| 1 |
Claremont · Private
|
Los Angeles |
101 |
401 |
144
|
413 |
34.8% |
8.3% |
109.9 |
25.7 |
417 |
145 |
| 2 |
Carson · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
169 |
673 |
129
|
370 |
34.8% |
21.6% |
112.4 |
26.0 |
626 |
218 |
| 3 |
Cerritos · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
176 |
1,024 |
126
|
422 |
29.9% |
25.7% |
104.5 |
21.0 |
742 |
222 |
| 4 |
La Canada · Private
|
Los Angeles |
106 |
537 |
103
|
375 |
27.5% |
9.2% |
83.0 |
25.5 |
397 |
109 |
| 5 |
Wilmington · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
111 |
452 |
86
|
350 |
24.5% |
32.6% |
57.7 |
13.5 |
388 |
95 |
| 6 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
106 |
625 |
77
|
294 |
26.3% |
13.4% |
61.3 |
22.6 |
312 |
82 |
| 7 |
Calabasas · Private
|
Los Angeles |
108 |
1,131 |
77
|
268 |
28.7% |
6.0% |
56.5 |
20.4 |
289 |
83 |
| 8 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
183 |
1,357 |
75
|
260 |
29.0% |
22.5% |
62.8 |
16.9 |
476 |
138 |
| 9 |
San Marino · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
209 |
886 |
72
|
296 |
24.4% |
21.2% |
54.1 |
14.8 |
619 |
151 |
| 10 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
142 |
617 |
71
|
215 |
33.0% |
21.8% |
59.9 |
14.1 |
306 |
101 |
| 11 |
Rolling Hills Estat · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
571 |
2,075 |
71
|
274 |
25.8% |
23.5% |
56.9 |
11.7 |
1,565 |
404 |
| 12 |
Los Angeles · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
143 |
980 |
68
|
274 |
24.7% |
21.6% |
44.8 |
9.1 |
392 |
97 |
| 13 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
134 |
778 |
66
|
260 |
25.5% |
10.1% |
54.5 |
14.2 |
349 |
89 |
| 14 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
129 |
551 |
65
|
190 |
34.3% |
15.5% |
50.4 |
19.4 |
245 |
84 |
| 15 |
Diamond Bar · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
647 |
2,563 |
65
|
300 |
21.6% |
26.6% |
47.3 |
13.4 |
1,940 |
418 |
| 16 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
111 |
546 |
64
|
256 |
25.0% |
4.2% |
47.8 |
18.0 |
284 |
71 |
| 17 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
120 |
521 |
63
|
182 |
34.9% |
23.7% |
53.3 |
8.3 |
218 |
76 |
| 18 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
299 |
1,289 |
62
|
275 |
22.6% |
11.8% |
48.2 |
15.1 |
823 |
186 |
| 19 |
Studio City · Private
|
Los Angeles |
283 |
1,616 |
62
|
317 |
19.5% |
9.1% |
49.5 |
15.6 |
898 |
175 |
| 20 |
Arcadia · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
817 |
2,939 |
61
|
289 |
21.0% |
27.7% |
44.7 |
11.0 |
2,362 |
495 |
| 21 |
Manhattan Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
653 |
2,473 |
60
|
236 |
25.4% |
22.8% |
50.2 |
12.9 |
1,540 |
391 |
| 22 |
Temple City · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
437 |
1,779 |
60
|
262 |
22.8% |
33.0% |
43.9 |
8.7 |
1,144 |
261 |
| 23 |
La Canada · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
355 |
1,989 |
59
|
320 |
18.6% |
17.5% |
47.0 |
12.1 |
1,135 |
211 |
| 24 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
367 |
58
|
245 |
23.6% |
25.4% |
44.8 |
9.5 |
284 |
67 |
| 25 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
998 |
57
|
178 |
32.2% |
22.1% |
46.0 |
8.7 |
267 |
86 |
| 26 |
Sherman Oaks · Private
|
Los Angeles |
316 |
1,263 |
57
|
242 |
23.6% |
17.7% |
42.1 |
9.5 |
766 |
181 |
| 27 |
Palos Verdes Estate · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
337 |
1,484 |
57
|
228 |
25.0% |
18.8% |
47.2 |
12.5 |
768 |
192 |
| 28 |
Burbank · Private Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
120 |
497 |
57
|
252 |
22.4% |
22.1% |
45.0 |
16.7 |
303 |
68 |
| 29 |
Lancaster · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
104 |
670 |
56
|
288 |
19.4% |
24.1% |
47.1 |
10.6 |
299 |
58 |
| 30 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
135 |
554 |
56
|
238 |
23.4% |
21.3% |
45.2 |
6.7 |
321 |
75 |
| 31 |
Compton · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
556 |
55
|
230 |
23.8% |
32.8% |
46.7 |
13.9 |
281 |
67 |
| 32 |
Inglewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
152 |
634 |
55
|
187 |
29.2% |
25.3% |
44.1 |
7.9 |
284 |
83 |
| 33 |
El Segundo · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
346 |
1,232 |
54
|
199 |
27.2% |
22.9% |
40.2 |
7.8 |
690 |
188 |
| 34 |
Torrance · Private
|
Los Angeles |
208 |
844 |
54
|
253 |
21.3% |
29.5% |
40.4 |
9.6 |
526 |
112 |
| 35 |
Valencia · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
449 |
1,777 |
52
|
202 |
25.9% |
23.0% |
42.5 |
9.3 |
906 |
235 |
| 36 |
Long Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
177 |
682 |
51
|
158 |
32.6% |
31.9% |
41.2 |
9.6 |
279 |
91 |
| 37 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
156 |
659 |
51
|
272 |
18.9% |
16.2% |
39.7 |
9.0 |
424 |
80 |
| 38 |
Chatsworth · Private
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
1,096 |
51
|
269 |
19.1% |
11.3% |
40.5 |
16.5 |
325 |
62 |
| 39 |
Walnut · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
549 |
2,148 |
51
|
234 |
21.9% |
29.5% |
37.7 |
7.3 |
1,285 |
281 |
| 40 |
Calabasas · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
430 |
1,707 |
50
|
175 |
28.9% |
22.6% |
37.7 |
11.6 |
751 |
217 |
| 41 |
Sun Valley · Private
|
Los Angeles |
125 |
1,199 |
50
|
166 |
30.3% |
15.9% |
36.8 |
11.2 |
208 |
63 |
| 42 |
Duarte · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
235 |
974 |
49
|
173 |
28.3% |
23.5% |
39.1 |
11.5 |
406 |
115 |
| 43 |
Santa Monica · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
710 |
2,588 |
49
|
205 |
23.8% |
27.8% |
37.0 |
13.8 |
1,457 |
346 |
| 44 |
Inglewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
142 |
592 |
49
|
196 |
24.8% |
15.9% |
40.1 |
6.3 |
278 |
69 |
| 45 |
Reseda · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
202 |
1,712 |
49
|
192 |
25.3% |
27.6% |
37.1 |
7.9 |
388 |
98 |
| 46 |
La Crescenta · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
625 |
2,624 |
48
|
214 |
22.7% |
24.4% |
38.2 |
9.4 |
1,336 |
303 |
| 47 |
Cerritos · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
541 |
1,996 |
48
|
198 |
24.5% |
29.4% |
38.8 |
6.5 |
1,070 |
262 |
| 48 |
Lakewood · Private
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
557 |
48
|
184 |
26.2% |
13.6% |
39.3 |
10.7 |
225 |
59 |
| 49 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
1,202 |
48
|
261 |
18.4% |
19.4% |
40.7 |
15.3 |
391 |
72 |
| 50 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
115 |
887 |
48
|
186 |
25.7% |
16.4% |
36.5 |
11.3 |
214 |
55 |
| 51 |
North Hollywood · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
535 |
2,444 |
47
|
162 |
29.1% |
23.3% |
37.2 |
8.2 |
869 |
253 |
| 52 |
La Crescenta · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
257 |
1,136 |
46
|
215 |
21.5% |
22.7% |
38.1 |
8.2 |
553 |
119 |
| 53 |
South Pasadena · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
379 |
1,536 |
46
|
238 |
19.4% |
25.7% |
31.1 |
6.1 |
901 |
175 |
| 54 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
484 |
46
|
147 |
31.0% |
22.6% |
37.1 |
6.0 |
171 |
53 |
| 55 |
West Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
274 |
1,237 |
45
|
218 |
20.8% |
22.6% |
35.0 |
8.0 |
596 |
124 |
| 56 |
Pasadena · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
224 |
1,689 |
45
|
149 |
30.2% |
25.7% |
38.4 |
15.6 |
334 |
101 |
| 57 |
Torrance · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
450 |
1,775 |
45
|
188 |
23.8% |
28.2% |
32.7 |
6.4 |
848 |
202 |
| 58 |
Los Angeles · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
172 |
819 |
45
|
204 |
21.9% |
23.4% |
40.7 |
8.7 |
351 |
77 |
| 59 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
137 |
607 |
44
|
201 |
21.7% |
23.3% |
32.1 |
9.5 |
276 |
60 |
| 60 |
Huntington Park · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
160 |
729 |
44
|
167 |
26.2% |
14.3% |
36.2 |
8.8 |
267 |
70 |
| 61 |
Pacific Palisades · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
757 |
2,920 |
44
|
204 |
21.4% |
23.0% |
31.4 |
9.6 |
1,546 |
330 |
| 62 |
Lancaster · Private
|
Los Angeles |
113 |
561 |
43
|
133 |
32.7% |
22.4% |
36.3 |
6.2 |
150 |
49 |
| 63 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
107 |
534 |
43
|
132 |
32.6% |
23.9% |
35.5 |
11.2 |
141 |
46 |
| 64 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
175 |
1,530 |
43
|
154 |
27.8% |
— |
36.6 |
8.0 |
270 |
75 |
| 65 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
123 |
517 |
42
|
167 |
25.4% |
25.0% |
36.6 |
7.3 |
205 |
52 |
| 66 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
149 |
1,767 |
42
|
209 |
20.3% |
20.6% |
30.2 |
8.1 |
311 |
63 |
| 67 |
Woodland Hills · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
478 |
2,221 |
41
|
188 |
22.0% |
28.9% |
31.8 |
7.3 |
897 |
197 |
| 68 |
Westlake Village · Private
|
Los Angeles |
290 |
1,705 |
41
|
202 |
20.3% |
20.2% |
30.3 |
8.3 |
585 |
119 |
| 69 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
564 |
39
|
120 |
32.6% |
22.9% |
28.7 |
6.6 |
147 |
48 |
| 70 |
Los Angeles · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
281 |
1,381 |
39
|
174 |
22.5% |
28.2% |
30.2 |
8.9 |
489 |
110 |
| 71 |
Hawthorne · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
123 |
567 |
39
|
168 |
23.2% |
22.9% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
207 |
48 |
| 72 |
Maywood · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
195 |
1,093 |
39
|
149 |
26.2% |
21.1% |
34.9 |
7.7 |
290 |
76 |
| 73 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
126 |
456 |
39
|
139 |
28.0% |
26.5% |
30.9 |
7.9 |
175 |
49 |
| 74 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
136 |
1,242 |
38
|
247 |
15.5% |
5.8% |
31.6 |
14.0 |
336 |
52 |
| 75 |
North Hollywood · Private
|
Los Angeles |
131 |
1,162 |
38
|
211 |
18.1% |
6.0% |
29.0 |
9.9 |
277 |
50 |
| 76 |
Santa Fe Springs · Private
|
Los Angeles |
105 |
405 |
38
|
168 |
22.7% |
25.0% |
29.5 |
3.8 |
176 |
40 |
| 77 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
516 |
2,293 |
38
|
158 |
24.0% |
26.5% |
30.6 |
9.7 |
817 |
196 |
| 78 |
Los Angeles · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
348 |
1,385 |
37
|
145 |
25.8% |
23.9% |
29.6 |
7.5 |
503 |
130 |
| 79 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
129 |
558 |
37
|
138 |
27.0% |
6.2% |
30.2 |
5.4 |
178 |
48 |
| 80 |
Huntington Park · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
149 |
615 |
37
|
142 |
25.9% |
21.8% |
30.2 |
10.7 |
212 |
55 |
| 81 |
Culver City · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
507 |
2,012 |
37
|
171 |
21.4% |
28.5% |
29.0 |
8.1 |
868 |
186 |
| 82 |
Beverly Hills · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
308 |
1,173 |
36
|
157 |
23.2% |
15.2% |
28.6 |
8.1 |
483 |
112 |
| 83 |
Torrance · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
459 |
1,734 |
36
|
196 |
18.4% |
30.9% |
27.7 |
5.7 |
899 |
165 |
| 84 |
Huntington Park · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
109 |
541 |
36
|
117 |
30.5% |
7.7% |
29.4 |
7.3 |
128 |
39 |
| 85 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
470 |
36
|
217 |
16.4% |
27.9% |
24.0 |
5.0 |
263 |
43 |
| 86 |
Redondo Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
739 |
2,921 |
35
|
154 |
23.0% |
21.4% |
28.3 |
6.2 |
1,137 |
262 |
| 87 |
Los Angeles · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
332 |
2,031 |
35
|
165 |
21.3% |
25.6% |
26.2 |
9.6 |
549 |
117 |
| 88 |
Alhambra · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
582 |
2,201 |
34
|
173 |
19.8% |
31.2% |
25.6 |
5.5 |
1,005 |
199 |
| 89 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
241 |
913 |
34
|
140 |
24.3% |
18.3% |
29.9 |
8.7 |
338 |
82 |
| 90 |
San Gabriel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
471 |
1,761 |
33
|
145 |
22.8% |
37.2% |
24.8 |
4.2 |
685 |
156 |
| 91 |
Granada Hills · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
1,154 |
5,927 |
33
|
173 |
19.0% |
29.2% |
26.5 |
6.3 |
2,000 |
380 |
| 92 |
Panorama City · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
330 |
1,316 |
33
|
122 |
26.9% |
27.8% |
25.4 |
6.4 |
401 |
108 |
| 93 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
130 |
500 |
32
|
172 |
18.8% |
35.7% |
25.4 |
6.2 |
223 |
42 |
| 94 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
130 |
557 |
32
|
195 |
16.6% |
14.3% |
28.5 |
3.1 |
253 |
42 |
| 95 |
Hacienda Heights · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
355 |
1,456 |
32
|
170 |
18.7% |
31.0% |
23.1 |
6.5 |
603 |
113 |
| 96 |
Long Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
126 |
552 |
32
|
213 |
14.9% |
25.0% |
26.2 |
7.9 |
269 |
40 |
| 97 |
San Gabriel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
378 |
1,438 |
31
|
179 |
17.6% |
34.5% |
23.0 |
6.9 |
678 |
119 |
| 98 |
Claremont · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
535 |
2,065 |
31
|
136 |
23.1% |
26.2% |
25.2 |
5.4 |
727 |
168 |
| 99 |
Los Angeles · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
115 |
493 |
31
|
174 |
18.0% |
— |
26.1 |
7.0 |
200 |
36 |
| 100 |
San Fernando · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
444 |
31
|
139 |
22.4% |
— |
23.2 |
2.7 |
156 |
35 |