County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — California · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Stockton · Public
109
3
Santa Ana · Public
100
4
Los Angeles · Public
98
5
Santa Cruz · Public
94
6
Los Angeles · Public
90
7
Fresno · Public
87
8
Tustin · Public
87
9
Los Angeles · Public
82
10
San Bernardino · Public
81

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Irvine · Private
161
4
Los Angeles · Private
121
5
Palo Alto · Private
114
6
Dublin · Private
113
7
Pasadena · Private
104
8
Sacramento · Private
93
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Santa Ana · Charter
96
4
Fresno · Public
95
5
San Diego · Public
93
6
La Jolla · Public
86
7
San Jose · Public
86
8
Wilmington · Public
86
9
Cupertino · Public
85
10
Cypress · Public
84

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Pebble Beach · Private
95
8
Irvine · Private
94
9
San Jose · Private
94
10
Oakland · Private
81

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Oceanside · Public
1
3
Fontana · Public
1
4
San Diego · Public
2
5
Waterford · Public
2
6
Mckinleyville · Public
3
7
Nicolaus · Public
3
8
Menifee · Public
3
9
Colusa · Public
3
10
Gridley · Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Redlands · Private
6
3
Ontario · Private
10
4
Long Beach · Private
13
5
Mission Hills · Private
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
14
7
San Diego · Private
14
8
Modesto · Private
14
9
Cerritos · Private
16
10
Santa Maria · Private
17

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Carson · Public
14
6
Newport Coast · Private
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Newport Coast · Private
12
4
San Jose · Private
11
5
Los Angeles · Private
10
6
Santa Ana · Charter
10
7
San Francisco · Private
9
8
La Canada · Private
9
9
Compton · Public
9
10
Claremont · Private
9

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Victorville · Public
20
5
Los Angeles · Public
19
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Los Angeles · Public
18
9
Redwood City · Public
18
10
Newport Coast · Private
18

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
San Jose · Private
30
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Carson · Public
34
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
San Diego · Public
30
6
San Diego · Public
27
7
Fresno · Public
27
8
Cypress · Public
26
9
Irvine · Private
26
10
Santa Ana · Charter
23

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Sacramento · Public
31
3
Wilmington · Public
28
4
Pebble Beach · Private
27
5
Newport Coast · Private
25
6
San Francisco · Public
24
7
Fresno · Public
24
8
Daly City · Public
24
9
San Lorenzo · Public
23
10
Los Angeles · Public
23

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Richmond · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
San Diego · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
9
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
10
Pasadena · Private
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
8
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
8
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
9
avg 23.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
10
avg 44.8 · σ 2.34
σ 2.34

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
100%
4
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
5
Stockton · n=79 · 2025
99%
6
Gilroy · n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
San Francisco · Public
34 '18 → 70 '25 +36.4pp
San Francisco · Public
25 '18 → 61 '25 +35.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -6.9% +154.0pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.6% +121.5pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +19.8% +115.8pp
San Jose · Santa Clara · Public  Watch — engagement
+129.6% vs +17.0% +112.6pp
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+129.2% vs +19.8% +109.4pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Waterford · Stanislaus · Public  Compounding decline
-65.7% vs +2.3% -67.9pp
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Sharp downturn
-52.4% vs +2.5% -54.9pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

996 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.8pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.6pp
Palo Cedro · Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.4pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.1pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.8pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
Stockton · Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -9.2pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.6pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -8.0pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -8.0pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,561 schools · 2025 data · Page 13 of 16 (showing 1201–1300)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
1201
Carmichael · Private
Sacramento 43 388 9 21 44.4% 9 4
1202
Adelanto · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 551 2,247 9 47 19.6% 21.6% 8.0 1.1 260 51
1203
Norco · Public  Strong demand
Riverside 486 2,032 9 37 25.3% 20.0% 8.2 0.8 178 45
1204
Hesperia · Public  Strong demand
San Bernardino 487 2,098 9 39 23.8% 40.0% 8.2 0.6 189 45
1205
Lemoore · Public  Material decline
Kings 390 1,798 9 38 24.3% 19.4% 6.7 148 36
1206
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 401 1,608 9 57 16.2% 13.5% 8.5 1.2 229 37
1207
Upper Lake · Public  Watch — engagement
Lake 65 307 9 75 12.2% 9.2 49 6
1208
Bakersfield · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 466 2,159 9 32 28.9% 7.7 1.5 149 43
1209
Napa · Public  Tracking
Napa 434 1,642 9 38 23.9% 12.5% 7.1 2.3 167 40
1210
Woodlake · Public  Demand hides churn
Tulare 152 646 9 22 42.4% 7.2 33 14
1211
Oakdale · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 370 1,563 9 23 40.5% 29.4% 5.7 84 34
1212
Marina · Public  Best in class
Monterey 153 721 9 39 23.3% 6.5 2.0 60 14
1213
Modesto · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 504 2,192 9 26 35.1% 17.4% 6.3 1.8 131 46
1214
Pomona · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 99 597 9 66 13.8% 6.1 65 9
1215
Sun Valley · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 33 372 9 127 7.1% 42 3
1216
Hemet · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 551 2,414 9 38 24.0% 24.0% 8.5 0.7 208 50
1217
La Mesa · Public  Tracking
San Diego 563 2,172 9 42 21.7% 31.4% 8.0 1.9 235 51
1218
Acton · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 89 394 9 38 23.5% 9.0 34 8
1219
Watsonville · Public  Material decline
Santa Cruz 56 501 9 75 11.9% 80.0% 42 5
1220
North Highlands · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 45 716 9 42 21.1% 19 4
1221
Arbuckle · Public  Demand problem
Colusa 124 463 9 37 23.9% 27.3% 3.2 46 11
1222
Modesto · Public  Demand hides churn
Stanislaus 508 2,029 9 32 27.6% 17.8% 5.5 0.6 163 45
1223
North Hollywood · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 113 558 9 109 8.1% 8.8 123 10
1224
Nipomo · Public  Strong demand
San Luis Obispo 192 819 9 27 33.3% 6.8 51 17
1225
El Cajon · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 635 2,331 9 57 15.5% 33.9% 7.4 1.3 362 56
1226
Antelope · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 320 1,312 9 42 20.7% 42.9% 5.0 135 28
1227
Dixon · Public  Weak at the gate
Solano 242 990 9 54 16.0% 14.3% 5.0 131 21
1228
Clovis · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 751 2,779 9 26 32.8% 27.7% 6.7 0.8 198 65
1229
Dos Palos · Public  Material decline
Merced 151 639 9 36 23.6% 23.1% 4.0 55 13
1230
Victorville · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 535 2,255 9 34 25.4% 15.2% 7.8 1.5 181 46
1231
Lancaster · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 675 2,631 9 31 28.2% 24.1% 7.0 1.2 206 58
1232
Vacaville · Public  Best in class
Solano 409 1,671 9 41 21.0% 40.0% 4.7 0.7 167 35
1233
Ramona · Public  Best in class
San Diego 328 1,404 9 39 21.9% 14.3% 5.8 128 28
1234
Atascadero · Public  Demand problem
San Luis Obispo 293 1,157 9 34 25.0% 5.5 100 25
1235
Bakersfield · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 529 2,098 9 32 26.8% 28.9% 6.0 168 45
1236
Eureka · Private
Humboldt 47 295 9 23 36.4% 11 4
1237
San Bernardino · Public  Both ends slipping
San Bernardino 306 1,440 8 36 23.4% 6.2 111 26
1238
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 95 438 8 83 10.1% 8.4 79 8
1239
Bakersfield · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 598 2,331 8 32 25.8% 6.0% 6.9 1.5 194 50
1240
Stockton · Public  Holding share
San Joaquin 72 1,186 8 56 15.0% 40 6
1241
Los Angeles · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 84 477 8 130 6.4% 4.8 109 7
1242
Fremont · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 72 394 8 57 14.6% 4.2 41 6
1243
Stockton · Public
San Joaquin 576 2,355 8 32 25.9% 14.6% 4.9 185 48
1244
San Diego · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 204 780 8 48 17.4% 41.2% 8.3 98 17
1245
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 168 654 8 57 14.6% 21.4% 8.3 96 14
1246
Sacramento · Public  Demand hides churn
Sacramento 433 1,682 8 39 21.1% 38.9% 4.2 171 36
1247
Chico · Public
Butte 482 1,978 8 34 24.1% 20.0% 4.8 0.6 166 40
1248
Santa Ana · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 500 1,519 8 37 22.4% 17.1% 7.4 0.8 183 41
1249
City Of Industry · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 183 723 8 66 12.5% 26.7% 8.2 120 15
1250
Redding · Public  Holding share
Shasta 281 1,268 8 37 22.3% 30.4% 4.6 103 23
1251
Los Banos · Public  Demand problem
Merced 443 1,725 8 36 22.4% 11.1% 6.1 0.9 161 36
1252
Calipatria · Public  Sharp downturn
Imperial 74 345 8 46 17.6% 8.1 34 6
1253
San Diego · Private
San Diego 37 436 8 86 9.4% 100.0% 8.1 32 3
1254
Lodi · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 481 2,058 8 32 25.7% 15.4% 4.8 0.8 152 39
1255
Santa Rosa · Public  Compounding decline
Sonoma 346 1,553 8 50 16.1% 32.1% 4.0 174 28
1256
San Jose · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Clara 225 862 8 24 34.0% 4.4 3.1 53 18
1257
Bakersfield · Public  Best in class
Kern 656 2,530 8 31 25.6% 5.8% 6.1 0.6 203 52
1258
San Jose · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Clara 177 874 8 25 31.1% 6.2 45 14
1259
Riverside · Private
Riverside 89 685 8 69 11.5% 7.9 61 7
1260
Spring Valley · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 446 1,543 8 37 21.3% 34.3% 7.0 0.9 164 35
1261
Rancho Cordova · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 435 1,944 8 35 22.5% 32.4% 4.6 0.9 151 34
1262
Bakersfield · Public  Strong demand
Kern 525 2,324 8 26 30.6% 31.7% 6.3 0.6 134 41
1263
Santa Rosa · Public  Demand hides churn
Sonoma 334 1,434 8 32 24.5% 30.8% 4.5 106 26
1264
Rohnert Park · Public  Strong demand
Sonoma 425 1,755 8 36 21.6% 21.2% 4.7 153 33
1265
Santee · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 425 1,621 8 39 19.8% 27.3% 6.6 2.1 167 33
1266
Littlerock · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 374 1,507 8 25 30.9% 6.2 94 29
1267
Kerman · Public  Best in class
Fresno 350 1,493 8 21 37.5% 11.1% 5.1 0.9 72 27
1268
Phelan · Public  Demand problem
San Bernardino 467 2,163 8 33 23.5% 11.1% 6.6 1.3 153 36
1269
Bloomington · Public  Material decline
San Bernardino 416 1,794 8 50 15.2% 6.7 210 32
1270
Fair Oaks · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 365 1,548 8 37 20.9% 17.9% 4.7 134 28
1271
Canyon Country · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 502 1,952 8 43 17.8% 28.9% 6.2 1.6 214 38
1272
Ventura · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 371 1,585 8 43 17.7% 14.3% 5.7 158 28
1273
Oakland · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 53 207 8 60 12.5% 7.5 32 4
1274
Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
Fresno 398 1,741 8 24 30.9% 13.3% 5.3 0.8 97 30
1275
Wheatland · Public  Best in class
Yuba 252 1,063 8 33 22.6% 47.4% 4.0 1.2 84 19
1276
Bonsall · Public  Watch — engagement
San Diego 93 342 8 62 12.1% 4.3 58 7
1277
Tollhouse · Public  Compounding decline
Fresno 93 367 8 13 58.3% 3.2 12 7
1278
Lancaster · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 638 2,688 8 34 22.3% 16.7% 6.9 1.1 215 48
1279
Hanford · Public  Tracking
Kings 346 1,498 8 22 34.7% 15.4% 5.2 75 26
1280
Hayward · Public  Mid-year churn
Alameda 346 1,580 8 46 16.2% 38.5% 4.0 160 26
1281
El Cajon · Public  Both ends slipping
San Diego 440 1,701 8 35 21.3% 12.1% 7.5 1.8 155 33
1282
San Francisco · Private
San Francisco 40 320 8 188 4.0% 75 3
1283
Stockton · Public  Compounding decline
San Joaquin 482 2,021 7 28 26.9% 22.2% 4.6 134 36
1284
Esparto · Public  Compounding decline
Yolo 67 287 7 37 20.0% 60.0% 25 5
1285
Manteca · Public  Best in class
San Joaquin 403 1,670 7 36 20.7% 20.0% 5.0 145 30
1286
Quincy · Public  Tracking
Plumas 54 310 7 30 25.0% 16 4
1287
Richmond · Public  Compounding decline
Contra Costa 203 740 7 34 22.1% 46.7% 3.9 2.0 68 15
1288
Mcfarland · Public  Best in class
Kern 218 1,027 7 47 15.7% 5.0 102 16
1289
Palo Cedro · Public  Best in class
Shasta 300 1,487 7 21 34.4% 27.3% 3.7 64 22
1290
Hayward · Public  Best in class
Alameda 41 643 7 85 8.6% 7.3 35 3
1291
Linden · Public  Holding share
San Joaquin 205 743 7 32 23.1% 40.0% 2.4 65 15
1292
Long Beach · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 82 396 7 54 13.6% 7.3 3.7 44 6
1293
Concord · Public  Both ends slipping
Contra Costa 247 1,059 7 50 14.5% 4.5 1.6 124 18
1294
Victorville · Public  Both ends slipping
San Bernardino 481 2,165 7 32 22.6% 31.4% 5.4 155 35
1295
Fresno · Public  Best in class
Fresno 344 1,438 7 47 15.5% 4.9 161 25
1296
Galt · Public  Sharp downturn
Sacramento 207 959 7 29 24.6% 4.8 61 15
1297
El Dorado · Public  Demand problem
El Dorado 249 1,033 7 33 22.2% 4.8 81 18
1298
Manteca · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 360 1,524 7 28 26.0% 11.5% 4.7 100 26
1299
Sylmar · Public
Los Angeles 42 208 7 64 11.1% 7.1 27 3
1300
Exeter · Public  Weak at the gate
Tulare 196 909 7 29 25.0% 21.4% 4.6 56 14
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →

Related reading

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next