County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

1005 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.7pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.2pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -13.9pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,564 schools · 2025 data · Page 11 of 16 (showing 1001–1100)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
1001
Livingston · Public  Weak at the gate
Merced 296 1,169 10 42 23.4% 13.8% 7.8 2.7 124 29
1002
Oakland · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 225 1,166 10 56 17.3% 18.2% 6.2 127 22
1003
Petaluma · Private
Sonoma 41 172 10 112 8.7% 46 4
1004
Gilroy · Public  Demand hides churn
Santa Clara 400 1,618 10 40 24.2% 12.8% 6.5 0.8 161 39
1005
Baldwin Park · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 226 1,260 10 54 17.9% 31.8% 9.7 1.3 123 22
1006
Ontario · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 452 1,994 10 50 19.6% 9.1% 9.7 1.6 225 44
1007
· Public  Sharp downturn
El Dorado 310 1,135 10 34 28.3% 26.7% 4.5 106 30
1008
Glendale · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 549 2,066 10 61 15.8% 30.2% 9.1 2.2 335 53
1009
Sacramento · Public  Demand problem
Sacramento 427 1,535 10 48 20.0% 17.1% 5.4 0.9 205 41
1010
Oakland · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 73 270 10 59 16.3% 43 7
1011
Vallejo · Private
Solano 73 320 10 111 8.6% 42.9% 4.1 81 7
1012
Rancho Mirage · Public  Material decline
Riverside 313 1,401 10 59 16.3% 26.7% 9.6 1.0 184 30
1013
San Jose · Public  Mid-year churn
Santa Clara 94 405 10 73 13.0% 3.2 69 9
1014
El Centro · Public  Tracking
Imperial 460 2,006 10 42 22.9% 20.4% 8.3 1.1 192 44
1015
Perris · Public  Holding share
Riverside 136 1,031 10 79 12.0% 7.3 108 13
1016
La Habra · Public  Tracking
Orange 471 1,881 10 55 17.4% 7.4 1.7 258 45
1017
Bakersfield · Public  Demand problem
Kern 471 2,048 10 33 29.2% 15.6% 8.1 1.3 154 45
1018
Lake Elsinore · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 403 1,687 9 36 25.9% 23.7% 8.7 147 38
1019
Manteca · Public  Strong demand
San Joaquin 509 1,907 9 33 28.9% 16.7% 6.7 1.6 166 48
1020
Rio Linda · Public
Sacramento 329 1,594 9 38 24.6% 32.3% 4.0 126 31
1021
Escalon · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 213 815 9 32 29.4% 35.0% 4.2 68 20
1022
Bakersfield · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 556 2,212 9 44 21.5% 34.6% 7.5 242 52
1023
Carmichael · Private
Sacramento 43 388 9 21 44.4% 9 4
1024
Adelanto · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 551 2,247 9 47 19.6% 21.6% 8.0 1.1 260 51
1025
Norco · Public  Strong demand
Riverside 486 2,032 9 37 25.3% 20.0% 8.2 0.8 178 45
1026
Hesperia · Public  Strong demand
San Bernardino 487 2,098 9 39 23.8% 40.0% 8.2 0.6 189 45
1027
Anaheim · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 401 1,608 9 57 16.2% 13.5% 8.5 1.2 229 37
1028
Upper Lake · Public  Watch — engagement
Lake 65 307 9 75 12.2% 9.2 49 6
1029
Bakersfield · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 466 2,159 9 32 28.9% 7.7 1.5 149 43
1030
Napa · Public  Tracking
Napa 434 1,642 9 38 23.9% 12.5% 7.1 2.3 167 40
1031
Woodlake · Public  Strong demand
Tulare 152 646 9 22 42.4% 7.2 33 14
1032
Oakdale · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 370 1,563 9 23 40.5% 29.4% 5.7 84 34
1033
· Public  Best in class
Monterey 153 721 9 39 23.3% 6.5 2.0 60 14
1034
Modesto · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 504 2,192 9 26 35.1% 17.4% 6.3 1.8 131 46
1035
Hemet · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 551 2,414 9 38 24.0% 24.0% 8.5 0.7 208 50
1036
La Mesa · Public  Tracking
San Diego 563 2,172 9 42 21.7% 31.4% 8.0 1.9 235 51
1037
Acton · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 89 394 9 38 23.5% 9.0 34 8
1038
Arbuckle · Public  Demand problem
Colusa 124 463 9 37 23.9% 27.3% 3.2 46 11
1039
North Hollywood · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 113 558 9 109 8.1% 8.8 123 10
1040
Nipomo · Public  Strong demand
San Luis Obispo 192 819 9 27 33.3% 6.8 51 17
1041
· Public  Strong demand
San Diego 635 2,331 9 57 15.5% 33.9% 7.4 1.3 362 56
1042
Antelope · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 320 1,312 9 42 20.7% 42.9% 5.0 135 28
1043
Dixon · Public  Weak at the gate
Solano 242 990 9 54 16.0% 14.3% 5.0 131 21
1044
Clovis · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 751 2,779 9 26 32.8% 27.7% 6.7 0.8 198 65
1045
Dos Palos · Public  Material decline
Merced 151 639 9 36 23.6% 23.1% 4.0 55 13
1046
Victorville · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 535 2,255 9 34 25.4% 15.2% 7.8 1.5 181 46
1047
Lancaster · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 675 2,631 9 31 28.2% 24.1% 7.0 1.2 206 58
1048
Vacaville · Public  Best in class
Solano 409 1,671 9 41 21.0% 40.0% 4.7 0.7 167 35
1049
Ramona · Public  Best in class
San Diego 328 1,404 9 39 21.9% 14.3% 5.8 128 28
1050
Atascadero · Public  Demand problem
San Luis Obispo 293 1,157 9 34 25.0% 5.5 100 25
1051
Bakersfield · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 529 2,098 9 32 26.8% 28.9% 6.0 168 45
1052
San Bernardino · Public  Both ends slipping
San Bernardino 306 1,440 8 36 23.4% 6.2 111 26
1053
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 95 438 8 83 10.1% 8.4 79 8
1054
Bakersfield · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 598 2,331 8 32 25.8% 6.0% 6.9 1.5 194 50
1055
Stockton · Public  Weak at the gate
San Joaquin 72 1,186 8 56 15.0% 40 6
1056
Los Angeles · Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 84 477 8 130 6.4% 4.8 109 7
1057
Fremont · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 72 394 8 57 14.6% 4.2 41 6
1058
Stockton · Public
San Joaquin 576 2,355 8 32 25.9% 14.6% 4.9 185 48
1059
· Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 204 780 8 48 17.4% 41.2% 8.3 98 17
1060
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 168 654 8 57 14.6% 21.4% 8.3 96 14
1061
Sacramento · Public  Demand hides churn
Sacramento 433 1,682 8 39 21.1% 38.9% 4.2 171 36
1062
Chico · Public
Butte 482 1,978 8 34 24.1% 20.0% 4.8 0.6 166 40
1063
Santa Ana · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 500 1,519 8 37 22.4% 17.1% 7.4 0.8 183 41
1064
· Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 183 723 8 66 12.5% 26.7% 8.2 120 15
1065
Redding · Public  Holding share
Shasta 281 1,268 8 37 22.3% 30.4% 4.6 103 23
1066
Los Banos · Public  Demand problem
Merced 443 1,725 8 36 22.4% 11.1% 6.1 0.9 161 36
1067
Calipatria · Public  Sharp downturn
Imperial 74 345 8 46 17.6% 8.1 34 6
1068
San Diego · Private
San Diego 37 436 8 86 9.4% 100.0% 8.1 32 3
1069
Lodi · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 481 2,058 8 32 25.7% 15.4% 4.8 0.8 152 39
1070
Santa Rosa · Public  Compounding decline
Sonoma 346 1,553 8 50 16.1% 32.1% 4.0 174 28
1071
San Jose · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Clara 225 862 8 24 34.0% 4.4 3.1 53 18
1072
Bakersfield · Public  Best in class
Kern 656 2,530 8 31 25.6% 5.8% 6.1 0.6 203 52
1073
San Jose · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Clara 177 874 8 25 31.1% 6.2 45 14
1074
Riverside · Private
Riverside 89 685 8 69 11.5% 7.9 61 7
1075
· Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 446 1,543 8 37 21.3% 34.3% 7.0 0.9 164 35
1076
Rancho Cordova · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 435 1,944 8 35 22.5% 32.4% 4.6 0.9 151 34
1077
· Public  Strong demand
Kern 525 2,324 8 26 30.6% 31.7% 6.3 0.6 134 41
1078
Santa Rosa · Public  Demand hides churn
Sonoma 334 1,434 8 32 24.5% 30.8% 4.5 106 26
1079
Rohnert Park · Public  Strong demand
Sonoma 425 1,755 8 36 21.6% 21.2% 4.7 153 33
1080
Santee · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 425 1,621 8 39 19.8% 27.3% 6.6 2.1 167 33
1081
Littlerock · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 374 1,507 8 25 30.9% 6.2 94 29
1082
Kerman · Public  Best in class
Fresno 350 1,493 8 21 37.5% 11.1% 5.1 0.9 72 27
1083
Phelan · Public  Demand problem
San Bernardino 467 2,163 8 33 23.5% 11.1% 6.6 1.3 153 36
1084
Bloomington · Public  Material decline
San Bernardino 416 1,794 8 50 15.2% 6.7 210 32
1085
Fair Oaks · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 365 1,548 8 37 20.9% 17.9% 4.7 134 28
1086
· Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 502 1,952 8 43 17.8% 28.9% 6.2 1.6 214 38
1087
Ventura · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 371 1,585 8 43 17.7% 14.3% 5.7 158 28
1088
Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
Fresno 398 1,741 8 24 30.9% 13.3% 5.3 0.8 97 30
1089
Bonsall · Public  Watch — engagement
San Diego 93 342 8 62 12.1% 4.3 58 7
1090
· Public  Compounding decline
Fresno 93 367 8 13 58.3% 3.2 12 7
1091
Lancaster · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 638 2,688 8 34 22.3% 16.7% 6.9 1.1 215 48
1092
Hanford · Public  Tracking
Kings 346 1,498 8 22 34.7% 15.4% 5.2 75 26
1093
Hayward · Public  Mid-year churn
Alameda 346 1,580 8 46 16.2% 38.5% 4.0 160 26
1094
El Cajon · Public  Mid-year churn
San Diego 440 1,701 8 35 21.3% 12.1% 7.5 1.8 155 33
1095
San Francisco · Private
San Francisco 40 320 8 188 4.0% 75 3
1096
Stockton · Public  Compounding decline
San Joaquin 482 2,021 7 28 26.9% 22.2% 4.6 134 36
1097
Esparto · Public  Compounding decline
Yolo 67 287 7 37 20.0% 60.0% 25 5
1098
Manteca · Public  Best in class
San Joaquin 403 1,670 7 36 20.7% 20.0% 5.0 145 30
1099
· Public  Tracking
Plumas 54 310 7 30 25.0% 16 4
1100
· Public  Compounding decline
Contra Costa 203 740 7 34 22.1% 46.7% 3.9 2.0 68 15
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →