Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Plumas Charter School → Portola Junior/Senior High → Hamilton High → Inspire School Of Arts And Sciences → Durham High School → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- 📚 7 AP courses offered — Strong
- 🎓 AP rigor: 54th percentile nationally
- 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 95% (75th percentile nationally)
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
🎓 Where grads go
UC admits by campus · Class of 2025
Source: University of California Office of the President, Admissions by Source School. Full campus-by-campus breakdown below.
How Quincy Junior/Senior High compares for families
Real college outcomes data available below.
- ▸ Statewide7.4% UC Reach — 10.7 points below the California median of 18.1%.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsTrails the peer median (7.4% UC Reach vs 12.5% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
For Parents
Follow Quincy Junior/Senior High
Get an email when Quincy Junior/Senior High's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
🎓 Academic rigor
AP + advanced-course offerings
Strong — solid AP program + advanced courses
54th percentile nationally
Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).
SAT / ACT participation
CRDC federal data · 2020-21Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.
🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts
What % of students graduate on time?
75th percentile nationally
Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.
🏛️ Federal Title I context
Title I Schoolwide eligible
≥40% FRPL — qualifies for Title I Schoolwide program
40-74% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. The district can use Title I funds across the whole school under federal Schoolwide Program rules.
Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 12.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+0.6%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~312 | +2 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~315 | +5 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~319 | +9 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Quincy Junior/Senior High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Quincy Junior/Senior High sits in the middle of its similar-school group (ranked #4 of 6): 7% vs. a peer median of 12%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has held roughly steady since 2018.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 12% (49→55 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of +4%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+0.4%/yr); projects to ~313 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quincy Junior/Senior High | Public | 310 | 7.4% | +12% |
| Peer-group median | 12.5% | +4% | ||
| Plumas Charter School | Public | 141 | — | -19% |
| Portola Junior/Senior High | Public | 239 | 12.5% | +16% |
| Hamilton High | Public | 320 | — | +42% |
| Inspire School Of Arts And Sciences | Public | 299 | 12.5% | -18% |
| Durham High School | Public | 326 | 5.6% | +33% |
| Forest Charter School | Public | 284 | 5.0% | -9% |
| Marysville Charter Academy For The Arts | Public | 378 | — | +26% |
| Core Butte Charter School | Public | 405 | — | -11% |
| Yuba County Career Preparatory Charter | Public | 217 | — | -66% |
| North Tahoe High School | Public | 448 | 17.2% | +94% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Plumas County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment and retention both close to Plumas County baseline. The demographic tide is the main mover; no internal break in the system, but no outperformance either. Chronic absenteeism is rising (28.7%, +14.0 pts since 2016-17) — a watch signal worth monitoring as a leading indicator.
29 of 235 students who enrolled at Quincy Junior/Senior High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (12.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Plumas Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 71.1%
Federal: 11.3%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Plumas Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
Quincy Junior/Senior High sent 16 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 25.0% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 7.4% — 10.7 percentage points below the California median of 18.1%, higher than 9% of California high schools..
-5.1 pp vs. peer median (12.5%) · Ranked #4 of 6 similar schools
18.1%
12.5%
51.2%
7.4%
Higher than 9% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Quincy Junior/Senior High's UC Reach of 7.4% is below the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.
Overall, Quincy Junior/Senior High's UC Reach is higher than 9% of California high schools (978 ranked).
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 6 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | — | —† |
| UCLA → Elite | 5 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | — | —† |
| UC Davis → | 5 | 4 | —† | 80.0% | 7.4% | — | — | —† |
What This Means
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for Quincy Junior/Senior High
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your UC Reach (7.4%) ranked head-to-head against your closest competitor schools
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 0.6%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals