County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

1005 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.7pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.2pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -13.9pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,564 schools · 2025 data · Page 9 of 16 (showing 801–900)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
801
Mendota · Public  Holding share
Fresno 266 1,065 14 43 31.6% 8.3% 9.8 1.5 114 36
802
Fontana · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 423 1,739 13 73 18.5% 14.0% 11.1 1.4 308 57
803
· Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 542 1,980 13 56 24.0% 26.0% 10.2 2.6 304 73
804
Santa Ana · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 616 2,505 13 64 20.9% 24.1% 12.0 3.1 397 83
805
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 379 1,539 13 54 24.8% 27.4% 11.9 2.1 206 51
806
Caruthers · Public  Best in class
Fresno 171 682 13 39 34.3% 17.4% 6.4 67 23
807
El Segundo · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 134 923 13 109 12.3% 10.4 3.0 146 18
808
Moorpark · Public  Best in class
Ventura 447 1,691 13 69 19.4% 18.3% 10.3 1.1 310 60
809
Hesperia · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 537 2,405 13 55 24.2% 25.0% 12.5 1.9 298 72
810
Roseville · Public  Material decline
Placer 485 1,940 13 67 20.0% 29.2% 8.7 1.6 325 65
811
Murrieta · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 516 2,066 13 50 26.7% 29.0% 11.4 1.4 258 69
812
Kingsburg · Public  Weak at the gate
Fresno 247 1,073 13 32 41.2% 9.1% 9.7 1.6 80 33
813
Simi Valley · Public  Tracking
Ventura 464 1,910 13 57 23.4% 14.5% 10.3 1.3 265 62
814
Lake Elsinore · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 540 2,373 13 57 23.5% 34.7% 11.7 2.0 306 72
815
Roseville · Public  Material decline
Placer 383 1,443 13 48 27.6% 27.4% 7.8 2.4 185 51
816
La Palma · Public  Demand problem
Orange 527 1,983 13 88 15.0% 25.7% 11.2 1.9 466 70
817
San Pedro · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 219 916 13 92 14.4% 24.1% 10.5 1.8 202 29
818
Mission Hills · Private
Los Angeles 189 810 13 142 9.3% 16.0% 10.1 2.1 268 25
819
El Centro · Public  Weak at the gate
Imperial 454 1,846 13 53 25.1% 33.3% 11.0 1.5 239 60
820
Pinole · Public  Demand hides churn
Contra Costa 311 1,245 13 83 15.9% 46.3% 6.4 1.9 258 41
821
Oro Grande · Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 175 2,453 13 54 24.2% 9.1 95 23
822
Modesto · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 604 2,292 13 39 33.8% 15.2% 8.6 1.7 234 79
823
Gilroy · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 383 1,630 13 63 20.8% 40.0% 8.4 1.8 240 50
824
Oxnard · Public  Demand hides churn
Ventura 445 1,913 13 50 26.0% 13.8% 9.4 2.0 223 58
825
Oceanside · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 454 1,948 13 61 21.1% 22.0% 11.2 2.0 279 59
826
Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 447 1,746 13 48 27.0% 25.9% 10.7 2.2 215 58
827
Tulare · Public  Tracking
Tulare 355 1,616 13 28 46.5% 15.2% 10.4 2.0 99 46
828
Stockton · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 278 1,164 13 49 26.7% 19.4% 7.9 1.8 135 36
829
Long Beach · Private
Los Angeles 116 422 13 120 10.8% 7.8 2.6 139 15
830
Sun Valley · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 512 2,124 13 70 18.3% 24.2% 10.6 2.3 360 66
831
Costa Mesa · Public  Demand problem
Orange 264 976 13 54 23.9% 17.6% 11.7 142 34
832
Stockton · Public  Compounding decline
San Joaquin 365 1,644 13 38 34.3% 21.3% 8.8 1.4 137 47
833
· Public  Demand problem
Tuolumne 202 880 13 30 43.3% 11.5% 9.4 2.0 60 26
834
Rialto · Public  Material decline
San Bernardino 499 2,075 13 67 19.3% 12.5% 11.6 0.8 332 64
835
Escondido · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 507 1,656 13 47 27.1% 24.6% 11.4 0.6 240 65
836
· Public  Demand problem
Contra Costa 242 1,028 13 56 23.0% 12.9% 7.0 135 31
837
Patterson · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 422 1,830 13 40 32.3% 11.1% 9.7 2.8 167 54
838
Lakeside · Public  Best in class
San Diego 501 1,810 13 53 24.0% 28.1% 9.0 2.0 267 64
839
Oxnard · Public  Watch — engagement
Ventura 628 2,380 13 53 24.0% 21.2% 10.5 2.1 333 80
840
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 55 283 13 131 9.7% 12.7 5.5 72 7
841
La Mirada · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 457 1,726 13 67 18.9% 27.6% 10.5 2.2 306 58
842
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 331 1,446 13 47 26.9% 26.2% 11.2 1.8 156 42
843
Porterville · Public  Demand problem
Tulare 458 1,855 13 49 25.9% 6.9% 10.0 1.3 224 58
844
Oak Hills · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 545 2,370 13 47 26.7% 17.4% 10.8 1.8 258 69
845
Bakersfield · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 542 2,228 13 49 25.7% 20.6% 10.0 1.7 265 68
846
Pomona · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 463 1,567 13 55 22.9% 10.3% 11.0 2.2 253 58
847
Selma · Public  Demand problem
Fresno 391 1,721 13 42 29.5% 24.5% 8.4 2.0 166 49
848
San Bernardino · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 632 2,692 12 61 20.5% 20.2% 10.1 1.7 385 79
849
· Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 520 2,261 12 72 17.4% 23.1% 9.6 3.5 373 65
850
Richmond · Public  Material decline
Contra Costa 288 1,047 12 68 18.5% 41.7% 6.6 2.8 195 36
851
El Cajon · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 24 37 12 100 12.5% 24 3
852
Hayfork · Public  Strong demand
Trinity 24 96 12 46 27.3% 11 3
853
Lodi · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 480 1,952 12 32 39.5% 11.7% 8.8 2.5 152 60
854
Montclair · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 552 2,515 12 48 25.9% 27.5% 11.4 1.6 266 69
855
· Public  Watch — engagement
Plumas 40 256 12 92 13.5% 37 5
856
Pomona · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 88 647 12 80 15.7% 27.3% 12.5 70 11
857
Merced · Public  Strong demand
Merced 441 1,943 12 46 27.4% 9.1% 8.6 0.7 201 55
858
Delano · Public  Best in class
Kern 345 1,394 12 37 34.1% 13.9% 9.6 2.6 126 43
859
· Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 402 1,487 12 52 23.8% 32.0% 11.2 2.5 210 50
860
Lathrop · Public  Demand problem
San Joaquin 346 1,486 12 50 24.9% 20.9% 7.2 173 43
861
Huntington Beach · Public  Material decline
Orange 298 1,154 12 63 19.6% 24.3% 10.1 2.4 189 37
862
Fairfield · Public  Sharp downturn
Solano 419 1,631 12 67 18.5% 30.8% 6.7 0.7 281 52
863
Lakewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 372 1,384 12 51 24.1% 23.9% 10.8 0.8 191 46
864
Beaumont · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 793 3,460 12 39 31.3% 25.5% 10.2 1.4 313 98
865
Lompoc · Public  Material decline
Santa Barbara 235 1,060 12 43 28.4% 17.2% 8.1 102 29
866
Delano · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 316 1,318 12 32 39.0% 15.4% 9.2 1.9 100 39
867
Bakersfield · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 683 2,575 12 47 26.2% 22.6% 9.5 1.2 320 84
868
La Puente · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 171 747 12 54 22.8% 12.3 1.8 92 21
869
· Public  Sharp downturn
Butte 440 1,804 12 50 24.3% 20.4% 6.6 1.6 222 54
870
Chico · Public
Butte 440 1,804 12 50 24.3% 20.4% 6.6 1.6 222 54
871
· Public  Compounding decline
Sonoma 318 1,253 12 57 21.4% 20.5% 8.5 2.5 182 39
872
Oxnard · Public  Strong demand
Ventura 638 2,452 12 47 26.3% 21.8% 9.7 1.7 297 78
873
Lake Arrowhead · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 229 860 12 41 29.8% 10.7% 9.2 1.3 94 28
874
Los Banos · Public  Strong demand
Merced 352 1,543 12 52 23.5% 8.8 1.4 183 43
875
Monrovia · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 385 1,455 12 80 15.3% 21.3% 9.3 1.8 308 47
876
Hughson · Public  Best in class
Stanislaus 189 859 12 42 28.8% 26.1% 6.3 80 23
877
· Public  Material decline
Sacramento 436 1,652 12 61 20.1% 28.3% 7.6 1.8 264 53
878
Ontario · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 535 2,109 12 51 24.0% 26.1% 10.5 0.8 271 65
879
· Public  Best in class
Madera 173 748 12 42 28.8% 19.1% 8.1 73 21
880
San Gabriel · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 33 244 12 230 5.3% 12.1 76 4
881
· Public  Strong demand
Ventura 722 2,675 12 39 31.1% 21.8% 9.1 2.1 280 87
882
San Jose · Public  Mid-year churn
Santa Clara 391 1,564 12 45 26.7% 12.8% 7.7 1.3 176 47
883
San Diego · Public  Mid-year churn
San Diego 208 823 12 65 18.4% 12.0% 9.1 1.4 136 25
884
Apple Valley · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 400 1,791 12 44 27.0% 27.1% 8.2 1.8 178 48
885
Hacienda Heights · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 359 1,592 12 54 22.1% 23.3% 10.3 0.8 195 43
886
Lakewood · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 611 2,305 12 67 17.9% 19.2% 9.7 1.6 407 73
887
Arleta · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 252 1,038 12 45 26.3% 13.3% 8.7 1.2 114 30
888
Calexico · Public  Sharp downturn
Imperial 707 2,746 12 41 28.8% 21.4% 10.2 1.6 292 84
889
Hanford · Public  Best in class
Kings 261 1,183 12 39 30.1% 12.9% 8.1 103 31
890
Chowchilla · Public  Weak at the gate
Madera 236 1,017 12 34 34.6% 8.9 1.7 81 28
891
Fresno · Public  Material decline
Fresno 557 2,485 12 46 25.5% 24.2% 8.8 1.4 259 66
892
Sebastopol · Public  Best in class
Sonoma 347 1,473 12 60 19.8% 19.5% 6.9 0.9 207 41
893
Paramount · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 890 3,400 12 60 19.7% 29.5% 10.1 2.1 534 105
894
Wilmington · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 603 2,422 12 59 20.0% 23.9% 10.6 1.5 355 71
895
Holtville · Public  Strong demand
Imperial 119 516 12 53 22.2% 7.6 63 14
896
Riverbank · Public  Best in class
Stanislaus 153 744 12 35 34.0% 16.7% 5.2 53 18
897
North Hollywood · Private
Los Angeles 51 271 12 47 25.0% 11.8 5.9 24 6
898
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 51 409 12 90 13.0% 50.0% 11.8 5.9 46 6
899
· Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Clara 340 1,363 12 44 26.5% 22.5% 7.1 2.6 151 40
900
Riverside · Public  Best in class
Riverside 588 2,399 12 49 24.0% 24.6% 10.4 1.7 287 69
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →