| 101 |
Lynwood · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
378 |
1,633 |
24.1%
|
81.8% |
29.4% |
19.8% |
21.2 |
3.4 |
309 |
91 |
| 102 |
Rowland Heights · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
463 |
2,016 |
24.0%
|
125.3% |
19.1% |
30.6% |
18.4 |
4.1 |
580 |
111 |
| 103 |
Huntington Park · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
382 |
1,479 |
23.6%
|
94.2% |
25.0% |
32.2% |
19.6 |
4.2 |
360 |
90 |
| 104 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
316 |
1,263 |
23.4%
|
68.0% |
34.4% |
16.2% |
19.6 |
7.0 |
215 |
74 |
| 105 |
Baldwin Park · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
393 |
1,650 |
23.2%
|
75.1% |
30.9% |
19.8% |
21.6 |
4.1 |
295 |
91 |
| 106 |
· Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
402 |
1,549 |
23.1%
|
90.0% |
25.7% |
24.7% |
19.6 |
3.5 |
362 |
93 |
| 107 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
384 |
1,582 |
22.9%
|
118.0% |
19.4% |
20.4% |
19.8 |
5.0 |
453 |
88 |
| 108 |
Bell · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
441 |
2,088 |
22.9%
|
100.7% |
22.8% |
22.8% |
19.7 |
4.1 |
444 |
101 |
| 109 |
Los Angeles · Public Both ends slipping
|
Los Angeles |
106 |
431 |
22.6%
|
108.5% |
20.9% |
25.0% |
16.0 |
3.8 |
115 |
24 |
| 110 |
El Monte · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
423 |
1,638 |
22.5%
|
84.4% |
26.6% |
30.5% |
20.3 |
4.0 |
357 |
95 |
| 111 |
· Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
512 |
2,152 |
22.5%
|
86.5% |
26.0% |
21.7% |
17.8 |
3.3 |
443 |
115 |
| 112 |
La Verne · Private
|
Los Angeles |
156 |
696 |
22.4%
|
154.5% |
14.5% |
17.1% |
16.0 |
1.9 |
241 |
35 |
| 113 |
South Gate · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
499 |
1,990 |
22.4%
|
108.6% |
20.7% |
29.5% |
17.4 |
3.2 |
542 |
112 |
| 114 |
· Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
256 |
1,000 |
22.3%
|
102.0% |
21.8% |
19.3% |
16.4 |
4.3 |
261 |
57 |
| 115 |
Covina · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
252 |
1,056 |
21.8%
|
88.9% |
24.6% |
9.1% |
17.9 |
2.4 |
224 |
55 |
| 116 |
Long Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
823 |
3,408 |
21.5%
|
116.7% |
18.4% |
23.7% |
17.2 |
5.6 |
960 |
177 |
| 117 |
Palmdale · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
251 |
2,259 |
21.5%
|
78.1% |
27.6% |
29.6% |
19.1 |
4.0 |
196 |
54 |
| 118 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
395 |
491 |
21.3%
|
89.6% |
23.7% |
29.8% |
19.8 |
4.6 |
354 |
84 |
| 119 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
273 |
1,284 |
21.2%
|
119.4% |
17.8% |
22.4% |
16.5 |
4.4 |
326 |
58 |
| 120 |
Carson · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
320 |
1,407 |
20.9%
|
91.2% |
22.9% |
25.4% |
18.1 |
5.3 |
292 |
67 |
| 121 |
Los Angeles · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
145 |
533 |
20.7%
|
115.2% |
18.0% |
— |
16.6 |
4.8 |
167 |
30 |
| 122 |
· Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
227 |
908 |
20.3%
|
81.5% |
24.9% |
15.2% |
16.3 |
3.5 |
185 |
46 |
| 123 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
247 |
978 |
20.2%
|
82.6% |
24.5% |
6.0% |
17.4 |
4.9 |
204 |
50 |
| 124 |
· Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
622 |
2,457 |
20.1%
|
106.9% |
18.8% |
25.6% |
15.8 |
4.3 |
665 |
125 |
| 125 |
Burbank · Public
|
Los Angeles |
622 |
2,457 |
20.1%
|
106.9% |
18.8% |
25.6% |
15.8 |
4.3 |
665 |
125 |
| 126 |
Pico Rivera · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
505 |
1,995 |
19.8%
|
88.1% |
22.5% |
23.0% |
15.6 |
3.8 |
445 |
100 |
| 127 |
Rosemead · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
499 |
1,691 |
19.4%
|
84.6% |
23.0% |
27.8% |
15.6 |
4.2 |
422 |
97 |
| 128 |
San Fernando · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
367 |
1,608 |
19.4%
|
75.2% |
25.7% |
21.1% |
16.4 |
4.1 |
276 |
71 |
| 129 |
Pomona · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
356 |
1,542 |
19.1%
|
71.1% |
26.9% |
33.8% |
15.7 |
1.4 |
253 |
68 |
| 130 |
Panorama City · Private
|
Los Angeles |
126 |
547 |
19.1%
|
122.2% |
15.6% |
12.5% |
13.5 |
— |
154 |
24 |
| 131 |
Lawndale · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
442 |
1,981 |
19.0%
|
98.4% |
19.3% |
22.6% |
14.5 |
2.3 |
435 |
84 |
| 132 |
Los Angeles · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
249 |
942 |
18.9%
|
97.6% |
19.3% |
27.7% |
13.2 |
2.8 |
243 |
47 |
| 133 |
South El Monte · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
308 |
1,125 |
18.8%
|
67.2% |
28.0% |
20.7% |
17.5 |
4.2 |
207 |
58 |
| 134 |
West Covina · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
389 |
1,568 |
18.8%
|
86.1% |
21.8% |
26.0% |
15.7 |
4.4 |
335 |
73 |
| 135 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
450 |
18.8%
|
141.1% |
13.3% |
— |
18.8 |
5.4 |
158 |
21 |
| 136 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
240 |
971 |
18.8%
|
78.8% |
23.8% |
26.7% |
13.3 |
5.4 |
189 |
45 |
| 137 |
Long Beach · Public
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
701 |
18.8%
|
78.6% |
23.9% |
— |
10.7 |
— |
88 |
21 |
| 138 |
· Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
370 |
1,582 |
18.6%
|
82.7% |
22.6% |
13.0% |
14.9 |
3.2 |
306 |
69 |
| 139 |
San Pedro · Public Tracking
|
Los Angeles |
563 |
2,398 |
18.3%
|
86.3% |
21.2% |
29.1% |
15.1 |
3.4 |
486 |
103 |
| 140 |
Downey · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
933 |
4,051 |
17.9%
|
82.6% |
21.7% |
28.1% |
15.3 |
2.6 |
771 |
167 |
| 141 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
410 |
17.9%
|
112.5% |
15.9% |
15.0% |
13.4 |
— |
126 |
20 |
| 142 |
Alhambra · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
576 |
2,056 |
17.7%
|
114.6% |
15.4% |
27.4% |
13.0 |
4.0 |
660 |
102 |
| 143 |
Castaic · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
294 |
1,159 |
17.7%
|
56.8% |
31.1% |
25.0% |
14.3 |
2.7 |
167 |
52 |
| 144 |
West Covina · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
437 |
1,756 |
17.6%
|
93.1% |
18.9% |
31.2% |
13.0 |
1.8 |
407 |
77 |
| 145 |
Azusa · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
422 |
1,609 |
17.5%
|
60.4% |
29.0% |
23.0% |
15.9 |
3.1 |
255 |
74 |
| 146 |
Duarte · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
206 |
756 |
17.5%
|
75.2% |
23.2% |
16.7% |
15.1 |
1.9 |
155 |
36 |
| 147 |
Pasadena · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
269 |
1,206 |
17.5%
|
78.8% |
22.2% |
17.0% |
13.8 |
4.5 |
212 |
47 |
| 148 |
Maywood · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
242 |
1,012 |
17.4%
|
68.2% |
25.4% |
14.3% |
14.1 |
1.2 |
165 |
42 |
| 149 |
Montebello · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
549 |
2,121 |
17.3%
|
66.7% |
26.0% |
23.2% |
14.8 |
2.9 |
366 |
95 |
| 150 |
Whittier · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
406 |
1,652 |
17.2%
|
87.2% |
19.8% |
20.0% |
13.6 |
1.2 |
354 |
70 |
| 151 |
Tujunga · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
267 |
1,195 |
17.2%
|
86.1% |
20.0% |
10.9% |
14.6 |
4.5 |
230 |
46 |
| 152 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
210 |
738 |
17.1%
|
68.6% |
25.0% |
16.7% |
14.8 |
3.3 |
144 |
36 |
| 153 |
Glendora · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
521 |
2,069 |
16.9%
|
93.7% |
18.0% |
33.0% |
12.9 |
2.5 |
488 |
88 |
| 154 |
Whittier · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
554 |
2,372 |
16.6%
|
96.4% |
17.2% |
26.1% |
13.7 |
2.9 |
534 |
92 |
| 155 |
· Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
523 |
2,046 |
16.2%
|
53.9% |
30.1% |
23.5% |
12.8 |
2.3 |
282 |
85 |
| 156 |
Cudahy · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
142 |
1,257 |
16.2%
|
83.8% |
19.3% |
— |
13.4 |
2.1 |
119 |
23 |
| 157 |
Quartz Hill · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
822 |
3,175 |
16.2%
|
67.0% |
24.1% |
27.1% |
12.7 |
2.5 |
551 |
133 |
| 158 |
Norwalk · Public
|
Los Angeles |
198 |
882 |
16.2%
|
63.6% |
25.4% |
— |
13.1 |
1.5 |
126 |
32 |
| 159 |
Cerritos · Private
|
Los Angeles |
137 |
527 |
16.1%
|
88.3% |
18.2% |
13.6% |
13.9 |
2.9 |
121 |
22 |
| 160 |
El Monte · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
368 |
1,383 |
16.0%
|
74.2% |
21.6% |
28.8% |
14.4 |
3.0 |
273 |
59 |
| 161 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
131 |
555 |
16.0%
|
106.1% |
15.1% |
28.6% |
10.7 |
2.3 |
139 |
21 |
| 162 |
Cerritos · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
395 |
1,739 |
15.9%
|
52.4% |
30.4% |
36.5% |
11.4 |
1.5 |
207 |
63 |
| 163 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
138 |
564 |
15.9%
|
88.4% |
18.0% |
— |
11.6 |
— |
122 |
22 |
| 164 |
Lynwood · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
448 |
1,858 |
15.6%
|
70.1% |
22.3% |
18.6% |
12.9 |
1.3 |
314 |
70 |
| 165 |
Covina · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
314 |
1,247 |
15.6%
|
62.7% |
24.9% |
12.2% |
12.4 |
2.2 |
197 |
49 |
| 166 |
South Gate · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
405 |
1,681 |
15.6%
|
86.7% |
17.9% |
19.1% |
13.6 |
4.2 |
351 |
63 |
| 167 |
La Puente · Public Both ends slipping
|
Los Angeles |
374 |
1,535 |
15.5%
|
90.4% |
17.2% |
36.2% |
14.4 |
2.4 |
338 |
58 |
| 168 |
Saugus · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
537 |
2,317 |
15.3%
|
78.2% |
19.5% |
30.5% |
12.1 |
2.6 |
420 |
82 |
| 169 |
Covina · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
295 |
1,259 |
15.2%
|
57.3% |
26.6% |
24.4% |
12.2 |
2.4 |
169 |
45 |
| 170 |
La Puente · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
205 |
813 |
15.1%
|
67.8% |
22.3% |
22.6% |
11.7 |
1.5 |
139 |
31 |
| 171 |
Palmdale · Public Both ends slipping
|
Los Angeles |
582 |
2,349 |
15.1%
|
61.2% |
24.7% |
35.2% |
12.0 |
1.7 |
356 |
88 |
| 172 |
Pomona · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
246 |
993 |
15.0%
|
48.8% |
30.8% |
32.4% |
12.2 |
1.2 |
120 |
37 |
| 173 |
Hawthorne · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
426 |
1,675 |
15.0%
|
75.1% |
20.0% |
20.3% |
12.4 |
1.4 |
320 |
64 |
| 174 |
Montebello · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
493 |
1,907 |
15.0%
|
54.6% |
27.5% |
20.3% |
13.0 |
2.6 |
269 |
74 |
| 175 |
Bellflower · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
341 |
1,997 |
15.0%
|
67.2% |
22.3% |
15.7% |
12.0 |
2.4 |
229 |
51 |
| 176 |
Inglewood · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
114 |
407 |
14.9%
|
72.8% |
20.5% |
— |
11.4 |
2.6 |
83 |
17 |
| 177 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
289 |
1,159 |
14.9%
|
52.9% |
28.1% |
18.6% |
14.9 |
1.4 |
153 |
43 |
| 178 |
Santa Fe Springs · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
523 |
1,865 |
14.7%
|
67.1% |
21.9% |
31.2% |
13.6 |
1.9 |
351 |
77 |
| 179 |
Newhall · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
560 |
1,941 |
14.5%
|
77.5% |
18.7% |
29.6% |
12.1 |
2.1 |
434 |
81 |
| 180 |
North Hills · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
450 |
1,905 |
14.4%
|
77.8% |
18.6% |
21.5% |
9.8 |
1.3 |
350 |
65 |
| 181 |
West Covina · Public Tracking
|
Los Angeles |
208 |
712 |
14.4%
|
89.4% |
16.1% |
13.3% |
11.5 |
1.9 |
186 |
30 |
| 182 |
Los Angeles · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
127 |
614 |
14.2%
|
71.7% |
19.8% |
— |
14.2 |
2.4 |
91 |
18 |
| 183 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
405 |
1,889 |
14.1%
|
76.0% |
18.5% |
8.8% |
11.6 |
2.7 |
308 |
57 |
| 184 |
Pomona · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
235 |
895 |
14.0%
|
48.5% |
28.9% |
18.2% |
12.3 |
2.5 |
114 |
33 |
| 185 |
San Dimas · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
315 |
1,235 |
14.0%
|
89.8% |
15.6% |
20.4% |
11.4 |
1.6 |
283 |
44 |
| 186 |
· Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
388 |
1,590 |
13.9%
|
82.5% |
16.9% |
37.0% |
10.3 |
1.8 |
320 |
54 |
| 187 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
124 |
583 |
13.7%
|
209.7% |
6.5% |
— |
10.5 |
— |
260 |
17 |
| 188 |
Gardena · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
352 |
1,343 |
13.6%
|
51.1% |
26.7% |
12.5% |
11.9 |
2.6 |
180 |
48 |
| 189 |
· Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
542 |
1,980 |
13.5%
|
56.1% |
24.0% |
26.0% |
10.2 |
2.6 |
304 |
73 |
| 190 |
El Segundo · Public Strong demand
|
Los Angeles |
134 |
923 |
13.4%
|
109.0% |
12.3% |
— |
10.4 |
3.0 |
146 |
18 |
| 191 |
San Pedro · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
219 |
916 |
13.2%
|
92.2% |
14.4% |
24.1% |
10.5 |
1.8 |
202 |
29 |
| 192 |
Mission Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
189 |
810 |
13.2%
|
141.8% |
9.3% |
16.0% |
10.1 |
2.1 |
268 |
25 |
| 193 |
Long Beach · Private
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
422 |
12.9%
|
119.8% |
10.8% |
— |
7.8 |
2.6 |
139 |
15 |
| 194 |
Sun Valley · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
512 |
2,124 |
12.9%
|
70.3% |
18.3% |
24.2% |
10.6 |
2.3 |
360 |
66 |
| 195 |
La Mirada · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
457 |
1,726 |
12.7%
|
67.0% |
18.9% |
27.6% |
10.5 |
2.2 |
306 |
58 |
| 196 |
Pomona · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
463 |
1,567 |
12.5%
|
54.6% |
22.9% |
10.3% |
11.0 |
2.2 |
253 |
58 |
| 197 |
· Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
520 |
2,261 |
12.5%
|
71.7% |
17.4% |
23.1% |
9.6 |
3.5 |
373 |
65 |
| 198 |
Lakewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
372 |
1,384 |
12.4%
|
51.3% |
24.1% |
23.9% |
10.8 |
0.8 |
191 |
46 |
| 199 |
La Puente · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
171 |
747 |
12.3%
|
53.8% |
22.8% |
— |
12.3 |
1.8 |
92 |
21 |
| 200 |
Monrovia · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
385 |
1,455 |
12.2%
|
80.0% |
15.3% |
21.3% |
9.3 |
1.8 |
308 |
47 |