Home
›
High School Rankings
San Joaquin County · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's
entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (
Berkeley,
UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach of just 0.6% (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a 25% UC Reach — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100%? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating
more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (
UCLA +
UCSD, or
Berkeley +
UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear 100% UC Reach.
Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors).
Scoped to San Joaquin County — change the County filter above to rescope.
▲ Top 10 Public + Charter
San Joaquin County
| 1 |
Mountain House · Public
|
61.5% |
| 2 |
Tracy · Public
|
28.8% |
| 3 |
Ripon · Public
|
18.4% |
| 4 |
Tracy · Public
|
16.6% |
| 5 |
· Public
|
14.3% |
| 6 |
Stockton · Public
|
14.2% |
| 7 |
Stockton · Public
|
12.9% |
| 8 |
Stockton · Public
|
12.9% |
| 9 |
Lodi · Public
|
12.5% |
| 10 |
Lathrop · Public
|
12.4% |
▲ Top 10 Private
San Joaquin County
| 1 |
Stockton · Private
|
36.9% |
▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter
San Joaquin County
| 1 |
Stockton · Public
|
4.0% |
| 2 |
· Public
|
5.2% |
| 3 |
· Public
|
6.7% |
| 4 |
Manteca · Public
|
7.2% |
| 5 |
Linden · Public
|
7.3% |
| 6 |
Manteca · Public
|
7.4% |
| 7 |
Stockton · Public
|
7.5% |
| 8 |
Lodi · Public
|
8.1% |
| 9 |
Stockton · Public
|
8.3% |
| 10 |
Escalon · Public
|
9.4% |
▼ Bottom 10 Private
San Joaquin County
| 1 |
Stockton · Private
|
36.9% |
Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.
▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter
San Joaquin County
| 1 |
· Public
|
109.2% |
| 2 |
Stockton · Public
|
64.2% |
| 3 |
Stockton · Public
|
37.4% |
| 4 |
Stockton · Public
|
28.7% |
| 5 |
Stockton · Public
|
10.7% |
| 6 |
Stockton · Public
|
8.3% |
▲ Top 10 Small Private
San Joaquin County
Not enough schools in San Joaquin County for this list.
Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.
Top 10 — UCB Reach
UC Berkeley
| 1 |
Mountain House · Public
|
5.2% |
| 2 |
Stockton · Private
|
2.7% |
| 3 |
Lodi · Public
|
1.9% |
| 4 |
Stockton · Public
|
1.8% |
| 5 |
Stockton · Public
|
1.6% |
| 6 |
Stockton · Public
|
1.4% |
| 7 |
Tracy · Public
|
1.3% |
| 8 |
Tracy · Public
|
1.1% |
| 9 |
· Public
|
1.0% |
| 10 |
· Public
|
0.8% |
| 1 |
Stockton · Private
|
3.7% |
| 2 |
Mountain House · Public
|
2.8% |
| 3 |
Tracy · Public
|
1.5% |
| 4 |
Ripon · Public
|
1.1% |
| 5 |
Manteca · Public
|
0.8% |
| 6 |
Lodi · Public
|
0.8% |
| 7 |
· Public
|
0.7% |
| 8 |
Lodi · Public
|
0.6% |
Top 10 — UCSD Reach
UC San Diego
| 1 |
Mountain House · Public
|
9.1% |
| 2 |
Stockton · Private
|
5.3% |
| 3 |
Tracy · Public
|
4.3% |
| 4 |
Tracy · Public
|
3.8% |
| 5 |
Ripon · Public
|
3.4% |
| 6 |
Stockton · Public
|
3.2% |
| 7 |
Stockton · Public
|
2.9% |
| 8 |
Lathrop · Public
|
2.6% |
| 9 |
Stockton · Public
|
2.2% |
| 10 |
· Public
|
2.1% |
Top 10 — UCSB Reach
UC Santa Barbara
| 1 |
Mountain House · Public
|
8.8% |
| 2 |
Stockton · Private
|
5.3% |
| 3 |
Tracy · Public
|
4.3% |
| 4 |
Manteca · Public
|
3.2% |
| 5 |
Stockton · Public
|
3.0% |
| 6 |
Lathrop · Public
|
2.9% |
| 7 |
· Public
|
2.8% |
| 8 |
Escalon · Public
|
2.8% |
| 9 |
Ripon · Public
|
2.7% |
| 10 |
Lodi · Public
|
2.5% |
Top 10 — UCI Reach
UC Irvine
| 1 |
Mountain House · Public
|
16.7% |
| 2 |
Stockton · Private
|
9.6% |
| 3 |
Tracy · Public
|
7.3% |
| 4 |
Ripon · Public
|
3.8% |
| 5 |
Tracy · Public
|
3.7% |
| 6 |
· Public
|
3.2% |
| 7 |
Stockton · Public
|
3.0% |
| 8 |
Stockton · Public
|
2.2% |
| 9 |
Lodi · Public
|
2.1% |
| 10 |
Manteca · Public
|
1.9% |
Top 10 — UCD Reach
UC Davis
| 1 |
Mountain House · Public
|
19.0% |
| 2 |
Tracy · Public
|
10.8% |
| 3 |
Stockton · Private
|
10.2% |
| 4 |
Ripon · Public
|
7.3% |
| 5 |
Lathrop · Public
|
5.2% |
| 6 |
Escalon · Public
|
5.2% |
| 7 |
Tracy · Public
|
5.0% |
| 8 |
Stockton · Public
|
5.0% |
| 9 |
Linden · Public
|
4.9% |
| 10 |
· Public
|
4.4% |
UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.
Top 10 — A-G Completion
% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort
| 1 |
Stockton · Public
|
100.0% |
| 2 |
· Public
|
96.9% |
| 3 |
Stockton · Public
|
96.8% |
| 4 |
Stockton · Public
|
89.2% |
| 5 |
· Public
|
88.2% |
| 6 |
Stockton · Public
|
79.7% |
| 7 |
Mountain House · Public
|
69.8% |
| 8 |
Ripon · Public
|
53.6% |
| 9 |
Lathrop · Public
|
52.1% |
| 10 |
Linden · Public
|
45.4% |
Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate
% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20
| 1 |
Mountain House · Public
|
100.0% |
| 2 |
Lodi · Public
|
100.0% |
| 3 |
Stockton · Public
|
91.7% |
| 4 |
Stockton · Private
|
91.3% |
| 5 |
Manteca · Public
|
90.9% |
| 6 |
Stockton · Public
|
90.9% |
| 7 |
Tracy · Public
|
90.5% |
| 8 |
Stockton · Public
|
90.0% |
| 9 |
Stockton · Public
|
88.5% |
| 10 |
Manteca · Public
|
88.5% |
Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity
Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students
| 1 |
· Public
|
221:1 |
| 2 |
Stockton · Public
|
228:1 |
| 3 |
· Public
|
245:1 |
| 4 |
Linden · Public
|
258:1 |
| 5 |
Stockton · Public
|
273:1 |
| 6 |
· Public
|
289:1 |
| 7 |
Escalon · Public
|
298:1 |
| 8 |
Ripon · Public
|
334:1 |
| 9 |
Lodi · Public
|
354:1 |
| 10 |
· Public
|
356:1 |
Top 10 — Most Consistent
Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)
| 1 |
avg 10.3% · σ 2.06
|
σ 2.06 |
| 2 |
avg 12.6% · σ 3.43
|
σ 3.43 |
| 3 |
avg 11.6% · σ 3.61
|
σ 3.61 |
| 4 |
avg 12.3% · σ 4.36
|
σ 4.36 |
| 5 |
avg 12.8% · σ 5.98
|
σ 5.98 |
| 6 |
avg 17.4% · σ 6.59
|
σ 6.59 |
| 7 |
avg 26.9% · σ 8.46
|
σ 8.46 |
| 8 |
avg 15.3% · σ 10.16
|
σ 10.16 |
| 9 |
avg 68.6% · σ 10.52
|
σ 10.52 |
| 10 |
avg 38.4% · σ 13.88
|
σ 13.88 |
Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded
% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30
| 1 |
· n=79 · 2025
|
99% |
| 2 |
Stockton · n=107 · 2025
|
93% |
| 3 |
Stockton · n=52 · 2025
|
85% |
| 4 |
Mountain House · n=557 · 2025
|
81% |
| 5 |
Stockton · n=86 · 2025
|
79% |
| 6 |
· n=166 · 2025
|
78% |
| 7 |
Manteca · n=420 · 2025
|
67% |
| 8 |
Tracy · n=364 · 2025
|
65% |
| 9 |
Lathrop · n=361 · 2025
|
62% |
| 10 |
Tracy · n=400 · 2025
|
61% |
Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded
% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30
| 1 |
· n=79 · 2025
|
75% |
| 2 |
Mountain House · n=562 · 2025
|
67% |
| 3 |
Stockton · n=107 · 2025
|
62% |
| 4 |
· n=166 · 2025
|
51% |
| 5 |
Stockton · n=51 · 2025
|
37% |
| 6 |
Manteca · n=417 · 2025
|
37% |
| 7 |
Ripon · n=223 · 2025
|
36% |
| 8 |
Tracy · n=364 · 2025
|
36% |
| 9 |
· n=132 · 2025
|
32% |
| 10 |
Lodi · n=440 · 2025
|
26% |
Top 10 — Private Net Assets
Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year
| 1 |
Ripon · Other religious · FY 2024
|
$10.0M |
≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year
Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.
▲ Biggest gains
| School | Then → Now | Δ |
|---|
|
Mountain House · Public
|
12% '18
→ 62% '25
|
+49.3pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
37% '20
→ 65% '24
|
+27.9pp |
|
Tracy · Public
|
4% '18
→ 17% '25
|
+12.6pp |
|
Ripon · Public
|
6% '18
→ 18% '25
|
+12.5pp |
|
Tracy · Public
|
19% '18
→ 29% '25
|
+9.3pp |
|
· Public
|
7% '18
→ 14% '25
|
+7.1pp |
|
Stockton · Private
|
30% '20
→ 37% '25
|
+7.0pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
1% '18
→ 8% '25
|
+6.9pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
7% '18
→ 14% '25
|
+6.8pp |
|
Lathrop · Public
|
7% '18
→ 12% '25
|
+5.7pp |
▼ Biggest declines
| School | Then → Now | Δ |
|---|
|
· Public
|
10% '18
→ 7% '25
|
-3.5pp |
|
Lodi · Public
|
9% '18
→ 8% '25
|
-1.1pp |
|
Manteca · Public
|
7% '18
→ 7% '25
|
-0.1pp |
|
Lodi · Public
|
12% '18
→ 12% '25
|
0.8pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
6% '18
→ 8% '25
|
1.1pp |
|
Manteca · Public
|
6% '18
→ 7% '25
|
1.2pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
12% '18
→ 13% '25
|
1.4pp |
|
Manteca · Public
|
7% '18
→ 9% '25
|
2.0pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
2% '18
→ 4% '25
|
2.0pp |
|
Escalon · Public
|
7% '18
→ 9% '25
|
2.5pp |
grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students
The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.
▲ Outperforming the county the most
| School | School · County | Gap |
|---|
|
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public Best in class
|
+135.6% vs +21.8%
|
+113.9pp |
|
Manteca · San Joaquin · Public Strong demand
|
+43.8% vs +21.8%
|
+22.0pp |
|
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public Best in class
|
+36.0% vs +21.8%
|
+14.2pp |
|
Manteca · San Joaquin · Public Best in class
|
+31.4% vs +21.8%
|
+9.6pp |
|
Linden · San Joaquin · Public Holding share
|
+20.9% vs +21.8%
|
-0.9pp |
|
Lathrop · San Joaquin · Public Demand problem
|
+18.8% vs +21.8%
|
-3.0pp |
|
Ripon · San Joaquin · Public Weak at the gate
|
+14.6% vs +21.8%
|
-7.1pp |
|
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public Weak at the gate
|
+13.8% vs +21.8%
|
-7.9pp |
|
· San Joaquin · Public Both ends slipping
|
+13.1% vs +21.8%
|
-8.7pp |
|
Tracy · San Joaquin · Public Sharp downturn
|
+10.0% vs +21.8%
|
-11.8pp |
▼ Underperforming the county the most
| School | School · County | Gap |
|---|
|
Tracy · San Joaquin · Public Material decline
|
-11.7% vs +21.8%
|
-33.4pp |
|
Lodi · San Joaquin · Public Material decline
|
-11.5% vs +21.8%
|
-33.3pp |
|
Manteca · San Joaquin · Public Material decline
|
-9.1% vs +21.8%
|
-30.9pp |
|
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public Compounding decline
|
-6.3% vs +21.8%
|
-28.1pp |
|
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public Sharp downturn
|
-5.6% vs +21.8%
|
-27.4pp |
|
Escalon · San Joaquin · Public Sharp downturn
|
-4.7% vs +21.8%
|
-26.5pp |
|
Lodi · San Joaquin · Public Sharp downturn
|
+0.4% vs +21.8%
|
-21.3pp |
|
· San Joaquin · Public Sharp downturn
|
+1.0% vs +21.8%
|
-20.7pp |
|
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public Compounding decline
|
+1.5% vs +21.8%
|
-20.3pp |
|
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public Material decline
|
+2.0% vs +21.8%
|
-19.8pp |
25 schools eligible · 2025
Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.
▲ Top 10 outperformers
| School |
GPA |
Actual |
Δ vs exp. |
|
· Public
|
3.91 |
56.8% |
+28.5pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
3.90 |
45.9% |
+22.4pp |
|
Escalon · Public
|
3.83 |
48.8% |
+19.6pp |
|
· Public
|
4.06 |
45.6% |
+18.4pp |
|
Lodi · Public
|
4.00 |
39.5% |
+17.3pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
3.89 |
39.5% |
+15.9pp |
|
Ripon · Public
|
4.03 |
38.4% |
+14.1pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
3.79 |
40.7% |
+13.9pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
3.74 |
41.4% |
+13.7pp |
|
Tracy · Public
|
3.97 |
38.2% |
+13.6pp |
▼ Top 10 underperformers
| School |
GPA |
Actual |
Δ vs exp. |
|
Stockton · Public
|
3.58 |
23.5% |
-2.9pp |
|
Tracy · Public
|
3.88 |
28.3% |
-0.1pp |
|
Manteca · Public
|
3.71 |
29.1% |
2.2pp |
|
Mountain House · Public
|
3.86 |
23.5% |
2.6pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
3.70 |
27.5% |
5.5pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
3.87 |
27.2% |
5.9pp |
|
Tracy · Public
|
3.86 |
27.1% |
6.0pp |
|
· Public
|
3.62 |
31.1% |
7.8pp |
|
Lodi · Public
|
3.89 |
31.5% |
7.9pp |
|
Stockton · Public
|
3.71 |
31.3% |
7.9pp |
Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.
| # |
School |
County |
Seniors
ⓘ
|
Total Enroll
ⓘ
|
UC Reach
ⓘ
|
App Reach
ⓘ
|
Admit Rate
ⓘ
|
Yield
ⓘ
|
Selective Reach
ⓘ
|
Elite Reach
ⓘ
|
Raw Apps
ⓘ
|
Raw Admits
ⓘ
|
| 1 |
· Public Best in class
|
San Joaquin |
76 |
343 |
109.2%
|
290.8% |
37.6% |
32.5% |
73.7 |
13.2 |
221 |
83 |
| 2 |
Stockton · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Joaquin |
95 |
428 |
64.2%
|
235.8% |
27.2% |
42.6% |
30.5 |
8.4 |
224 |
61 |
| 3 |
Mountain House · Public Best in class
|
San Joaquin |
580 |
2,428 |
61.5%
|
261.9% |
23.5% |
33.9% |
42.6 |
7.9 |
1,519 |
357 |
| 4 |
Stockton · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Joaquin |
83 |
410 |
37.4%
|
184.3% |
20.3% |
35.5% |
16.9 |
3.6 |
153 |
31 |
| 5 |
Stockton · Private
|
San Joaquin |
187 |
845 |
36.9%
|
123.0% |
30.0% |
21.7% |
26.7 |
6.4 |
230 |
69 |
| 6 |
Tracy · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Joaquin |
400 |
1,587 |
28.8%
|
106.2% |
27.1% |
27.8% |
18.0 |
2.8 |
425 |
115 |
| 7 |
Stockton · Public Best in class
|
San Joaquin |
87 |
772 |
28.7%
|
104.6% |
27.5% |
— |
19.5 |
8.1 |
91 |
25 |
| 8 |
Ripon · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Joaquin |
261 |
1,051 |
18.4%
|
56.3% |
32.6% |
25.0% |
11.1 |
1.1 |
147 |
48 |
| 9 |
Tracy · Public Material decline
|
San Joaquin |
537 |
1,920 |
16.6%
|
50.5% |
32.8% |
29.2% |
11.6 |
1.1 |
271 |
89 |
| 10 |
· Public Sharp downturn
|
San Joaquin |
680 |
2,801 |
14.3%
|
49.0% |
29.1% |
25.8% |
9.8 |
1.8 |
333 |
97 |
| 11 |
Stockton · Public Material decline
|
San Joaquin |
436 |
1,925 |
14.2%
|
36.5% |
39.0% |
24.2% |
10.3 |
1.6 |
159 |
62 |
| 12 |
Stockton · Public Material decline
|
San Joaquin |
278 |
1,164 |
12.9%
|
48.6% |
26.7% |
19.4% |
7.9 |
1.8 |
135 |
36 |
| 13 |
Stockton · Public Compounding decline
|
San Joaquin |
365 |
1,644 |
12.9%
|
37.5% |
34.3% |
21.3% |
8.8 |
1.4 |
137 |
47 |
| 14 |
Lodi · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Joaquin |
480 |
1,952 |
12.5%
|
31.7% |
39.5% |
11.7% |
8.8 |
2.5 |
152 |
60 |
| 15 |
Lathrop · Public Demand problem
|
San Joaquin |
346 |
1,486 |
12.4%
|
50.0% |
24.9% |
20.9% |
7.2 |
— |
173 |
43 |
| 16 |
Stockton · Public Best in class
|
San Joaquin |
28 |
199 |
10.7%
|
157.1% |
6.8% |
— |
— |
— |
44 |
3 |
| 17 |
Manteca · Public Strong demand
|
San Joaquin |
509 |
1,907 |
9.4%
|
32.6% |
28.9% |
16.7% |
6.7 |
1.6 |
166 |
48 |
| 18 |
Escalon · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Joaquin |
213 |
815 |
9.4%
|
31.9% |
29.4% |
35.0% |
4.2 |
— |
68 |
20 |
| 19 |
Stockton · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Joaquin |
72 |
1,186 |
8.3%
|
55.6% |
15.0% |
— |
— |
— |
40 |
6 |
| 20 |
Stockton · Public
|
San Joaquin |
576 |
2,355 |
8.3%
|
32.1% |
25.9% |
14.6% |
4.9 |
— |
185 |
48 |
| 21 |
Lodi · Public Material decline
|
San Joaquin |
481 |
2,058 |
8.1%
|
31.6% |
25.7% |
15.4% |
4.8 |
0.8 |
152 |
39 |
| 22 |
Stockton · Public Compounding decline
|
San Joaquin |
482 |
2,021 |
7.5%
|
27.8% |
26.9% |
22.2% |
4.6 |
— |
134 |
36 |
| 23 |
Manteca · Public Best in class
|
San Joaquin |
403 |
1,670 |
7.4%
|
36.0% |
20.7% |
20.0% |
5.0 |
— |
145 |
30 |
| 24 |
Linden · Public Holding share
|
San Joaquin |
205 |
743 |
7.3%
|
31.7% |
23.1% |
40.0% |
2.4 |
— |
65 |
15 |
| 25 |
Manteca · Public Material decline
|
San Joaquin |
360 |
1,524 |
7.2%
|
27.8% |
26.0% |
11.5% |
4.7 |
— |
100 |
26 |
| 26 |
· Public Compounding decline
|
San Joaquin |
478 |
2,065 |
6.7%
|
25.1% |
26.7% |
34.4% |
4.2 |
0.8 |
120 |
32 |
| 27 |
· Public Both ends slipping
|
San Joaquin |
405 |
1,677 |
5.2%
|
14.6% |
35.6% |
— |
2.7 |
— |
59 |
21 |
| 28 |
Stockton · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Joaquin |
277 |
1,657 |
4.0%
|
28.5% |
13.9% |
27.3% |
1.1 |
— |
79 |
11 |
| 29 |
Stockton · Public
|
San Joaquin |
— |
— |
—
|
— |
31.9% |
27.3% |
— |
— |
207 |
66 |
| 30 |
Stockton · Public
|
San Joaquin |
— |
— |
—
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
22 |
— |
| 31 |
Tracy · Public
|
San Joaquin |
— |
— |
—
|
— |
13.8% |
20.0% |
— |
— |
109 |
15 |
| 32 |
Stockton · Public
|
San Joaquin |
— |
— |
—
|
— |
11.6% |
50.0% |
— |
— |
69 |
8 |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals,
campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values
above 100% indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers.
See methodology →