County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year Reset filters

Top 10 in Los Angeles County — UC Reach Score

Los Angeles County · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — Los Angeles County · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

Los Angeles County

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Los Angeles · Public
98
3
Los Angeles · Public
90
4
Los Angeles · Public
82
5
Santa Clarita · Public
68
6
Malibu · Public
52
7
Sun Valley · Public
42
8
Lakewood · Public
42
9
Van Nuys · Public
38
10
Los Angeles · Public
38

▲ Top 10 Small Private

Los Angeles County

1
Los Angeles · Private
121
2
Pasadena · Private
104
3
Inglewood · Private
86
4
La Canada · Private
76
5
Pasadena · Private
76
6
Burbank · Private
69
7
Palos Verdes Estate · Private
66
8
Santa Monica · Private
65
9
Canoga Park · Private
64
10
Encino · Private
62

Leaderboards by type — Los Angeles County (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Scoped to Los Angeles County — change the County filter above to rescope.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

Los Angeles County

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Wilmington · Public
86
4
Los Angeles · Public
75
5
San Marino · Public
72
6
Los Angeles · Public
71
7
Rolling Hills Estat · Public
71
8
Los Angeles · Public
68
9
Los Angeles · Public
65
10
Diamond Bar · Public
65

▲ Top 10 Private

Los Angeles County

1
Claremont · Private
144
2
La Canada · Private
103
3
Los Angeles · Private
77
4
Calabasas · Private
77
5
Los Angeles · Private
66
6
Los Angeles · Private
64
7
Los Angeles · Private
62
8
Studio City · Private
62
9
Santa Monica · Private
58
10
Sherman Oaks · Private
57

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

Los Angeles County

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Los Angeles · Public
7
3
Lancaster · Public
8
4
Canyon Country · Public
8
5
Littlerock · Public
8
6
City Of Industry · Public
8
7
Los Angeles · Public
8
8
Lancaster · Public
9
9
North Hollywood · Public
9
10
Glendale · Public
10

▼ Bottom 10 Private

Los Angeles County

1
Long Beach · Private
13
2
Mission Hills · Private
13
3
Los Angeles · Private
14
4
Cerritos · Private
16
5
Los Angeles · Private
18
6
Panorama City · Private
19
7
La Verne · Private
22
8
Los Angeles · Private
23
9
La Puente · Private
28
10
La Canada · Private
29

Top 10 by individual UC campus — Los Angeles County · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
La Canada · Private
16
3
Calabasas · Private
15
4
Carson · Public
14
5
Cerritos · Public
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
12
7
Los Angeles · Private
12
8
Chatsworth · Private
11
9
Studio City · Private
10
10
Santa Monica · Private
10

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Los Angeles · Private
10
4
La Canada · Private
9
5
Compton · Public
9
6
Claremont · Private
9
7
Los Angeles · Public
8
8
Cerritos · Public
8
9
Los Angeles · Public
8
10
Lakewood · Private
7

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
Carson · Public
34
2
Claremont · Private
25
3
Los Angeles · Public
19
4
Cerritos · Public
19
5
Los Angeles · Public
18
6
Los Angeles · Private
17
7
Los Angeles · Public
16
8
Hawthorne · Public
15
9
Sherman Oaks · Private
15
10
La Crescenta · Public
15

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Claremont · Private
30
2
La Canada · Private
29
3
Cerritos · Public
28
4
Los Angeles · Private
23
5
Los Angeles · Private
21
6
Los Angeles · Public
20
7
Carson · Public
19
8
Wilmington · Public
19
9
Calabasas · Private
18
10
Manhattan Beach · Public
18

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Cerritos · Public
37
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
Lancaster · Public
22
5
Los Angeles · Public
21
6
Pasadena · Private
21
7
Wilmington · Public
21
8
Los Angeles · Public
20
9
Rolling Hills Estat · Public
19
10
Cerritos · Public
17

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Wilmington · Public
28
3
Los Angeles · Public
23
4
Cerritos · Public
22
5
Calabasas · Private
20
6
La Canada · Private
20
7
San Marino · Public
18
8
Diamond Bar · Public
17
9
Carson · Public
17
10
Los Angeles · Private
16

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on Los Angeles County

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
3
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
4
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Compton · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
Wilmington · Public
100.0%
10
Panorama City · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
2
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
3
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
4
Rosemead · Public
98.1%
5
San Gabriel · Public
97.2%
6
Walnut · Public
96.9%
7
Woodland Hills · Public
96.8%
8
San Gabriel · Public
96.7%
9
Palos Verdes Estate · Public
96.2%
10
Hacienda Heights · Public
96.1%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Arleta · Public
125:1
4
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
5
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
6
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
7
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
8
La Puente · Public
148:1
9
Huntington Park · Public
151:1
10
Long Beach · Public
165:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 28.8 · σ 2.66
σ 2.66
2
avg 25.1 · σ 2.73
σ 2.73
3
avg 26.6 · σ 2.74
σ 2.74
4
avg 28.3 · σ 2.92
σ 2.92
5
avg 39.7 · σ 3.17
σ 3.17
6
avg 54.5 · σ 3.29
σ 3.29
7
avg 25.4 · σ 3.36
σ 3.36
8
avg 106.9 · σ 3.43
σ 3.43
9
avg 27.9 · σ 3.47
σ 3.47
10
avg 28.6 · σ 3.5
σ 3.5

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
3
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
4
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
5
Santa Clarita · n=98 · 2025
97%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
97%
7
La Canada · n=327 · 2025
94%
8
Long Beach · n=112 · 2025
91%
9
Los Angeles · n=92 · 2025
90%
10
Rolling Hills Estat · n=494 · 2025
90%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
2
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
3
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
4
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
5
Long Beach · n=112 · 2025
86%
6
La Canada · n=327 · 2025
81%
7
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
79%
8
San Marino · n=211 · 2025
78%
9
Santa Clarita · n=98 · 2025
78%
10
Rolling Hills Estat · n=495 · 2025
75%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
3
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
4
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
5
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$103.3M
6
Sherman Oaks · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$97.0M
7
Claremont · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$95.6M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$77.8M
9
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$67.9M
10
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$63.9M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp
Lakewood · Private
18 '20 → 48 '25 +30.6pp
Inglewood · Public
18 '18 → 49 '25 +30.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
33 '18 → 63 '25 +30.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
16 '18 → 44 '25 +27.7pp
Los Angeles · Public
12 '18 → 39 '25 +26.9pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp
Rosemead · Public
38 '18 → 19 '25 -18.3pp
Calabasas · Private
93 '20 → 77 '25 -16.5pp
West Hills · Private
61 '20 → 45 '25 -15.9pp
Chatsworth · Private
67 '20 → 51 '25 -15.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
29 '20 → 16 '23 -13.0pp
Alhambra · Public
30 '18 → 18 '25 -12.8pp
Panorama City · Private
32 '20 → 19 '25 -12.6pp
La Verne · Private
35 '20 → 22 '25 -12.4pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp
Hollywood · Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
+65.7% vs -5.3% +71.0pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+58.7% vs -8.7% +67.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
+61.0% vs -5.3% +66.3pp
Lancaster · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+59.6% vs -5.3% +64.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+43.9% vs -12.0% +55.9pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Inglewood · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.8% -43.5pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.0% -42.2pp
Inglewood · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-50.5% vs -8.7% -41.8pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-46.2% vs -5.3% -40.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-43.9% vs -5.3% -38.6pp
Huntington Park · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-43.5% vs -5.3% -38.3pp
Reseda · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-43.1% vs -5.3% -37.9pp
Granada Hills · Los Angeles · Public  Material decline
-43.0% vs -5.3% -37.7pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

241 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Long Beach · Public
3.77 53.8% +26.5pp
Littlerock · Public
3.83 44.6% +19.1pp
Lancaster · Public
3.85 35.8% +16.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.86 34.3% +15.3pp
Hollywood · Public
3.62 47.2% +14.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.89 34.9% +14.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.81 33.0% +13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.80 32.7% +13.2pp
Carson · Public
3.73 32.3% +12.9pp
Carson · Public
4.10 34.8% +12.9pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.58 14.3% -7.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.52 19.5% -5.9pp
Canoga Park · Public
3.65 16.7% -5.7pp
La Puente · Public
3.58 17.2% -5.6pp
Monrovia · Public
3.86 15.3% -5.0pp

Full rankings — every Los Angeles County high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

298 schools · 2025 data · Page 2 of 3 (showing 101–200) · 130 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
101
Bellflower · Private
Los Angeles 183 869 31 168 18.5% 12.3% 25.7 6.6 308 57
102
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 264 1,025 31 121 25.6% 23.2% 26.5 8.0 320 82
103
Pomona · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 117 458 31 197 15.6% 25.0% 24.8 4.3 231 36
104
Los Angeles · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 498 2,055 31 120 25.6% 15.0% 25.5 8.6 598 153
105
Downey · Private
Los Angeles 111 591 31 153 20.0% 27.0 6.3 170 34
106
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 180 694 31 94 32.4% 16.4% 24.4 6.7 170 55
107
Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 392 1,497 30 172 17.7% 29.4% 25.8 6.1 674 119
108
Los Angeles · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 127 546 30 123 24.4% 27.6 5.5 156 38
109
Reseda · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 333 1,339 29 92 31.9% 22.4% 24.0 5.4 307 98
110
Lawndale · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 415 1,403 29 97 30.2% 27.1% 26.8 5.1 404 122
111
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 167 589 29 102 28.8% 16.3% 23.9 7.2 170 49
112
La Canada · Private
Los Angeles 150 623 29 209 14.1% 22.7% 22.7 7.3 313 44
113
Lake Balboa · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 713 3,162 29 130 22.6% 27.3% 22.7 5.6 925 209
114
Huntington Park · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 113 565 29 151 19.3% 15.2% 29.2 8.0 171 33
115
Carson · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 120 474 29 113 25.7% 22.9% 26.7 8.3 136 35
116
Chatsworth · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 429 1,743 29 97 29.7% 20.2% 22.1 5.8 418 124
117
Torrance · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 430 1,812 29 108 26.7% 27.4% 22.6 4.7 465 124
118
Torrance · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 452 1,879 29 124 23.3% 33.9% 22.6 4.4 559 130
119
Van Nuys · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 515 1,969 29 115 25.1% 29.1% 23.9 6.6 590 148
120
Carson · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 105 438 29 96 29.7% 10.0% 20.9 2.9 101 30
121
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 268 1,130 28 127 22.4% 30.3% 22.8 4.5 340 76
122
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 113 484 28 198 14.3% 9.4% 20.4 8.0 224 32
123
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 378 1,495 28 105 26.9% 26.2% 22.2 6.3 397 107
124
La Puente · Private
Los Angeles 223 977 28 120 23.5% 22.2% 22.4 4.9 268 63
125
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 117 598 28 128 22.0% 27.3% 24.8 8.6 150 33
126
Los Angeles · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 531 2,237 28 118 23.8% 28.9% 25.2 5.1 627 149
127
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 139 515 28 161 17.4% 7.7% 19.4 7.2 224 39
128
Los Angeles · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 418 1,842 28 155 18.0% 25.6% 23.4 6.5 649 117
129
Reseda · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 567 2,719 28 122 22.8% 24.7% 19.4 5.8 693 158
130
South Gate · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 101 867 28 95 29.2% 10.7% 27.7 6.9 96 28
131
Hawthorne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 131 552 27 178 15.4% 11.1% 19.9 5.3 233 36
132
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 117 512 27 115 23.7% 9.4% 19.7 2.6 135 32
133
Pasadena · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 339 1,303 27 130 20.9% 15.2% 21.5 7.7 440 92
134
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 258 1,001 27 90 30.0% 21.4% 20.2 5.0 233 70
135
Sun Valley · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 118 1,100 27 140 19.4% 12.5% 21.2 4.2 165 32
136
Inglewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 144 588 27 165 16.4% 20.5% 18.1 2.1 238 39
137
Panorama City · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 492 27 180 14.8% 10.0% 21.4 2.7 202 30
138
Long Beach · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 992 3,890 27 101 26.5% 24.1% 22.1 6.2 1,000 265
139
La Verne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 467 1,911 27 87 30.6% 27.4% 22.3 4.3 405 124
140
Van Nuys · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 136 1,229 26 99 26.7% 8.3% 22.8 5.2 135 36
141
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 121 494 26 126 20.9% 15.6% 21.5 7.4 153 32
142
Venice · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 110 335 26 130 20.3% 22.7 9.1 143 29
143
Van Nuys · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 426 1,774 26 94 27.4% 23.6% 21.6 4.5 402 110
144
El Segundo · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 141 550 26 131 19.5% 8.3% 19.1 6.4 185 36
145
Pasadena · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 138 1,053 25 115 22.0% 25.7% 18.1 5.1 159 35
146
Agoura Hills · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 442 1,709 25 130 19.5% 26.8% 19.7 5.2 574 112
147
Sylmar · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 341 1,463 25 89 28.2% 24.4% 22.0 5.3 305 86
148
Valencia · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 611 2,286 25 128 19.6% 31.4% 19.6 5.1 781 153
149
Long Beach · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 299 1,260 24 105 22.9% 62.5% 20.7 4.3 315 72
150
Lynwood · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 378 1,633 24 82 29.4% 19.8% 21.2 3.4 309 91
151
Rowland Heights · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 463 2,016 24 125 19.1% 30.6% 18.4 4.1 580 111
152
Hollywood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 140 599 24 119 19.8% 21.2% 17.1 3.6 167 33
153
Huntington Park · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 382 1,479 24 94 25.0% 32.2% 19.6 4.2 360 90
154
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 316 1,263 23 68 34.4% 16.2% 19.6 7.0 215 74
155
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 146 616 23 136 17.1% 14.4 2.7 199 34
156
Baldwin Park · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 393 1,650 23 75 30.9% 19.8% 21.6 4.1 295 91
157
Harbor City · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 402 1,549 23 90 25.7% 24.7% 19.6 3.5 362 93
158
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 384 1,582 23 118 19.4% 20.4% 19.8 5.0 453 88
159
Bell · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 441 2,088 23 101 22.8% 22.8% 19.7 4.1 444 101
160
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 140 1,031 23 174 13.2% 34.4% 22.9 8.6 243 32
161
Los Angeles · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 106 431 23 108 20.9% 25.0% 16.0 3.8 115 24
162
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 137 585 23 112 20.1% 14.6 154 31
163
El Monte · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 423 1,638 22 84 26.6% 30.5% 20.3 4.0 357 95
164
Granada Hills · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 512 2,152 22 87 26.0% 21.7% 17.8 3.3 443 115
165
La Verne · Private
Los Angeles 156 696 22 154 14.5% 17.1% 16.0 1.9 241 35
166
South Gate · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 499 1,990 22 109 20.7% 29.5% 17.4 3.2 542 112
167
Whittier · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 256 1,000 22 102 21.8% 19.3% 16.4 4.3 261 57
168
Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 117 474 22 95 23.4% 11.5% 19.7 111 26
169
Covina · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 252 1,056 22 89 24.6% 9.1% 17.9 2.4 224 55
170
Long Beach · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 823 3,408 22 117 18.4% 23.7% 17.2 5.6 960 177
171
Palmdale · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 251 2,259 22 78 27.6% 29.6% 19.1 4.0 196 54
172
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 395 491 21 90 23.7% 29.8% 19.8 4.6 354 84
173
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 273 1,284 21 119 17.8% 22.4% 16.5 4.4 326 58
174
Carson · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 320 1,407 21 91 22.9% 25.4% 18.1 5.3 292 67
175
Los Angeles · Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 145 533 21 115 18.0% 16.6 4.8 167 30
176
Compton · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 227 908 20 82 24.9% 15.2% 16.3 3.5 185 46
177
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 247 978 20 83 24.5% 6.0% 17.4 4.9 204 50
178
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 109 457 20 79 25.6% 27.3% 20.2 2.8 86 22
179
Burbank · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
180
Burbank · Public
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
181
Pico Rivera · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 505 1,995 20 88 22.5% 23.0% 15.6 3.8 445 100
182
Rosemead · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 499 1,691 19 85 23.0% 27.8% 15.6 4.2 422 97
183
San Fernando · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 367 1,608 19 75 25.7% 21.1% 16.4 4.1 276 71
184
Pomona · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 356 1,542 19 71 26.9% 33.8% 15.7 1.4 253 68
185
Panorama City · Private
Los Angeles 126 547 19 122 15.6% 12.5% 13.5 154 24
186
Lawndale · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 442 1,981 19 98 19.3% 22.6% 14.5 2.3 435 84
187
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 249 942 19 98 19.3% 27.7% 13.2 2.8 243 47
188
South El Monte · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 308 1,125 19 67 28.0% 20.7% 17.5 4.2 207 58
189
San Fernando · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 170 2,629 19 88 21.5% 9.4% 15.3 4.1 149 32
190
West Covina · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 389 1,568 19 86 21.8% 26.0% 15.7 4.4 335 73
191
Burbank · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 533 2,283 19 113 16.7% 30.0% 13.3 3.2 600 100
192
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 450 19 141 13.3% 18.8 5.4 158 21
193
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 240 971 19 79 23.8% 26.7% 13.3 5.4 189 45
194
Long Beach · Public
Los Angeles 112 701 19 79 23.9% 10.7 88 21
195
Compton · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 370 1,582 19 83 22.6% 13.0% 14.9 3.2 306 69
196
San Pedro · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 563 2,398 18 86 21.2% 29.1% 15.1 3.4 486 103
197
Downey · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 933 4,051 18 83 21.7% 28.1% 15.3 2.6 771 167
198
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 112 410 18 112 15.9% 15.0% 13.4 126 20
199
Alhambra · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 576 2,056 18 115 15.4% 27.4% 13.0 4.0 660 102
200
Castaic · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 294 1,159 18 57 31.1% 25.0% 14.3 2.7 167 52
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →

Related reading

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next