County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

1005 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
West Covina · Private
3.95 68.8% +41.7pp
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Reedley · Public
4.10 59.0% +33.2pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -13.9pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,564 schools · 2025 data · Page 8 of 16 (showing 701–800)
Apply 50-senior floor Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
701
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 83 349 16 60 26.0% 30.8% 12.1 50 13
702
Lynwood · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 448 1,858 16 70 22.3% 18.6% 12.9 1.3 314 70
703
Covina · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 314 1,247 16 63 24.9% 12.2% 12.4 2.2 197 49
704
South Gate · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 405 1,681 16 87 17.9% 19.1% 13.6 4.2 351 63
705
Turlock · Public  Holding share
Stanislaus 476 1,986 16 57 27.3% 31.1% 10.9 2.1 271 74
706
Napa · Public  Material decline
Napa 393 1,622 16 56 27.6% 31.1% 7.6 2.5 221 61
707
La Puente · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 374 1,535 16 90 17.2% 36.2% 14.4 2.4 338 58
708
Moreno Valley · Public  Tracking
Riverside 646 2,699 15 57 26.9% 22.0% 13.8 1.9 371 100
709
Loomis · Public  Material decline
Placer 390 1,634 15 61 25.4% 16.7% 11.5 3.6 236 60
710
Etiwanda · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 852 3,446 15 65 23.5% 35.9% 13.7 1.8 557 131
711
Pittsburg · Public  Demand hides churn
Contra Costa 803 3,403 15 57 27.0% 30.9% 11.0 2.5 456 123
712
Saugus · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 537 2,317 15 78 19.5% 30.5% 12.1 2.6 420 82
713
Covina · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 295 1,259 15 57 26.6% 24.4% 12.2 2.4 169 45
714
Mission Viejo · Public  Material decline
Orange 394 1,566 15 88 17.3% 23.3% 11.7 2.5 347 60
715
Newman · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 230 925 15 53 28.9% 34.3% 9.6 121 35
716
· Public  Best in class
Tulare 519 2,490 15 60 25.2% 22.8% 10.6 2.7 314 79
717
· Public  Watch — engagement
Merced 434 1,917 15 47 32.5% 16.7% 9.9 2.1 203 66
718
· Public  Material decline
San Diego 664 2,290 15 69 22.2% 34.6% 13.9 2.3 455 101
719
Santa Ana · Public  Strong demand
Orange 337 1,451 15 61 25.0% 21.6% 12.8 1.8 204 51
720
La Puente · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 205 813 15 68 22.3% 22.6% 11.7 1.5 139 31
721
Palmdale · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 582 2,349 15 61 24.7% 35.2% 12.0 1.7 356 88
722
Pomona · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 246 993 15 49 30.8% 32.4% 12.2 1.2 120 37
723
Hawthorne · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 426 1,675 15 75 20.0% 20.3% 12.4 1.4 320 64
724
Montebello · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 493 1,907 15 55 27.5% 20.3% 13.0 2.6 269 74
725
Santa Maria · Public  Strong demand
Santa Barbara 793 3,143 15 60 25.1% 28.6% 10.1 1.5 474 119
726
Santa Maria · Public  Strong demand
Santa Barbara 760 3,080 15 53 28.1% 21.1% 11.1 2.2 405 114
727
Bellflower · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 341 1,997 15 67 22.3% 15.7% 12.0 2.4 229 51
728
Montebello · Private
Los Angeles 87 378 15 106 14.1% 14.9 92 13
729
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 623 2,368 15 63 23.6% 35.5% 8.8 0.6 394 93
730
Inglewood · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 114 407 15 73 20.5% 11.4 2.6 83 17
731
Sanger · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 631 2,426 15 35 42.1% 24.5% 10.9 1.7 223 94
732
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 289 1,159 15 53 28.1% 18.6% 14.9 1.4 153 43
733
Madera · Public  Material decline
Madera 390 1,869 15 46 32.0% 24.1% 11.3 2.6 181 58
734
Lincoln · Public  Best in class
Placer 291 1,317 15 45 32.6% 39.5% 7.6 132 43
735
· Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 454 1,908 15 53 27.9% 20.9% 12.8 2.0 240 67
736
Elk Grove · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 556 2,142 15 68 21.8% 29.3% 9.2 1.6 377 82
737
Santa Fe Springs · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 523 1,865 15 67 21.9% 31.2% 13.6 1.9 351 77
738
Chino · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 449 2,077 15 55 26.5% 10.6% 13.6 1.8 249 66
739
Tulare · Public  Sharp downturn
Tulare 483 1,927 15 40 37.0% 9.9% 12.4 1.2 192 71
740
Spring Valley · Public  Best in class
San Diego 525 2,198 15 85 17.3% 31.2% 10.7 1.9 446 77
741
Santee · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 396 1,624 15 51 28.7% 31.0% 12.6 2.8 202 58
742
Fresno · Public  Holding share
Fresno 514 2,184 15 68 21.6% 20.0% 12.7 2.3 348 75
743
Corona · Public  Material decline
Riverside 576 2,307 15 60 24.4% 25.0% 13.7 1.9 344 84
744
Weed · Public  Watch — engagement
Siskiyou 48 187 15 65 22.6% 6.2 6.2 31 7
745
Fontana · Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 634 2,725 15 52 27.7% 26.1% 13.4 1.6 332 92
746
San Jose · Public  Strong demand
Santa Clara 69 297 14 177 8.2% 5.8 122 10
747
Imperial Beach · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 290 1,216 14 66 21.9% 16.7% 12.1 1.0 192 42
748
Costa Mesa · Public  Tracking
Orange 304 1,730 14 64 22.6% 27.3% 12.5 1.3 195 44
749
Richmond · Public  Strong demand
Contra Costa 76 333 14 76 19.0% 27.3% 7.9 4.0 58 11
750
South San Francisco · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 304 1,239 14 66 21.8% 22.7% 9.9 2.0 202 44
751
Newhall · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 560 1,941 14 78 18.7% 29.6% 12.1 2.1 434 81
752
North Hills · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 450 1,905 14 78 18.6% 21.5% 9.8 1.3 350 65
753
Modesto · Private
Stanislaus 104 422 14 89 16.1% 20.0% 7.7 93 15
754
West Covina · Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 208 712 14 89 16.1% 13.3% 11.5 1.9 186 30
755
San Jose · Public  Compounding decline
Santa Clara 347 1,374 14 75 19.3% 24.0% 10.1 1.7 259 50
756
San Diego · Private
San Diego 167 717 14 133 10.8% 12.5% 12.0 4.8 222 24
757
Sacramento · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 272 1,226 14 55 26.2% 17.9% 7.0 149 39
758
Antelope · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 384 1,821 14 62 23.0% 29.1% 8.8 2.1 239 55
759
Fair Oaks · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 454 1,939 14 52 27.8% 27.7% 8.4 2.6 234 65
760
Sacramento · Private
Sacramento 21 523 14 67 21.4% 100.0% 14 3
761
· Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 680 2,801 14 49 29.1% 25.8% 9.8 1.8 333 97
762
Richmond · Public  Both ends slipping
Contra Costa 337 1,280 14 62 23.1% 29.2% 7.7 3.0 208 48
763
San Bruno · Public  Strong demand
San Mateo 281 1,061 14 76 18.7% 20.0% 9.2 3.2 214 40
764
Stockton · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 436 1,925 14 36 39.0% 24.2% 10.3 1.6 159 62
765
Brentwood · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 598 2,566 14 105 13.5% 31.8% 9.7 2.3 628 85
766
Riverside · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 324 1,514 14 63 22.7% 21.7% 13.0 1.2 203 46
767
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 127 614 14 72 19.8% 14.2 2.4 91 18
768
Watsonville · Public  Both ends slipping
Santa Cruz 515 2,215 14 52 27.1% 32.9% 8.3 1.2 269 73
769
La Habra · Public  Material decline
Orange 459 1,779 14 76 18.6% 16.9% 10.7 2.2 349 65
770
Fresno · Public  Demand hides churn
Fresno 424 2,056 14 67 21.1% 16.7% 9.0 1.4 285 60
771
Fontana · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 583 2,534 14 96 14.7% 12.2% 12.9 2.2 558 82
772
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 405 1,889 14 76 18.5% 8.8% 11.6 2.7 308 57
773
Pomona · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 235 895 14 49 28.9% 18.2% 12.3 2.5 114 33
774
Hanford · Public  Sharp downturn
Kings 321 1,331 14 34 41.7% 13.3% 10.9 2.8 108 45
775
· Public  Material decline
Riverside 593 2,330 14 34 41.3% 30.1% 11.6 1.5 201 83
776
Pomona · Private
Los Angeles 50 171 14 170 8.2% 6.0 85 7
777
Madera · Public  Compounding decline
Madera 386 1,859 14 44 31.6% 22.2% 8.6 1.8 171 54
778
Ceres · Public  Demand problem
Stanislaus 415 1,660 14 38 36.5% 12.1% 10.6 2.9 159 58
779
San Dimas · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 315 1,235 14 90 15.6% 20.4% 11.4 1.6 283 44
780
Rancho Cucamonga · Private
San Bernardino 43 925 14 151 9.2% 13.9 65 6
781
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 388 1,590 14 82 16.9% 37.0% 10.3 1.8 320 54
782
Jurupa Valley · Public  Material decline
Riverside 302 1,259 14 59 23.6% 7.1% 11.6 2.6 178 42
783
Daly City · Public  Demand hides churn
San Mateo 260 1,072 14 82 16.8% 27.8% 9.6 2.3 214 36
784
· Public
Solano 65 260 14 94 14.8% 66.7% 4.6 61 9
785
Farmersville · Public  Weak at the gate
Tulare 181 711 14 29 48.1% 12.0% 9.9 1.7 52 25
786
Shingle Springs · Public  Sharp downturn
El Dorado 428 1,675 14 46 30.3% 18.6% 8.9 0.7 195 59
787
Vacaville · Public  Best in class
Solano 515 2,044 14 50 27.7% 35.2% 7.8 3.1 256 71
788
Moreno Valley · Public  Mid-year churn
Riverside 473 2,103 14 58 23.8% 20.0% 12.5 1.9 273 65
789
Santa Maria · Public  Strong demand
Santa Barbara 576 2,416 14 45 30.6% 24.1% 11.3 2.6 258 79
790
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 124 583 14 210 6.5% 10.5 260 17
791
Temecula · Public  Best in class
Riverside 774 3,136 14 83 16.5% 36.8% 10.7 1.0 641 106
792
Escondido · Public  Best in class
San Diego 307 1,336 14 61 22.3% 21.4% 11.4 1.3 188 42
793
Redlands · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 520 2,110 14 54 25.4% 28.2% 12.3 1.7 279 71
794
Gardena · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 352 1,343 14 51 26.7% 12.5% 11.9 2.6 180 48
795
Newport Beach · Private
Orange 66 259 14 85 16.1% 6.1 56 9
796
Paso Robles · Public  Demand problem
San Luis Obispo 411 1,986 14 48 28.6% 25.0% 9.7 2.2 196 56
797
Apple Valley · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 558 2,211 14 45 30.0% 14.5% 11.1 1.4 253 76
798
Visalia · Public  Demand problem
Tulare 434 1,890 14 45 30.1% 18.6% 10.4 2.3 196 59
799
Oroville · Public  Weak at the gate
Butte 295 1,265 14 29 46.5% 20.0% 8.8 2.0 86 40
800
San Jacinto · Public  Best in class
Riverside 96 1,658 14 74 18.3% 13.5 71 13
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. See methodology →