County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — California · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Stockton · Public
109
3
Santa Ana · Public
100
4
Los Angeles · Public
98
5
Santa Cruz · Public
94
6
Los Angeles · Public
90
7
Fresno · Public
87
8
Tustin · Public
87
9
Los Angeles · Public
82
10
San Bernardino · Public
81

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Irvine · Private
161
4
Los Angeles · Private
121
5
Palo Alto · Private
114
6
Dublin · Private
113
7
Pasadena · Private
104
8
Sacramento · Private
93
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Santa Ana · Charter
96
4
Fresno · Public
95
5
San Diego · Public
93
6
La Jolla · Public
86
7
San Jose · Public
86
8
Wilmington · Public
86
9
Cupertino · Public
85
10
Cypress · Public
84

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Pebble Beach · Private
95
8
Irvine · Private
94
9
San Jose · Private
94
10
Oakland · Private
81

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Oceanside · Public
1
3
Fontana · Public
1
4
San Diego · Public
2
5
Waterford · Public
2
6
Mckinleyville · Public
3
7
Nicolaus · Public
3
8
Menifee · Public
3
9
Colusa · Public
3
10
Gridley · Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Redlands · Private
6
3
Ontario · Private
10
4
Long Beach · Private
13
5
Mission Hills · Private
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
14
7
San Diego · Private
14
8
Modesto · Private
14
9
Cerritos · Private
16
10
Santa Maria · Private
17

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Carson · Public
14
6
Newport Coast · Private
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Newport Coast · Private
12
4
San Jose · Private
11
5
Los Angeles · Private
10
6
Santa Ana · Charter
10
7
San Francisco · Private
9
8
La Canada · Private
9
9
Compton · Public
9
10
Claremont · Private
9

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Victorville · Public
20
5
Los Angeles · Public
19
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Los Angeles · Public
18
9
Redwood City · Public
18
10
Newport Coast · Private
18

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
San Jose · Private
30
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Carson · Public
34
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
San Diego · Public
30
6
San Diego · Public
27
7
Fresno · Public
27
8
Cypress · Public
26
9
Irvine · Private
26
10
Santa Ana · Charter
23

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Sacramento · Public
31
3
Wilmington · Public
28
4
Pebble Beach · Private
27
5
Newport Coast · Private
25
6
San Francisco · Public
24
7
Fresno · Public
24
8
Daly City · Public
24
9
San Lorenzo · Public
23
10
Los Angeles · Public
23

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Richmond · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
San Diego · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
9
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
10
Pasadena · Private
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
8
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
8
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
9
avg 23.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
10
avg 44.8 · σ 2.34
σ 2.34

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
100%
4
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
5
Stockton · n=79 · 2025
99%
6
Gilroy · n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
San Francisco · Public
34 '18 → 70 '25 +36.4pp
San Francisco · Public
25 '18 → 61 '25 +35.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -6.9% +154.0pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.6% +121.5pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +19.8% +115.8pp
San Jose · Santa Clara · Public  Watch — engagement
+129.6% vs +17.0% +112.6pp
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+129.2% vs +19.8% +109.4pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Waterford · Stanislaus · Public  Compounding decline
-65.7% vs +2.3% -67.9pp
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Sharp downturn
-52.4% vs +2.5% -54.9pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

913 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.6pp
Palo Cedro · Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.4pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.8pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
Stockton · Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.4pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -9.2pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.6pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -8.0pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -8.0pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,118 schools · 2025 data · Page 10 of 12 (showing 901–1000) · 443 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
901
Oceanside · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 623 2,463 10 54 19.5% 30.8% 8.5 0.8 334 65
902
Porterville · Public  Demand problem
Tulare 499 2,125 10 29 36.4% 19.2% 7.6 1.4 143 52
903
Palmdale · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 569 2,208 10 40 26.0% 5.1% 8.8 1.4 227 59
904
Auburn · Public  Material decline
Placer 347 1,265 10 28 36.7% 27.8% 6.6 98 36
905
Los Angeles · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 145 503 10 69 15.0% 6.9 2.1 100 15
906
Perris · Public  Compounding decline
Riverside 504 2,096 10 41 25.0% 5.8% 8.5 1.6 208 52
907
Ontario · Private
San Bernardino 117 469 10 97 10.6% 10.3 113 12
908
California City · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 147 604 10 35 28.9% 26.7% 8.2 52 15
909
Imperial · Public  Best in class
Imperial 343 1,439 10 28 36.1% 28.6% 10.2 0.9 97 35
910
Fresno · Public  Both ends slipping
Fresno 452 2,175 10 52 19.5% 6.5% 7.7 1.8 236 46
911
Turlock · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 619 2,479 10 34 30.0% 28.6% 7.0 1.1 210 63
912
Pacifica · Public  Material decline
San Mateo 178 740 10 91 11.1% 22.2% 5.6 162 18
913
Oxnard · Public  Demand hides churn
Ventura 476 1,951 10 37 27.3% 14.6% 8.4 1.7 176 48
914
Wildomar · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 447 1,927 10 31 32.9% 35.6% 8.7 1.3 137 45
915
Sacramento · Public  Watch — engagement
Sacramento 418 1,485 10 45 22.1% 19.1% 6.0 190 42
916
Sacramento · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 299 1,157 10 46 21.7% 30.0% 6.0 1.3 138 30
917
Ontario · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 750 3,127 10 37 27.2% 26.7% 9.2 1.6 276 75
918
Orland · Public  Strong demand
Glenn 150 725 10 41 24.2% 33.3% 4.0 62 15
919
Palmdale · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 210 989 10 71 14.0% 7.6 150 21
920
Hemet · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 421 1,761 10 36 28.0% 9.5% 8.6 0.7 150 42
921
Lakewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 381 2,422 10 50 19.8% 34.2% 8.9 1.1 192 38
922
Chino · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 372 1,256 10 37 26.6% 27.0% 8.9 0.8 139 37
923
Tulare · Public  Best in class
Tulare 342 1,678 10 29 34.3% 7.9 1.8 99 34
924
Red Bluff · Public  Holding share
Tehama 353 1,586 10 25 40.2% 40.0% 5.7 0.8 87 35
925
Winters · Public  Strong demand
Yolo 111 479 10 48 20.8% 6.3 53 11
926
Atwater · Public  Strong demand
Merced 479 2,029 10 42 23.3% 6.4% 7.1 1.0 202 47
927
Brentwood · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 683 2,836 10 52 19.0% 23.9% 5.7 1.5 352 67
928
Palmdale · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 684 2,706 10 39 25.0% 22.4% 8.0 1.3 268 67
929
Livingston · Public  Weak at the gate
Merced 296 1,169 10 42 23.4% 13.8% 7.8 2.7 124 29
930
Oakland · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 225 1,166 10 56 17.3% 18.2% 6.2 127 22
931
Gilroy · Public  Demand hides churn
Santa Clara 400 1,618 10 40 24.2% 12.8% 6.5 0.8 161 39
932
Baldwin Park · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 226 1,260 10 54 17.9% 31.8% 9.7 1.3 123 22
933
Ontario · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 452 1,994 10 50 19.6% 9.1% 9.7 1.6 225 44
934
Fresno · Public  Best in class
Fresno 258 1,096 10 28 34.2% 12.0% 6.2 1.2 73 25
935
Placerville · Public  Sharp downturn
El Dorado 310 1,135 10 34 28.3% 26.7% 4.5 106 30
936
Glendale · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 549 2,066 10 61 15.8% 30.2% 9.1 2.2 335 53
937
Sacramento · Public  Demand problem
Sacramento 427 1,535 10 48 20.0% 17.1% 5.4 0.9 205 41
938
Rancho Mirage · Public  Material decline
Riverside 313 1,401 10 59 16.3% 26.7% 9.6 1.0 184 30
939
El Centro · Public  Tracking
Imperial 460 2,006 10 42 22.9% 20.4% 8.3 1.1 192 44
940
Perris · Public  Holding share
Riverside 136 1,031 10 79 12.0% 7.3 108 13
941
La Habra · Public  Demand problem
Orange 471 1,881 10 55 17.4% 7.4 1.7 258 45
942
Bakersfield · Public  Demand problem
Kern 471 2,048 10 33 29.2% 15.6% 8.1 1.3 154 45
943
Lake Elsinore · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 403 1,687 9 36 25.9% 23.7% 8.7 147 38
944
Manteca · Public  Strong demand
San Joaquin 509 1,907 9 33 28.9% 16.7% 6.7 1.6 166 48
945
Visalia · Public  Demand hides churn
Tulare 361 1,637 9 34 27.4% 14.7% 5.5 124 34
946
Rio Linda · Public
Sacramento 329 1,594 9 38 24.6% 32.3% 4.0 126 31
947
Escalon · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 213 815 9 32 29.4% 35.0% 4.2 68 20
948
Bakersfield · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 556 2,212 9 44 21.5% 34.6% 7.5 242 52
949
Adelanto · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 551 2,247 9 47 19.6% 21.6% 8.0 1.1 260 51
950
Norco · Public  Strong demand
Riverside 486 2,032 9 37 25.3% 20.0% 8.2 0.8 178 45
951
Hesperia · Public  Strong demand
San Bernardino 487 2,098 9 39 23.8% 40.0% 8.2 0.6 189 45
952
Lemoore · Public  Material decline
Kings 390 1,798 9 38 24.3% 19.4% 6.7 148 36
953
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 401 1,608 9 57 16.2% 13.5% 8.5 1.2 229 37
954
Bakersfield · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 466 2,159 9 32 28.9% 7.7 1.5 149 43
955
Napa · Public  Tracking
Napa 434 1,642 9 38 23.9% 12.5% 7.1 2.3 167 40
956
Woodlake · Public  Demand hides churn
Tulare 152 646 9 22 42.4% 7.2 33 14
957
Oakdale · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 370 1,563 9 23 40.5% 29.4% 5.7 84 34
958
Marina · Public  Best in class
Monterey 153 721 9 39 23.3% 6.5 2.0 60 14
959
Modesto · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 504 2,192 9 26 35.1% 17.4% 6.3 1.8 131 46
960
Hemet · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 551 2,414 9 38 24.0% 24.0% 8.5 0.7 208 50
961
La Mesa · Public  Tracking
San Diego 563 2,172 9 42 21.7% 31.4% 8.0 1.9 235 51
962
Arbuckle · Public  Demand problem
Colusa 124 463 9 37 23.9% 27.3% 3.2 46 11
963
Modesto · Public  Demand hides churn
Stanislaus 508 2,029 9 32 27.6% 17.8% 5.5 0.6 163 45
964
North Hollywood · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 113 558 9 109 8.1% 8.8 123 10
965
Nipomo · Public  Strong demand
San Luis Obispo 192 819 9 27 33.3% 6.8 51 17
966
El Cajon · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 635 2,331 9 57 15.5% 33.9% 7.4 1.3 362 56
967
Antelope · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 320 1,312 9 42 20.7% 42.9% 5.0 135 28
968
Dixon · Public  Weak at the gate
Solano 242 990 9 54 16.0% 14.3% 5.0 131 21
969
Clovis · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 751 2,779 9 26 32.8% 27.7% 6.7 0.8 198 65
970
Dos Palos · Public  Material decline
Merced 151 639 9 36 23.6% 23.1% 4.0 55 13
971
Victorville · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 535 2,255 9 34 25.4% 15.2% 7.8 1.5 181 46
972
Lancaster · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 675 2,631 9 31 28.2% 24.1% 7.0 1.2 206 58
973
Vacaville · Public  Best in class
Solano 409 1,671 9 41 21.0% 40.0% 4.7 0.7 167 35
974
Ramona · Public  Best in class
San Diego 328 1,404 9 39 21.9% 14.3% 5.8 128 28
975
Atascadero · Public  Demand problem
San Luis Obispo 293 1,157 9 34 25.0% 5.5 100 25
976
Bakersfield · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 529 2,098 9 32 26.8% 28.9% 6.0 168 45
977
San Bernardino · Public  Both ends slipping
San Bernardino 306 1,440 8 36 23.4% 6.2 111 26
978
Bakersfield · Public  Both ends slipping
Kern 598 2,331 8 32 25.8% 6.0% 6.9 1.5 194 50
979
Stockton · Public
San Joaquin 576 2,355 8 32 25.9% 14.6% 4.9 185 48
980
San Diego · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 204 780 8 48 17.4% 41.2% 8.3 98 17
981
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 168 654 8 57 14.6% 21.4% 8.3 96 14
982
Sacramento · Public  Demand hides churn
Sacramento 433 1,682 8 39 21.1% 38.9% 4.2 171 36
983
Chico · Public
Butte 482 1,978 8 34 24.1% 20.0% 4.8 0.6 166 40
984
Santa Ana · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 500 1,519 8 37 22.4% 17.1% 7.4 0.8 183 41
985
City Of Industry · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 183 723 8 66 12.5% 26.7% 8.2 120 15
986
Redding · Public  Holding share
Shasta 281 1,268 8 37 22.3% 30.4% 4.6 103 23
987
Los Banos · Public  Demand problem
Merced 443 1,725 8 36 22.4% 11.1% 6.1 0.9 161 36
988
Lodi · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 481 2,058 8 32 25.7% 15.4% 4.8 0.8 152 39
989
Santa Rosa · Public  Compounding decline
Sonoma 346 1,553 8 50 16.1% 32.1% 4.0 174 28
990
San Jose · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Clara 225 862 8 24 34.0% 4.4 3.1 53 18
991
Bakersfield · Public  Best in class
Kern 656 2,530 8 31 25.6% 5.8% 6.1 0.6 203 52
992
San Jose · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Clara 177 874 8 25 31.1% 6.2 45 14
993
Spring Valley · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 446 1,543 8 37 21.3% 34.3% 7.0 0.9 164 35
994
Rancho Cordova · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 435 1,944 8 35 22.5% 32.4% 4.6 0.9 151 34
995
Bakersfield · Public  Strong demand
Kern 525 2,324 8 26 30.6% 31.7% 6.3 0.6 134 41
996
Santa Rosa · Public  Demand hides churn
Sonoma 334 1,434 8 32 24.5% 30.8% 4.5 106 26
997
Rohnert Park · Public  Strong demand
Sonoma 425 1,755 8 36 21.6% 21.2% 4.7 153 33
998
Santee · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 425 1,621 8 39 19.8% 27.3% 6.6 2.1 167 33
999
Littlerock · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 374 1,507 8 25 30.9% 6.2 94 29
1000
Kerman · Public  Best in class
Fresno 350 1,493 8 21 37.5% 11.1% 5.1 0.9 72 27
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →

Related reading

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next