County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

1005 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.7pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.2pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -13.9pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,564 schools · 2025 data · Page 10 of 16 (showing 901–1000)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
901
Brawley · Public  Strong demand
Imperial 393 1,863 12 32 36.8% 23.9% 10.2 1.0 125 46
902
Modesto · Public  Demand hides churn
Stanislaus 488 2,083 12 42 28.1% 28.1% 7.6 1.6 203 57
903
Firebaugh · Public  Weak at the gate
Fresno 163 673 12 48 24.4% 42.1% 7.4 78 19
904
Menifee · Public  Material decline
Riverside 549 2,487 12 40 28.8% 40.6% 10.9 1.5 222 64
905
Arvin · Public  Best in class
Kern 627 2,653 12 39 30.0% 16.4% 8.4 1.6 243 73
906
San Jacinto · Public  Both ends slipping
Riverside 524 2,388 12 44 26.4% 31.1% 10.9 1.9 231 61
907
Soledad · Public  Demand problem
Monterey 387 1,546 12 43 26.8% 26.7% 7.5 1.3 168 45
908
Orange · Public  Demand problem
Orange 439 1,795 12 57 20.2% 35.3% 8.9 1.4 252 51
909
Modesto · Public  Holding share
Stanislaus 413 1,609 12 39 29.6% 27.1% 8.0 0.7 162 48
910
Salinas · Public  Strong demand
Monterey 526 2,106 12 48 24.0% 14.8% 7.8 2.1 254 61
911
Riverside · Public  Tracking
Riverside 449 1,920 12 42 27.5% 19.2% 10.0 1.6 189 52
912
Greenfield · Public  Strong demand
Monterey 285 1,274 12 56 20.8% 12.1% 8.4 159 33
913
Yuba City · Public  Demand hides churn
Sutter 415 1,678 12 39 29.6% 29.2% 6.8 1.7 162 48
914
Redwood City · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 52 224 12 40 28.6% 21 6
915
Albany · Private
Alameda 52 160 12 108 10.7% 5.8 56 6
916
Indio · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 417 1,650 12 32 36.1% 31.2% 9.6 0.7 133 48
917
Bakersfield · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 469 2,107 12 60 19.1% 22.2% 8.7 1.3 282 54
918
Lompoc · Public  Strong demand
Santa Barbara 409 1,593 11 45 25.7% 12.8% 9.1 2.0 183 47
919
Lower Lake · Public  Watch — engagement
Lake 174 966 11 34 33.9% 20.0% 5.8 59 20
920
San Rafael · Public  Strong demand
Marin 367 1,332 11 74 15.4% 38.1% 7.9 3.3 273 42
921
· Public  Demand hides churn
Ventura 70 221 11 89 12.9% 4.3 62 8
922
El Segundo · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 132 536 11 87 13.0% 7.6 115 15
923
Bishop · Public  Strong demand
Inyo 141 608 11 39 29.1% 18.8% 8.5 55 16
924
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 592 2,326 11 56 20.2% 23.9% 10.1 1.0 331 67
925
Redlands · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 433 1,845 11 49 22.9% 26.5% 10.4 1.6 214 49
926
Dinuba · Public  Best in class
Tulare 434 2,115 11 35 32.5% 6.1% 6.9 0.7 151 49
927
Concord · Public  Compounding decline
Contra Costa 275 1,137 11 43 26.5% 45.2% 7.3 2.9 117 31
928
Spring Valley · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 417 1,539 11 51 22.0% 21.3% 9.8 2.4 214 47
929
· Public  Demand hides churn
Sacramento 321 1,417 11 55 20.2% 27.8% 4.7 178 36
930
Colton · Public  Material decline
San Bernardino 448 1,729 11 55 20.3% 16.0% 9.4 1.1 246 50
931
Ceres · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 512 2,317 11 43 26.1% 24.6% 8.0 1.8 218 57
932
Oakley · Public  Demand problem
Contra Costa 602 2,460 11 44 25.5% 37.3% 7.0 1.5 263 67
933
Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
Fresno 342 1,867 11 33 33.9% 7.9% 8.5 2.0 112 38
934
Santa Ana · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 72 288 11 72 15.4% 11.1 52 8
935
Lakeside · Public  Best in class
San Diego 36 164 11 17 66.7% 75.0% 6 4
936
Delano · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 316 1,221 11 38 29.4% 11.4% 9.2 0.9 119 35
937
Riverside · Public
Riverside 379 1,804 11 48 23.1% 9.5% 11.1 2.6 182 42
938
Fresno · Public  Demand problem
Fresno 509 2,095 11 36 30.9% 17.9% 8.1 1.4 181 56
939
Norwalk · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 491 2,075 11 64 17.2% 18.5% 10.4 0.6 314 54
940
Yuba City · Public  Both ends slipping
Sutter 391 1,695 11 47 23.2% 20.9% 6.7 1.8 185 43
941
Vallejo · Public  Both ends slipping
Solano 337 1,418 11 45 24.7% 24.3% 7.1 2.1 150 37
942
Hollywood · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 155 703 11 52 21.0% 6.5 81 17
943
Orangevale · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 265 1,150 11 45 24.6% 17.2% 5.3 118 29
944
Clovis · Public  Best in class
Fresno 723 3,113 11 36 30.0% 25.3% 7.9 0.8 263 79
945
Woodland · Private
Yolo 55 805 11 60 18.2% 66.7% 33 6
946
San Lorenzo · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 312 1,029 11 46 23.9% 41.2% 6.7 1.0 142 34
947
Tehachapi · Public  Material decline
Kern 321 1,260 11 22 50.7% 17.1% 8.7 1.9 69 35
948
Inglewood · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 202 757 11 63 17.2% 7.4 1.5 128 22
949
Watsonville · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Cruz 331 1,293 11 45 24.0% 7.8 2.4 150 36
950
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 389 1,466 11 51 21.0% 16.7% 10.0 1.3 200 42
951
Canoga Park · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 325 1,389 11 65 16.7% 25.7% 9.2 1.9 210 35
952
Stockton · Public  Best in class
San Joaquin 28 199 11 157 6.8% 44 3
953
Hollister · Public  Strong demand
San Benito 888 3,316 11 40 26.7% 25.3% 6.9 1.1 356 95
954
Mira Loma · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 430 1,693 11 34 31.7% 6.5% 10.0 1.4 145 46
955
Alta Loma · Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 582 2,386 11 50 21.2% 12.9% 9.8 1.4 292 62
956
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 216 853 11 50 21.5% 8.8 4.2 107 23
957
Fairfield · Public  Best in class
Solano 47 745 11 53 20.0% 100.0% 25 5
958
Bakersfield · Public  Best in class
Kern 594 2,369 11 48 21.9% 20.6% 7.9 1.9 288 63
959
Lancaster · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 369 1,498 11 30 35.8% 7.7% 9.2 1.6 109 39
960
San Diego · Public  Tracking
San Diego 76 360 11 103 10.3% 37.5% 10.5 78 8
961
Rialto · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 617 2,623 11 46 23.1% 21.5% 8.3 1.6 281 65
962
Valley Center · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 266 1,075 11 45 23.1% 28.6% 7.5 121 28
963
Northridge · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 210 832 10 68 15.4% 8.1 143 22
964
· Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 277 1,438 10 64 16.4% 20.7% 9.4 1.4 177 29
965
Compton · Public
Los Angeles 277 1,438 10 64 16.4% 20.7% 9.4 1.4 177 29
966
San Jose · Public  Strong demand
Santa Clara 335 1,350 10 50 21.1% 8.6% 7.2 0.9 166 35
967
Lake Forest · Public  Material decline
Orange 469 1,902 10 88 11.8% 38.8% 8.7 1.3 415 49
968
Oceanside · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 623 2,463 10 54 19.5% 30.8% 8.5 0.8 334 65
969
Porterville · Public  Tracking
Tulare 499 2,125 10 29 36.4% 19.2% 7.6 1.4 143 52
970
Napa · Public  Strong demand
Napa 77 365 10 56 18.6% 50.0% 43 8
971
Palmdale · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 569 2,208 10 40 26.0% 5.1% 8.8 1.4 227 59
972
Auburn · Public  Material decline
Placer 347 1,265 10 28 36.7% 27.8% 6.6 98 36
973
Perris · Public  Compounding decline
Riverside 504 2,096 10 41 25.0% 5.8% 8.5 1.6 208 52
974
Menlo Park · Public  Sharp downturn
San Mateo 68 212 10 129 8.0% 4.4 88 7
975
Redlands · Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 39 262 10 113 9.1% 10.3 44 4
976
Ontario · Private
San Bernardino 117 469 10 97 10.6% 10.3 113 12
977
Mammoth Lakes · Public  Strong demand
Mono 88 330 10 68 15.0% 3.4 60 9
978
Temecula · Private
Riverside 88 788 10 83 12.3% 6.8 73 9
979
California City · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 147 604 10 35 28.9% 26.7% 8.2 52 15
980
Imperial · Public  Best in class
Imperial 343 1,439 10 28 36.1% 28.6% 10.2 0.9 97 35
981
Turlock · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 619 2,479 10 34 30.0% 28.6% 7.0 1.1 210 63
982
Pacifica · Public  Material decline
San Mateo 178 740 10 91 11.1% 22.2% 5.6 162 18
983
Oxnard · Public  Demand hides churn
Ventura 476 1,951 10 37 27.3% 14.6% 8.4 1.7 176 48
984
Wildomar · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 447 1,927 10 31 32.9% 35.6% 8.7 1.3 137 45
985
Sacramento · Public  Watch — engagement
Sacramento 418 1,485 10 45 22.1% 19.1% 6.0 190 42
986
Sacramento · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 299 1,157 10 46 21.7% 30.0% 6.0 1.3 138 30
987
Ontario · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 750 3,127 10 37 27.2% 26.7% 9.2 1.6 276 75
988
Oakland · Private
Alameda 30 129 10 153 6.5% 46 3
989
Orland · Public  Strong demand
Glenn 150 725 10 41 24.2% 33.3% 4.0 62 15
990
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 210 989 10 71 14.0% 7.6 150 21
991
Sacramento · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 40 412 10 90 11.1% 36 4
992
Hemet · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 421 1,761 10 36 28.0% 9.5% 8.6 0.7 150 42
993
Lakewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 381 2,422 10 50 19.8% 34.2% 8.9 1.1 192 38
994
Chino · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 372 1,256 10 37 26.6% 27.0% 8.9 0.8 139 37
995
Tulare · Public  Best in class
Tulare 342 1,678 10 29 34.3% 7.9 1.8 99 34
996
Red Bluff · Public  Holding share
Tehama 353 1,586 10 25 40.2% 40.0% 5.7 0.8 87 35
997
Winters · Public  Strong demand
Yolo 111 479 10 48 20.8% 6.3 53 11
998
Atwater · Public  Strong demand
Merced 479 2,029 10 42 23.3% 6.4% 7.1 1.0 202 47
999
· Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 683 2,836 10 52 19.0% 23.9% 5.7 1.5 352 67
1000
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 684 2,706 10 39 25.0% 22.4% 8.0 1.3 268 67
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →