County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year Reset filters

🏆 Top 10 in Los Angeles County — UC Reach

Los Angeles County · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach of just 0.6% (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a 25% UC Reach — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100%? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear 100% UC Reach.

Leaderboards by type — Los Angeles County (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Scoped to Los Angeles County — change the County filter above to rescope.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

Los Angeles County

1
Cerritos · Public
126.1%
2
El Monte · Public
113.5%
3
Los Angeles · Public
110.0%
4
San Marino · Public
72.2%
5
Rolling Hills Estat · Public
70.8%
6
Diamond Bar · Public
64.6%
7
Arcadia · Public
60.6%
8
Manhattan Beach · Public
59.9%
9
Temple City · Public
59.7%
10
La Canada · Public
59.4%

▲ Top 10 Private

Los Angeles County

1
Claremont · Private
143.6%
2
La Canada · Private
102.8%
3
Los Angeles · Private
77.4%
4
Calabasas · Private
76.8%
5
La Canada · Private
72.7%
6
Los Angeles · Private
66.4%
7
Los Angeles · Private
64.0%
8
Los Angeles · Private
62.2%
9
Studio City · Private
61.8%
10
Santa Monica · Private
57.8%

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

Los Angeles County

1
Los Angeles · Public
0.8%
2
Lancaster · Public
7.5%
3
· Public
7.6%
4
Littlerock · Public
7.8%
5
· Public
8.2%
6
Los Angeles · Public
8.3%
7
Lancaster · Public
8.6%
8
North Hollywood · Public
8.8%
9
Glendale · Public
9.7%
10
Baldwin Park · Public
9.7%

▼ Bottom 10 Private

Los Angeles County

1
Long Beach · Private
12.9%
2
Mission Hills · Private
13.2%
3
Los Angeles · Private
13.7%
4
Cerritos · Private
16.1%
5
Los Angeles · Private
17.9%
6
Panorama City · Private
19.1%
7
La Verne · Private
22.4%
8
Los Angeles · Private
23.4%
9
La Puente · Private
28.2%
10
Lakewood · Private
30.3%

🎯 Specialized high schools — Los Angeles County · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

Los Angeles County

1
North Hollywood · Public
109.3%
2
· Public
83.8%
3
Los Angeles · Public
82.3%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
68.0%
5
Malibu · Public
51.6%
6
Sun Valley · Public
42.2%
7
Lakewood · Public
42.1%
8
Los Angeles · Public
38.0%
9
Montebello · Public
24.1%
10
Huntington Park · Public
22.4%

▲ Top 10 Small Private

Los Angeles County

1
Los Angeles · Private
121.0%
2
Pasadena · Private
104.0%
3
Inglewood · Private
86.0%
4
La Canada · Private
76.4%
5
Pasadena · Private
76.3%
6
Burbank · Private
68.5%
7
Palos Verdes Estate · Private
65.8%
8
Santa Monica · Private
64.6%
9
Canoga Park · Private
64.3%
10
Pasadena · Private
61.5%

Top 10 by individual UC campus — Los Angeles County · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
16.8%
2
La Canada · Private
16.0%
3
Calabasas · Private
14.8%
4
Los Angeles · Public
13.7%
5
Cerritos · Public
13.1%
6
Los Angeles · Private
12.3%
7
Los Angeles · Private
11.7%
8
El Monte · Public
11.0%
9
Chatsworth · Private
10.7%
10
Studio City · Private
10.2%

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Private
10.4%
2
La Canada · Private
9.4%
3
Compton · Public
9.0%
4
Claremont · Private
8.9%
5
El Monte · Public
8.4%
6
Cerritos · Public
8.0%
7
Los Angeles · Private
6.7%
8
San Marino · Public
6.7%
9
La Canada · Private
6.7%
10
Burbank · Private
6.7%

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
Claremont · Private
24.8%
2
Los Angeles · Public
21.6%
3
Cerritos · Public
18.8%
4
Los Angeles · Private
17.2%
5
Los Angeles · Public
15.5%
6
San Marino · Public
14.8%
7
La Canada · Private
14.2%
8
Inglewood · Public
14.1%
9
Compton · Public
13.9%
10
Los Angeles · Public
13.7%

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Claremont · Private
29.7%
2
El Monte · Public
29.3%
3
La Canada · Private
29.2%
4
Cerritos · Public
27.8%
5
Los Angeles · Private
22.6%
6
Los Angeles · Private
20.9%
7
Los Angeles · Public
20.7%
8
La Canada · Private
19.3%
9
Calabasas · Private
17.6%
10
Manhattan Beach · Public
17.5%

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Cerritos · Public
36.9%
2
Claremont · Private
29.7%
3
Pasadena · Private
20.7%
4
Rolling Hills Estat · Public
19.4%
5
El Monte · Public
19.0%
6
Cerritos · Public
17.0%
7
Studio City · Private
16.6%
8
La Canada · Private
14.2%
9
Temple City · Public
13.5%
10
Palos Verdes Estate · Public
13.1%

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39.0%
2
Claremont · Private
33.7%
3
El Monte · Public
24.9%
4
Cerritos · Public
21.6%
5
Calabasas · Private
20.4%
6
La Canada · Private
20.0%
7
La Canada · Private
19.8%
8
San Marino · Public
18.2%
9
Diamond Bar · Public
17.3%
10
Los Angeles · Private
16.2%

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on Los Angeles County

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
· Public
100.0%
3
· Public
100.0%
4
Compton · Public
100.0%
5
· Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
Panorama City · Public
100.0%
9
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
2
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
3
Rosemead · Public
98.1%
4
San Gabriel · Public
97.2%
5
Walnut · Public
96.9%
6
San Gabriel · Public
96.7%
7
Palos Verdes Estate · Public
96.2%
8
Hacienda Heights · Public
96.1%
9
San Dimas · Public
96.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
95.8%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Arleta · Public
125:1
4
· Public
129:1
5
· Public
134:1
6
· Public
137:1
7
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
8
La Puente · Public
148:1
9
· Public
151:1
10
· Public
165:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 28.8% · σ 2.66
σ 2.66
2
avg 25.1% · σ 2.73
σ 2.73
3
avg 26.6% · σ 2.74
σ 2.74
4
avg 23.5% · σ 2.89
σ 2.89
5
avg 54.5% · σ 3.29
σ 3.29
6
avg 25.4% · σ 3.36
σ 3.36
7
avg 106.9% · σ 3.43
σ 3.43
8
avg 27.9% · σ 3.47
σ 3.47
9
avg 28.6% · σ 3.5
σ 3.5
10
avg 25.2% · σ 3.53
σ 3.53

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
· n=157 · 2025
99%
2
· n=108 · 2025
98%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Santa Clarita · n=98 · 2025
97%
5
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
97%
6
La Canada · n=327 · 2025
94%
7
· n=112 · 2025
91%
8
Los Angeles · n=92 · 2025
90%
9
Rolling Hills Estat · n=494 · 2025
90%
10
· n=132 · 2025
89%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
2
· n=157 · 2025
95%
3
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
4
· n=112 · 2025
86%
5
La Canada · n=327 · 2025
81%
6
· n=108 · 2025
79%
7
San Marino · n=211 · 2025
78%
8
Santa Clarita · n=98 · 2025
78%
9
Rolling Hills Estat · n=495 · 2025
75%
10
· n=255 · 2025
73%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
3
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
4
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
5
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$103.3M
6
Sherman Oaks · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$97.0M
7
Claremont · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$95.6M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$77.8M
9
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$67.9M
10
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$63.9M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63% '21 → 144% '25 +80.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
3% '20 → 46% '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71% '18 → 114% '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86% '18 → 126% '25 +40.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
75% '18 → 110% '25 +35.2pp
El Segundo · Public
20% '18 → 54% '25 +34.0pp
La Canada · Private
41% '20 → 73% '25 +31.6pp
Inglewood · Public
18% '18 → 49% '25 +30.5pp
Burbank · Private
30% '21 → 57% '25 +26.7pp
Long Beach · Public
25% '18 → 51% '25 +26.6pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Cerritos · Private
39% '20 → 16% '25 -22.6pp
Rosemead · Public
38% '18 → 19% '25 -18.3pp
Long Beach · Public
44% '18 → 27% '25 -16.8pp
Calabasas · Private
93% '20 → 77% '25 -16.5pp
West Hills · Private
61% '20 → 45% '25 -15.9pp
Chatsworth · Private
67% '20 → 51% '25 -15.8pp
Alhambra · Public
30% '18 → 18% '25 -12.8pp
Panorama City · Private
32% '20 → 19% '25 -12.6pp
La Verne · Private
35% '20 → 22% '25 -12.4pp
Walnut · Public
64% '18 → 51% '25 -12.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Hollywood · Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
+65.7% vs -8.2% +73.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
+61.0% vs -8.2% +69.2pp
Pasadena · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+50.0% vs -8.2% +58.2pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+45.8% vs -11.1% +56.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+43.9% vs -12.1% +56.0pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+46.2% vs -8.2% +54.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Inglewood · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +2.9% -39.6pp
· Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-46.2% vs -8.2% -38.0pp
· Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-42.9% vs -8.2% -34.7pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-39.2% vs -8.2% -31.0pp
Bell · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-37.1% vs -8.2% -28.9pp
Montebello · Los Angeles · Public  Material decline
-36.9% vs -8.2% -28.7pp
San Fernando · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-34.9% vs -8.2% -26.7pp
South Gate · Los Angeles · Public  Material decline
-34.2% vs -8.2% -26.0pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

185 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Long Beach · Public
3.77 53.8% +26.5pp
Littlerock · Public
3.83 44.6% +19.2pp
Lancaster · Public
3.85 35.8% +16.2pp
Hollywood · Public
3.62 47.2% +15.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.80 32.7% +13.2pp
Carson · Public
3.73 32.3% +12.9pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.77 32.8% +12.9pp
Pomona · Public
3.69 33.9% +12.6pp
Inglewood · Public
3.80 35.4% +12.2pp
Baldwin Park · Public
3.86 30.8% +11.7pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.58 14.3% -7.4pp
La Puente · Public
3.58 17.2% -5.1pp
Monrovia · Public
3.86 15.3% -5.0pp
Canoga Park · Public
3.65 16.7% -5.0pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.66 17.7% -4.4pp
Alhambra · Public
3.88 15.5% -4.4pp

Full rankings — every Los Angeles County high school by UC Reach

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

231 schools · 2025 data · Page 1 of 3 (showing 1–100) · 200 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach App Reach Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
1
Claremont · Private
Los Angeles 101 401 143.6% 412.9% 34.8% 8.3% 109.9 25.7 417 145
2
Cerritos · Public
Los Angeles 176 1,024 126.1% 421.6% 29.9% 25.7% 104.5 21.0 742 222
3
El Monte · Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 273 1,123 113.5% 575.5% 19.7% 22.6% 88.6 19.4 1,571 310
4
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 241 502 110.0% 476.8% 23.1% 31.7% 71.0 19.9 1,149 265
5
La Canada · Private
Los Angeles 106 537 102.8% 374.5% 27.5% 9.2% 83.0 25.5 397 109
6
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 106 625 77.4% 294.3% 26.3% 13.4% 61.3 22.6 312 82
7
Calabasas · Private
Los Angeles 108 1,131 76.8% 267.6% 28.7% 6.0% 56.5 20.4 289 83
8
La Canada · Private
Los Angeles 150 623 72.7% 304.7% 23.9% 36.7% 52.7 12.0 457 109
9
San Marino · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 209 886 72.2% 296.2% 24.4% 21.2% 54.1 14.8 619 151
10
Rolling Hills Estat · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 571 2,075 70.8% 274.1% 25.8% 23.5% 56.9 11.7 1,565 404
11
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 134 778 66.4% 260.4% 25.5% 10.1% 54.5 14.2 349 89
12
Diamond Bar · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 647 2,563 64.6% 299.9% 21.6% 26.6% 47.3 13.4 1,940 418
13
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 111 546 64.0% 255.9% 25.0% 4.2% 47.8 18.0 284 71
14
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 299 1,289 62.2% 275.2% 22.6% 11.8% 48.2 15.1 823 186
15
Studio City · Private
Los Angeles 283 1,616 61.8% 317.3% 19.5% 9.1% 49.5 15.6 898 175
16
Arcadia · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 817 2,939 60.6% 289.1% 21.0% 27.7% 44.7 11.0 2,362 495
17
Manhattan Beach · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 653 2,473 59.9% 235.8% 25.4% 22.8% 50.2 12.9 1,540 391
18
Temple City · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 437 1,779 59.7% 261.8% 22.8% 33.0% 43.9 8.7 1,144 261
19
La Canada · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 355 1,989 59.4% 319.7% 18.6% 17.5% 47.0 12.1 1,135 211
20
Santa Monica · Private
Los Angeles 116 367 57.8% 244.8% 23.6% 25.4% 44.8 9.5 284 67
21
Palos Verdes Estate · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 337 1,484 57.0% 227.9% 25.0% 18.8% 47.2 12.5 768 192
22
Burbank · Private  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 120 497 56.7% 252.5% 22.4% 22.1% 45.0 16.7 303 68
23
Pasadena · Private
Los Angeles 135 554 55.6% 237.8% 23.4% 21.3% 45.2 6.7 321 75
24
Compton · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 122 556 54.9% 230.3% 23.8% 32.8% 46.7 13.9 281 67
25
El Segundo · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 346 1,232 54.3% 199.4% 27.2% 22.9% 40.2 7.8 690 188
26
Torrance · Private
Los Angeles 208 844 53.9% 252.9% 21.3% 29.5% 40.4 9.6 526 112
27
Valencia · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 449 1,777 52.3% 201.8% 25.9% 23.0% 42.5 9.3 906 235
28
Long Beach · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 177 682 51.4% 157.6% 32.6% 31.9% 41.2 9.6 279 91
29
Pasadena · Private
Los Angeles 156 659 51.3% 271.8% 18.9% 16.2% 39.7 9.0 424 80
30
Chatsworth · Private
Los Angeles 121 1,096 51.2% 268.6% 19.1% 11.3% 40.5 16.5 325 62
31
Walnut · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 549 2,148 51.2% 234.1% 21.9% 29.5% 37.7 7.3 1,285 281
32
Calabasas · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 430 1,707 50.5% 174.7% 28.9% 22.6% 37.7 11.6 751 217
33
Sun Valley · Private
Los Angeles 125 1,199 50.4% 166.4% 30.3% 15.9% 36.8 11.2 208 63
34
Santa Monica · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 710 2,588 48.7% 205.2% 23.8% 27.8% 37.0 13.8 1,457 346
35
Inglewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 142 592 48.6% 195.8% 24.8% 15.9% 40.1 6.3 278 69
36
La Crescenta · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 625 2,624 48.5% 213.8% 22.7% 24.4% 38.2 9.4 1,336 303
37
Cerritos · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 541 1,996 48.4% 197.8% 24.5% 29.4% 38.8 6.5 1,070 262
38
Santa Monica · Private
Los Angeles 150 1,202 48.0% 260.7% 18.4% 19.4% 40.7 15.3 391 72
39
North Hollywood · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 535 2,444 47.3% 162.4% 29.1% 23.3% 37.2 8.2 869 253
40
South Pasadena · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 379 1,536 46.2% 237.7% 19.4% 25.7% 31.1 6.1 901 175
41
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 116 484 45.7% 147.4% 31.0% 22.6% 37.1 6.0 171 53
42
West Hills · Private
Los Angeles 274 1,237 45.3% 217.5% 20.8% 22.6% 35.0 8.0 596 124
43
· Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 450 1,775 44.9% 188.4% 23.8% 28.2% 32.7 6.4 848 202
44
Pacific Palisade · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 757 2,920 43.6% 204.2% 21.4% 23.0% 31.4 9.6 1,546 330
45
Lancaster · Private
Los Angeles 113 561 43.4% 132.7% 32.7% 22.4% 36.3 6.2 150 49
46
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 175 1,530 42.9% 154.3% 27.8% 36.6 8.0 270 75
47
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 122 564 39.3% 120.5% 32.6% 22.9% 28.7 6.6 147 48
48
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 136 1,242 38.2% 247.1% 15.5% 5.8% 31.6 14.0 336 52
49
Santa Fe Springs · Private
Los Angeles 105 405 38.1% 167.6% 22.7% 25.0% 29.5 3.8 176 40
50
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 516 2,293 38.0% 158.3% 24.0% 26.5% 30.6 9.7 817 196
51
Culver City · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 507 2,012 36.7% 171.2% 21.4% 28.5% 29.0 8.1 868 186
52
Beverly Hills · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 308 1,173 36.4% 156.8% 23.2% 15.2% 28.6 8.1 483 112
53
· Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 459 1,734 36.0% 195.9% 18.4% 30.9% 27.7 5.7 899 165
54
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 121 470 35.5% 217.4% 16.4% 27.9% 24.0 5.0 263 43
55
Redondo Beach · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 739 2,921 35.5% 153.9% 23.0% 21.4% 28.3 6.2 1,137 262
56
Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 332 2,031 35.2% 165.4% 21.3% 25.6% 26.2 9.6 549 117
57
Alhambra · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 582 2,201 34.2% 172.7% 19.8% 31.2% 25.6 5.5 1,005 199
58
San Gabriel · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 471 1,761 33.1% 145.4% 22.8% 37.2% 24.8 4.2 685 156
59
Granada Hills · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 1,154 5,927 32.9% 173.3% 19.0% 29.2% 26.5 6.3 2,000 380
60
Panorama City · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 330 1,316 32.7% 121.5% 26.9% 27.8% 25.4 6.4 401 108
61
Hacienda Heights · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 355 1,456 31.8% 169.9% 18.7% 31.0% 23.1 6.5 603 113
62
San Gabriel · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 378 1,438 31.5% 179.4% 17.6% 34.5% 23.0 6.9 678 119
63
Claremont · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 535 2,065 31.4% 135.9% 23.1% 26.2% 25.2 5.4 727 168
64
Bellflower · Private
Los Angeles 183 869 31.1% 168.3% 18.5% 12.3% 25.7 6.6 308 57
65
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 264 1,025 31.1% 121.2% 25.6% 23.2% 26.5 8.0 320 82
66
Pomona · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 117 458 30.8% 197.4% 15.6% 25.0% 24.8 4.3 231 36
67
Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 498 2,055 30.7% 120.1% 25.6% 15.0% 25.5 8.6 598 153
68
Downey · Private
Los Angeles 111 591 30.6% 153.2% 20.0% 27.0 6.3 170 34
69
· Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 180 694 30.6% 94.4% 32.4% 16.4% 24.4 6.7 170 55
70
Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 392 1,497 30.4% 171.9% 17.7% 29.4% 25.8 6.1 674 119
71
Lakewood · Private
Los Angeles 122 557 30.3% 96.7% 31.4% 21.6% 27.1 5.7 118 37
72
Lawndale · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 415 1,403 29.4% 97.3% 30.2% 27.1% 26.8 5.1 404 122
73
· Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 713 3,162 29.3% 129.7% 22.6% 27.3% 22.7 5.6 925 209
74
· Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 429 1,743 28.9% 97.4% 29.7% 20.2% 22.1 5.8 418 124
75
· Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 430 1,812 28.8% 108.1% 26.7% 27.4% 22.6 4.7 465 124
76
Torrance · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 452 1,879 28.8% 123.7% 23.3% 33.9% 22.6 4.4 559 130
77
Van Nuys · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 515 1,969 28.7% 114.6% 25.1% 29.1% 23.9 6.6 590 148
78
Carson · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 105 438 28.6% 96.2% 29.7% 10.0% 20.9 2.9 101 30
79
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 113 484 28.3% 198.2% 14.3% 9.4% 20.4 8.0 224 32
80
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 378 1,495 28.3% 105.0% 26.9% 26.2% 22.2 6.3 397 107
81
La Puente · Private
Los Angeles 223 977 28.2% 120.2% 23.5% 22.2% 22.4 4.9 268 63
82
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 117 598 28.2% 128.2% 22.0% 27.3% 24.8 8.6 150 33
83
Los Angeles · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 531 2,237 28.1% 118.1% 23.8% 28.9% 25.2 5.1 627 149
84
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 139 515 28.1% 161.2% 17.4% 7.7% 19.4 7.2 224 39
85
Los Angeles · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 418 1,842 28.0% 155.3% 18.0% 25.6% 23.4 6.5 649 117
86
· Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 235 974 27.7% 158.7% 17.4% 23.1% 21.3 7.7 373 65
87
Hawthorne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 131 552 27.5% 177.9% 15.4% 11.1% 19.9 5.3 233 36
88
· Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 136 797 27.2% 215.4% 12.6% 35.1% 24.3 4.4 293 37
89
Pasadena · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 339 1,303 27.1% 129.8% 20.9% 15.2% 21.5 7.7 440 92
90
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 258 1,001 27.1% 90.3% 30.0% 21.4% 20.2 5.0 233 70
91
Panorama City · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 492 26.8% 180.4% 14.8% 10.0% 21.4 2.7 202 30
92
Long Beach · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 992 3,890 26.7% 100.8% 26.5% 24.1% 22.1 6.2 1,000 265
93
La Verne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 467 1,911 26.6% 86.7% 30.6% 27.4% 22.3 4.3 405 124
94
Venice · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 110 335 26.4% 130.0% 20.3% 22.7 9.1 143 29
95
Van Nuys · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 426 1,774 25.8% 94.4% 27.4% 23.6% 21.6 4.5 402 110
96
El Segundo · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 141 550 25.5% 131.2% 19.5% 8.3% 19.1 6.4 185 36
97
Pasadena · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 138 1,053 25.4% 115.2% 22.0% 25.7% 18.1 5.1 159 35
98
Agoura Hills · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 442 1,709 25.3% 129.9% 19.5% 26.8% 19.7 5.2 574 112
99
· Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 611 2,286 25.0% 127.8% 19.6% 31.4% 19.6 5.1 781 153
100
Long Beach · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 299 1,260 24.1% 105.3% 22.9% 62.5% 20.7 4.3 315 72
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100% indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →