County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

816 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp
Folsom · Public
3.84 13.7% -7.5pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

992 schools · 2025 data · Page 10 of 10 (showing 901–992) · 572 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
901
Linden · Public  Holding share
San Joaquin 205 743 7 32 23.1% 40.0% 2.4 65 15
902
Concord · Public  Both ends slipping
Contra Costa 247 1,059 7 50 14.5% 4.5 1.6 124 18
903
Victorville · Public  Both ends slipping
San Bernardino 481 2,165 7 32 22.6% 31.4% 5.4 155 35
904
Fresno · Public  Best in class
Fresno 344 1,438 7 47 15.5% 4.9 161 25
905
Galt · Public  Sharp downturn
Sacramento 207 959 7 29 24.6% 4.8 61 15
906
El Dorado · Public  Demand problem
El Dorado 249 1,033 7 33 22.2% 4.8 81 18
907
Manteca · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 360 1,524 7 28 26.0% 11.5% 4.7 100 26
908
Exeter · Public  Weak at the gate
Tulare 196 909 7 29 25.0% 21.4% 4.6 56 14
909
Olivehurst · Public  Compounding decline
Yuba 252 1,254 7 20 36.0% 33.3% 4.0 1.2 50 18
910
Orange Cove · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 155 635 7 18 39.3% 4.5 1.9 28 11
911
Blythe · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 155 740 7 19 37.9% 4.5 29 11
912
Coalinga · Public  Watch — engagement
Fresno 299 1,256 7 33 21.4% 4.3 98 21
913
Jackson · Public  Demand problem
Amador 132 593 7 33 20.4% 2.3 44 9
914
Elk Grove · Public  Sharp downturn
Sacramento 443 1,684 7 50 13.4% 26.7% 4.5 0.7 223 30
915
Shafter · Public  Best in class
Kern 326 1,599 7 27 25.3% 4.9 87 22
916
· Public  Compounding decline
San Joaquin 478 2,065 7 25 26.7% 34.4% 4.2 0.8 120 32
917
Citrus Heights · Public  Demand problem
Sacramento 225 894 7 28 23.8% 26.7% 1.8 63 15
918
Orange · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 438 1,728 7 33 19.9% 20.7% 5.9 0.7 146 29
919
Moreno Valley · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 471 1,924 7 43 15.2% 6.6 0.6 204 31
920
Yreka · Public  Demand hides churn
Siskiyou 153 612 7 30 21.7% 3.9 46 10
921
Riverdale · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 125 496 6 33 19.5% 3.2 41 8
922
Citrus Heights · Public  Compounding decline
Sacramento 141 559 6 40 15.8% 2.1 57 9
923
Banning · Public  Demand hides churn
Riverside 268 1,145 6 30 21.2% 23.5% 6.3 80 17
924
Fortuna · Public  Compounding decline
Humboldt 177 826 6 29 21.6% 27.3% 3.4 51 11
925
Fresno · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 131 625 6 22 27.6% 3.0 29 8
926
Yucaipa · Public
San Bernardino 641 2,755 6 23 26.0% 25.6% 5.0 150 39
927
Fairfield · Public  Material decline
Solano 448 1,844 6 31 19.7% 25.9% 3.1 0.9 137 27
928
Visalia · Public  Strong demand
Tulare 455 2,059 6 27 21.8% 29.6% 4.0 124 27
929
Sutter Creek · Public  Strong demand
Amador 153 615 6 46 12.9% 2.6 70 9
930
Marysville · Public  Demand problem
Yuba 240 1,034 6 21 27.4% 21.4% 2.9 51 14
931
Cottonwood · Public  Weak at the gate
Shasta 446 1,857 6 43 13.6% 15.4% 5.2 191 26
932
Oakland · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 191 719 6 36 15.9% 3.1 69 11
933
Big Bear Lake · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 140 630 6 38 15.1% 5.7 53 8
934
Galt · Public  Sharp downturn
Sacramento 213 899 6 25 22.2% 3.8 54 12
935
Bakersfield · Public  Demand hides churn
Kern 747 3,069 6 19 29.0% 9.5% 4.3 145 42
936
Twentynine Palms · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 143 719 6 36 15.7% 5.6 51 8
937
Kelseyville · Public  Weak at the gate
Lake 145 515 6 28 20.0% 2.1 40 8
938
Gustine · Public  Sharp downturn
Merced 128 531 5 31 17.5% 3.1 40 7
939
Atwater · Public  Material decline
Merced 421 1,704 5 34 16.1% 26.1% 3.3 143 23
940
Bakersfield · Public  Demand hides churn
Kern 498 2,135 5 22 24.1% 4.4 112 27
941
Taft · Public  Tracking
Kern 262 1,064 5 18 29.8% 3.4 47 14
942
Antioch · Public  Compounding decline
Contra Costa 417 1,812 5 33 16.1% 27.3% 3.4 0.7 137 22
943
Hayward · Public  Demand hides churn
Alameda 419 1,511 5 21 25.3% 13.6% 3.6 0.7 87 22
944
Santa Rosa · Public  Compounding decline
Sonoma 230 1,029 5 22 23.5% 2.2 51 12
945
· Public  Both ends slipping
San Joaquin 405 1,677 5 15 35.6% 2.7 59 21
946
Fresno · Public  Demand hides churn
Fresno 412 2,040 5 32 16.0% 14.3% 3.9 1.0 131 21
947
Bakersfield · Public  Demand problem
Kern 516 2,043 5 21 24.3% 3.9 107 26
948
Oroville · Public  Compounding decline
Butte 242 872 5 19 26.1% 58.3% 2.5 46 12
949
Fairfield · Public  Demand hides churn
Solano 387 1,605 5 24 20.6% 36.8% 2.6 92 19
950
Redding · Public  Best in class
Shasta 270 1,148 5 34 14.0% 53.9% 2.2 93 13
951
Antioch · Public  Demand hides churn
Contra Costa 399 1,776 5 33 14.5% 2.8 0.8 131 19
952
Ridgecrest · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 345 1,536 5 23 20.0% 31.2% 3.2 80 16
953
Grass Valley · Public  Best in class
Nevada 152 664 5 39 11.9% 2.6 59 7
954
Grass Valley · Public  Best in class
Nevada 350 1,561 5 32 14.4% 3.1 111 16
955
Temecula · Public  Mid-year churn
Riverside 207 987 4 22 19.6% 2.4 46 9
956
Seaside · Public  Material decline
Monterey 278 1,073 4 22 20.0% 41.7% 1.4 60 12
957
North Highlands · Public  Demand hides churn
Sacramento 186 778 4 16 26.7% 50.0% 30 8
958
Yucca Valley · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 268 1,168 4 17 23.9% 4.1 46 11
959
Stockton · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 277 1,657 4 29 13.9% 27.3% 1.1 79 11
960
Highland · Public  Compounding decline
San Bernardino 101 528 4 37 10.8% 4.0 37 4
961
Lincoln · Public  Material decline
Placer 305 1,184 4 17 22.6% 25.0% 1.6 53 12
962
Barstow · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 363 1,558 4 16 23.7% 2.5 59 14
963
· Public  Material decline
Humboldt 286 1,162 4 24 16.2% 1.8 68 11
964
Eureka · Public
Humboldt 286 1,162 4 24 16.2% 1.8 68 11
965
Clarksburg · Public  Compounding decline
Yolo 198 291 4 8 46.7% 42.9% 15 7
966
Vallejo · Public  Compounding decline
Solano 273 1,146 3 19 17.0% 33.3% 2.2 53 9
967
San Andreas · Public  Material decline
Calaveras 157 703 3 12 26.3% 3.2 19 5
968
Parlier · Public  Weak at the gate
Fresno 190 901 3 28 11.1% 54 6
969
Altaville · Public  Tracking
Calaveras 130 559 3 25 12.1% 3.1 33 4
970
Paradise · Public  Material decline
Butte 101 495 3 22 13.6% 3.0 22 3
971
· Public  Watch — engagement
Kern 376 1,927 3 22 13.2% 2.9 83 11
972
Susanville · Public  Demand problem
Lassen 177 816 3 21 13.5% 37 5
973
Gridley · Public  Best in class
Butte 143 670 3 27 10.3% 39 4
974
Colusa · Public  Strong demand
Colusa 109 431 3 39 7.1% 42 3
975
Menifee · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 118 1,736 3 57 4.5% 2.5 67 3
976
Mckinleyville · Public  Material decline
Humboldt 119 566 3 17 15.0% 100.0% 20 3
977
El Cajon · Private
San Diego 122 772 2 39 6.2% 2.5 48 3
978
Waterford · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 164 582 2 17 14.3% 2.4 28 4
979
San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 179 1,375 2 26 8.7% 2.2 46 4
980
Fontana · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 328 2,171 1 21 5.9% 1.2 68 4
981
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 352 896 1 10 8.8% 0.8 34 3
982
Lancaster · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 345 3,014 14 49
983
Vacaville · Public  Best in class
Solano 101 474 48 48
984
· Public  Demand problem
Del Norte 219 918 4 8
985
Sacramento · Public  Demand hides churn
Sacramento 190 766 14 26
986
Hilmar · Public  Best in class
Merced 160 696 9 15
987
Lincoln · Public  Both ends slipping
Placer 192 646 3 6
988
· Public
Los Angeles 102 411 53 54
989
San Francisco · Public
San Francisco 102 460 6 6
990
Mojave · Public  Compounding decline
Kern 153 277 4 6
991
National City · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 175 2,722 3 6
992
Placerville · Public  Strong demand
El Dorado 114 583 13 15
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →