County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — California · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Stockton · Public
109
3
Santa Ana · Public
100
4
Los Angeles · Public
98
5
Santa Cruz · Public
94
6
Los Angeles · Public
90
7
Fresno · Public
87
8
Tustin · Public
87
9
Los Angeles · Public
82
10
San Bernardino · Public
81

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Irvine · Private
161
4
Los Angeles · Private
121
5
Palo Alto · Private
114
6
Dublin · Private
113
7
Pasadena · Private
104
8
Sacramento · Private
93
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Santa Ana · Charter
96
4
Fresno · Public
95
5
San Diego · Public
93
6
La Jolla · Public
86
7
San Jose · Public
86
8
Wilmington · Public
86
9
Cupertino · Public
85
10
Cypress · Public
84

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Pebble Beach · Private
95
8
Irvine · Private
94
9
San Jose · Private
94
10
Oakland · Private
81

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Oceanside · Public
1
3
Fontana · Public
1
4
San Diego · Public
2
5
Waterford · Public
2
6
Mckinleyville · Public
3
7
Nicolaus · Public
3
8
Menifee · Public
3
9
Colusa · Public
3
10
Gridley · Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Redlands · Private
6
3
Ontario · Private
10
4
Long Beach · Private
13
5
Mission Hills · Private
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
14
7
San Diego · Private
14
8
Modesto · Private
14
9
Cerritos · Private
16
10
Santa Maria · Private
17

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Carson · Public
14
6
Newport Coast · Private
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Newport Coast · Private
12
4
San Jose · Private
11
5
Los Angeles · Private
10
6
Santa Ana · Charter
10
7
San Francisco · Private
9
8
La Canada · Private
9
9
Compton · Public
9
10
Claremont · Private
9

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Victorville · Public
20
5
Los Angeles · Public
19
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Los Angeles · Public
18
9
Redwood City · Public
18
10
Newport Coast · Private
18

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
San Jose · Private
30
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Carson · Public
34
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
San Diego · Public
30
6
San Diego · Public
27
7
Fresno · Public
27
8
Cypress · Public
26
9
Irvine · Private
26
10
Santa Ana · Charter
23

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Sacramento · Public
31
3
Wilmington · Public
28
4
Pebble Beach · Private
27
5
Newport Coast · Private
25
6
San Francisco · Public
24
7
Fresno · Public
24
8
Daly City · Public
24
9
San Lorenzo · Public
23
10
Los Angeles · Public
23

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Richmond · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
San Diego · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
9
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
10
Pasadena · Private
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
8
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
8
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
9
avg 23.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
10
avg 44.8 · σ 2.34
σ 2.34

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
100%
4
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
5
Stockton · n=79 · 2025
99%
6
Gilroy · n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
San Francisco · Public
34 '18 → 70 '25 +36.4pp
San Francisco · Public
25 '18 → 61 '25 +35.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -6.9% +154.0pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.6% +121.5pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +19.8% +115.8pp
San Jose · Santa Clara · Public  Watch — engagement
+129.6% vs +17.0% +112.6pp
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+129.2% vs +19.8% +109.4pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Waterford · Stanislaus · Public  Compounding decline
-65.7% vs +2.3% -67.9pp
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Sharp downturn
-52.4% vs +2.5% -54.9pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

996 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.8pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.6pp
Palo Cedro · Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.4pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.1pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.8pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
Stockton · Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -9.2pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.6pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -8.0pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -8.0pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,561 schools · 2025 data · Page 6 of 16 (showing 501–600)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
501
San Jose · Public  Holding share
Santa Clara 539 2,134 27 123 22.4% 24.3% 20.2 4.3 661 148
502
Oakland · Public  Demand problem
Alameda 62 436 27 111 24.6% 23.5% 16.1 6.5 69 17
503
Alameda · Public  Material decline
Alameda 230 1,280 27 155 17.7% 23.8% 17.4 4.3 356 63
504
Rancho Cucamonga · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 698 2,759 27 129 21.2% 27.8% 22.5 4.6 899 191
505
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 117 512 27 115 23.7% 9.4% 19.7 2.6 135 32
506
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 601 2,485 27 128 21.3% 26.8% 20.1 2.8 771 164
507
Oakland · Private
Alameda 77 334 27 195 14.0% 19.1% 14.3 6.5 150 21
508
Pasadena · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 339 1,303 27 130 20.9% 15.2% 21.5 7.7 440 92
509
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 258 1,001 27 90 30.0% 21.4% 20.2 5.0 233 70
510
Sun Valley · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 118 1,100 27 140 19.4% 12.5% 21.2 4.2 165 32
511
Inglewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 144 588 27 165 16.4% 20.5% 18.1 2.1 238 39
512
Oak Park · Public  Demand hides churn
Ventura 48 145 27 83 32.5% 23.1% 27.1 8.3 40 13
513
Garden Grove · Public  Material decline
Orange 425 1,701 27 117 23.1% 34.8% 24.2 4.5 497 115
514
Porterville · Public  Sharp downturn
Tulare 115 509 27 74 36.5% 20.0 4.3 85 31
515
La Mesa · Public  Best in class
San Diego 621 2,554 27 127 21.1% 31.7% 19.6 3.4 791 167
516
Benicia · Public  Sharp downturn
Solano 317 1,335 27 117 22.9% 28.2% 17.7 4.1 371 85
517
Elk Grove · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 675 2,650 27 129 20.8% 38.7% 17.0 3.7 870 181
518
Huntington Beach · Public  Tracking
Orange 698 2,645 27 119 22.4% 34.2% 22.4 5.3 834 187
519
Oakland · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 56 199 27 129 20.8% 17.9 72 15
520
Oakland · Public  Strong demand
Alameda 112 828 27 133 20.1% 17.0 5.4 149 30
521
Panorama City · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 492 27 180 14.8% 10.0% 21.4 2.7 202 30
522
Rocklin · Public  Holding share
Placer 449 2,041 27 118 22.7% 30.8% 18.0 4.0 529 120
523
Newbury Park · Public  Weak at the gate
Ventura 539 2,047 27 111 24.2% 24.3% 21.1 4.6 596 144
524
Long Beach · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 992 3,890 27 101 26.5% 24.1% 22.1 6.2 1,000 265
525
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 139 1,862 27 110 24.2% 24.3% 24.5 2.9 153 37
526
Livermore · Public  Best in class
Alameda 568 2,156 27 123 21.7% 26.5% 20.4 4.0 697 151
527
La Verne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 467 1,911 27 87 30.6% 27.4% 22.3 4.3 405 124
528
Van Nuys · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 136 1,229 26 99 26.7% 8.3% 22.8 5.2 135 36
529
Danville · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 510 2,036 26 137 19.3% 33.3% 19.6 7.2 700 135
530
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 121 494 26 126 20.9% 15.6% 21.5 7.4 153 32
531
Venice · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 110 335 26 130 20.3% 22.7 9.1 143 29
532
Carlsbad · Public  Best in class
San Diego 573 2,336 26 94 27.9% 26.5% 20.4 4.2 541 151
533
East Palo Alto · Private
San Mateo 57 251 26 142 18.5% 33.3% 12.3 81 15
534
San Bernardino · Private
San Bernardino 137 645 26 130 20.2% 25.0% 23.4 2.2 178 36
535
Colfax · Public  Material decline
Placer 138 611 26 60 43.4% 11.1% 18.8 6.5 83 36
536
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 265 1,240 26 129 20.1% 21.7% 16.6 4.5 343 69
537
Hemet · Public  Best in class
Riverside 77 762 26 166 15.6% 15.0% 15.6 128 20
538
Modesto · Public  Weak at the gate
Stanislaus 591 2,304 26 81 32.1% 22.9% 17.9 3.0 477 153
539
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 480 1,602 26 102 25.2% 33.1% 20.6 4.4 492 124
540
Van Nuys · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 426 1,774 26 94 27.4% 23.6% 21.6 4.5 402 110
541
Fort Bragg · Public  Sharp downturn
Mendocino 132 569 26 81 31.8% 11.8% 20.4 107 34
542
Morro Bay · Public  Weak at the gate
San Luis Obispo 171 751 26 91 28.2% 6.8% 19.3 3.5 156 44
543
San Diego · Public  Both ends slipping
San Diego 70 313 26 87 29.5% 22.2% 25.7 4.3 61 18
544
Fowler · Public  Holding share
Fresno 199 807 26 73 35.2% 17.6% 18.1 6.5 145 51
545
Concord · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 582 2,373 26 122 21.0% 29.5% 20.1 3.4 709 149
546
El Segundo · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 141 550 26 131 19.5% 8.3% 19.1 6.4 185 36
547
Newport Beach · Public  Strong demand
Orange 526 2,084 25 94 27.2% 29.9% 21.9 3.8 493 134
548
Richmond · Public  Strong demand
Contra Costa 130 546 25 103 24.6% 9.1% 16.1 7.7 134 33
549
Pasadena · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 138 1,053 25 115 22.0% 25.7% 18.1 5.1 159 35
550
Bakersfield · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 576 2,398 25 91 27.9% 24.7% 20.7 3.1 523 146
551
Chatsworth · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 71 259 25 100 25.4% 14.1 71 18
552
Agoura Hills · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 442 1,709 25 130 19.5% 26.8% 19.7 5.2 574 112
553
San Juan Capistrano · Public  Best in class
Orange 703 2,641 25 111 22.9% 25.3% 19.4 2.6 777 178
554
Delhi · Public  Material decline
Merced 162 710 25 90 28.1% 17.1% 16.1 1.9 146 41
555
Temecula · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 733 2,946 25 125 20.2% 33.5% 21.0 3.1 916 185
556
Sylmar · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 341 1,463 25 89 28.2% 24.4% 22.0 5.3 305 86
557
San Leandro · Public  Material decline
Alameda 599 2,510 25 95 26.4% 32.5% 15.7 2.0 571 151
558
Daly City · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 322 1,278 25 119 21.1% 39.5% 15.5 3.7 384 81
559
Cathedral City · Public  Material decline
Riverside 346 1,334 25 76 33.1% 21.8% 20.8 4.3 263 87
560
Novato · Public  Both ends slipping
Marin 350 1,287 25 105 23.9% 26.1% 18.6 5.4 368 88
561
Valencia · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 611 2,286 25 128 19.6% 31.4% 19.6 5.1 781 153
562
Camarillo · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 416 1,969 25 91 27.4% 26.9% 19.0 1.9 380 104
563
Lake View Terrace · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 96 776 25 121 20.7% 19.8 3.1 116 24
564
Temecula · Public  Holding share
Riverside 683 2,739 25 102 24.5% 29.4% 21.4 3.4 695 170
565
Burlingame · Private
San Mateo 81 354 25 210 11.8% 13.6 170 20
566
Newark · Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 345 1,367 25 103 24.0% 27.1% 15.9 4.9 354 85
567
Santa Ana · Public  Best in class
Orange 536 2,126 25 108 22.8% 26.5% 18.3 4.5 580 132
568
Ojai · Private
Ventura 65 257 25 215 11.4% 20.0 7.7 140 16
569
Anaheim · Private
Orange 187 767 25 157 15.7% 6.5% 18.2 2.1 294 46
570
Van Nuys · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 57 183 25 116 21.2% 12.3 66 14
571
Hercules · Public  Material decline
Contra Costa 163 767 25 179 13.8% 37.5% 15.9 7.4 291 40
572
Oakland · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 53 405 25 151 16.2% 5.7 80 13
573
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 400 1,724 24 133 18.5% 33.7% 17.8 3.8 531 98
574
San Marcos · Public  Best in class
San Diego 777 3,067 24 116 21.1% 29.5% 19.6 3.2 901 190
575
Vista · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 119 1,355 24 88 27.6% 34.5% 21.0 2.5 105 29
576
San Jose · Public
Santa Clara 107 421 24 94 25.7% 15.4% 19.6 7.5 101 26
577
Salinas · Public  Material decline
Monterey 611 2,380 24 63 38.6% 22.3% 18.3 2.6 383 148
578
Sonoma · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 256 1,071 24 73 33.0% 14.5% 15.6 5.9 188 62
579
Sunnyvale · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 572 2,060 24 156 15.4% 28.3% 19.6 3.5 895 138
580
Montebello · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 83 295 24 98 24.7% 15.0% 16.9 81 20
581
Long Beach · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 299 1,260 24 105 22.9% 62.5% 20.7 4.3 315 72
582
Lynwood · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 378 1,633 24 82 29.4% 19.8% 21.2 3.4 309 91
583
Ukiah · Public  Strong demand
Mendocino 378 1,767 24 59 40.6% 18.7% 16.7 2.9 224 91
584
Davis · Public  Sharp downturn
Yolo 75 562 24 144 16.7% 10.7 108 18
585
Rowland Heights · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 463 2,016 24 125 19.1% 30.6% 18.4 4.1 580 111
586
San Pablo · Public  Watch — engagement
Contra Costa 96 629 24 134 17.8% 34.8% 13.5 5.2 129 23
587
San Diego · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 46 88 24 143 16.7% 27.3% 15.2 66 11
588
San Francisco · Public  Material decline
San Francisco 63 196 24 165 14.4% 20.0% 14.3 104 15
589
Huntington Beach · Public  Material decline
Orange 507 1,997 24 94 25.3% 25.0% 19.3 4.3 475 120
590
Hollywood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 140 599 24 119 19.8% 21.2% 17.1 3.6 167 33
591
Thermal · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 433 1,875 24 67 35.2% 20.6% 19.6 3.2 290 102
592
Huntington Park · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 382 1,479 24 94 25.0% 32.2% 19.6 4.2 360 90
593
Oakland · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 51 255 24 106 22.2% 25.0% 13.7 5.9 54 12
594
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 316 1,263 23 68 34.4% 16.2% 19.6 7.0 215 74
595
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 94 632 23 189 12.4% 13.6% 13.8 4.3 178 22
596
Carlsbad · Private
San Diego 60 272 23 162 14.4% 42.9% 13.3 97 14
597
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 146 616 23 136 17.1% 14.4 2.7 199 34
598
Novato · Public  Demand problem
Marin 305 1,250 23 135 17.2% 15.5% 16.1 3.3 412 71
599
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 537 1,941 23 80 29.2% 22.4% 19.6 4.5 428 125
600
Mission Viejo · Public  Demand problem
Orange 597 2,475 23 101 23.1% 29.5% 18.4 3.5 601 139
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →

Related reading

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next