Home
›
High School Rankings
San Luis Obispo County · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's
entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (
Berkeley,
UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating
more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (
UCLA +
UCSD, or
Berkeley +
UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.
Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors).
Scoped to San Luis Obispo County — change the County filter above to rescope.
▲ Top 10 Public + Charter
San Luis Obispo County
| 1 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
36 |
| 2 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
26 |
| 3 |
Templeton · Public
|
22 |
| 4 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
19 |
| 5 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
14 |
| 6 |
Nipomo · Public
|
9 |
| 7 |
Atascadero · Public
|
9 |
▲ Top 10 Private
San Luis Obispo County
Not enough schools in San Luis Obispo County for this list.
▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter
San Luis Obispo County
| 1 |
Atascadero · Public
|
9 |
| 2 |
Nipomo · Public
|
9 |
| 3 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
14 |
| 4 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
19 |
| 5 |
Templeton · Public
|
22 |
| 6 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
26 |
| 7 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
36 |
▼ Bottom 10 Private
San Luis Obispo County
Not enough schools in San Luis Obispo County for this list.
Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.
▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter
San Luis Obispo County
Not enough schools in San Luis Obispo County for this list.
▲ Top 10 Small Private
San Luis Obispo County
| 1 |
San Luis Obispo · Private
|
22 |
Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.
Top 10 — UCB Reach
UC Berkeley
| 1 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
4 |
| 2 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
2 |
| 3 |
Templeton · Public
|
2 |
| 4 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
1 |
| 5 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
1 |
| 1 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
2 |
| 2 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
2 |
| 3 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
1 |
| 4 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
1 |
Top 10 — UCSD Reach
UC San Diego
| 1 |
Templeton · Public
|
4 |
| 2 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
3 |
| 3 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
2 |
| 4 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
2 |
| 5 |
Nipomo · Public
|
2 |
| 6 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
2 |
| 7 |
Atascadero · Public
|
1 |
Top 10 — UCSB Reach
UC Santa Barbara
| 1 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
8 |
| 2 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
6 |
| 3 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
5 |
| 4 |
Templeton · Public
|
4 |
| 5 |
Nipomo · Public
|
3 |
| 6 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
3 |
| 7 |
Atascadero · Public
|
2 |
Top 10 — UCI Reach
UC Irvine
| 1 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
9 |
| 2 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
8 |
| 3 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
5 |
| 4 |
Templeton · Public
|
4 |
| 5 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
3 |
| 6 |
Atascadero · Public
|
2 |
| 7 |
Nipomo · Public
|
2 |
Top 10 — UCD Reach
UC Davis
| 1 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
10 |
| 2 |
Templeton · Public
|
8 |
| 3 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
6 |
| 4 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
5 |
| 5 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
4 |
| 6 |
Atascadero · Public
|
3 |
| 7 |
Nipomo · Public
|
2 |
UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.
Top 10 — A-G Completion
% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort
| 1 |
· Public
|
81.5% |
| 2 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
76.3% |
| 3 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
60.5% |
| 4 |
Templeton · Public
|
57.2% |
| 5 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
55.5% |
| 6 |
Nipomo · Public
|
53.2% |
| 7 |
Atascadero · Public
|
44.0% |
| 8 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
26.9% |
| 9 |
· Public
|
24.6% |
| 10 |
Cambria · Public
|
21.7% |
Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate
% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20
| 1 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
93.1% |
| 2 |
Atascadero · Public
|
90.0% |
| 3 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
88.4% |
| 4 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
86.2% |
Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity
Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students
| 1 |
Atascadero · Public
|
287:1 |
| 2 |
Paso Robles · Public
|
327:1 |
| 3 |
Templeton · Public
|
349:1 |
| 4 |
Morro Bay · Public
|
386:1 |
| 5 |
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
388:1 |
| 6 |
Nipomo · Public
|
417:1 |
| 7 |
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
423:1 |
Top 10 — Most Consistent
Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)
| 1 |
avg 16.5 · σ 3.81
|
σ 3.81 |
| 2 |
avg 16.9 · σ 3.89
|
σ 3.89 |
| 3 |
avg 27.8 · σ 7.35
|
σ 7.35 |
| 4 |
avg 35.3 · σ 18.59
|
σ 18.59 |
Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded
% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30
| 1 |
· n=79 · 2025
|
77% |
| 2 |
Templeton · n=177 · 2025
|
74% |
| 3 |
Arroyo Grande · n=441 · 2025
|
70% |
| 4 |
Morro Bay · n=184 · 2025
|
70% |
| 5 |
Nipomo · n=192 · 2025
|
68% |
| 6 |
Paso Robles · n=429 · 2025
|
67% |
| 7 |
San Luis Obispo · n=387 · 2025
|
67% |
| 8 |
Atascadero · n=243 · 2025
|
60% |
| 9 |
Templeton · n=33 · 2025
|
52% |
| 10 |
· n=52 · 2025
|
44% |
Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded
% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30
| 1 |
· n=79 · 2025
|
53% |
| 2 |
San Luis Obispo · n=391 · 2025
|
51% |
| 3 |
Morro Bay · n=185 · 2025
|
39% |
| 4 |
Arroyo Grande · n=435 · 2025
|
37% |
| 5 |
Paso Robles · n=427 · 2025
|
33% |
| 6 |
Atascadero · n=245 · 2025
|
31% |
| 7 |
Templeton · n=175 · 2025
|
31% |
| 8 |
Nipomo · n=192 · 2025
|
20% |
| 9 |
· n=51 · 2025
|
16% |
| 10 |
Templeton · n=33 · 2025
|
12% |
Top 10 — Private Net Assets
Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year
No private-school 990 data for this filter.
≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year
Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.
▲ Biggest gains
| School | Then → Now | Δ |
|---|
|
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
26 '18
→ 36 '25
|
+10.0pp |
|
Morro Bay · Public
|
17 '18
→ 26 '25
|
+8.7pp |
|
Paso Robles · Public
|
6 '18
→ 14 '25
|
+7.6pp |
|
Templeton · Public
|
18 '18
→ 22 '25
|
+3.2pp |
|
Nipomo · Public
|
8 '18
→ 9 '25
|
+0.4pp |
|
Atascadero · Public
|
11 '18
→ 8 '25
|
+-2.4pp |
|
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
22 '18
→ 19 '25
|
+-3.0pp |
▼ Biggest declines
| School | Then → Now | Δ |
|---|
|
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
22 '18
→ 19 '25
|
-3.0pp |
|
Atascadero · Public
|
11 '18
→ 8 '25
|
-2.4pp |
|
Nipomo · Public
|
8 '18
→ 9 '25
|
0.4pp |
|
Templeton · Public
|
18 '18
→ 22 '25
|
3.2pp |
|
Paso Robles · Public
|
6 '18
→ 14 '25
|
7.6pp |
|
Morro Bay · Public
|
17 '18
→ 26 '25
|
8.7pp |
|
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
26 '18
→ 36 '25
|
10.0pp |
grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students
The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.
▲ Outperforming the county the most
| School | School · County | Gap |
|---|
|
San Luis Obispo · San Luis Obispo · Public Best in class
|
+11.9% vs -1.4%
|
+13.3pp |
|
Nipomo · San Luis Obispo · Public Strong demand
|
+3.2% vs -1.4%
|
+4.5pp |
|
Templeton · San Luis Obispo · Public Holding share
|
+0.0% vs -1.4%
|
+1.4pp |
|
Atascadero · San Luis Obispo · Public Demand problem
|
-4.2% vs -1.4%
|
-2.8pp |
|
Paso Robles · San Luis Obispo · Public Demand problem
|
-8.1% vs -1.4%
|
-6.7pp |
|
Morro Bay · San Luis Obispo · Public Weak at the gate
|
-8.3% vs -1.4%
|
-6.9pp |
|
Arroyo Grande · San Luis Obispo · Public Weak at the gate
|
-8.8% vs -1.4%
|
-7.4pp |
▼ Underperforming the county the most
| School | School · County | Gap |
|---|
|
Arroyo Grande · San Luis Obispo · Public Weak at the gate
|
-8.8% vs -1.4%
|
-7.4pp |
|
Morro Bay · San Luis Obispo · Public Weak at the gate
|
-8.3% vs -1.4%
|
-6.9pp |
|
Paso Robles · San Luis Obispo · Public Demand problem
|
-8.1% vs -1.4%
|
-6.7pp |
|
Atascadero · San Luis Obispo · Public Demand problem
|
-4.2% vs -1.4%
|
-2.8pp |
|
Templeton · San Luis Obispo · Public Holding share
|
+0.0% vs -1.4%
|
+1.4pp |
|
Nipomo · San Luis Obispo · Public Strong demand
|
+3.2% vs -1.4%
|
+4.5pp |
|
San Luis Obispo · San Luis Obispo · Public Best in class
|
+11.9% vs -1.4%
|
+13.3pp |
7 schools eligible · 2025
Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.
▲ Top 10 outperformers
| School |
GPA |
Actual |
Δ vs exp. |
|
Nipomo · Public
|
3.98 |
45.9% |
+18.0pp |
|
Templeton · Public
|
4.08 |
36.7% |
+9.3pp |
|
Atascadero · Public
|
4.02 |
38.5% |
+8.9pp |
|
Paso Robles · Public
|
3.90 |
28.6% |
+7.0pp |
|
Morro Bay · Public
|
3.94 |
28.2% |
+5.3pp |
|
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
4.05 |
27.9% |
+4.4pp |
|
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
4.03 |
25.5% |
+2.9pp |
▼ Top 10 underperformers
| School |
GPA |
Actual |
Δ vs exp. |
|
San Luis Obispo · Public
|
4.03 |
25.5% |
2.9pp |
|
Arroyo Grande · Public
|
4.05 |
27.9% |
4.4pp |
|
Morro Bay · Public
|
3.94 |
28.2% |
5.3pp |
|
Paso Robles · Public
|
3.90 |
28.6% |
7.0pp |
|
Atascadero · Public
|
4.02 |
38.5% |
8.9pp |
|
Templeton · Public
|
4.08 |
36.7% |
9.3pp |
|
Nipomo · Public
|
3.98 |
45.9% |
18.0pp |
Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.
| # |
School |
County |
Seniors
ⓘ
|
Total Enroll
ⓘ
|
UC Reach Score
ⓘ
|
App Reach Score
ⓘ
|
Admit Rate
ⓘ
|
Yield
ⓘ
|
Selective Reach
ⓘ
|
Elite Reach
ⓘ
|
Raw Apps
ⓘ
|
Raw Admits
ⓘ
|
| 1 |
San Luis Obispo · Public Best in class
|
San Luis Obispo |
393 |
1,678 |
36
|
140 |
25.4% |
27.1% |
25.9 |
5.6 |
550 |
140 |
| 2 |
Morro Bay · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Luis Obispo |
171 |
751 |
26
|
91 |
28.2% |
6.8% |
19.3 |
3.5 |
156 |
44 |
| 3 |
San Luis Obispo · Private
|
San Luis Obispo |
83 |
319 |
22
|
170 |
12.8% |
16.7% |
13.2 |
— |
141 |
18 |
| 4 |
Templeton · Public Holding share
|
San Luis Obispo |
204 |
725 |
22
|
74 |
29.3% |
11.4% |
13.7 |
1.5 |
150 |
44 |
| 5 |
Arroyo Grande · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Luis Obispo |
531 |
2,012 |
19
|
69 |
27.9% |
25.5% |
14.3 |
2.5 |
366 |
102 |
| 6 |
Paso Robles · Public Demand problem
|
San Luis Obispo |
411 |
1,986 |
14
|
48 |
28.6% |
25.0% |
9.7 |
2.2 |
196 |
56 |
| 7 |
Nipomo · Public Strong demand
|
San Luis Obispo |
192 |
819 |
9
|
27 |
33.3% |
— |
6.8 |
— |
51 |
17 |
| 8 |
Atascadero · Public Demand problem
|
San Luis Obispo |
293 |
1,157 |
9
|
34 |
25.0% |
— |
5.5 |
— |
100 |
25 |
| 9 |
Nipomo · Public
|
San Luis Obispo |
— |
— |
—
|
— |
11.6% |
— |
— |
— |
86 |
10 |
| 10 |
Cambria · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Luis Obispo |
46 |
159 |
—
|
22 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
10 |
— |
| 11 |
San Luis Obispo · Private
|
San Luis Obispo |
— |
— |
—
|
— |
9.7% |
— |
— |
— |
31 |
3 |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals,
campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values
above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers.
See methodology →