| 1 |
Claremont · Private
|
Los Angeles |
101 |
401 |
143.6%
|
412.9% |
34.8% |
8.3% |
109.9 |
25.7 |
417 |
145 |
| 2 |
Cerritos · Public
|
Los Angeles |
176 |
1,024 |
126.1%
|
421.6% |
29.9% |
25.7% |
104.5 |
21.0 |
742 |
222 |
| 3 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
76 |
589 |
121.0%
|
415.8% |
29.1% |
20.6% |
90.8 |
46.0 |
316 |
92 |
| 4 |
El Monte · Public Tracking
|
Los Angeles |
273 |
1,123 |
113.5%
|
575.5% |
19.7% |
22.6% |
88.6 |
19.4 |
1,571 |
310 |
| 5 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
241 |
502 |
110.0%
|
476.8% |
23.1% |
31.7% |
71.0 |
19.9 |
1,149 |
265 |
| 6 |
North Hollywood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
43 |
536 |
109.3%
|
462.8% |
23.6% |
17.0% |
79.1 |
20.9 |
199 |
47 |
| 7 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
75 |
550 |
104.0%
|
380.0% |
27.4% |
3.9% |
78.7 |
25.3 |
285 |
78 |
| 8 |
La Canada · Private
|
Los Angeles |
106 |
537 |
102.8%
|
374.5% |
27.5% |
9.2% |
83.0 |
25.5 |
397 |
109 |
| 9 |
Inglewood · Private
|
Los Angeles |
50 |
237 |
86.0%
|
232.0% |
37.1% |
— |
66.0 |
22.0 |
116 |
43 |
| 10 |
· Public
|
Los Angeles |
80 |
323 |
83.8%
|
335.0% |
25.0% |
22.4% |
68.8 |
11.2 |
268 |
67 |
| 11 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
34 |
475 |
82.3%
|
300.0% |
27.4% |
14.3% |
61.8 |
26.5 |
102 |
28 |
| 12 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
106 |
625 |
77.4%
|
294.3% |
26.3% |
13.4% |
61.3 |
22.6 |
312 |
82 |
| 13 |
Calabasas · Private
|
Los Angeles |
108 |
1,131 |
76.8%
|
267.6% |
28.7% |
6.0% |
56.5 |
20.4 |
289 |
83 |
| 14 |
La Canada · Private
|
Los Angeles |
89 |
381 |
76.4%
|
279.8% |
27.3% |
19.1% |
56.2 |
12.4 |
249 |
68 |
| 15 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
93 |
881 |
76.3%
|
349.5% |
21.9% |
14.1% |
62.4 |
26.9 |
325 |
71 |
| 16 |
La Canada · Private
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
623 |
72.7%
|
304.7% |
23.9% |
36.7% |
52.7 |
12.0 |
457 |
109 |
| 17 |
San Marino · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
209 |
886 |
72.2%
|
296.2% |
24.4% |
21.2% |
54.1 |
14.8 |
619 |
151 |
| 18 |
Rolling Hills Estat · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
571 |
2,075 |
70.8%
|
274.1% |
25.8% |
23.5% |
56.9 |
11.7 |
1,565 |
404 |
| 19 |
Burbank · Private
|
Los Angeles |
54 |
399 |
68.5%
|
263.0% |
26.1% |
13.5% |
50.0 |
20.4 |
142 |
37 |
| 20 |
Santa Clarita · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
97 |
385 |
68.0%
|
303.1% |
22.4% |
18.2% |
48.5 |
16.5 |
294 |
66 |
| 21 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
134 |
778 |
66.4%
|
260.4% |
25.5% |
10.1% |
54.5 |
14.2 |
349 |
89 |
| 22 |
Palos Verdes Estate · Private
|
Los Angeles |
82 |
863 |
65.8%
|
291.5% |
22.6% |
13.0% |
57.3 |
13.4 |
239 |
54 |
| 23 |
Diamond Bar · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
647 |
2,563 |
64.6%
|
299.9% |
21.6% |
26.6% |
47.3 |
13.4 |
1,940 |
418 |
| 24 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
79 |
545 |
64.6%
|
213.9% |
30.2% |
9.8% |
46.8 |
24.1 |
169 |
51 |
| 25 |
Canoga Park · Private
|
Los Angeles |
56 |
809 |
64.3%
|
332.1% |
19.4% |
13.9% |
50.0 |
17.9 |
186 |
36 |
| 26 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
111 |
546 |
64.0%
|
255.9% |
25.0% |
4.2% |
47.8 |
18.0 |
284 |
71 |
| 27 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
299 |
1,289 |
62.2%
|
275.2% |
22.6% |
11.8% |
48.2 |
15.1 |
823 |
186 |
| 28 |
Studio City · Private
|
Los Angeles |
283 |
1,616 |
61.8%
|
317.3% |
19.5% |
9.1% |
49.5 |
15.6 |
898 |
175 |
| 29 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
83 |
310 |
61.5%
|
263.9% |
23.3% |
11.8% |
49.4 |
18.1 |
219 |
51 |
| 30 |
Encino · Private
|
Los Angeles |
97 |
428 |
60.8%
|
182.5% |
33.3% |
15.2% |
49.5 |
9.3 |
177 |
59 |
| 31 |
Arcadia · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
817 |
2,939 |
60.6%
|
289.1% |
21.0% |
27.7% |
44.7 |
11.0 |
2,362 |
495 |
| 32 |
Manhattan Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
653 |
2,473 |
59.9%
|
235.8% |
25.4% |
22.8% |
50.2 |
12.9 |
1,540 |
391 |
| 33 |
Temple City · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
437 |
1,779 |
59.7%
|
261.8% |
22.8% |
33.0% |
43.9 |
8.7 |
1,144 |
261 |
| 34 |
La Canada · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
355 |
1,989 |
59.4%
|
319.7% |
18.6% |
17.5% |
47.0 |
12.1 |
1,135 |
211 |
| 35 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
367 |
57.8%
|
244.8% |
23.6% |
25.4% |
44.8 |
9.5 |
284 |
67 |
| 36 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
66 |
259 |
57.6%
|
221.2% |
26.0% |
18.4% |
43.9 |
12.1 |
146 |
38 |
| 37 |
Palos Verdes Estate · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
337 |
1,484 |
57.0%
|
227.9% |
25.0% |
18.8% |
47.2 |
12.5 |
768 |
192 |
| 38 |
Burbank · Private Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
120 |
497 |
56.7%
|
252.5% |
22.4% |
22.1% |
45.0 |
16.7 |
303 |
68 |
| 39 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
135 |
554 |
55.6%
|
237.8% |
23.4% |
21.3% |
45.2 |
6.7 |
321 |
75 |
| 40 |
Compton · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
556 |
54.9%
|
230.3% |
23.8% |
32.8% |
46.7 |
13.9 |
281 |
67 |
| 41 |
El Segundo · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
346 |
1,232 |
54.3%
|
199.4% |
27.2% |
22.9% |
40.2 |
7.8 |
690 |
188 |
| 42 |
Torrance · Private
|
Los Angeles |
208 |
844 |
53.9%
|
252.9% |
21.3% |
29.5% |
40.4 |
9.6 |
526 |
112 |
| 43 |
Sherman Oaks · Private
|
Los Angeles |
87 |
829 |
52.9%
|
232.2% |
22.8% |
6.5% |
41.4 |
14.9 |
202 |
46 |
| 44 |
Valencia · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
449 |
1,777 |
52.3%
|
201.8% |
25.9% |
23.0% |
42.5 |
9.3 |
906 |
235 |
| 45 |
Malibu · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
93 |
387 |
51.6%
|
195.7% |
26.4% |
10.4% |
41.9 |
14.0 |
182 |
48 |
| 46 |
Long Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
177 |
682 |
51.4%
|
157.6% |
32.6% |
31.9% |
41.2 |
9.6 |
279 |
91 |
| 47 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
156 |
659 |
51.3%
|
271.8% |
18.9% |
16.2% |
39.7 |
9.0 |
424 |
80 |
| 48 |
Chatsworth · Private
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
1,096 |
51.2%
|
268.6% |
19.1% |
11.3% |
40.5 |
16.5 |
325 |
62 |
| 49 |
Walnut · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
549 |
2,148 |
51.2%
|
234.1% |
21.9% |
29.5% |
37.7 |
7.3 |
1,285 |
281 |
| 50 |
Glendora · Private
|
Los Angeles |
79 |
240 |
50.6%
|
205.1% |
24.7% |
— |
44.3 |
10.1 |
162 |
40 |
| 51 |
Calabasas · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
430 |
1,707 |
50.5%
|
174.7% |
28.9% |
22.6% |
37.7 |
11.6 |
751 |
217 |
| 52 |
Sun Valley · Private
|
Los Angeles |
125 |
1,199 |
50.4%
|
166.4% |
30.3% |
15.9% |
36.8 |
11.2 |
208 |
63 |
| 53 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
61 |
343 |
49.2%
|
306.6% |
16.0% |
23.3% |
34.4 |
11.5 |
187 |
30 |
| 54 |
Santa Monica · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
710 |
2,588 |
48.7%
|
205.2% |
23.8% |
27.8% |
37.0 |
13.8 |
1,457 |
346 |
| 55 |
Inglewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
142 |
592 |
48.6%
|
195.8% |
24.8% |
15.9% |
40.1 |
6.3 |
278 |
69 |
| 56 |
La Crescenta · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
625 |
2,624 |
48.5%
|
213.8% |
22.7% |
24.4% |
38.2 |
9.4 |
1,336 |
303 |
| 57 |
Cerritos · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
541 |
1,996 |
48.4%
|
197.8% |
24.5% |
29.4% |
38.8 |
6.5 |
1,070 |
262 |
| 58 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
1,202 |
48.0%
|
260.7% |
18.4% |
19.4% |
40.7 |
15.3 |
391 |
72 |
| 59 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
42 |
451 |
47.6%
|
183.3% |
26.0% |
— |
30.9 |
14.3 |
77 |
20 |
| 60 |
North Hollywood · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
535 |
2,444 |
47.3%
|
162.4% |
29.1% |
23.3% |
37.2 |
8.2 |
869 |
253 |
| 61 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
68 |
264 |
47.1%
|
211.8% |
22.2% |
— |
32.4 |
— |
144 |
32 |
| 62 |
South Pasadena · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
379 |
1,536 |
46.2%
|
237.7% |
19.4% |
25.7% |
31.1 |
6.1 |
901 |
175 |
| 63 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
74 |
862 |
46.0%
|
237.8% |
19.3% |
— |
41.9 |
14.9 |
176 |
34 |
| 64 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
484 |
45.7%
|
147.4% |
31.0% |
22.6% |
37.1 |
6.0 |
171 |
53 |
| 65 |
West Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
274 |
1,237 |
45.3%
|
217.5% |
20.8% |
22.6% |
35.0 |
8.0 |
596 |
124 |
| 66 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
71 |
484 |
45.1%
|
223.9% |
20.1% |
9.4% |
35.2 |
14.1 |
159 |
32 |
| 67 |
· Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
450 |
1,775 |
44.9%
|
188.4% |
23.8% |
28.2% |
32.7 |
6.4 |
848 |
202 |
| 68 |
Woodland Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
88 |
353 |
44.3%
|
251.1% |
17.6% |
17.9% |
26.1 |
8.0 |
221 |
39 |
| 69 |
Pacific Palisade · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
757 |
2,920 |
43.6%
|
204.2% |
21.4% |
23.0% |
31.4 |
9.6 |
1,546 |
330 |
| 70 |
Lancaster · Private
|
Los Angeles |
113 |
561 |
43.4%
|
132.7% |
32.7% |
22.4% |
36.3 |
6.2 |
150 |
49 |
| 71 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
175 |
1,530 |
42.9%
|
154.3% |
27.8% |
— |
36.6 |
8.0 |
270 |
75 |
| 72 |
Alhambra · Private
|
Los Angeles |
85 |
296 |
42.4%
|
184.7% |
22.9% |
11.1% |
31.8 |
10.6 |
157 |
36 |
| 73 |
Sun Valley · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
90 |
410 |
42.2%
|
125.6% |
33.6% |
7.9% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
113 |
38 |
| 74 |
Lakewood · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
95 |
336 |
42.1%
|
240.0% |
17.5% |
32.5% |
29.5 |
5.3 |
228 |
40 |
| 75 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
32 |
153 |
40.6%
|
256.2% |
15.8% |
23.1% |
40.6 |
31.2 |
82 |
13 |
| 76 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
564 |
39.3%
|
120.5% |
32.6% |
22.9% |
28.7 |
6.6 |
147 |
48 |
| 77 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
74 |
317 |
39.2%
|
186.5% |
21.0% |
17.2% |
25.7 |
10.8 |
138 |
29 |
| 78 |
Torrance · Private
|
Los Angeles |
26 |
148 |
38.5%
|
223.1% |
17.2% |
— |
26.9 |
— |
58 |
10 |
| 79 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
136 |
1,242 |
38.2%
|
247.1% |
15.5% |
5.8% |
31.6 |
14.0 |
336 |
52 |
| 80 |
Santa Fe Springs · Private
|
Los Angeles |
105 |
405 |
38.1%
|
167.6% |
22.7% |
25.0% |
29.5 |
3.8 |
176 |
40 |
| 81 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
71 |
361 |
38.0%
|
163.4% |
23.3% |
— |
32.4 |
9.9 |
116 |
27 |
| 82 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
516 |
2,293 |
38.0%
|
158.3% |
24.0% |
26.5% |
30.6 |
9.7 |
817 |
196 |
| 83 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
69 |
726 |
37.7%
|
197.1% |
19.1% |
— |
27.5 |
10.1 |
136 |
26 |
| 84 |
West Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
75 |
319 |
37.3%
|
204.0% |
18.3% |
10.7% |
24.0 |
8.0 |
153 |
28 |
| 85 |
Culver City · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
507 |
2,012 |
36.7%
|
171.2% |
21.4% |
28.5% |
29.0 |
8.1 |
868 |
186 |
| 86 |
Beverly Hills · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
308 |
1,173 |
36.4%
|
156.8% |
23.2% |
15.2% |
28.6 |
8.1 |
483 |
112 |
| 87 |
· Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
459 |
1,734 |
36.0%
|
195.9% |
18.4% |
30.9% |
27.7 |
5.7 |
899 |
165 |
| 88 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
67 |
284 |
35.8%
|
153.7% |
23.3% |
16.7% |
31.3 |
6.0 |
103 |
24 |
| 89 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
470 |
35.5%
|
217.4% |
16.4% |
27.9% |
24.0 |
5.0 |
263 |
43 |
| 90 |
Redondo Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
739 |
2,921 |
35.5%
|
153.9% |
23.0% |
21.4% |
28.3 |
6.2 |
1,137 |
262 |
| 91 |
El Segundo · Private
|
Los Angeles |
68 |
222 |
35.3%
|
245.6% |
14.4% |
12.5% |
25.0 |
— |
167 |
24 |
| 92 |
Los Angeles · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
332 |
2,031 |
35.2%
|
165.4% |
21.3% |
25.6% |
26.2 |
9.6 |
549 |
117 |
| 93 |
Rosemead · Private
|
Los Angeles |
67 |
351 |
34.3%
|
252.2% |
13.6% |
26.1% |
26.9 |
4.5 |
169 |
23 |
| 94 |
Alhambra · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
582 |
2,201 |
34.2%
|
172.7% |
19.8% |
31.2% |
25.6 |
5.5 |
1,005 |
199 |
| 95 |
Valencia · Private
|
Los Angeles |
57 |
670 |
33.3%
|
126.3% |
26.4% |
15.8% |
26.3 |
7.0 |
72 |
19 |
| 96 |
San Gabriel · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
471 |
1,761 |
33.1%
|
145.4% |
22.8% |
37.2% |
24.8 |
4.2 |
685 |
156 |
| 97 |
Granada Hills · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
1,154 |
5,927 |
32.9%
|
173.3% |
19.0% |
29.2% |
26.5 |
6.3 |
2,000 |
380 |
| 98 |
Panorama City · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
330 |
1,316 |
32.7%
|
121.5% |
26.9% |
27.8% |
25.4 |
6.4 |
401 |
108 |
| 99 |
Hacienda Heights · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
355 |
1,456 |
31.8%
|
169.9% |
18.7% |
31.0% |
23.1 |
6.5 |
603 |
113 |
| 100 |
San Gabriel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
378 |
1,438 |
31.5%
|
179.4% |
17.6% |
34.5% |
23.0 |
6.9 |
678 |
119 |