County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — California · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Stockton · Public
109
3
Santa Ana · Public
100
4
Los Angeles · Public
98
5
Santa Cruz · Public
94
6
Los Angeles · Public
90
7
Fresno · Public
87
8
Tustin · Public
87
9
Los Angeles · Public
82
10
San Bernardino · Public
81

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Irvine · Private
161
4
Los Angeles · Private
121
5
Palo Alto · Private
114
6
Dublin · Private
113
7
Pasadena · Private
104
8
Sacramento · Private
93
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Santa Ana · Charter
96
4
Fresno · Public
95
5
San Diego · Public
93
6
La Jolla · Public
86
7
San Jose · Public
86
8
Wilmington · Public
86
9
Cupertino · Public
85
10
Cypress · Public
84

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Pebble Beach · Private
95
8
Irvine · Private
94
9
San Jose · Private
94
10
Oakland · Private
81

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Oceanside · Public
1
3
Fontana · Public
1
4
San Diego · Public
2
5
Waterford · Public
2
6
Mckinleyville · Public
3
7
Nicolaus · Public
3
8
Menifee · Public
3
9
Colusa · Public
3
10
Gridley · Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Redlands · Private
6
3
Ontario · Private
10
4
Long Beach · Private
13
5
Mission Hills · Private
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
14
7
San Diego · Private
14
8
Modesto · Private
14
9
Cerritos · Private
16
10
Santa Maria · Private
17

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Carson · Public
14
6
Newport Coast · Private
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Newport Coast · Private
12
4
San Jose · Private
11
5
Los Angeles · Private
10
6
Santa Ana · Charter
10
7
San Francisco · Private
9
8
La Canada · Private
9
9
Compton · Public
9
10
Claremont · Private
9

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Victorville · Public
20
5
Los Angeles · Public
19
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Los Angeles · Public
18
9
Redwood City · Public
18
10
Newport Coast · Private
18

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
San Jose · Private
30
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Carson · Public
34
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
San Diego · Public
30
6
San Diego · Public
27
7
Fresno · Public
27
8
Cypress · Public
26
9
Irvine · Private
26
10
Santa Ana · Charter
23

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Sacramento · Public
31
3
Wilmington · Public
28
4
Pebble Beach · Private
27
5
Newport Coast · Private
25
6
San Francisco · Public
24
7
Fresno · Public
24
8
Daly City · Public
24
9
San Lorenzo · Public
23
10
Los Angeles · Public
23

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Richmond · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
San Diego · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
9
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
10
Pasadena · Private
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
8
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
8
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
9
avg 23.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
10
avg 44.8 · σ 2.34
σ 2.34

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
100%
4
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
5
Stockton · n=79 · 2025
99%
6
Gilroy · n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
San Francisco · Public
34 '18 → 70 '25 +36.4pp
San Francisco · Public
25 '18 → 61 '25 +35.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -6.9% +154.0pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.6% +121.5pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +19.8% +115.8pp
San Jose · Santa Clara · Public  Watch — engagement
+129.6% vs +17.0% +112.6pp
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+129.2% vs +19.8% +109.4pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Waterford · Stanislaus · Public  Compounding decline
-65.7% vs +2.3% -67.9pp
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Sharp downturn
-52.4% vs +2.5% -54.9pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

996 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.8pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.6pp
Palo Cedro · Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.4pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.1pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.8pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
Stockton · Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -9.2pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.6pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -8.0pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -8.0pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,561 schools · 2025 data · Page 12 of 16 (showing 1101–1200)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
1101
Santa Ana · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 72 288 11 72 15.4% 11.1 52 8
1102
Lakeside · Public  Best in class
San Diego 36 164 11 17 66.7% 75.0% 6 4
1103
Delano · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 316 1,221 11 38 29.4% 11.4% 9.2 0.9 119 35
1104
Riverside · Public
Riverside 379 1,804 11 48 23.1% 9.5% 11.1 2.6 182 42
1105
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 136 797 11 67 16.5% 20.0% 8.1 91 15
1106
Fresno · Public  Demand problem
Fresno 509 2,095 11 36 30.9% 17.9% 8.1 1.4 181 56
1107
Norwalk · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 491 2,075 11 64 17.2% 18.5% 10.4 0.6 314 54
1108
Yuba City · Public  Compounding decline
Sutter 391 1,695 11 47 23.2% 20.9% 6.7 1.8 185 43
1109
Vallejo · Public  Both ends slipping
Solano 337 1,418 11 45 24.7% 24.3% 7.1 2.1 150 37
1110
Hollywood · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 155 703 11 52 21.0% 6.5 81 17
1111
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 64 472 11 89 12.3% 4.7 57 7
1112
Orangevale · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 265 1,150 11 45 24.6% 17.2% 5.3 118 29
1113
Clovis · Public  Best in class
Fresno 723 3,113 11 36 30.0% 25.3% 7.9 0.8 263 79
1114
Woodland · Private
Yolo 55 805 11 60 18.2% 66.7% 33 6
1115
San Lorenzo · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 312 1,029 11 46 23.9% 41.2% 6.7 1.0 142 34
1116
Tehachapi · Public  Material decline
Kern 321 1,260 11 22 50.7% 17.1% 8.7 1.9 69 35
1117
Inglewood · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 202 757 11 63 17.2% 7.4 1.5 128 22
1118
Watsonville · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Cruz 331 1,293 11 45 24.0% 7.8 2.4 150 36
1119
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 389 1,466 11 51 21.0% 16.7% 10.0 1.3 200 42
1120
Canoga Park · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 325 1,389 11 65 16.7% 25.7% 9.2 1.9 210 35
1121
Pacoima · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 56 220 11 109 9.8% 10.7 61 6
1122
Stockton · Public  Best in class
San Joaquin 28 199 11 157 6.8% 44 3
1123
Hollister · Public  Strong demand
San Benito 888 3,316 11 40 26.7% 25.3% 6.9 1.1 356 95
1124
Mira Loma · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 430 1,693 11 34 31.7% 6.5% 10.0 1.4 145 46
1125
Alta Loma · Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 582 2,386 11 50 21.2% 12.9% 9.8 1.4 292 62
1126
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 216 853 11 50 21.5% 8.8 4.2 107 23
1127
Fairfield · Public  Best in class
Solano 47 745 11 53 20.0% 100.0% 25 5
1128
Bakersfield · Public  Best in class
Kern 594 2,369 11 48 21.9% 20.6% 7.9 1.9 288 63
1129
Lancaster · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 369 1,498 11 30 35.8% 7.7% 9.2 1.6 109 39
1130
San Diego · Public  Tracking
San Diego 76 360 11 103 10.3% 37.5% 10.5 78 8
1131
Rialto · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 617 2,623 11 46 23.1% 21.5% 8.3 1.6 281 65
1132
Valley Center · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 266 1,075 11 45 23.1% 28.6% 7.5 121 28
1133
Long Beach · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 390 1,652 11 56 18.9% 9.8% 9.0 1.0 217 41
1134
Northridge · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 210 832 10 68 15.4% 8.1 143 22
1135
Compton · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 277 1,438 10 64 16.4% 20.7% 9.4 1.4 177 29
1136
Compton · Public
Los Angeles 277 1,438 10 64 16.4% 20.7% 9.4 1.4 177 29
1137
San Jose · Public  Strong demand
Santa Clara 335 1,350 10 50 21.1% 8.6% 7.2 0.9 166 35
1138
Lake Forest · Public  Material decline
Orange 469 1,902 10 88 11.8% 38.8% 8.7 1.3 415 49
1139
Oceanside · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 623 2,463 10 54 19.5% 30.8% 8.5 0.8 334 65
1140
Porterville · Public  Demand problem
Tulare 499 2,125 10 29 36.4% 19.2% 7.6 1.4 143 52
1141
Napa · Public  Strong demand
Napa 77 365 10 56 18.6% 50.0% 43 8
1142
Palmdale · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 569 2,208 10 40 26.0% 5.1% 8.8 1.4 227 59
1143
Auburn · Public  Material decline
Placer 347 1,265 10 28 36.7% 27.8% 6.6 98 36
1144
Los Angeles · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 145 503 10 69 15.0% 6.9 2.1 100 15
1145
Moorpark · Public  Sharp downturn
Ventura 29 121 10 224 4.6% 65 3
1146
Perris · Public  Compounding decline
Riverside 504 2,096 10 41 25.0% 5.8% 8.5 1.6 208 52
1147
Menlo Park · Public  Sharp downturn
San Mateo 68 212 10 129 8.0% 4.4 88 7
1148
Redlands · Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 39 262 10 113 9.1% 10.3 44 4
1149
Ontario · Private
San Bernardino 117 469 10 97 10.6% 10.3 113 12
1150
Mammoth Lakes · Public  Strong demand
Mono 88 330 10 68 15.0% 3.4 60 9
1151
Temecula · Private
Riverside 88 788 10 83 12.3% 6.8 73 9
1152
California City · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 147 604 10 35 28.9% 26.7% 8.2 52 15
1153
Imperial · Public  Best in class
Imperial 343 1,439 10 28 36.1% 28.6% 10.2 0.9 97 35
1154
Fresno · Public  Both ends slipping
Fresno 452 2,175 10 52 19.5% 6.5% 7.7 1.8 236 46
1155
Turlock · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 619 2,479 10 34 30.0% 28.6% 7.0 1.1 210 63
1156
Pacifica · Public  Material decline
San Mateo 178 740 10 91 11.1% 22.2% 5.6 162 18
1157
Oxnard · Public  Demand hides churn
Ventura 476 1,951 10 37 27.3% 14.6% 8.4 1.7 176 48
1158
Wildomar · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 447 1,927 10 31 32.9% 35.6% 8.7 1.3 137 45
1159
Sacramento · Public  Watch — engagement
Sacramento 418 1,485 10 45 22.1% 19.1% 6.0 190 42
1160
Sacramento · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 299 1,157 10 46 21.7% 30.0% 6.0 1.3 138 30
1161
Ontario · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 750 3,127 10 37 27.2% 26.7% 9.2 1.6 276 75
1162
Oakland · Private
Alameda 30 129 10 153 6.5% 46 3
1163
Orland · Public  Strong demand
Glenn 150 725 10 41 24.2% 33.3% 4.0 62 15
1164
Palmdale · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 210 989 10 71 14.0% 7.6 150 21
1165
Sacramento · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 40 412 10 90 11.1% 36 4
1166
Stockton · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 80 358 10 86 11.6% 50.0% 3.8 69 8
1167
Hemet · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 421 1,761 10 36 28.0% 9.5% 8.6 0.7 150 42
1168
Lakewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 381 2,422 10 50 19.8% 34.2% 8.9 1.1 192 38
1169
Chino · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 372 1,256 10 37 26.6% 27.0% 8.9 0.8 139 37
1170
Tulare · Public  Best in class
Tulare 342 1,678 10 29 34.3% 7.9 1.8 99 34
1171
Red Bluff · Public  Holding share
Tehama 353 1,586 10 25 40.2% 40.0% 5.7 0.8 87 35
1172
Winters · Public  Strong demand
Yolo 111 479 10 48 20.8% 6.3 53 11
1173
Atwater · Public  Strong demand
Merced 479 2,029 10 42 23.3% 6.4% 7.1 1.0 202 47
1174
Brentwood · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 683 2,836 10 52 19.0% 23.9% 5.7 1.5 352 67
1175
Palmdale · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 684 2,706 10 39 25.0% 22.4% 8.0 1.3 268 67
1176
Livingston · Public  Weak at the gate
Merced 296 1,169 10 42 23.4% 13.8% 7.8 2.7 124 29
1177
Oakland · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 225 1,166 10 56 17.3% 18.2% 6.2 127 22
1178
Petaluma · Private
Sonoma 41 172 10 112 8.7% 46 4
1179
Gilroy · Public  Demand hides churn
Santa Clara 400 1,618 10 40 24.2% 12.8% 6.5 0.8 161 39
1180
Baldwin Park · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 226 1,260 10 54 17.9% 31.8% 9.7 1.3 123 22
1181
Ontario · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 452 1,994 10 50 19.6% 9.1% 9.7 1.6 225 44
1182
Fresno · Public  Best in class
Fresno 258 1,096 10 28 34.2% 12.0% 6.2 1.2 73 25
1183
Placerville · Public  Sharp downturn
El Dorado 310 1,135 10 34 28.3% 26.7% 4.5 106 30
1184
Glendale · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 549 2,066 10 61 15.8% 30.2% 9.1 2.2 335 53
1185
Sacramento · Public  Demand problem
Sacramento 427 1,535 10 48 20.0% 17.1% 5.4 0.9 205 41
1186
Oakland · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 73 270 10 59 16.3% 43 7
1187
Vallejo · Private
Solano 73 320 10 111 8.6% 42.9% 4.1 81 7
1188
Rancho Mirage · Public  Material decline
Riverside 313 1,401 10 59 16.3% 26.7% 9.6 1.0 184 30
1189
San Jose · Public  Mid-year churn
Santa Clara 94 405 10 73 13.0% 3.2 69 9
1190
El Centro · Public  Tracking
Imperial 460 2,006 10 42 22.9% 20.4% 8.3 1.1 192 44
1191
Perris · Public  Holding share
Riverside 136 1,031 10 79 12.0% 7.3 108 13
1192
La Habra · Public  Demand problem
Orange 471 1,881 10 55 17.4% 7.4 1.7 258 45
1193
Bakersfield · Public  Demand problem
Kern 471 2,048 10 33 29.2% 15.6% 8.1 1.3 154 45
1194
Sylmar · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 42 205 10 133 7.1% 56 4
1195
Lake Elsinore · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 403 1,687 9 36 25.9% 23.7% 8.7 147 38
1196
Manteca · Public  Strong demand
San Joaquin 509 1,907 9 33 28.9% 16.7% 6.7 1.6 166 48
1197
Visalia · Public  Demand hides churn
Tulare 361 1,637 9 34 27.4% 14.7% 5.5 124 34
1198
Rio Linda · Public
Sacramento 329 1,594 9 38 24.6% 32.3% 4.0 126 31
1199
Escalon · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 213 815 9 32 29.4% 35.0% 4.2 68 20
1200
Bakersfield · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 556 2,212 9 44 21.5% 34.6% 7.5 242 52
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →

Related reading

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next