • In business terms, this is market-share growth during a market contraction. San Mateo County's senior population shrank 5% over the same window — Menlo Atherton High School only shrank 1%. So Menlo Atherton High School picked up about 5 percentage points of relative share — families chose it over the alternatives even as the overall pool got smaller. That's overperforming the market in a shrinking market.
  • At its recent rate (-1.6%/yr), enrollment projects to ~2050 by 2029 — about 102 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

2152 students (2026)
~2050 projected (2029)
at -1.6%/yr

That's about 102 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Menlo Atherton High School Public 2152 30.1% -1%
Peer-group median 54.2% -2%
Palo Alto Senior High School Public 1828 69.9% -8%
Palo Alto High Public 1828 -2%
Los Altos High Public 2203 54.3% +4%
Sequoia High School Public 1839 21.3% -5%
Woodside High School Public 1694 31.7% -2%
Carlmont High School Public 2385 54.1% +4%
Henry M. Gunn High Public 1606 -16%
Homestead High School Public 2190 54.6% -1%
Fremont High Public 2015 24.1% +4%
Irvington High School Public 2141 60.6% -15%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Mateo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Outperforming on demand; some mid-year churn to look at.

Menlo Atherton High School is recruiting families faster than San Mateo County is shrinking (school -0.7% vs. county -5.3%), but 157 students didn't make it to year-end. The recruitment engine works; the mid-year exits are worth understanding.

-0.7%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-5.3%  San Mateo County baseline
+4.6pp  gap vs. county
93.0%  retention (county median 93.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
93.0%
2,074 of 2,231 students

157 of 2,231 students who enrolled at Menlo Atherton High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (7.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Mateo County median
93.0% · school is in the 50th percentile of 28 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 80th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (969) 90.0%
Socio. disadvantaged (961) 87.9%
White (758) 96.8%
English learners (402) 81.8%
Students w/ disabilities (322) 90.7%
Asian (169) 98.8%

Nearest peer high schools

Palo Alto High 96.6% Los Altos High 95.1% Sequoia High School 92.8% Woodside High School 93.5%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Sequoia Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$274.6M
+23.6% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$29,134
9,424 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 16.6%
Local: 79.5%
Federal: 3.9%
Instruction share
53.6%
of current spending · $11,688/pupil
Long-term debt
$494.2M
+37.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Sequoia Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

📊 Key takeaway · Class of 2025

Menlo Atherton High School sent 1,025 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 16.8% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 30.1%12.0 percentage points above the California median of 18.1%, higher than 74% of California high schools. The school produces 6.7 UCLA + UC Berkeley admits per 100 seniors.

University of California outcomes · Class of 2025
UC Reach
30%
172 admits / 571 seniors
-24.1 pp vs. peer median (54.2%) · Ranked #7 of 9 similar schools
5-year trend
2021 · 29.0% 2025 · 30.1%
Where this sits on the California curve
CA median
18.1%
Peer median
54.2%
Top 10%
51.2%
This school
30.1%
0%50%100%
CA median 18.1% Top 10% ≥ 51.2% This school 30.1%

Higher than 74% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)

📊 What this number means

Menlo Atherton High School's UC Reach of 30.1% is above the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.

But in San Mateo County, where the local median is 31.9% and the top-10% bar is 64.6%, this score is mid-pack rather than exceptional — typical of its market rather than a standout.

Against similar schools, Menlo Atherton High School trails the peer-group median (54.2%) — even though it looks strong vs. the state average.

For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 97.3% — a gap of 67 pp from where this school sits.

Overall, Menlo Atherton High School's UC Reach is higher than 74% of California high schools (978 ranked).

UC Application Reach
179.5%
1025 applications
Most seniors are applying to at least one of the six most selective UCs (applications counted at each campus).
In context: CA median 74.9% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 241.0% · San Mateo Co. Top 10% ≥ 344.3% · higher than 84% of CA HS.
UC Admit Rate
16.8%
172 / 1025 applications
In context: CA median 26.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 40.5% · higher than 4% of CA HS.
UC Yield Rate
25.6%
44 enrolled of 172 admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
7.7%
44 enrollees / 571 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
Student-Counselor Ratio
215:1
10.0 FTE counselors · 2,152 students
In context: CA median 338:1 · 123 fewer students per counselor · ASCA target 250:1.
A-G Completion
66%
319 of 487 graduates · 2024-25 cohort
In context: CA median 55.9% · +9.6 pp above · San Mateo Co. 66.7%.
UC 6-Yr Grad Rate
100%
79% finished in 4 yrs · N=43 entered 2019
In context: CA median 88.6% · +11.4 pp above.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
21.5
per 100 seniors · campus-level total
In context: CA median 15.4 · Top 10% statewide ≥ 41.5 · higher than 67% of CA HS.
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
6.7
per 100 seniors · campus-level total
In context: CA median 3.3 · Top 10% statewide ≥ 9.7 · higher than 78% of CA HS.
Senior Class Size
571
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
2,158
All grades · CDE Census Day
Economic Connectedness
1.35
73rd percentile in CA · cross‑class friendships
Avg. Applicant GPA · top-6 UCs
3.98
Avg. Admitted GPA · top-6 UCs
4.20

UC funnel — which kids are getting in at what GPA

Combining the school's applicant pool GPA, admit pool GPA, actual admit rate, and statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, we can read which GPA tiers tend to get in — and which don't.

🎯 Who's actually getting into UC from Menlo Atherton High School
Campus 4.00+ GPA 3.70–3.99 GPA 3.30–3.69 GPA < 3.30 GPA
UC Berkeley Real shot Long odds Filtered out Filtered out
UCLA Real shot Long odds Filtered out Filtered out
UC San Diego Strong shot Moderate Long odds Filtered out
UC Santa Barbara Strong shot Real shot Long odds Filtered out
UC Irvine Strong shot Real shot Long odds Filtered out
UC Davis Strong shot Strong shot Real shot Filtered out
Strong shot = ≥30% statewide admit rate at this band · Real shot = 10–29% · Moderate = 5–9% · Long odds = 1–4% · Filtered out = under 1%. Tiers map this school's likely outcomes by GPA tier using statewide CA admit rates from UCOP 2025.

The numbers behind it

Campus Applicant GPA Admit GPA Lift Admit rate vs peer schools @ same GPA
UC Berkeley 4.02 4.18 +0.16 13.3% Peers +0.22 · wider
UCLA 4.01 4.25 +0.24 8.4% Peers +0.26 · matches
UC San Diego 4.00 4.23 +0.24 14.9% Peers +0.27 · matches
UC Santa Barbara 3.93 4.25 +0.32 22.2% Peers +0.30 · matches
UC Irvine 3.99 4.14 +0.15 11.6% Peers +0.23 · wider
UC Davis 3.95 4.14 +0.19 29.0% Peers +0.23 · wider
📊 Statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, 2025 (for reference)
GPA band UCB UCLA UCSD UCSB UCI UCD
4.00+ 17.0% 15.1% 45.2% 62.3% 46.3% 65.9%
3.70–3.99 3.1% 1.6% 9.3% 17.6% 17.0% 31.1%
3.30–3.69 0.8% 0.5% 1.5% 2.8% 2.4% 10.3%
3.00–3.29 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.3% 1.9%
< 3.00 0.7% 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.7%
How we infer the tier labels: Each tier comes from the statewide CA admit rate at that GPA band at that UC. The "vs peers" column compares this school's lift (admit GPA − applicant GPA) to the average lift at ~100–300 other CA schools with similar applicant pool GPA. What this isn't: a guarantee. UC comprehensive review weighs essays, course rigor, demographics, and context-of-opportunity beyond GPA. A 3.9 with strong context can land an admit; a 4.0 with weak essays can be denied. Use as a baseline expectation, not a verdict. Per-campus year is shown when it differs from the headline year (UCOP doesn't always publish admit-GPA for every campus every year).

Where Menlo Atherton High School sits vs. all California schools

Overall, this school admits its UC applicants in line with what their GPAs predict (16.8% actual vs. 21.6% expected).

UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025

UC Admit Rate %
UC Reach % (where available)
UC Admits (count, right axis)

Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.

Campus Breakdown — 2025

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Berkeley → Elite 173 23 10 13.3% 4.0% 43.5% 4.02 4.18
UCLA → Elite 179 15 8 8.4% 2.6% 53.3% 4.01 4.25
UC San Diego → Selective 168 25 5 14.9% 4.4% 20.0% 4.00 4.23
UC Santa Barbara → Selective 198 44 7 22.2% 7.7% 15.9% 3.93 4.25
UC Irvine → Selective 138 16 11.6% 2.8% 3.99 4.14
UC Davis → 169 49 14 29.0% 8.6% 28.6% 3.95 4.14
= UCOP-suppressed (count below 3 students, hidden for privacy — actual value is 0, 1, or 2, not necessarily zero). Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once; Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

A large share of the senior class applies to UC, indicating strong college-going culture and UC pipeline development.
A large share of the class applies to UC, so the admit rate runs lower than the application volume alone might suggest — expected when many students apply broadly, including to reach campuses. UC Reach (which credits every admit relative to the class) is the truer read of how the class fares: a strong Reach alongside a moderate admit rate is healthy, not a contradiction.
UC Reach is solid. A meaningful share of the senior class is achieving UC admission, and there is likely room to grow both application volume and admission outcomes.
Students are earning UC admission but enrolling elsewhere at a notable rate. This may reflect competition from private colleges, out-of-state flagships, cost considerations, or UC campus fit. Student outcome surveys can clarify.
The school generates broad UC access, but fewer students are reaching the most selective UC campuses (UCLA, Berkeley, UCSD, UCSB, UCI). Targeted academic enrichment and campus-fit advising may help.
Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Compare with other schools → See San Mateo County rankings →

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Menlo Atherton High School

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your UC Reach (30.1%) ranked head-to-head against your closest competitor schools
  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently -2.2%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Menlo Atherton High School?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →