County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

1005 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.7pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.2pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -13.9pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,564 schools · 2025 data · Page 12 of 16 (showing 1101–1200)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
1101
· Public  Best in class
Shasta 300 1,487 7 21 34.4% 27.3% 3.7 64 22
1102
Hayward · Public  Best in class
Alameda 41 643 7 85 8.6% 7.3 35 3
1103
Linden · Public  Holding share
San Joaquin 205 743 7 32 23.1% 40.0% 2.4 65 15
1104
Concord · Public  Both ends slipping
Contra Costa 247 1,059 7 50 14.5% 4.5 1.6 124 18
1105
Victorville · Public  Both ends slipping
San Bernardino 481 2,165 7 32 22.6% 31.4% 5.4 155 35
1106
Fresno · Public  Best in class
Fresno 344 1,438 7 47 15.5% 4.9 161 25
1107
Galt · Public  Sharp downturn
Sacramento 207 959 7 29 24.6% 4.8 61 15
1108
El Dorado · Public  Demand problem
El Dorado 249 1,033 7 33 22.2% 4.8 81 18
1109
Manteca · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 360 1,524 7 28 26.0% 11.5% 4.7 100 26
1110
Sylmar · Public
Los Angeles 42 208 7 64 11.1% 7.1 27 3
1111
Exeter · Public  Weak at the gate
Tulare 196 909 7 29 25.0% 21.4% 4.6 56 14
1112
Foresthill · Public  Compounding decline
Placer 42 190 7 45 15.8% 19 3
1113
Olivehurst · Public  Compounding decline
Yuba 252 1,254 7 20 36.0% 33.3% 4.0 1.2 50 18
1114
Orange Cove · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 155 635 7 18 39.3% 4.5 1.9 28 11
1115
Blythe · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 155 740 7 19 37.9% 4.5 29 11
1116
Coalinga · Public  Watch — engagement
Fresno 299 1,256 7 33 21.4% 4.3 98 21
1117
Waterford · Public  Compounding decline
Stanislaus 57 776 7 18 40.0% 10 4
1118
East Palo Alto · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 57 194 7 125 5.6% 71 4
1119
Middletown · Public  Sharp downturn
Lake 86 421 7 34 20.7% 3.5 29 6
1120
Cloverdale · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 87 393 7 54 12.8% 47 6
1121
Vallejo · Public  Watch — engagement
Solano 58 186 7 107 6.5% 62 4
1122
Jackson · Public  Demand problem
Amador 132 593 7 33 20.4% 2.3 44 9
1123
Elk Grove · Public  Sharp downturn
Sacramento 443 1,684 7 50 13.4% 26.7% 4.5 0.7 223 30
1124
Shafter · Public  Best in class
Kern 326 1,599 7 27 25.3% 4.9 87 22
1125
· Public  Compounding decline
San Joaquin 478 2,065 7 25 26.7% 34.4% 4.2 0.8 120 32
1126
Citrus Heights · Public  Demand problem
Sacramento 225 894 7 28 23.8% 26.7% 1.8 63 15
1127
Orange · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 438 1,728 7 33 19.9% 20.7% 5.9 0.7 146 29
1128
Moreno Valley · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 471 1,924 7 43 15.2% 6.6 0.6 204 31
1129
Yreka · Public  Demand hides churn
Siskiyou 153 612 7 30 21.7% 3.9 46 10
1130
North Hills · Private
Los Angeles 92 745 7 100 6.5% 3.3 92 6
1131
Riverdale · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 125 496 6 33 19.5% 3.2 41 8
1132
San Diego · Private
San Diego 47 196 6 179 3.6% 84 3
1133
Citrus Heights · Public  Compounding decline
Sacramento 141 559 6 40 15.8% 2.1 57 9
1134
La Habra · Private
Orange 94 410 6 67 9.5% 6.4 63 6
1135
Sacramento · Private
Sacramento 63 660 6 87 7.3% 75.0% 55 4
1136
Mount Shasta · Public  Material decline
Siskiyou 63 241 6 16 40.0% 6.3 10 4
1137
Banning · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 268 1,145 6 30 21.2% 23.5% 6.3 80 17
1138
Fortuna · Public  Compounding decline
Humboldt 177 826 6 29 21.6% 27.3% 3.4 51 11
1139
Fresno · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 131 625 6 22 27.6% 3.0 29 8
1140
Yucaipa · Public
San Bernardino 641 2,755 6 23 26.0% 25.6% 5.0 150 39
1141
Fairfield · Public  Material decline
Solano 448 1,844 6 31 19.7% 25.9% 3.1 0.9 137 27
1142
Visalia · Public  Strong demand
Tulare 455 2,059 6 27 21.8% 29.6% 4.0 124 27
1143
Sutter Creek · Public  Strong demand
Amador 153 615 6 46 12.9% 2.6 70 9
1144
Marysville · Public  Demand problem
Yuba 240 1,034 6 21 27.4% 21.4% 2.9 51 14
1145
Cottonwood · Public  Weak at the gate
Shasta 446 1,857 6 43 13.6% 15.4% 5.2 191 26
1146
Oakland · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 191 719 6 36 15.9% 3.1 69 11
1147
Big Bear Lake · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 140 630 6 38 15.1% 5.7 53 8
1148
Galt · Public  Sharp downturn
Sacramento 213 899 6 25 22.2% 3.8 54 12
1149
Bakersfield · Public  Demand hides churn
Kern 747 3,069 6 19 29.0% 9.5% 4.3 145 42
1150
Twentynine Palms · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 143 719 6 36 15.7% 5.6 51 8
1151
Durham · Public  Best in class
Butte 72 320 6 24 23.5% 17 4
1152
Kelseyville · Public  Weak at the gate
Lake 145 515 6 28 20.0% 2.1 40 8
1153
Gustine · Public  Sharp downturn
Merced 128 531 5 31 17.5% 3.1 40 7
1154
Atwater · Public  Material decline
Merced 421 1,704 5 34 16.1% 26.1% 3.3 143 23
1155
Bakersfield · Public  Demand hides churn
Kern 498 2,135 5 22 24.1% 4.4 112 27
1156
Oakland · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 74 273 5 78 6.9% 58 4
1157
Taft · Public  Tracking
Kern 262 1,064 5 18 29.8% 3.4 47 14
1158
Tranquillity · Public  Weak at the gate
Fresno 94 370 5 72 7.3% 68 5
1159
Antioch · Public  Compounding decline
Contra Costa 417 1,812 5 33 16.1% 27.3% 3.4 0.7 137 22
1160
Hayward · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 419 1,511 5 21 25.3% 13.6% 3.6 0.7 87 22
1161
Santa Rosa · Public  Compounding decline
Sonoma 230 1,029 5 22 23.5% 2.2 51 12
1162
· Public  Both ends slipping
San Joaquin 405 1,677 5 15 35.6% 2.7 59 21
1163
El Cerrito · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 78 554 5 117 4.4% 91 4
1164
Fresno · Public  Demand hides churn
Fresno 412 2,040 5 32 16.0% 14.3% 3.9 1.0 131 21
1165
Bakersfield · Public  Demand problem
Kern 516 2,043 5 21 24.3% 3.9 107 26
1166
Nevada City · Public  Compounding decline
Nevada 80 294 5 19 26.7% 5.0 15 4
1167
Oroville · Public  Compounding decline
Butte 242 872 5 19 26.1% 58.3% 2.5 46 12
1168
Fairfield · Public  Demand hides churn
Solano 387 1,605 5 24 20.6% 36.8% 2.6 92 19
1169
Redding · Public  Best in class
Shasta 270 1,148 5 34 14.0% 53.9% 2.2 93 13
1170
Antioch · Public  Demand hides churn
Contra Costa 399 1,776 5 33 14.5% 2.8 0.8 131 19
1171
· Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 63 226 5 60 7.9% 4.8 38 3
1172
Ridgecrest · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 345 1,536 5 23 20.0% 31.2% 3.2 80 16
1173
Thermal · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 65 503 5 83 5.6% 4.6 54 3
1174
Grass Valley · Public  Best in class
Nevada 152 664 5 39 11.9% 2.6 59 7
1175
Grass Valley · Public  Best in class
Nevada 350 1,561 5 32 14.4% 3.1 111 16
1176
San Juan Bautista · Public  Material decline
San Benito 66 267 5 9 50.0% 6 3
1177
East Palo Alto · Public  Demand problem
San Mateo 68 278 4 59 7.5% 4.4 40 3
1178
Temecula · Public  Mid-year churn
Riverside 207 987 4 22 19.6% 2.4 46 9
1179
Seaside · Public  Material decline
Monterey 278 1,073 4 22 20.0% 41.7% 1.4 60 12
1180
Sacramento · Public  Material decline
Sacramento 93 469 4 31 13.8% 29 4
1181
North Highlands · Public  Demand hides churn
Sacramento 186 778 4 16 26.7% 50.0% 30 8
1182
Loma Linda · Private
San Bernardino 96 1,261 4 62 6.7% 4.2 60 4
1183
Yucca Valley · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 268 1,168 4 17 23.9% 4.1 46 11
1184
Lakeport · Public  Material decline
Lake 74 335 4 32 12.5% 4.0 24 3
1185
Stockton · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 277 1,657 4 29 13.9% 27.3% 1.1 79 11
1186
Highland · Public  Compounding decline
San Bernardino 101 528 4 37 10.8% 4.0 37 4
1187
Lincoln · Public  Material decline
Placer 305 1,184 4 17 22.6% 25.0% 1.6 53 12
1188
Barstow · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 363 1,558 4 16 23.7% 2.5 59 14
1189
· Public  Material decline
Humboldt 286 1,162 4 24 16.2% 1.8 68 11
1190
Eureka · Public
Humboldt 286 1,162 4 24 16.2% 1.8 68 11
1191
Mariposa · Public  Material decline
Mariposa 83 461 4 28 13.0% 3.6 23 3
1192
Clarksburg · Public  Compounding decline
Yolo 198 291 4 8 46.7% 42.9% 15 7
1193
Denair · Public  Best in class
Stanislaus 87 306 3 16 21.4% 14 3
1194
Vallejo · Public  Compounding decline
Solano 273 1,146 3 19 17.0% 33.3% 2.2 53 9
1195
San Jose · Public  Demand hides churn
Santa Clara 92 313 3 54 6.0% 3.3 50 3
1196
San Andreas · Public  Material decline
Calaveras 157 703 3 12 26.3% 3.2 19 5
1197
Parlier · Public  Weak at the gate
Fresno 190 901 3 28 11.1% 54 6
1198
Altaville · Public  Tracking
Calaveras 130 559 3 25 12.1% 3.1 33 4
1199
Paradise · Public  Material decline
Butte 101 495 3 22 13.6% 3.0 22 3
1200
· Public  Watch — engagement
Kern 376 1,927 3 22 13.2% 2.9 83 11
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →