County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — California · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Stockton · Public
109
3
Santa Ana · Public
100
4
Los Angeles · Public
98
5
Santa Cruz · Public
94
6
Los Angeles · Public
90
7
Fresno · Public
87
8
Tustin · Public
87
9
Los Angeles · Public
82
10
San Bernardino · Public
81

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Irvine · Private
161
4
Los Angeles · Private
121
5
Palo Alto · Private
114
6
Dublin · Private
113
7
Pasadena · Private
104
8
Sacramento · Private
93
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Santa Ana · Charter
96
4
Fresno · Public
95
5
San Diego · Public
93
6
La Jolla · Public
86
7
San Jose · Public
86
8
Wilmington · Public
86
9
Cupertino · Public
85
10
Cypress · Public
84

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Pebble Beach · Private
95
8
Irvine · Private
94
9
San Jose · Private
94
10
Oakland · Private
81

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Oceanside · Public
1
3
Fontana · Public
1
4
San Diego · Public
2
5
Waterford · Public
2
6
Mckinleyville · Public
3
7
Nicolaus · Public
3
8
Menifee · Public
3
9
Colusa · Public
3
10
Gridley · Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Redlands · Private
6
3
Ontario · Private
10
4
Long Beach · Private
13
5
Mission Hills · Private
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
14
7
San Diego · Private
14
8
Modesto · Private
14
9
Cerritos · Private
16
10
Santa Maria · Private
17

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Carson · Public
14
6
Newport Coast · Private
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Newport Coast · Private
12
4
San Jose · Private
11
5
Los Angeles · Private
10
6
Santa Ana · Charter
10
7
San Francisco · Private
9
8
La Canada · Private
9
9
Compton · Public
9
10
Claremont · Private
9

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Victorville · Public
20
5
Los Angeles · Public
19
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Los Angeles · Public
18
9
Redwood City · Public
18
10
Newport Coast · Private
18

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
San Jose · Private
30
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Carson · Public
34
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
San Diego · Public
30
6
San Diego · Public
27
7
Fresno · Public
27
8
Cypress · Public
26
9
Irvine · Private
26
10
Santa Ana · Charter
23

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Sacramento · Public
31
3
Wilmington · Public
28
4
Pebble Beach · Private
27
5
Newport Coast · Private
25
6
San Francisco · Public
24
7
Fresno · Public
24
8
Daly City · Public
24
9
San Lorenzo · Public
23
10
Los Angeles · Public
23

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Richmond · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
San Diego · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
9
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
10
Pasadena · Private
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
8
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
8
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
9
avg 23.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
10
avg 44.8 · σ 2.34
σ 2.34

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
100%
4
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
5
Stockton · n=79 · 2025
99%
6
Gilroy · n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
San Francisco · Public
34 '18 → 70 '25 +36.4pp
San Francisco · Public
25 '18 → 61 '25 +35.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -6.9% +154.0pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.6% +121.5pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +19.8% +115.8pp
San Jose · Santa Clara · Public  Watch — engagement
+129.6% vs +17.0% +112.6pp
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+129.2% vs +19.8% +109.4pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Waterford · Stanislaus · Public  Compounding decline
-65.7% vs +2.3% -67.9pp
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Sharp downturn
-52.4% vs +2.5% -54.9pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

996 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.8pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.6pp
Palo Cedro · Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.4pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.1pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.8pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
Stockton · Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -9.2pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.6pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -8.0pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -8.0pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,561 schools · 2025 data · Page 7 of 16 (showing 601–700)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
601
Baldwin Park · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 393 1,650 23 75 30.9% 19.8% 21.6 4.1 295 91
602
Santa Rosa · Private
Sonoma 108 567 23 150 15.4% 17.6 2.8 162 25
603
Harbor City · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 402 1,549 23 90 25.7% 24.7% 19.6 3.5 362 93
604
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 26 74 23 154 15.0% 11.5 40 6
605
San Gabriel · Private
Los Angeles 26 112 23 169 13.6% 23.1 11.5 44 6
606
Gonzales · Public  Sharp downturn
Monterey 204 751 23 56 41.2% 14.9% 15.7 4.4 114 47
607
Concord · Private
Contra Costa 252 1,025 23 132 17.5% 25.9% 17.9 6.8 332 58
608
San Fernando · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 87 417 23 123 18.7% 18.4 4.6 107 20
609
Nuevo · Public  Best in class
Riverside 170 667 23 74 31.2% 15.4% 20.6 1.8 125 39
610
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 384 1,582 23 118 19.4% 20.4% 19.8 5.0 453 88
611
Bell · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 441 2,088 23 101 22.8% 22.8% 19.7 4.1 444 101
612
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 140 1,031 23 174 13.2% 34.4% 22.9 8.6 243 32
613
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 425 1,891 23 97 23.4% 32.0% 13.9 3.3 414 97
614
Oakland · Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 79 295 23 105 21.7% 10.1 83 18
615
San Francisco · Public  Sharp downturn
San Francisco 44 123 23 89 25.6% 6.8 6.8 39 10
616
Salinas · Private
Monterey 88 584 23 141 16.1% 15.0% 17.1 124 20
617
Union City · Public  Material decline
Alameda 832 3,096 23 120 19.0% 34.4% 15.4 3.7 995 189
618
Los Angeles · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 106 431 23 108 20.9% 25.0% 16.0 3.8 115 24
619
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 137 585 23 112 20.1% 14.6 154 31
620
Corona · Public  Demand problem
Riverside 673 2,712 23 86 26.3% 23.0% 20.1 4.5 578 152
621
Los Olivos · Private
Santa Barbara 31 219 23 100 22.6% 12.9 31 7
622
South San Francisco · Public  Demand problem
San Mateo 271 1,053 23 126 17.8% 29.5% 14.0 3.3 342 61
623
Moreno Valley · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 476 2,101 22 87 26.0% 29.0% 18.7 1.9 412 107
624
Idyllwild · Private
Riverside 89 273 22 80 28.2% 15.0% 18.0 5.6 71 20
625
El Monte · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 423 1,638 22 84 26.6% 30.5% 20.3 4.0 357 95
626
Granada Hills · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 512 2,152 22 87 26.0% 21.7% 17.8 3.3 443 115
627
La Verne · Private
Los Angeles 156 696 22 154 14.5% 17.1% 16.0 1.9 241 35
628
South Gate · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 499 1,990 22 109 20.7% 29.5% 17.4 3.2 542 112
629
Placentia · Public  Strong demand
Orange 433 1,998 22 103 21.8% 25.8% 18.7 3.7 446 97
630
Huntington Park · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 67 562 22 112 20.0% 22.4 4.5 75 15
631
Whittier · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 256 1,000 22 102 21.8% 19.3% 16.4 4.3 261 57
632
Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 117 474 22 95 23.4% 11.5% 19.7 111 26
633
Perris · Public  Material decline
Riverside 405 1,630 22 79 28.2% 22.2% 19.3 1.5 319 90
634
Edwards · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 63 497 22 68 32.6% 17.5 43 14
635
San Diego · Private
San Diego 63 862 22 165 13.5% 17.5 104 14
636
Felton · Public  Material decline
Santa Cruz 163 578 22 72 30.5% 8.3% 17.8 4.9 118 36
637
San Diego · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 557 2,187 22 99 22.2% 30.9% 19.6 4.5 554 123
638
Chula Vista · Public  Holding share
San Diego 654 2,440 22 109 20.2% 30.6% 18.6 3.2 711 144
639
Fresno · Public  Demand problem
Fresno 518 2,339 22 62 35.3% 23.7% 15.6 5.2 323 114
640
Rancho Cucamonga · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 769 3,221 22 94 23.5% 30.2% 17.6 3.5 719 169
641
Arcata · Public  Demand problem
Humboldt 264 1,007 22 69 31.7% 24.1% 16.7 3.4 183 58
642
San Diego · Public  Demand problem
San Diego 146 535 22 83 26.4% 28.1% 19.2 4.8 121 32
643
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 96 363 22 132 16.5% 21.9 127 21
644
Fillmore · Public  Strong demand
Ventura 247 1,007 22 55 39.4% 9.3% 19.4 4.9 137 54
645
Elk Grove · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 613 2,536 22 99 22.0% 37.3% 13.4 1.6 608 134
646
Castroville · Public  Watch — engagement
Monterey 316 1,250 22 62 35.4% 13.0% 15.5 2.9 195 69
647
Covina · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 252 1,056 22 89 24.6% 9.1% 17.9 2.4 224 55
648
Oakland · Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 55 480 22 173 12.6% 33.3% 7.3 95 12
649
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 423 1,568 22 82 26.4% 37.0% 19.4 2.6 348 92
650
Marysville · Public  Weak at the gate
Yuba 46 366 22 74 29.4% 13.0 6.5 34 10
651
San Luis Obispo · Private
San Luis Obispo 83 319 22 170 12.8% 16.7% 13.2 141 18
652
Petaluma · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 296 1,193 22 102 21.1% 23.4% 16.6 2.4 303 64
653
Ojai · Public  Material decline
Ventura 153 576 22 95 22.6% 18.2% 15.0 146 33
654
Templeton · Public  Holding share
San Luis Obispo 204 725 22 74 29.3% 11.4% 13.7 1.5 150 44
655
Long Beach · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 823 3,408 22 117 18.4% 23.7% 17.2 5.6 960 177
656
Palmdale · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 251 2,259 22 78 27.6% 29.6% 19.1 4.0 196 54
657
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 294 1,318 21 78 27.6% 31.8% 20.1 7.1 228 63
658
Palm Springs · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 393 1,497 21 74 29.0% 26.2% 18.8 2.3 290 84
659
Chula Vista · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 712 2,557 21 127 16.8% 32.9% 19.4 3.5 904 152
660
Huntington Beach · Public  Best in class
Orange 550 2,049 21 83 25.6% 25.6% 17.4 3.3 457 117
661
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 395 491 21 90 23.7% 29.8% 19.8 4.6 354 84
662
Redwood City · Public  Tracking
San Mateo 475 1,854 21 118 18.0% 16.8% 14.9 5.0 560 101
663
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 273 1,284 21 119 17.8% 22.4% 16.5 4.4 326 58
664
Roseville · Public  Strong demand
Placer 440 2,079 21 95 22.3% 22.6% 13.6 2.5 417 93
665
Fremont · Public  Material decline
Alameda 336 1,273 21 117 18.1% 25.4% 13.7 2.7 393 71
666
Westminster · Public  Demand problem
Orange 644 2,529 21 95 22.2% 28.7% 19.1 3.7 613 136
667
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 57 298 21 193 10.9% 21.1 5.3 110 12
668
Carson · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 320 1,407 21 91 22.9% 25.4% 18.1 5.3 292 67
669
Fullerton · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 441 1,880 21 59 35.1% 20.6% 16.6 3.2 262 92
670
Chula Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 446 1,771 21 62 33.6% 32.3% 17.3 3.1 277 93
671
Ventura · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 457 1,939 21 79 26.4% 16.8% 15.3 4.4 360 95
672
San Bernardino · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 255 1,246 21 71 29.3% 15.1% 16.1 2.8 181 53
673
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 82 394 21 130 15.9% 29.4% 15.8 107 17
674
Los Angeles · Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 145 533 21 115 18.0% 16.6 4.8 167 30
675
Carpinteria · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Barbara 145 593 21 71 29.1% 23.3% 16.6 3.5 103 30
676
Ventura · Public  Best in class
Ventura 232 951 21 134 15.5% 18.8% 12.9 3.5 310 48
677
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 257 1,183 21 100 20.5% 28.3% 16.3 2.7 258 53
678
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 34 237 21 106 19.4% 20.6 11.8 36 7
679
Garden Grove · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 457 1,664 21 77 26.8% 30.9% 18.6 3.9 351 94
680
Villa Park · Public  Demand problem
Orange 467 2,023 21 92 22.4% 29.2% 15.8 3.0 428 96
681
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 404 1,563 21 83 24.8% 27.7% 17.1 1.5 335 83
682
Modesto · Public  Best in class
Stanislaus 565 2,346 21 59 34.6% 21.6% 13.1 2.3 335 116
683
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 377 1,591 20 73 27.9% 33.8% 18.0 2.6 276 77
684
Garden Grove · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 373 1,439 20 81 25.2% 26.3% 17.4 2.7 301 76
685
Calistoga · Public  Strong demand
Napa 59 355 20 119 17.1% 6.8 70 12
686
Perris · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 615 2,396 20 86 23.6% 18.4% 17.6 3.2 529 125
687
Rocklin · Public  Sharp downturn
Placer 532 1,936 20 92 22.0% 33.3% 14.7 2.6 490 108
688
Livermore · Public  Weak at the gate
Alameda 434 1,827 20 102 19.8% 27.3% 13.6 3.5 444 88
689
Compton · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 227 908 20 82 24.9% 15.2% 16.3 3.5 185 46
690
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 247 978 20 83 24.5% 6.0% 17.4 4.9 204 50
691
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 109 457 20 79 25.6% 27.3% 20.2 2.8 86 22
692
Burbank · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
693
Burbank · Public
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
694
Salinas · Public  Material decline
Monterey 662 2,742 20 78 25.7% 27.8% 12.8 2.4 517 133
695
Simi Valley · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 478 1,835 20 64 31.6% 24.0% 16.1 4.4 304 96
696
San Francisco · Private
San Francisco 80 302 20 241 8.3% 10.0 193 16
697
Milpitas · Public  Demand hides churn
Santa Clara 25 55 20 184 10.9% 46 5
698
Santa Ana · Public  Holding share
Orange 595 2,376 20 75 26.7% 27.7% 16.6 3.2 445 119
699
Merced · Public  Strong demand
Merced 461 1,793 20 53 37.7% 23.9% 12.6 3.7 244 92
700
Avenal · Public  Demand problem
Kings 156 762 20 45 44.3% 16.1% 16.0 2.6 70 31
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →

Related reading

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next