Calistoga Junior/Senior High

· Napa County · Calistoga Joint Unified · Public

Public Napa County 🏛 Calistoga Joint Unified → ~59 seniors CDS 2866241…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

🎓95% 4-yr grad rate

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • 📚 6 AP courses offered — Strong
  • ✅ Dual-enrollment program (college credit while in HS)
  • ✅ Gifted & talented program
  • 🔢 1 calculus classes · 6 chemistry
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: 61th percentile nationally
  • 📝 SAT/ACT participation: Bottom 28% by test-taker volume
  • 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 95% (75th percentile nationally)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

🎓 Where grads go

20.3% UC Reach — top-6 UC admits per 100 seniors in the Class of 2025. Counts each campus admit, so multi-admits count more than once.

UC admits by campus · Class of 2025

UCSD
4 admitted
UCD
8 admitted

Source: University of California Office of the President, Admissions by Source School. Full campus-by-campus breakdown below.

💡

How Calistoga Junior/Senior High compares for families

Mid-pack college outcomes within California.

  • Statewide20.3% UC Reach — right around the California median of 18.1%.
  • vs Similar SchoolsBeats the peer median (20.3% UC Reach vs 13.3% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.

For Parents

📬

Follow Calistoga Junior/Senior High

Get an email when Calistoga Junior/Senior High's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.

🎓 Academic rigor

AP + advanced-course offerings

Strong — solid AP program + advanced courses

61th percentile nationally

50th 90th ↑ this school
Less rigorMore rigorMost rigor
AP courses offered
6
Math ✓
Students taking AP courses
69
≈29 per 100 students · uptake, not just offerings
Advanced math classes
3
1 calculus · 2 advanced
Lab science classes
6
0 physics · 6 chemistry
Other rigor signals
✅ Dual-enrollment program
✅ Gifted/talented program

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21

Bottom 28% by test-taker volume

50th 90th
SAT/ACT test-takers
26
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
11.0
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12
Compared against
18,426
US high schools reporting SAT/ACT participation

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

75th percentile nationally

50th 90th
4-year graduation rate
95%
Range: 90–100%
4-year cohort size
56
Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years
Compared against
17,988
US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

High-poverty school

Title I Schoolwide eligible

88.2%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

≥75% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. These schools qualify for the highest tier of federal Title I funding and typically receive extra wraparound services. Academic outcomes vary widely — check the state assessment + grad-rate tiles.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 60
46.7%
incl. 8.3% exceeded
-3.0 pts vs. Napa County median (49.7%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 61
14.8%
incl. 3.3% exceeded
-4.6 pts vs. Napa County median (19.4%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 91% +2.5
White 7% -2.2
Not reported 2%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 76% -11.8
Socioeconomically disadv. 11% +6.4

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
14.4%
35 of 243 students

Absenteeism is up 9.6 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Napa County median
16.7% · school is better than 86% of 7 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
357 (2018)345 (2026)
-3.4%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
47 (2018)62 (2026)
+31.9%

If this trend holds (-0.7%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~342 -3 $0
3 yr (2029) ~337 -8 $0
5 yr (2031) ~332 -13 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Calistoga Junior/Senior High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • On UC Reach, Calistoga Junior/Senior High sits in the middle of its similar-school group (ranked #4 of 9): 20% vs. a peer median of 13%.
  • Calistoga Junior/Senior High's UC Reach has declined meaningfully from a peak of 36% in 2023 to 20% in 2025 — a 16-point drop that warrants attention. Multi-year UC Reach declines of this size often signal something specific (leadership change, comp-program shift, demographic move) rather than year-to-year noise. This is the kind of trajectory an Enrollment Trend Audit unpacks.
  • Senior-class enrollment is up 32% (47→62 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -8%.
  • At its recent rate (-0.4%/yr), enrollment projects to ~341 by 2029 — about 4 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

345 students (2026)
~341 projected (2029)
at -0.4%/yr

That's about 4 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Calistoga Junior/Senior High Public 345 20.3% +32%
Peer-group median 13.3% -8%
Saint Helena High School Public 443 16.2% -2%
Middletown High School Public 417 7.0% -13%
Technology High School Public 344 31.6% +10%
Ridgway High (continuation) Public 252 -4%
Pathways Charter Public 379 -32%
Healdsburg High School Public 510 40.3% -20%
Credo High School Public 487 21.3% +235%
New Technology High School Public 378 10.4% +10%
Cloverdale High School Public 388 6.9% -21%
Esparto High School Public 287 7.5% -24%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Napa County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Outperforming on demand; some mid-year churn to look at.

Calistoga Junior/Senior High is recruiting families faster than Napa County is shrinking (school +31.9% vs. county +1.0%), but 21 students didn't make it to year-end. The recruitment engine works; the mid-year exits are worth understanding.

+31.9%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+1.0%  Napa County baseline
+30.9pp  gap vs. county
91.5%  retention (county median 91.5%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
91.5%
227 of 248 students

21 of 248 students who enrolled at Calistoga Junior/Senior High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (8.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Napa County median
91.5% · school is in the 57th percentile of 7 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 74th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (334) 90.7%
Socio. disadvantaged (332) 91.3%
Students w/ disabilities (59) 88.1%
English learners (56) 80.4%
White (32) 90.6%

Nearest peer high schools

Saint Helena High School 96.4% Middletown High School 87.2% Technology High School 96.8% Ridgway High (continuation) 44.1% Pathways Charter 64.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Calistoga Joint Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$22.5M
+18.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$25,840
869 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 10.7%
Local: 80.3%
Federal: 9.0%
Instruction share
57.8%
of current spending · $13,623/pupil
Long-term debt
$29.6M
+35.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Calistoga Joint Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

📊 Key takeaway · Class of 2025

Calistoga Junior/Senior High sent 70 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 17.1% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 20.3%2.2 percentage points above the California median of 18.1%, higher than 56% of California high schools..

University of California outcomes · Class of 2025
UC Reach
20%
12 admits / 59 seniors
+7.0 pp above peer median (13.3%) · Ranked #4 of 9 similar schools
5-year trend
2021 · 8.3% 2025 · 20.3%
Where this sits on the California curve
CA median
18.1%
Peer median
13.3%
Top 10%
51.2%
This school
20.3%
0%50%100%
CA median 18.1% Top 10% ≥ 51.2% This school 20.3%

Higher than 56% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)

📊 What this number means

Calistoga Junior/Senior High's UC Reach of 20.3% is above the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.

For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 97.3% — a gap of 77 pp from where this school sits.

Overall, Calistoga Junior/Senior High's UC Reach is higher than 56% of California high schools (978 ranked).

UC Application Reach
118.6%
70 applications
Most seniors are applying to at least one of the six most selective UCs (applications counted at each campus).
In context: CA median 74.9% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 241.0% · higher than 69% of CA HS.
UC Admit Rate
17.1%
12 / 70 applications
In context: CA median 26.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 40.5% · higher than 4% of CA HS.
UC Yield Rate
N/A
None enrolled of 12 admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
N/A
None enrollees / 59 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
Student-Counselor Ratio
345:1
1.0 FTE counselors · 345 students
In context: CA median 338:1 · ASCA target 250:1.
A-G Completion
59%
34 of 58 graduates · 2024-25 cohort
In context: CA median 55.9% · +2.7 pp above · Napa Co. 51.9%.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
6.8
per 100 seniors · campus-level total
In context: CA median 15.4 · Top 10% statewide ≥ 41.5 · higher than 8% of CA HS.
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
N/A
Senior Class Size
59
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
355
All grades · CDE Census Day
Economic Connectedness
0.98
44th percentile in CA · cross‑class friendships

UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025

UC Admit Rate %
UC Reach % (where available)
UC Admits (count, right axis)

Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.

Campus Breakdown — 2025

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Berkeley → Elite 10
UCLA → Elite 9
UC San Diego → Selective 9 4 44.4% 6.8%
UC Santa Barbara → Selective 9
UC Irvine → Selective 11
UC Davis → 22 8 36.4% 13.6%
= UCOP-suppressed (count below 3 students, hidden for privacy — actual value is 0, 1, or 2, not necessarily zero). Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once; Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

A large share of the senior class applies to UC, indicating strong college-going culture and UC pipeline development.
A large share of the class applies to UC, so the admit rate runs lower than the application volume alone might suggest — expected when many students apply broadly, including to reach campuses. UC Reach (which credits every admit relative to the class) is the truer read of how the class fares: a strong Reach alongside a moderate admit rate is healthy, not a contradiction.
UC Reach has improved meaningfully compared to the prior year — a positive trajectory worth monitoring and reinforcing.
Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Compare with other schools → See Napa County rankings →

For School Admins

The full Reach Report for Calistoga Junior/Senior High

A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.

  • Your UC Reach (20.3%) ranked head-to-head against your closest competitor schools
  • Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently -0.7%/yr) with the revenue at stake
  • Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals
See a sample report →

For Parents

Researching colleges for your kid at Calistoga Junior/Senior High?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For School Admins looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →