County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

1005 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.7pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.2pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -13.9pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,564 schools · 2025 data · Page 6 of 16 (showing 501–600)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
501
Union City · Public  Material decline
Alameda 832 3,096 23 120 19.0% 34.4% 15.4 3.7 995 189
502
Los Angeles · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 106 431 23 108 20.9% 25.0% 16.0 3.8 115 24
503
· Public  Demand problem
Riverside 673 2,712 23 86 26.3% 23.0% 20.1 4.5 578 152
504
Los Olivos · Private
Santa Barbara 31 219 23 100 22.6% 12.9 31 7
505
South San Francisco · Public  Demand problem
San Mateo 271 1,053 23 126 17.8% 29.5% 14.0 3.3 342 61
506
Moreno Valley · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 476 2,101 22 87 26.0% 29.0% 18.7 1.9 412 107
507
Idyllwild · Private
Riverside 89 273 22 80 28.2% 15.0% 18.0 5.6 71 20
508
El Monte · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 423 1,638 22 84 26.6% 30.5% 20.3 4.0 357 95
509
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 512 2,152 22 87 26.0% 21.7% 17.8 3.3 443 115
510
La Verne · Private
Los Angeles 156 696 22 154 14.5% 17.1% 16.0 1.9 241 35
511
South Gate · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 499 1,990 22 109 20.7% 29.5% 17.4 3.2 542 112
512
Placentia · Public  Strong demand
Orange 433 1,998 22 103 21.8% 25.8% 18.7 3.7 446 97
513
Huntington Park · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 67 562 22 112 20.0% 22.4 4.5 75 15
514
· Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 256 1,000 22 102 21.8% 19.3% 16.4 4.3 261 57
515
Perris · Public  Material decline
Riverside 405 1,630 22 79 28.2% 22.2% 19.3 1.5 319 90
516
San Diego · Private
San Diego 63 862 22 165 13.5% 17.5 104 14
517
Felton · Public  Material decline
Santa Cruz 163 578 22 72 30.5% 8.3% 17.8 4.9 118 36
518
San Diego · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 557 2,187 22 99 22.2% 30.9% 19.6 4.5 554 123
519
Chula Vista · Public  Holding share
San Diego 654 2,440 22 109 20.2% 30.6% 18.6 3.2 711 144
520
Fresno · Public  Demand problem
Fresno 518 2,339 22 62 35.3% 23.7% 15.6 5.2 323 114
521
Rancho Cucamonga · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 769 3,221 22 94 23.5% 30.2% 17.6 3.5 719 169
522
Arcata · Public  Demand problem
Humboldt 264 1,007 22 69 31.7% 24.1% 16.7 3.4 183 58
523
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 96 363 22 132 16.5% 21.9 127 21
524
Fillmore · Public  Strong demand
Ventura 247 1,007 22 55 39.4% 9.3% 19.4 4.9 137 54
525
Elk Grove · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 613 2,536 22 99 22.0% 37.3% 13.4 1.6 608 134
526
Castroville · Public  Watch — engagement
Monterey 316 1,250 22 62 35.4% 13.0% 15.5 2.9 195 69
527
Covina · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 252 1,056 22 89 24.6% 9.1% 17.9 2.4 224 55
528
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 423 1,568 22 82 26.4% 37.0% 19.4 2.6 348 92
529
San Luis Obispo · Private
San Luis Obispo 83 319 22 170 12.8% 16.7% 13.2 141 18
530
Petaluma · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 296 1,193 22 102 21.1% 23.4% 16.6 2.4 303 64
531
Ojai · Public  Material decline
Ventura 153 576 22 95 22.6% 18.2% 15.0 146 33
532
Templeton · Public  Holding share
San Luis Obispo 204 725 22 74 29.3% 11.4% 13.7 1.5 150 44
533
Long Beach · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 823 3,408 22 117 18.4% 23.7% 17.2 5.6 960 177
534
Palmdale · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 251 2,259 22 78 27.6% 29.6% 19.1 4.0 196 54
535
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 294 1,318 21 78 27.6% 31.8% 20.1 7.1 228 63
536
Palm Springs · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 393 1,497 21 74 29.0% 26.2% 18.8 2.3 290 84
537
Chula Vista · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 712 2,557 21 127 16.8% 32.9% 19.4 3.5 904 152
538
· Public  Best in class
Orange 550 2,049 21 83 25.6% 25.6% 17.4 3.3 457 117
539
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 395 491 21 90 23.7% 29.8% 19.8 4.6 354 84
540
Redwood City · Public  Tracking
San Mateo 475 1,854 21 118 18.0% 16.8% 14.9 5.0 560 101
541
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 273 1,284 21 119 17.8% 22.4% 16.5 4.4 326 58
542
Roseville · Public  Strong demand
Placer 440 2,079 21 95 22.3% 22.6% 13.6 2.5 417 93
543
· Public  Material decline
Alameda 336 1,273 21 117 18.1% 25.4% 13.7 2.7 393 71
544
Westminster · Public  Demand problem
Orange 644 2,529 21 95 22.2% 28.7% 19.1 3.7 613 136
545
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 57 298 21 193 10.9% 21.1 5.3 110 12
546
Carson · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 320 1,407 21 91 22.9% 25.4% 18.1 5.3 292 67
547
Fullerton · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 441 1,880 21 59 35.1% 20.6% 16.6 3.2 262 92
548
Chula Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 446 1,771 21 62 33.6% 32.3% 17.3 3.1 277 93
549
Ventura · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 457 1,939 21 79 26.4% 16.8% 15.3 4.4 360 95
550
San Bernardino · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 255 1,246 21 71 29.3% 15.1% 16.1 2.8 181 53
551
Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 145 533 21 115 18.0% 16.6 4.8 167 30
552
Carpinteria · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Barbara 145 593 21 71 29.1% 23.3% 16.6 3.5 103 30
553
Ventura · Public  Best in class
Ventura 232 951 21 134 15.5% 18.8% 12.9 3.5 310 48
554
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 257 1,183 21 100 20.5% 28.3% 16.3 2.7 258 53
555
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 34 237 21 106 19.4% 20.6 11.8 36 7
556
· Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 457 1,664 21 77 26.8% 30.9% 18.6 3.9 351 94
557
Villa Park · Public  Demand problem
Orange 467 2,023 21 92 22.4% 29.2% 15.8 3.0 428 96
558
· Public  Material decline
San Diego 404 1,563 21 83 24.8% 27.7% 17.1 1.5 335 83
559
Modesto · Public  Best in class
Stanislaus 565 2,346 21 59 34.6% 21.6% 13.1 2.3 335 116
560
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 377 1,591 20 73 27.9% 33.8% 18.0 2.6 276 77
561
Garden Grove · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 373 1,439 20 81 25.2% 26.3% 17.4 2.7 301 76
562
· Public  Strong demand
Napa 59 355 20 119 17.1% 6.8 70 12
563
Perris · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 615 2,396 20 86 23.6% 18.4% 17.6 3.2 529 125
564
Rocklin · Public  Sharp downturn
Placer 532 1,936 20 92 22.0% 33.3% 14.7 2.6 490 108
565
Livermore · Public  Weak at the gate
Alameda 434 1,827 20 102 19.8% 27.3% 13.6 3.5 444 88
566
· Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 227 908 20 82 24.9% 15.2% 16.3 3.5 185 46
567
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 247 978 20 83 24.5% 6.0% 17.4 4.9 204 50
568
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
569
Burbank · Public
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
570
Salinas · Public  Demand problem
Monterey 662 2,742 20 78 25.7% 27.8% 12.8 2.4 517 133
571
Simi Valley · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 478 1,835 20 64 31.6% 24.0% 16.1 4.4 304 96
572
San Francisco · Private
San Francisco 80 302 20 241 8.3% 10.0 193 16
573
Milpitas · Public  Demand hides churn
Santa Clara 25 55 20 184 10.9% 46 5
574
Santa Ana · Public  Best in class
Orange 595 2,376 20 75 26.7% 27.7% 16.6 3.2 445 119
575
· Public  Strong demand
Merced 461 1,793 20 53 37.7% 23.9% 12.6 3.7 244 92
576
Avenal · Public  Demand problem
Kings 156 762 20 45 44.3% 16.1% 16.0 2.6 70 31
577
Santa Paula · Public  Strong demand
Ventura 353 1,494 20 72 27.6% 5.7% 14.2 2.5 254 70
578
Pico Rivera · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 505 1,995 20 88 22.5% 23.0% 15.6 3.8 445 100
579
Lindsay · Public  Best in class
Tulare 283 1,132 20 54 36.8% 17.9% 16.6 4.2 152 56
580
San Clemente · Public  Demand problem
Orange 745 2,740 20 83 23.8% 26.5% 15.3 2.7 618 147
581
Corona · Public  Holding share
Riverside 832 3,577 20 91 21.7% 28.7% 17.6 3.9 756 164
582
West Sacramento · Public  Demand hides churn
Yolo 551 2,168 20 69 28.5% 38.0% 11.8 1.8 379 108
583
Escondido · Public  Material decline
San Diego 450 1,846 20 75 26.0% 27.3% 15.3 2.4 338 88
584
Riverside · Public  Holding share
Riverside 399 1,780 20 75 26.0% 29.5% 18.8 2.0 300 78
585
Santa Ynez · Public  Sharp downturn
Santa Barbara 221 801 19 71 27.4% 7.0% 14.0 3.2 157 43
586
Rosemead · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 499 1,691 19 85 23.0% 27.8% 15.6 4.2 422 97
587
· Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 649 2,551 19 65 29.6% 23.0% 15.6 3.1 425 126
588
Oakland · Public  Strong demand
Alameda 98 396 19 63 30.6% 21.1% 10.2 7.1 62 19
589
· Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 501 1,864 19 69 27.9% 26.8% 17.8 3.4 347 97
590
Chula Vista · Public
San Diego 501 1,864 19 69 27.9% 26.8% 17.8 3.4 347 97
591
Thousand Oaks · Public  Sharp downturn
Ventura 439 1,703 19 87 22.1% 34.1% 14.1 3.2 384 85
592
San Fernando · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 367 1,608 19 75 25.7% 21.1% 16.4 4.1 276 71
593
American Canyon · Public  Best in class
Napa 404 1,720 19 88 22.0% 23.1% 11.6 3.5 355 78
594
San Diego · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 83 359 19 140 13.8% 18.8% 13.2 4.8 116 16
595
· Public  Strong demand
Yolo 364 1,582 19 67 28.8% 31.4% 10.4 3.0 243 70
596
Arroyo Grande · Public  Weak at the gate
San Luis Obispo 531 2,012 19 69 27.9% 25.5% 14.3 2.5 366 102
597
Fairfield · Public  Best in class
Solano 521 2,111 19 101 18.9% 41.0% 11.1 2.9 528 100
598
· Public  Best in class
Riverside 616 2,537 19 58 32.8% 28.8% 17.1 1.9 360 118
599
San Diego · Public  Mid-year churn
San Diego 94 339 19 69 27.7% 16.7% 16.0 3.2 65 18
600
San Juan Capistrano · Private
Orange 68 691 19 85 22.4% 11.8 58 13
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →