| 801 |
Mendota · Public Holding share
|
Fresno |
266 |
1,065 |
14
|
43 |
31.6% |
8.3% |
9.8 |
1.5 |
114 |
36 |
| 802 |
Fontana · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Bernardino |
423 |
1,739 |
13
|
73 |
18.5% |
14.0% |
11.1 |
1.4 |
308 |
57 |
| 803 |
· Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
542 |
1,980 |
13
|
56 |
24.0% |
26.0% |
10.2 |
2.6 |
304 |
73 |
| 804 |
Santa Ana · Public Demand hides churn
|
Orange |
616 |
2,505 |
13
|
64 |
20.9% |
24.1% |
12.0 |
3.1 |
397 |
83 |
| 805 |
Anaheim · Public Compounding decline
|
Orange |
379 |
1,539 |
13
|
54 |
24.8% |
27.4% |
11.9 |
2.1 |
206 |
51 |
| 806 |
Caruthers · Public Best in class
|
Fresno |
171 |
682 |
13
|
39 |
34.3% |
17.4% |
6.4 |
— |
67 |
23 |
| 807 |
El Segundo · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
134 |
923 |
13
|
109 |
12.3% |
— |
10.4 |
3.0 |
146 |
18 |
| 808 |
Moorpark · Public Best in class
|
Ventura |
447 |
1,691 |
13
|
69 |
19.4% |
18.3% |
10.3 |
1.1 |
310 |
60 |
| 809 |
Hesperia · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Bernardino |
537 |
2,405 |
13
|
55 |
24.2% |
25.0% |
12.5 |
1.9 |
298 |
72 |
| 810 |
Roseville · Public Material decline
|
Placer |
485 |
1,940 |
13
|
67 |
20.0% |
29.2% |
8.7 |
1.6 |
325 |
65 |
| 811 |
Murrieta · Public Weak at the gate
|
Riverside |
516 |
2,066 |
13
|
50 |
26.7% |
29.0% |
11.4 |
1.4 |
258 |
69 |
| 812 |
Kingsburg · Public Weak at the gate
|
Fresno |
247 |
1,073 |
13
|
32 |
41.2% |
9.1% |
9.7 |
1.6 |
80 |
33 |
| 813 |
Simi Valley · Public Tracking
|
Ventura |
464 |
1,910 |
13
|
57 |
23.4% |
14.5% |
10.3 |
1.3 |
265 |
62 |
| 814 |
Lake Elsinore · Public Weak at the gate
|
Riverside |
540 |
2,373 |
13
|
57 |
23.5% |
34.7% |
11.7 |
2.0 |
306 |
72 |
| 815 |
Roseville · Public Material decline
|
Placer |
383 |
1,443 |
13
|
48 |
27.6% |
27.4% |
7.8 |
2.4 |
185 |
51 |
| 816 |
La Palma · Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
527 |
1,983 |
13
|
88 |
15.0% |
25.7% |
11.2 |
1.9 |
466 |
70 |
| 817 |
San Pedro · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
219 |
916 |
13
|
92 |
14.4% |
24.1% |
10.5 |
1.8 |
202 |
29 |
| 818 |
Mission Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
189 |
810 |
13
|
142 |
9.3% |
16.0% |
10.1 |
2.1 |
268 |
25 |
| 819 |
El Centro · Public Weak at the gate
|
Imperial |
454 |
1,846 |
13
|
53 |
25.1% |
33.3% |
11.0 |
1.5 |
239 |
60 |
| 820 |
Pinole · Public Demand hides churn
|
Contra Costa |
311 |
1,245 |
13
|
83 |
15.9% |
46.3% |
6.4 |
1.9 |
258 |
41 |
| 821 |
Oro Grande · Public Best in class
|
San Bernardino |
175 |
2,453 |
13
|
54 |
24.2% |
— |
9.1 |
— |
95 |
23 |
| 822 |
Modesto · Public Strong demand
|
Stanislaus |
604 |
2,292 |
13
|
39 |
33.8% |
15.2% |
8.6 |
1.7 |
234 |
79 |
| 823 |
Gilroy · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
383 |
1,630 |
13
|
63 |
20.8% |
40.0% |
8.4 |
1.8 |
240 |
50 |
| 824 |
Oxnard · Public Demand hides churn
|
Ventura |
445 |
1,913 |
13
|
50 |
26.0% |
13.8% |
9.4 |
2.0 |
223 |
58 |
| 825 |
Oceanside · Public Compounding decline
|
San Diego |
454 |
1,948 |
13
|
61 |
21.1% |
22.0% |
11.2 |
2.0 |
279 |
59 |
| 826 |
Vista · Public Material decline
|
San Diego |
447 |
1,746 |
13
|
48 |
27.0% |
25.9% |
10.7 |
2.2 |
215 |
58 |
| 827 |
Tulare · Public Tracking
|
Tulare |
355 |
1,616 |
13
|
28 |
46.5% |
15.2% |
10.4 |
2.0 |
99 |
46 |
| 828 |
Stockton · Public Material decline
|
San Joaquin |
278 |
1,164 |
13
|
49 |
26.7% |
19.4% |
7.9 |
1.8 |
135 |
36 |
| 829 |
Long Beach · Private
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
422 |
13
|
120 |
10.8% |
— |
7.8 |
2.6 |
139 |
15 |
| 830 |
Sun Valley · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
512 |
2,124 |
13
|
70 |
18.3% |
24.2% |
10.6 |
2.3 |
360 |
66 |
| 831 |
Costa Mesa · Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
264 |
976 |
13
|
54 |
23.9% |
17.6% |
11.7 |
— |
142 |
34 |
| 832 |
Stockton · Public Compounding decline
|
San Joaquin |
365 |
1,644 |
13
|
38 |
34.3% |
21.3% |
8.8 |
1.4 |
137 |
47 |
| 833 |
· Public Demand problem
|
Tuolumne |
202 |
880 |
13
|
30 |
43.3% |
11.5% |
9.4 |
2.0 |
60 |
26 |
| 834 |
Rialto · Public Material decline
|
San Bernardino |
499 |
2,075 |
13
|
67 |
19.3% |
12.5% |
11.6 |
0.8 |
332 |
64 |
| 835 |
Escondido · Public Compounding decline
|
San Diego |
507 |
1,656 |
13
|
47 |
27.1% |
24.6% |
11.4 |
0.6 |
240 |
65 |
| 836 |
· Public Demand problem
|
Contra Costa |
242 |
1,028 |
13
|
56 |
23.0% |
12.9% |
7.0 |
— |
135 |
31 |
| 837 |
Patterson · Public Strong demand
|
Stanislaus |
422 |
1,830 |
13
|
40 |
32.3% |
11.1% |
9.7 |
2.8 |
167 |
54 |
| 838 |
Lakeside · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
501 |
1,810 |
13
|
53 |
24.0% |
28.1% |
9.0 |
2.0 |
267 |
64 |
| 839 |
Oxnard · Public Watch — engagement
|
Ventura |
628 |
2,380 |
13
|
53 |
24.0% |
21.2% |
10.5 |
2.1 |
333 |
80 |
| 840 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
55 |
283 |
13
|
131 |
9.7% |
— |
12.7 |
5.5 |
72 |
7 |
| 841 |
La Mirada · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
457 |
1,726 |
13
|
67 |
18.9% |
27.6% |
10.5 |
2.2 |
306 |
58 |
| 842 |
Anaheim · Public Compounding decline
|
Orange |
331 |
1,446 |
13
|
47 |
26.9% |
26.2% |
11.2 |
1.8 |
156 |
42 |
| 843 |
Porterville · Public Demand problem
|
Tulare |
458 |
1,855 |
13
|
49 |
25.9% |
6.9% |
10.0 |
1.3 |
224 |
58 |
| 844 |
Oak Hills · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Bernardino |
545 |
2,370 |
13
|
47 |
26.7% |
17.4% |
10.8 |
1.8 |
258 |
69 |
| 845 |
Bakersfield · Public Sharp downturn
|
Kern |
542 |
2,228 |
13
|
49 |
25.7% |
20.6% |
10.0 |
1.7 |
265 |
68 |
| 846 |
Pomona · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
463 |
1,567 |
13
|
55 |
22.9% |
10.3% |
11.0 |
2.2 |
253 |
58 |
| 847 |
Selma · Public Demand problem
|
Fresno |
391 |
1,721 |
13
|
42 |
29.5% |
24.5% |
8.4 |
2.0 |
166 |
49 |
| 848 |
San Bernardino · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Bernardino |
632 |
2,692 |
12
|
61 |
20.5% |
20.2% |
10.1 |
1.7 |
385 |
79 |
| 849 |
· Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
520 |
2,261 |
12
|
72 |
17.4% |
23.1% |
9.6 |
3.5 |
373 |
65 |
| 850 |
Richmond · Public Material decline
|
Contra Costa |
288 |
1,047 |
12
|
68 |
18.5% |
41.7% |
6.6 |
2.8 |
195 |
36 |
| 851 |
El Cajon · Public Compounding decline
|
San Diego |
24 |
37 |
12
|
100 |
12.5% |
— |
— |
— |
24 |
3 |
| 852 |
Hayfork · Public Strong demand
|
Trinity |
24 |
96 |
12
|
46 |
27.3% |
— |
— |
— |
11 |
3 |
| 853 |
Lodi · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Joaquin |
480 |
1,952 |
12
|
32 |
39.5% |
11.7% |
8.8 |
2.5 |
152 |
60 |
| 854 |
Montclair · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Bernardino |
552 |
2,515 |
12
|
48 |
25.9% |
27.5% |
11.4 |
1.6 |
266 |
69 |
| 855 |
· Public Watch — engagement
|
Plumas |
40 |
256 |
12
|
92 |
13.5% |
— |
— |
— |
37 |
5 |
| 856 |
Pomona · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
88 |
647 |
12
|
80 |
15.7% |
27.3% |
12.5 |
— |
70 |
11 |
| 857 |
Merced · Public Strong demand
|
Merced |
441 |
1,943 |
12
|
46 |
27.4% |
9.1% |
8.6 |
0.7 |
201 |
55 |
| 858 |
Delano · Public Best in class
|
Kern |
345 |
1,394 |
12
|
37 |
34.1% |
13.9% |
9.6 |
2.6 |
126 |
43 |
| 859 |
· Public Demand hides churn
|
San Diego |
402 |
1,487 |
12
|
52 |
23.8% |
32.0% |
11.2 |
2.5 |
210 |
50 |
| 860 |
Lathrop · Public Demand problem
|
San Joaquin |
346 |
1,486 |
12
|
50 |
24.9% |
20.9% |
7.2 |
— |
173 |
43 |
| 861 |
Huntington Beach · Public Material decline
|
Orange |
298 |
1,154 |
12
|
63 |
19.6% |
24.3% |
10.1 |
2.4 |
189 |
37 |
| 862 |
Fairfield · Public Sharp downturn
|
Solano |
419 |
1,631 |
12
|
67 |
18.5% |
30.8% |
6.7 |
0.7 |
281 |
52 |
| 863 |
Lakewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
372 |
1,384 |
12
|
51 |
24.1% |
23.9% |
10.8 |
0.8 |
191 |
46 |
| 864 |
Beaumont · Public Demand hides churn
|
Riverside |
793 |
3,460 |
12
|
39 |
31.3% |
25.5% |
10.2 |
1.4 |
313 |
98 |
| 865 |
Lompoc · Public Material decline
|
Santa Barbara |
235 |
1,060 |
12
|
43 |
28.4% |
17.2% |
8.1 |
— |
102 |
29 |
| 866 |
Delano · Public Sharp downturn
|
Kern |
316 |
1,318 |
12
|
32 |
39.0% |
15.4% |
9.2 |
1.9 |
100 |
39 |
| 867 |
Bakersfield · Public Weak at the gate
|
Kern |
683 |
2,575 |
12
|
47 |
26.2% |
22.6% |
9.5 |
1.2 |
320 |
84 |
| 868 |
La Puente · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
171 |
747 |
12
|
54 |
22.8% |
— |
12.3 |
1.8 |
92 |
21 |
| 869 |
· Public Sharp downturn
|
Butte |
440 |
1,804 |
12
|
50 |
24.3% |
20.4% |
6.6 |
1.6 |
222 |
54 |
| 870 |
Chico · Public
|
Butte |
440 |
1,804 |
12
|
50 |
24.3% |
20.4% |
6.6 |
1.6 |
222 |
54 |
| 871 |
· Public Compounding decline
|
Sonoma |
318 |
1,253 |
12
|
57 |
21.4% |
20.5% |
8.5 |
2.5 |
182 |
39 |
| 872 |
Oxnard · Public Strong demand
|
Ventura |
638 |
2,452 |
12
|
47 |
26.3% |
21.8% |
9.7 |
1.7 |
297 |
78 |
| 873 |
Lake Arrowhead · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Bernardino |
229 |
860 |
12
|
41 |
29.8% |
10.7% |
9.2 |
1.3 |
94 |
28 |
| 874 |
Los Banos · Public Strong demand
|
Merced |
352 |
1,543 |
12
|
52 |
23.5% |
— |
8.8 |
1.4 |
183 |
43 |
| 875 |
Monrovia · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
385 |
1,455 |
12
|
80 |
15.3% |
21.3% |
9.3 |
1.8 |
308 |
47 |
| 876 |
Hughson · Public Best in class
|
Stanislaus |
189 |
859 |
12
|
42 |
28.8% |
26.1% |
6.3 |
— |
80 |
23 |
| 877 |
· Public Material decline
|
Sacramento |
436 |
1,652 |
12
|
61 |
20.1% |
28.3% |
7.6 |
1.8 |
264 |
53 |
| 878 |
Ontario · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Bernardino |
535 |
2,109 |
12
|
51 |
24.0% |
26.1% |
10.5 |
0.8 |
271 |
65 |
| 879 |
· Public Best in class
|
Madera |
173 |
748 |
12
|
42 |
28.8% |
19.1% |
8.1 |
— |
73 |
21 |
| 880 |
San Gabriel · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
33 |
244 |
12
|
230 |
5.3% |
— |
12.1 |
— |
76 |
4 |
| 881 |
· Public Strong demand
|
Ventura |
722 |
2,675 |
12
|
39 |
31.1% |
21.8% |
9.1 |
2.1 |
280 |
87 |
| 882 |
San Jose · Public Mid-year churn
|
Santa Clara |
391 |
1,564 |
12
|
45 |
26.7% |
12.8% |
7.7 |
1.3 |
176 |
47 |
| 883 |
San Diego · Public Mid-year churn
|
San Diego |
208 |
823 |
12
|
65 |
18.4% |
12.0% |
9.1 |
1.4 |
136 |
25 |
| 884 |
Apple Valley · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Bernardino |
400 |
1,791 |
12
|
44 |
27.0% |
27.1% |
8.2 |
1.8 |
178 |
48 |
| 885 |
Hacienda Heights · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
359 |
1,592 |
12
|
54 |
22.1% |
23.3% |
10.3 |
0.8 |
195 |
43 |
| 886 |
Lakewood · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
611 |
2,305 |
12
|
67 |
17.9% |
19.2% |
9.7 |
1.6 |
407 |
73 |
| 887 |
Arleta · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
252 |
1,038 |
12
|
45 |
26.3% |
13.3% |
8.7 |
1.2 |
114 |
30 |
| 888 |
Calexico · Public Sharp downturn
|
Imperial |
707 |
2,746 |
12
|
41 |
28.8% |
21.4% |
10.2 |
1.6 |
292 |
84 |
| 889 |
Hanford · Public Best in class
|
Kings |
261 |
1,183 |
12
|
39 |
30.1% |
12.9% |
8.1 |
— |
103 |
31 |
| 890 |
Chowchilla · Public Weak at the gate
|
Madera |
236 |
1,017 |
12
|
34 |
34.6% |
— |
8.9 |
1.7 |
81 |
28 |
| 891 |
Fresno · Public Material decline
|
Fresno |
557 |
2,485 |
12
|
46 |
25.5% |
24.2% |
8.8 |
1.4 |
259 |
66 |
| 892 |
Sebastopol · Public Best in class
|
Sonoma |
347 |
1,473 |
12
|
60 |
19.8% |
19.5% |
6.9 |
0.9 |
207 |
41 |
| 893 |
Paramount · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
890 |
3,400 |
12
|
60 |
19.7% |
29.5% |
10.1 |
2.1 |
534 |
105 |
| 894 |
Wilmington · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
603 |
2,422 |
12
|
59 |
20.0% |
23.9% |
10.6 |
1.5 |
355 |
71 |
| 895 |
Holtville · Public Strong demand
|
Imperial |
119 |
516 |
12
|
53 |
22.2% |
— |
7.6 |
— |
63 |
14 |
| 896 |
Riverbank · Public Best in class
|
Stanislaus |
153 |
744 |
12
|
35 |
34.0% |
16.7% |
5.2 |
— |
53 |
18 |
| 897 |
North Hollywood · Private
|
Los Angeles |
51 |
271 |
12
|
47 |
25.0% |
— |
11.8 |
5.9 |
24 |
6 |
| 898 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
51 |
409 |
12
|
90 |
13.0% |
50.0% |
11.8 |
5.9 |
46 |
6 |
| 899 |
· Public Both ends slipping
|
Santa Clara |
340 |
1,363 |
12
|
44 |
26.5% |
22.5% |
7.1 |
2.6 |
151 |
40 |
| 900 |
Riverside · Public Best in class
|
Riverside |
588 |
2,399 |
12
|
49 |
24.0% |
24.6% |
10.4 |
1.7 |
287 |
69 |