| 101 |
Bellflower · Private
|
Los Angeles |
183 |
869 |
31
|
168 |
18.5% |
12.3% |
25.7 |
6.6 |
308 |
57 |
| 102 |
Los Angeles · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
264 |
1,025 |
31
|
121 |
25.6% |
23.2% |
26.5 |
8.0 |
320 |
82 |
| 103 |
Pomona · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
117 |
458 |
31
|
197 |
15.6% |
25.0% |
24.8 |
4.3 |
231 |
36 |
| 104 |
Los Angeles · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
498 |
2,055 |
31
|
120 |
25.6% |
15.0% |
25.5 |
8.6 |
598 |
153 |
| 105 |
Downey · Private
|
Los Angeles |
111 |
591 |
31
|
153 |
20.0% |
— |
27.0 |
6.3 |
170 |
34 |
| 106 |
Los Angeles · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
180 |
694 |
31
|
94 |
32.4% |
16.4% |
24.4 |
6.7 |
170 |
55 |
| 107 |
Los Angeles · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
392 |
1,497 |
30
|
172 |
17.7% |
29.4% |
25.8 |
6.1 |
674 |
119 |
| 108 |
Los Angeles · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
127 |
546 |
30
|
123 |
24.4% |
— |
27.6 |
5.5 |
156 |
38 |
| 109 |
Reseda · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
333 |
1,339 |
29
|
92 |
31.9% |
22.4% |
24.0 |
5.4 |
307 |
98 |
| 110 |
Lawndale · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
415 |
1,403 |
29
|
97 |
30.2% |
27.1% |
26.8 |
5.1 |
404 |
122 |
| 111 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
167 |
589 |
29
|
102 |
28.8% |
16.3% |
23.9 |
7.2 |
170 |
49 |
| 112 |
La Canada · Private
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
623 |
29
|
209 |
14.1% |
22.7% |
22.7 |
7.3 |
313 |
44 |
| 113 |
Lake Balboa · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
713 |
3,162 |
29
|
130 |
22.6% |
27.3% |
22.7 |
5.6 |
925 |
209 |
| 114 |
Huntington Park · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
113 |
565 |
29
|
151 |
19.3% |
15.2% |
29.2 |
8.0 |
171 |
33 |
| 115 |
Carson · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
120 |
474 |
29
|
113 |
25.7% |
22.9% |
26.7 |
8.3 |
136 |
35 |
| 116 |
Chatsworth · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
429 |
1,743 |
29
|
97 |
29.7% |
20.2% |
22.1 |
5.8 |
418 |
124 |
| 117 |
Torrance · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
430 |
1,812 |
29
|
108 |
26.7% |
27.4% |
22.6 |
4.7 |
465 |
124 |
| 118 |
Torrance · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
452 |
1,879 |
29
|
124 |
23.3% |
33.9% |
22.6 |
4.4 |
559 |
130 |
| 119 |
Van Nuys · Public Both ends slipping
|
Los Angeles |
515 |
1,969 |
29
|
115 |
25.1% |
29.1% |
23.9 |
6.6 |
590 |
148 |
| 120 |
Carson · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
105 |
438 |
29
|
96 |
29.7% |
10.0% |
20.9 |
2.9 |
101 |
30 |
| 121 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
268 |
1,130 |
28
|
127 |
22.4% |
30.3% |
22.8 |
4.5 |
340 |
76 |
| 122 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
113 |
484 |
28
|
198 |
14.3% |
9.4% |
20.4 |
8.0 |
224 |
32 |
| 123 |
Los Angeles · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
378 |
1,495 |
28
|
105 |
26.9% |
26.2% |
22.2 |
6.3 |
397 |
107 |
| 124 |
La Puente · Private
|
Los Angeles |
223 |
977 |
28
|
120 |
23.5% |
22.2% |
22.4 |
4.9 |
268 |
63 |
| 125 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
117 |
598 |
28
|
128 |
22.0% |
27.3% |
24.8 |
8.6 |
150 |
33 |
| 126 |
Los Angeles · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
531 |
2,237 |
28
|
118 |
23.8% |
28.9% |
25.2 |
5.1 |
627 |
149 |
| 127 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
139 |
515 |
28
|
161 |
17.4% |
7.7% |
19.4 |
7.2 |
224 |
39 |
| 128 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
418 |
1,842 |
28
|
155 |
18.0% |
25.6% |
23.4 |
6.5 |
649 |
117 |
| 129 |
Reseda · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
567 |
2,719 |
28
|
122 |
22.8% |
24.7% |
19.4 |
5.8 |
693 |
158 |
| 130 |
South Gate · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
101 |
867 |
28
|
95 |
29.2% |
10.7% |
27.7 |
6.9 |
96 |
28 |
| 131 |
Hawthorne · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
131 |
552 |
27
|
178 |
15.4% |
11.1% |
19.9 |
5.3 |
233 |
36 |
| 132 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
117 |
512 |
27
|
115 |
23.7% |
9.4% |
19.7 |
2.6 |
135 |
32 |
| 133 |
Pasadena · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
339 |
1,303 |
27
|
130 |
20.9% |
15.2% |
21.5 |
7.7 |
440 |
92 |
| 134 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
258 |
1,001 |
27
|
90 |
30.0% |
21.4% |
20.2 |
5.0 |
233 |
70 |
| 135 |
Sun Valley · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
118 |
1,100 |
27
|
140 |
19.4% |
12.5% |
21.2 |
4.2 |
165 |
32 |
| 136 |
Inglewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
144 |
588 |
27
|
165 |
16.4% |
20.5% |
18.1 |
2.1 |
238 |
39 |
| 137 |
Panorama City · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
492 |
27
|
180 |
14.8% |
10.0% |
21.4 |
2.7 |
202 |
30 |
| 138 |
Long Beach · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
992 |
3,890 |
27
|
101 |
26.5% |
24.1% |
22.1 |
6.2 |
1,000 |
265 |
| 139 |
La Verne · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
467 |
1,911 |
27
|
87 |
30.6% |
27.4% |
22.3 |
4.3 |
405 |
124 |
| 140 |
Van Nuys · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
136 |
1,229 |
26
|
99 |
26.7% |
8.3% |
22.8 |
5.2 |
135 |
36 |
| 141 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
494 |
26
|
126 |
20.9% |
15.6% |
21.5 |
7.4 |
153 |
32 |
| 142 |
Venice · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
110 |
335 |
26
|
130 |
20.3% |
— |
22.7 |
9.1 |
143 |
29 |
| 143 |
Van Nuys · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
426 |
1,774 |
26
|
94 |
27.4% |
23.6% |
21.6 |
4.5 |
402 |
110 |
| 144 |
El Segundo · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
141 |
550 |
26
|
131 |
19.5% |
8.3% |
19.1 |
6.4 |
185 |
36 |
| 145 |
Pasadena · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
138 |
1,053 |
25
|
115 |
22.0% |
25.7% |
18.1 |
5.1 |
159 |
35 |
| 146 |
Agoura Hills · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
442 |
1,709 |
25
|
130 |
19.5% |
26.8% |
19.7 |
5.2 |
574 |
112 |
| 147 |
Sylmar · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
341 |
1,463 |
25
|
89 |
28.2% |
24.4% |
22.0 |
5.3 |
305 |
86 |
| 148 |
Valencia · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
611 |
2,286 |
25
|
128 |
19.6% |
31.4% |
19.6 |
5.1 |
781 |
153 |
| 149 |
Long Beach · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
299 |
1,260 |
24
|
105 |
22.9% |
62.5% |
20.7 |
4.3 |
315 |
72 |
| 150 |
Lynwood · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
378 |
1,633 |
24
|
82 |
29.4% |
19.8% |
21.2 |
3.4 |
309 |
91 |
| 151 |
Rowland Heights · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
463 |
2,016 |
24
|
125 |
19.1% |
30.6% |
18.4 |
4.1 |
580 |
111 |
| 152 |
Hollywood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
140 |
599 |
24
|
119 |
19.8% |
21.2% |
17.1 |
3.6 |
167 |
33 |
| 153 |
Huntington Park · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
382 |
1,479 |
24
|
94 |
25.0% |
32.2% |
19.6 |
4.2 |
360 |
90 |
| 154 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
316 |
1,263 |
23
|
68 |
34.4% |
16.2% |
19.6 |
7.0 |
215 |
74 |
| 155 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
146 |
616 |
23
|
136 |
17.1% |
— |
14.4 |
2.7 |
199 |
34 |
| 156 |
Baldwin Park · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
393 |
1,650 |
23
|
75 |
30.9% |
19.8% |
21.6 |
4.1 |
295 |
91 |
| 157 |
Harbor City · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
402 |
1,549 |
23
|
90 |
25.7% |
24.7% |
19.6 |
3.5 |
362 |
93 |
| 158 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
384 |
1,582 |
23
|
118 |
19.4% |
20.4% |
19.8 |
5.0 |
453 |
88 |
| 159 |
Bell · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
441 |
2,088 |
23
|
101 |
22.8% |
22.8% |
19.7 |
4.1 |
444 |
101 |
| 160 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
140 |
1,031 |
23
|
174 |
13.2% |
34.4% |
22.9 |
8.6 |
243 |
32 |
| 161 |
Los Angeles · Public Both ends slipping
|
Los Angeles |
106 |
431 |
23
|
108 |
20.9% |
25.0% |
16.0 |
3.8 |
115 |
24 |
| 162 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
137 |
585 |
23
|
112 |
20.1% |
— |
14.6 |
— |
154 |
31 |
| 163 |
El Monte · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
423 |
1,638 |
22
|
84 |
26.6% |
30.5% |
20.3 |
4.0 |
357 |
95 |
| 164 |
Granada Hills · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
512 |
2,152 |
22
|
87 |
26.0% |
21.7% |
17.8 |
3.3 |
443 |
115 |
| 165 |
La Verne · Private
|
Los Angeles |
156 |
696 |
22
|
154 |
14.5% |
17.1% |
16.0 |
1.9 |
241 |
35 |
| 166 |
South Gate · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
499 |
1,990 |
22
|
109 |
20.7% |
29.5% |
17.4 |
3.2 |
542 |
112 |
| 167 |
Whittier · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
256 |
1,000 |
22
|
102 |
21.8% |
19.3% |
16.4 |
4.3 |
261 |
57 |
| 168 |
Los Angeles · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
117 |
474 |
22
|
95 |
23.4% |
11.5% |
19.7 |
— |
111 |
26 |
| 169 |
Covina · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
252 |
1,056 |
22
|
89 |
24.6% |
9.1% |
17.9 |
2.4 |
224 |
55 |
| 170 |
Long Beach · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
823 |
3,408 |
22
|
117 |
18.4% |
23.7% |
17.2 |
5.6 |
960 |
177 |
| 171 |
Palmdale · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
251 |
2,259 |
22
|
78 |
27.6% |
29.6% |
19.1 |
4.0 |
196 |
54 |
| 172 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
395 |
491 |
21
|
90 |
23.7% |
29.8% |
19.8 |
4.6 |
354 |
84 |
| 173 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
273 |
1,284 |
21
|
119 |
17.8% |
22.4% |
16.5 |
4.4 |
326 |
58 |
| 174 |
Carson · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
320 |
1,407 |
21
|
91 |
22.9% |
25.4% |
18.1 |
5.3 |
292 |
67 |
| 175 |
Los Angeles · Public Tracking
|
Los Angeles |
145 |
533 |
21
|
115 |
18.0% |
— |
16.6 |
4.8 |
167 |
30 |
| 176 |
Compton · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
227 |
908 |
20
|
82 |
24.9% |
15.2% |
16.3 |
3.5 |
185 |
46 |
| 177 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
247 |
978 |
20
|
83 |
24.5% |
6.0% |
17.4 |
4.9 |
204 |
50 |
| 178 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
109 |
457 |
20
|
79 |
25.6% |
27.3% |
20.2 |
2.8 |
86 |
22 |
| 179 |
Burbank · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
622 |
2,457 |
20
|
107 |
18.8% |
25.6% |
15.8 |
4.3 |
665 |
125 |
| 180 |
Burbank · Public
|
Los Angeles |
622 |
2,457 |
20
|
107 |
18.8% |
25.6% |
15.8 |
4.3 |
665 |
125 |
| 181 |
Pico Rivera · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
505 |
1,995 |
20
|
88 |
22.5% |
23.0% |
15.6 |
3.8 |
445 |
100 |
| 182 |
Rosemead · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
499 |
1,691 |
19
|
85 |
23.0% |
27.8% |
15.6 |
4.2 |
422 |
97 |
| 183 |
San Fernando · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
367 |
1,608 |
19
|
75 |
25.7% |
21.1% |
16.4 |
4.1 |
276 |
71 |
| 184 |
Pomona · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
356 |
1,542 |
19
|
71 |
26.9% |
33.8% |
15.7 |
1.4 |
253 |
68 |
| 185 |
Panorama City · Private
|
Los Angeles |
126 |
547 |
19
|
122 |
15.6% |
12.5% |
13.5 |
— |
154 |
24 |
| 186 |
Lawndale · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
442 |
1,981 |
19
|
98 |
19.3% |
22.6% |
14.5 |
2.3 |
435 |
84 |
| 187 |
Los Angeles · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
249 |
942 |
19
|
98 |
19.3% |
27.7% |
13.2 |
2.8 |
243 |
47 |
| 188 |
South El Monte · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
308 |
1,125 |
19
|
67 |
28.0% |
20.7% |
17.5 |
4.2 |
207 |
58 |
| 189 |
San Fernando · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
170 |
2,629 |
19
|
88 |
21.5% |
9.4% |
15.3 |
4.1 |
149 |
32 |
| 190 |
West Covina · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
389 |
1,568 |
19
|
86 |
21.8% |
26.0% |
15.7 |
4.4 |
335 |
73 |
| 191 |
Burbank · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
533 |
2,283 |
19
|
113 |
16.7% |
30.0% |
13.3 |
3.2 |
600 |
100 |
| 192 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
450 |
19
|
141 |
13.3% |
— |
18.8 |
5.4 |
158 |
21 |
| 193 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
240 |
971 |
19
|
79 |
23.8% |
26.7% |
13.3 |
5.4 |
189 |
45 |
| 194 |
Long Beach · Public
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
701 |
19
|
79 |
23.9% |
— |
10.7 |
— |
88 |
21 |
| 195 |
Compton · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
370 |
1,582 |
19
|
83 |
22.6% |
13.0% |
14.9 |
3.2 |
306 |
69 |
| 196 |
San Pedro · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
563 |
2,398 |
18
|
86 |
21.2% |
29.1% |
15.1 |
3.4 |
486 |
103 |
| 197 |
Downey · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
933 |
4,051 |
18
|
83 |
21.7% |
28.1% |
15.3 |
2.6 |
771 |
167 |
| 198 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
410 |
18
|
112 |
15.9% |
15.0% |
13.4 |
— |
126 |
20 |
| 199 |
Alhambra · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
576 |
2,056 |
18
|
115 |
15.4% |
27.4% |
13.0 |
4.0 |
660 |
102 |
| 200 |
Castaic · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
294 |
1,159 |
18
|
57 |
31.1% |
25.0% |
14.3 |
2.7 |
167 |
52 |