County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

816 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp
Folsom · Public
3.84 13.7% -7.5pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

992 schools · 2025 data · Page 7 of 10 (showing 601–700) · 572 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
601
Modesto · Private
Stanislaus 104 422 14 89 16.1% 20.0% 7.7 93 15
602
West Covina · Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 208 712 14 89 16.1% 13.3% 11.5 1.9 186 30
603
San Jose · Public  Compounding decline
Santa Clara 347 1,374 14 75 19.3% 24.0% 10.1 1.7 259 50
604
San Diego · Private
San Diego 167 717 14 133 10.8% 12.5% 12.0 4.8 222 24
605
Sacramento · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 272 1,226 14 55 26.2% 17.9% 7.0 149 39
606
Antelope · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 384 1,821 14 62 23.0% 29.1% 8.8 2.1 239 55
607
Fair Oaks · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 454 1,939 14 52 27.8% 27.7% 8.4 2.6 234 65
608
· Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 680 2,801 14 49 29.1% 25.8% 9.8 1.8 333 97
609
Richmond · Public  Both ends slipping
Contra Costa 337 1,280 14 62 23.1% 29.2% 7.7 3.0 208 48
610
San Bruno · Public  Strong demand
San Mateo 281 1,061 14 76 18.7% 20.0% 9.2 3.2 214 40
611
Stockton · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 436 1,925 14 36 39.0% 24.2% 10.3 1.6 159 62
612
Brentwood · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 598 2,566 14 105 13.5% 31.8% 9.7 2.3 628 85
613
Riverside · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 324 1,514 14 63 22.7% 21.7% 13.0 1.2 203 46
614
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 127 614 14 72 19.8% 14.2 2.4 91 18
615
Watsonville · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Cruz 515 2,215 14 52 27.1% 32.9% 8.3 1.2 269 73
616
La Habra · Public  Material decline
Orange 459 1,779 14 76 18.6% 16.9% 10.7 2.2 349 65
617
Fresno · Public  Demand hides churn
Fresno 424 2,056 14 67 21.1% 16.7% 9.0 1.4 285 60
618
Fontana · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 583 2,534 14 96 14.7% 12.2% 12.9 2.2 558 82
619
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 405 1,889 14 76 18.5% 8.8% 11.6 2.7 308 57
620
Pomona · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 235 895 14 49 28.9% 18.2% 12.3 2.5 114 33
621
Hanford · Public  Sharp downturn
Kings 321 1,331 14 34 41.7% 13.3% 10.9 2.8 108 45
622
· Public  Material decline
Riverside 593 2,330 14 34 41.3% 30.1% 11.6 1.5 201 83
623
Madera · Public  Compounding decline
Madera 386 1,859 14 44 31.6% 22.2% 8.6 1.8 171 54
624
Ceres · Public  Demand problem
Stanislaus 415 1,660 14 38 36.5% 12.1% 10.6 2.9 159 58
625
San Dimas · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 315 1,235 14 90 15.6% 20.4% 11.4 1.6 283 44
626
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 388 1,590 14 82 16.9% 37.0% 10.3 1.8 320 54
627
Jurupa Valley · Public  Material decline
Riverside 302 1,259 14 59 23.6% 7.1% 11.6 2.6 178 42
628
Daly City · Public  Demand hides churn
San Mateo 260 1,072 14 82 16.8% 27.8% 9.6 2.3 214 36
629
Farmersville · Public  Weak at the gate
Tulare 181 711 14 29 48.1% 12.0% 9.9 1.7 52 25
630
Shingle Springs · Public  Sharp downturn
El Dorado 428 1,675 14 46 30.3% 18.6% 8.9 0.7 195 59
631
Vacaville · Public  Best in class
Solano 515 2,044 14 50 27.7% 35.2% 7.8 3.1 256 71
632
Moreno Valley · Public  Mid-year churn
Riverside 473 2,103 14 58 23.8% 20.0% 12.5 1.9 273 65
633
Santa Maria · Public  Strong demand
Santa Barbara 576 2,416 14 45 30.6% 24.1% 11.3 2.6 258 79
634
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 124 583 14 210 6.5% 10.5 260 17
635
Temecula · Public  Best in class
Riverside 774 3,136 14 83 16.5% 36.8% 10.7 1.0 641 106
636
Escondido · Public  Best in class
San Diego 307 1,336 14 61 22.3% 21.4% 11.4 1.3 188 42
637
Redlands · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 520 2,110 14 54 25.4% 28.2% 12.3 1.7 279 71
638
Gardena · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 352 1,343 14 51 26.7% 12.5% 11.9 2.6 180 48
639
Paso Robles · Public  Demand problem
San Luis Obispo 411 1,986 14 48 28.6% 25.0% 9.7 2.2 196 56
640
Apple Valley · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 558 2,211 14 45 30.0% 14.5% 11.1 1.4 253 76
641
Visalia · Public  Demand problem
Tulare 434 1,890 14 45 30.1% 18.6% 10.4 2.3 196 59
642
Oroville · Public  Weak at the gate
Butte 295 1,265 14 29 46.5% 20.0% 8.8 2.0 86 40
643
Mendota · Public  Holding share
Fresno 266 1,065 14 43 31.6% 8.3% 9.8 1.5 114 36
644
Fontana · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 423 1,739 13 73 18.5% 14.0% 11.1 1.4 308 57
645
· Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 542 1,980 13 56 24.0% 26.0% 10.2 2.6 304 73
646
Santa Ana · Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 616 2,505 13 64 20.9% 24.1% 12.0 3.1 397 83
647
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 379 1,539 13 54 24.8% 27.4% 11.9 2.1 206 51
648
Caruthers · Public  Best in class
Fresno 171 682 13 39 34.3% 17.4% 6.4 67 23
649
El Segundo · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 134 923 13 109 12.3% 10.4 3.0 146 18
650
Moorpark · Public  Best in class
Ventura 447 1,691 13 69 19.4% 18.3% 10.3 1.1 310 60
651
Hesperia · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 537 2,405 13 55 24.2% 25.0% 12.5 1.9 298 72
652
Roseville · Public  Material decline
Placer 485 1,940 13 67 20.0% 29.2% 8.7 1.6 325 65
653
Murrieta · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 516 2,066 13 50 26.7% 29.0% 11.4 1.4 258 69
654
Kingsburg · Public  Weak at the gate
Fresno 247 1,073 13 32 41.2% 9.1% 9.7 1.6 80 33
655
Simi Valley · Public  Tracking
Ventura 464 1,910 13 57 23.4% 14.5% 10.3 1.3 265 62
656
Lake Elsinore · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 540 2,373 13 57 23.5% 34.7% 11.7 2.0 306 72
657
Roseville · Public  Material decline
Placer 383 1,443 13 48 27.6% 27.4% 7.8 2.4 185 51
658
La Palma · Public  Demand problem
Orange 527 1,983 13 88 15.0% 25.7% 11.2 1.9 466 70
659
San Pedro · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 219 916 13 92 14.4% 24.1% 10.5 1.8 202 29
660
Mission Hills · Private
Los Angeles 189 810 13 142 9.3% 16.0% 10.1 2.1 268 25
661
El Centro · Public  Weak at the gate
Imperial 454 1,846 13 53 25.1% 33.3% 11.0 1.5 239 60
662
Pinole · Public  Demand hides churn
Contra Costa 311 1,245 13 83 15.9% 46.3% 6.4 1.9 258 41
663
Oro Grande · Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 175 2,453 13 54 24.2% 9.1 95 23
664
Modesto · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 604 2,292 13 39 33.8% 15.2% 8.6 1.7 234 79
665
Gilroy · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 383 1,630 13 63 20.8% 40.0% 8.4 1.8 240 50
666
Oxnard · Public  Demand hides churn
Ventura 445 1,913 13 50 26.0% 13.8% 9.4 2.0 223 58
667
Oceanside · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 454 1,948 13 61 21.1% 22.0% 11.2 2.0 279 59
668
Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 447 1,746 13 48 27.0% 25.9% 10.7 2.2 215 58
669
Tulare · Public  Tracking
Tulare 355 1,616 13 28 46.5% 15.2% 10.4 2.0 99 46
670
Stockton · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 278 1,164 13 49 26.7% 19.4% 7.9 1.8 135 36
671
Long Beach · Private
Los Angeles 116 422 13 120 10.8% 7.8 2.6 139 15
672
Sun Valley · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 512 2,124 13 70 18.3% 24.2% 10.6 2.3 360 66
673
Costa Mesa · Public  Demand problem
Orange 264 976 13 54 23.9% 17.6% 11.7 142 34
674
Stockton · Public  Compounding decline
San Joaquin 365 1,644 13 38 34.3% 21.3% 8.8 1.4 137 47
675
· Public  Demand problem
Tuolumne 202 880 13 30 43.3% 11.5% 9.4 2.0 60 26
676
Rialto · Public  Material decline
San Bernardino 499 2,075 13 67 19.3% 12.5% 11.6 0.8 332 64
677
Escondido · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 507 1,656 13 47 27.1% 24.6% 11.4 0.6 240 65
678
· Public  Demand problem
Contra Costa 242 1,028 13 56 23.0% 12.9% 7.0 135 31
679
Patterson · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 422 1,830 13 40 32.3% 11.1% 9.7 2.8 167 54
680
Lakeside · Public  Best in class
San Diego 501 1,810 13 53 24.0% 28.1% 9.0 2.0 267 64
681
Oxnard · Public  Watch — engagement
Ventura 628 2,380 13 53 24.0% 21.2% 10.5 2.1 333 80
682
La Mirada · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 457 1,726 13 67 18.9% 27.6% 10.5 2.2 306 58
683
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 331 1,446 13 47 26.9% 26.2% 11.2 1.8 156 42
684
Porterville · Public  Demand problem
Tulare 458 1,855 13 49 25.9% 6.9% 10.0 1.3 224 58
685
Oak Hills · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 545 2,370 13 47 26.7% 17.4% 10.8 1.8 258 69
686
Bakersfield · Public  Sharp downturn
Kern 542 2,228 13 49 25.7% 20.6% 10.0 1.7 265 68
687
Pomona · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 463 1,567 13 55 22.9% 10.3% 11.0 2.2 253 58
688
Selma · Public  Demand problem
Fresno 391 1,721 13 42 29.5% 24.5% 8.4 2.0 166 49
689
San Bernardino · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 632 2,692 12 61 20.5% 20.2% 10.1 1.7 385 79
690
· Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 520 2,261 12 72 17.4% 23.1% 9.6 3.5 373 65
691
Richmond · Public  Material decline
Contra Costa 288 1,047 12 68 18.5% 41.7% 6.6 2.8 195 36
692
Lodi · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 480 1,952 12 32 39.5% 11.7% 8.8 2.5 152 60
693
Montclair · Public  Watch — engagement
San Bernardino 552 2,515 12 48 25.9% 27.5% 11.4 1.6 266 69
694
Merced · Public  Strong demand
Merced 441 1,943 12 46 27.4% 9.1% 8.6 0.7 201 55
695
Delano · Public  Best in class
Kern 345 1,394 12 37 34.1% 13.9% 9.6 2.6 126 43
696
· Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 402 1,487 12 52 23.8% 32.0% 11.2 2.5 210 50
697
Lathrop · Public  Demand problem
San Joaquin 346 1,486 12 50 24.9% 20.9% 7.2 173 43
698
Huntington Beach · Public  Material decline
Orange 298 1,154 12 63 19.6% 24.3% 10.1 2.4 189 37
699
Fairfield · Public  Sharp downturn
Solano 419 1,631 12 67 18.5% 30.8% 6.7 0.7 281 52
700
Lakewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 372 1,384 12 51 24.1% 23.9% 10.8 0.8 191 46
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →