County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

1005 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.7pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.2pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -13.9pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,564 schools · 2025 data · Page 5 of 16 (showing 401–500)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
401
Oceanside · Public  Best in class
San Diego 398 1,670 28 130 21.5% 35.1% 20.6 3.3 517 111
402
Placentia · Public  Tracking
Orange 618 2,411 28 132 21.0% 27.3% 20.7 4.0 818 172
403
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 36 320 28 275 10.1% 11.1 99 10
404
· Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 235 974 28 159 17.4% 23.1% 21.3 7.7 373 65
405
Soquel · Public  Best in class
Santa Cruz 264 1,074 28 123 22.5% 20.6% 19.7 4.5 325 73
406
Santa Ana · Private
Orange 87 839 28 89 31.2% 12.5% 18.4 3.5 77 24
407
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 596 2,569 28 89 30.9% 27.4% 19.3 3.9 531 164
408
Hawthorne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 131 552 27 178 15.4% 11.1% 19.9 5.3 233 36
409
San Jose · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 539 2,134 27 123 22.4% 24.3% 20.2 4.3 661 148
410
Oakland · Public  Demand problem
Alameda 62 436 27 111 24.6% 23.5% 16.1 6.5 69 17
411
Rancho Cucamonga · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 698 2,759 27 129 21.2% 27.8% 22.5 4.6 899 191
412
Oakland · Private
Alameda 77 334 27 195 14.0% 19.1% 14.3 6.5 150 21
413
· Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 136 797 27 215 12.6% 35.1% 24.3 4.4 293 37
414
Pasadena · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 339 1,303 27 130 20.9% 15.2% 21.5 7.7 440 92
415
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 258 1,001 27 90 30.0% 21.4% 20.2 5.0 233 70
416
Oak Park · Public  Demand hides churn
Ventura 48 145 27 83 32.5% 23.1% 27.1 8.3 40 13
417
Garden Grove · Public  Demand problem
Orange 425 1,701 27 117 23.1% 34.8% 24.2 4.5 497 115
418
Porterville · Public  Sharp downturn
Tulare 115 509 27 74 36.5% 20.0 4.3 85 31
419
La Mesa · Public  Best in class
San Diego 621 2,554 27 127 21.1% 31.7% 19.6 3.4 791 167
420
Benicia · Public  Sharp downturn
Solano 317 1,335 27 117 22.9% 28.2% 17.7 4.1 371 85
421
Elk Grove · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 675 2,650 27 129 20.8% 38.7% 17.0 3.7 870 181
422
Huntington Beach · Public  Tracking
Orange 698 2,645 27 119 22.4% 34.2% 22.4 5.3 834 187
423
Oakland · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 56 199 27 129 20.8% 17.9 72 15
424
Oakland · Public  Strong demand
Alameda 112 828 27 133 20.1% 17.0 5.4 149 30
425
Panorama City · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 492 27 180 14.8% 10.0% 21.4 2.7 202 30
426
Rocklin · Public  Holding share
Placer 449 2,041 27 118 22.7% 30.8% 18.0 4.0 529 120
427
Newbury Park · Public  Weak at the gate
Ventura 539 2,047 27 111 24.2% 24.3% 21.1 4.6 596 144
428
Long Beach · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 992 3,890 27 101 26.5% 24.1% 22.1 6.2 1,000 265
429
Livermore · Public  Best in class
Alameda 568 2,156 27 123 21.7% 26.5% 20.4 4.0 697 151
430
La Verne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 467 1,911 27 87 30.6% 27.4% 22.3 4.3 405 124
431
Danville · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 510 2,036 26 137 19.3% 33.3% 19.6 7.2 700 135
432
Venice · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 110 335 26 130 20.3% 22.7 9.1 143 29
433
Carlsbad · Public  Best in class
San Diego 573 2,336 26 94 27.9% 26.5% 20.4 4.2 541 151
434
East Palo Alto · Private
San Mateo 57 251 26 142 18.5% 33.3% 12.3 81 15
435
San Bernardino · Private
San Bernardino 137 645 26 130 20.2% 25.0% 23.4 2.2 178 36
436
Colfax · Public  Material decline
Placer 138 611 26 60 43.4% 11.1% 18.8 6.5 83 36
437
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 265 1,240 26 129 20.1% 21.7% 16.6 4.5 343 69
438
Hemet · Public  Best in class
Riverside 77 762 26 166 15.6% 15.0% 15.6 128 20
439
Modesto · Public  Weak at the gate
Stanislaus 591 2,304 26 81 32.1% 22.9% 17.9 3.0 477 153
440
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 480 1,602 26 102 25.2% 33.1% 20.6 4.4 492 124
441
Van Nuys · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 426 1,774 26 94 27.4% 23.6% 21.6 4.5 402 110
442
Fort Bragg · Public  Sharp downturn
Mendocino 132 569 26 81 31.8% 11.8% 20.4 107 34
443
Morro Bay · Public  Weak at the gate
San Luis Obispo 171 751 26 91 28.2% 6.8% 19.3 3.5 156 44
444
Fowler · Public  Holding share
Fresno 199 807 26 73 35.2% 17.6% 18.1 6.5 145 51
445
· Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 582 2,373 26 122 21.0% 29.5% 20.1 3.4 709 149
446
El Segundo · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 141 550 26 131 19.5% 8.3% 19.1 6.4 185 36
447
Newport Beach · Public  Strong demand
Orange 526 2,084 25 94 27.2% 29.9% 21.9 3.8 493 134
448
Pasadena · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 138 1,053 25 115 22.0% 25.7% 18.1 5.1 159 35
449
Bakersfield · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 576 2,398 25 91 27.9% 24.7% 20.7 3.1 523 146
450
Agoura Hills · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 442 1,709 25 130 19.5% 26.8% 19.7 5.2 574 112
451
San Juan Capistrano · Public  Best in class
Orange 703 2,641 25 111 22.9% 25.3% 19.4 2.6 777 178
452
Delhi · Public  Material decline
Merced 162 710 25 90 28.1% 17.1% 16.1 1.9 146 41
453
Temecula · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 733 2,946 25 125 20.2% 33.5% 21.0 3.1 916 185
454
San Leandro · Public  Demand problem
Alameda 599 2,510 25 95 26.4% 32.5% 15.7 2.0 571 151
455
Daly City · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 322 1,278 25 119 21.1% 39.5% 15.5 3.7 384 81
456
Cathedral City · Public  Material decline
Riverside 346 1,334 25 76 33.1% 21.8% 20.8 4.3 263 87
457
Novato · Public  Both ends slipping
Marin 350 1,287 25 105 23.9% 26.1% 18.6 5.4 368 88
458
· Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 611 2,286 25 128 19.6% 31.4% 19.6 5.1 781 153
459
Camarillo · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 416 1,969 25 91 27.4% 26.9% 19.0 1.9 380 104
460
Temecula · Public  Holding share
Riverside 683 2,739 25 102 24.5% 29.4% 21.4 3.4 695 170
461
Burlingame · Private
San Mateo 81 354 25 210 11.8% 13.6 170 20
462
Newark · Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 345 1,367 25 103 24.0% 27.1% 15.9 4.9 354 85
463
· Public  Best in class
Orange 536 2,126 25 108 22.8% 26.5% 18.3 4.5 580 132
464
Ojai · Private
Ventura 65 257 25 215 11.4% 20.0 7.7 140 16
465
Anaheim · Private
Orange 187 767 25 157 15.7% 6.5% 18.2 2.1 294 46
466
Hercules · Public  Material decline
Contra Costa 163 767 25 179 13.8% 37.5% 15.9 7.4 291 40
467
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 400 1,724 24 133 18.5% 33.7% 17.8 3.8 531 98
468
San Marcos · Public  Best in class
San Diego 777 3,067 24 116 21.1% 29.5% 19.6 3.2 901 190
469
San Jose · Public
Santa Clara 107 421 24 94 25.7% 15.4% 19.6 7.5 101 26
470
Salinas · Public  Material decline
Monterey 611 2,380 24 63 38.6% 22.3% 18.3 2.6 383 148
471
Sonoma · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 256 1,071 24 73 33.0% 14.5% 15.6 5.9 188 62
472
· Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 572 2,060 24 156 15.4% 28.3% 19.6 3.5 895 138
473
Montebello · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 83 295 24 98 24.7% 15.0% 16.9 81 20
474
Long Beach · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 299 1,260 24 105 22.9% 62.5% 20.7 4.3 315 72
475
Lynwood · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 378 1,633 24 82 29.4% 19.8% 21.2 3.4 309 91
476
Ukiah · Public  Strong demand
Mendocino 378 1,767 24 59 40.6% 18.7% 16.7 2.9 224 91
477
Davis · Public  Sharp downturn
Yolo 75 562 24 144 16.7% 10.7 108 18
478
Rowland Heights · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 463 2,016 24 125 19.1% 30.6% 18.4 4.1 580 111
479
· Public  Strong demand
San Diego 46 88 24 143 16.7% 27.3% 15.2 66 11
480
Huntington Beach · Public  Material decline
Orange 507 1,997 24 94 25.3% 25.0% 19.3 4.3 475 120
481
Thermal · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 433 1,875 24 67 35.2% 20.6% 19.6 3.2 290 102
482
Huntington Park · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 382 1,479 24 94 25.0% 32.2% 19.6 4.2 360 90
483
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 316 1,263 23 68 34.4% 16.2% 19.6 7.0 215 74
484
Carlsbad · Private
San Diego 60 272 23 162 14.4% 42.9% 13.3 97 14
485
Novato · Public  Demand problem
Marin 305 1,250 23 135 17.2% 15.5% 16.1 3.3 412 71
486
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 537 1,941 23 80 29.2% 22.4% 19.6 4.5 428 125
487
Mission Viejo · Public  Demand problem
Orange 597 2,475 23 101 23.1% 29.5% 18.4 3.5 601 139
488
Baldwin Park · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 393 1,650 23 75 30.9% 19.8% 21.6 4.1 295 91
489
Santa Rosa · Private
Sonoma 108 567 23 150 15.4% 17.6 2.8 162 25
490
· Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 402 1,549 23 90 25.7% 24.7% 19.6 3.5 362 93
491
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 26 74 23 154 15.0% 11.5 40 6
492
San Gabriel · Private
Los Angeles 26 112 23 169 13.6% 23.1 11.5 44 6
493
Gonzales · Public  Sharp downturn
Monterey 204 751 23 56 41.2% 14.9% 15.7 4.4 114 47
494
Concord · Private
Contra Costa 252 1,025 23 132 17.5% 25.9% 17.9 6.8 332 58
495
Nuevo · Public  Best in class
Riverside 170 667 23 74 31.2% 15.4% 20.6 1.8 125 39
496
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 384 1,582 23 118 19.4% 20.4% 19.8 5.0 453 88
497
Bell · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 441 2,088 23 101 22.8% 22.8% 19.7 4.1 444 101
498
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 425 1,891 23 97 23.4% 32.0% 13.9 3.3 414 97
499
Oakland · Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 79 295 23 105 21.7% 10.1 83 18
500
Salinas · Private
Monterey 88 584 23 141 16.1% 15.0% 17.1 124 20
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →