| 701 |
Beaumont · Public Demand hides churn
|
Riverside |
793 |
3,460 |
12
|
39 |
31.3% |
25.5% |
10.2 |
1.4 |
313 |
98 |
| 702 |
Lompoc · Public Material decline
|
Santa Barbara |
235 |
1,060 |
12
|
43 |
28.4% |
17.2% |
8.1 |
— |
102 |
29 |
| 703 |
Delano · Public Sharp downturn
|
Kern |
316 |
1,318 |
12
|
32 |
39.0% |
15.4% |
9.2 |
1.9 |
100 |
39 |
| 704 |
Bakersfield · Public Weak at the gate
|
Kern |
683 |
2,575 |
12
|
47 |
26.2% |
22.6% |
9.5 |
1.2 |
320 |
84 |
| 705 |
La Puente · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
171 |
747 |
12
|
54 |
22.8% |
— |
12.3 |
1.8 |
92 |
21 |
| 706 |
· Public Sharp downturn
|
Butte |
440 |
1,804 |
12
|
50 |
24.3% |
20.4% |
6.6 |
1.6 |
222 |
54 |
| 707 |
Chico · Public
|
Butte |
440 |
1,804 |
12
|
50 |
24.3% |
20.4% |
6.6 |
1.6 |
222 |
54 |
| 708 |
· Public Compounding decline
|
Sonoma |
318 |
1,253 |
12
|
57 |
21.4% |
20.5% |
8.5 |
2.5 |
182 |
39 |
| 709 |
Oxnard · Public Strong demand
|
Ventura |
638 |
2,452 |
12
|
47 |
26.3% |
21.8% |
9.7 |
1.7 |
297 |
78 |
| 710 |
Lake Arrowhead · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Bernardino |
229 |
860 |
12
|
41 |
29.8% |
10.7% |
9.2 |
1.3 |
94 |
28 |
| 711 |
Los Banos · Public Strong demand
|
Merced |
352 |
1,543 |
12
|
52 |
23.5% |
— |
8.8 |
1.4 |
183 |
43 |
| 712 |
Monrovia · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
385 |
1,455 |
12
|
80 |
15.3% |
21.3% |
9.3 |
1.8 |
308 |
47 |
| 713 |
Hughson · Public Best in class
|
Stanislaus |
189 |
859 |
12
|
42 |
28.8% |
26.1% |
6.3 |
— |
80 |
23 |
| 714 |
· Public Material decline
|
Sacramento |
436 |
1,652 |
12
|
61 |
20.1% |
28.3% |
7.6 |
1.8 |
264 |
53 |
| 715 |
Ontario · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Bernardino |
535 |
2,109 |
12
|
51 |
24.0% |
26.1% |
10.5 |
0.8 |
271 |
65 |
| 716 |
· Public Best in class
|
Madera |
173 |
748 |
12
|
42 |
28.8% |
19.1% |
8.1 |
— |
73 |
21 |
| 717 |
· Public Strong demand
|
Ventura |
722 |
2,675 |
12
|
39 |
31.1% |
21.8% |
9.1 |
2.1 |
280 |
87 |
| 718 |
San Jose · Public Mid-year churn
|
Santa Clara |
391 |
1,564 |
12
|
45 |
26.7% |
12.8% |
7.7 |
1.3 |
176 |
47 |
| 719 |
San Diego · Public Mid-year churn
|
San Diego |
208 |
823 |
12
|
65 |
18.4% |
12.0% |
9.1 |
1.4 |
136 |
25 |
| 720 |
Apple Valley · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Bernardino |
400 |
1,791 |
12
|
44 |
27.0% |
27.1% |
8.2 |
1.8 |
178 |
48 |
| 721 |
Hacienda Heights · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
359 |
1,592 |
12
|
54 |
22.1% |
23.3% |
10.3 |
0.8 |
195 |
43 |
| 722 |
Lakewood · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
611 |
2,305 |
12
|
67 |
17.9% |
19.2% |
9.7 |
1.6 |
407 |
73 |
| 723 |
Arleta · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
252 |
1,038 |
12
|
45 |
26.3% |
13.3% |
8.7 |
1.2 |
114 |
30 |
| 724 |
Calexico · Public Sharp downturn
|
Imperial |
707 |
2,746 |
12
|
41 |
28.8% |
21.4% |
10.2 |
1.6 |
292 |
84 |
| 725 |
Hanford · Public Best in class
|
Kings |
261 |
1,183 |
12
|
39 |
30.1% |
12.9% |
8.1 |
— |
103 |
31 |
| 726 |
Chowchilla · Public Weak at the gate
|
Madera |
236 |
1,017 |
12
|
34 |
34.6% |
— |
8.9 |
1.7 |
81 |
28 |
| 727 |
Fresno · Public Material decline
|
Fresno |
557 |
2,485 |
12
|
46 |
25.5% |
24.2% |
8.8 |
1.4 |
259 |
66 |
| 728 |
Sebastopol · Public Best in class
|
Sonoma |
347 |
1,473 |
12
|
60 |
19.8% |
19.5% |
6.9 |
0.9 |
207 |
41 |
| 729 |
Paramount · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
890 |
3,400 |
12
|
60 |
19.7% |
29.5% |
10.1 |
2.1 |
534 |
105 |
| 730 |
Wilmington · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
603 |
2,422 |
12
|
59 |
20.0% |
23.9% |
10.6 |
1.5 |
355 |
71 |
| 731 |
Holtville · Public Strong demand
|
Imperial |
119 |
516 |
12
|
53 |
22.2% |
— |
7.6 |
— |
63 |
14 |
| 732 |
Riverbank · Public Best in class
|
Stanislaus |
153 |
744 |
12
|
35 |
34.0% |
16.7% |
5.2 |
— |
53 |
18 |
| 733 |
· Public Both ends slipping
|
Santa Clara |
340 |
1,363 |
12
|
44 |
26.5% |
22.5% |
7.1 |
2.6 |
151 |
40 |
| 734 |
Riverside · Public Best in class
|
Riverside |
588 |
2,399 |
12
|
49 |
24.0% |
24.6% |
10.4 |
1.7 |
287 |
69 |
| 735 |
Brawley · Public Strong demand
|
Imperial |
393 |
1,863 |
12
|
32 |
36.8% |
23.9% |
10.2 |
1.0 |
125 |
46 |
| 736 |
Modesto · Public Demand hides churn
|
Stanislaus |
488 |
2,083 |
12
|
42 |
28.1% |
28.1% |
7.6 |
1.6 |
203 |
57 |
| 737 |
Firebaugh · Public Weak at the gate
|
Fresno |
163 |
673 |
12
|
48 |
24.4% |
42.1% |
7.4 |
— |
78 |
19 |
| 738 |
Menifee · Public Material decline
|
Riverside |
549 |
2,487 |
12
|
40 |
28.8% |
40.6% |
10.9 |
1.5 |
222 |
64 |
| 739 |
Arvin · Public Best in class
|
Kern |
627 |
2,653 |
12
|
39 |
30.0% |
16.4% |
8.4 |
1.6 |
243 |
73 |
| 740 |
San Jacinto · Public Both ends slipping
|
Riverside |
524 |
2,388 |
12
|
44 |
26.4% |
31.1% |
10.9 |
1.9 |
231 |
61 |
| 741 |
Soledad · Public Demand problem
|
Monterey |
387 |
1,546 |
12
|
43 |
26.8% |
26.7% |
7.5 |
1.3 |
168 |
45 |
| 742 |
Orange · Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
439 |
1,795 |
12
|
57 |
20.2% |
35.3% |
8.9 |
1.4 |
252 |
51 |
| 743 |
Modesto · Public Holding share
|
Stanislaus |
413 |
1,609 |
12
|
39 |
29.6% |
27.1% |
8.0 |
0.7 |
162 |
48 |
| 744 |
Salinas · Public Strong demand
|
Monterey |
526 |
2,106 |
12
|
48 |
24.0% |
14.8% |
7.8 |
2.1 |
254 |
61 |
| 745 |
Riverside · Public Tracking
|
Riverside |
449 |
1,920 |
12
|
42 |
27.5% |
19.2% |
10.0 |
1.6 |
189 |
52 |
| 746 |
Greenfield · Public Strong demand
|
Monterey |
285 |
1,274 |
12
|
56 |
20.8% |
12.1% |
8.4 |
— |
159 |
33 |
| 747 |
Yuba City · Public Demand hides churn
|
Sutter |
415 |
1,678 |
12
|
39 |
29.6% |
29.2% |
6.8 |
1.7 |
162 |
48 |
| 748 |
Indio · Public Sharp downturn
|
Riverside |
417 |
1,650 |
12
|
32 |
36.1% |
31.2% |
9.6 |
0.7 |
133 |
48 |
| 749 |
Bakersfield · Public Both ends slipping
|
Kern |
469 |
2,107 |
12
|
60 |
19.1% |
22.2% |
8.7 |
1.3 |
282 |
54 |
| 750 |
Lompoc · Public Strong demand
|
Santa Barbara |
409 |
1,593 |
11
|
45 |
25.7% |
12.8% |
9.1 |
2.0 |
183 |
47 |
| 751 |
Lower Lake · Public Watch — engagement
|
Lake |
174 |
966 |
11
|
34 |
33.9% |
20.0% |
5.8 |
— |
59 |
20 |
| 752 |
San Rafael · Public Strong demand
|
Marin |
367 |
1,332 |
11
|
74 |
15.4% |
38.1% |
7.9 |
3.3 |
273 |
42 |
| 753 |
El Segundo · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
132 |
536 |
11
|
87 |
13.0% |
— |
7.6 |
— |
115 |
15 |
| 754 |
Bishop · Public Strong demand
|
Inyo |
141 |
608 |
11
|
39 |
29.1% |
18.8% |
8.5 |
— |
55 |
16 |
| 755 |
Anaheim · Public Compounding decline
|
Orange |
592 |
2,326 |
11
|
56 |
20.2% |
23.9% |
10.1 |
1.0 |
331 |
67 |
| 756 |
Redlands · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Bernardino |
433 |
1,845 |
11
|
49 |
22.9% |
26.5% |
10.4 |
1.6 |
214 |
49 |
| 757 |
Dinuba · Public Best in class
|
Tulare |
434 |
2,115 |
11
|
35 |
32.5% |
6.1% |
6.9 |
0.7 |
151 |
49 |
| 758 |
Concord · Public Compounding decline
|
Contra Costa |
275 |
1,137 |
11
|
43 |
26.5% |
45.2% |
7.3 |
2.9 |
117 |
31 |
| 759 |
Spring Valley · Public Demand hides churn
|
San Diego |
417 |
1,539 |
11
|
51 |
22.0% |
21.3% |
9.8 |
2.4 |
214 |
47 |
| 760 |
· Public Demand hides churn
|
Sacramento |
321 |
1,417 |
11
|
55 |
20.2% |
27.8% |
4.7 |
— |
178 |
36 |
| 761 |
Colton · Public Material decline
|
San Bernardino |
448 |
1,729 |
11
|
55 |
20.3% |
16.0% |
9.4 |
1.1 |
246 |
50 |
| 762 |
Ceres · Public Strong demand
|
Stanislaus |
512 |
2,317 |
11
|
43 |
26.1% |
24.6% |
8.0 |
1.8 |
218 |
57 |
| 763 |
Oakley · Public Demand problem
|
Contra Costa |
602 |
2,460 |
11
|
44 |
25.5% |
37.3% |
7.0 |
1.5 |
263 |
67 |
| 764 |
Fresno · Public Compounding decline
|
Fresno |
342 |
1,867 |
11
|
33 |
33.9% |
7.9% |
8.5 |
2.0 |
112 |
38 |
| 765 |
Delano · Public Sharp downturn
|
Kern |
316 |
1,221 |
11
|
38 |
29.4% |
11.4% |
9.2 |
0.9 |
119 |
35 |
| 766 |
Riverside · Public
|
Riverside |
379 |
1,804 |
11
|
48 |
23.1% |
9.5% |
11.1 |
2.6 |
182 |
42 |
| 767 |
Fresno · Public Demand problem
|
Fresno |
509 |
2,095 |
11
|
36 |
30.9% |
17.9% |
8.1 |
1.4 |
181 |
56 |
| 768 |
Norwalk · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
491 |
2,075 |
11
|
64 |
17.2% |
18.5% |
10.4 |
0.6 |
314 |
54 |
| 769 |
Yuba City · Public Both ends slipping
|
Sutter |
391 |
1,695 |
11
|
47 |
23.2% |
20.9% |
6.7 |
1.8 |
185 |
43 |
| 770 |
Vallejo · Public Both ends slipping
|
Solano |
337 |
1,418 |
11
|
45 |
24.7% |
24.3% |
7.1 |
2.1 |
150 |
37 |
| 771 |
Hollywood · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
155 |
703 |
11
|
52 |
21.0% |
— |
6.5 |
— |
81 |
17 |
| 772 |
Orangevale · Public Holding share
|
Sacramento |
265 |
1,150 |
11
|
45 |
24.6% |
17.2% |
5.3 |
— |
118 |
29 |
| 773 |
Clovis · Public Best in class
|
Fresno |
723 |
3,113 |
11
|
36 |
30.0% |
25.3% |
7.9 |
0.8 |
263 |
79 |
| 774 |
San Lorenzo · Public Compounding decline
|
Alameda |
312 |
1,029 |
11
|
46 |
23.9% |
41.2% |
6.7 |
1.0 |
142 |
34 |
| 775 |
Tehachapi · Public Material decline
|
Kern |
321 |
1,260 |
11
|
22 |
50.7% |
17.1% |
8.7 |
1.9 |
69 |
35 |
| 776 |
Inglewood · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
202 |
757 |
11
|
63 |
17.2% |
— |
7.4 |
1.5 |
128 |
22 |
| 777 |
Watsonville · Public Both ends slipping
|
Santa Cruz |
331 |
1,293 |
11
|
45 |
24.0% |
— |
7.8 |
2.4 |
150 |
36 |
| 778 |
Anaheim · Public Compounding decline
|
Orange |
389 |
1,466 |
11
|
51 |
21.0% |
16.7% |
10.0 |
1.3 |
200 |
42 |
| 779 |
Canoga Park · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
325 |
1,389 |
11
|
65 |
16.7% |
25.7% |
9.2 |
1.9 |
210 |
35 |
| 780 |
Hollister · Public Strong demand
|
San Benito |
888 |
3,316 |
11
|
40 |
26.7% |
25.3% |
6.9 |
1.1 |
356 |
95 |
| 781 |
Mira Loma · Public Watch — engagement
|
Riverside |
430 |
1,693 |
11
|
34 |
31.7% |
6.5% |
10.0 |
1.4 |
145 |
46 |
| 782 |
Alta Loma · Public Best in class
|
San Bernardino |
582 |
2,386 |
11
|
50 |
21.2% |
12.9% |
9.8 |
1.4 |
292 |
62 |
| 783 |
Los Angeles · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
216 |
853 |
11
|
50 |
21.5% |
— |
8.8 |
4.2 |
107 |
23 |
| 784 |
Bakersfield · Public Best in class
|
Kern |
594 |
2,369 |
11
|
48 |
21.9% |
20.6% |
7.9 |
1.9 |
288 |
63 |
| 785 |
Lancaster · Public Both ends slipping
|
Los Angeles |
369 |
1,498 |
11
|
30 |
35.8% |
7.7% |
9.2 |
1.6 |
109 |
39 |
| 786 |
Rialto · Public Holding share
|
San Bernardino |
617 |
2,623 |
11
|
46 |
23.1% |
21.5% |
8.3 |
1.6 |
281 |
65 |
| 787 |
Valley Center · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Diego |
266 |
1,075 |
11
|
45 |
23.1% |
28.6% |
7.5 |
— |
121 |
28 |
| 788 |
Northridge · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
210 |
832 |
10
|
68 |
15.4% |
— |
8.1 |
— |
143 |
22 |
| 789 |
· Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
277 |
1,438 |
10
|
64 |
16.4% |
20.7% |
9.4 |
1.4 |
177 |
29 |
| 790 |
Compton · Public
|
Los Angeles |
277 |
1,438 |
10
|
64 |
16.4% |
20.7% |
9.4 |
1.4 |
177 |
29 |
| 791 |
San Jose · Public Strong demand
|
Santa Clara |
335 |
1,350 |
10
|
50 |
21.1% |
8.6% |
7.2 |
0.9 |
166 |
35 |
| 792 |
Lake Forest · Public Material decline
|
Orange |
469 |
1,902 |
10
|
88 |
11.8% |
38.8% |
8.7 |
1.3 |
415 |
49 |
| 793 |
Oceanside · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Diego |
623 |
2,463 |
10
|
54 |
19.5% |
30.8% |
8.5 |
0.8 |
334 |
65 |
| 794 |
Porterville · Public Tracking
|
Tulare |
499 |
2,125 |
10
|
29 |
36.4% |
19.2% |
7.6 |
1.4 |
143 |
52 |
| 795 |
Palmdale · Public Both ends slipping
|
Los Angeles |
569 |
2,208 |
10
|
40 |
26.0% |
5.1% |
8.8 |
1.4 |
227 |
59 |
| 796 |
Auburn · Public Material decline
|
Placer |
347 |
1,265 |
10
|
28 |
36.7% |
27.8% |
6.6 |
— |
98 |
36 |
| 797 |
Perris · Public Compounding decline
|
Riverside |
504 |
2,096 |
10
|
41 |
25.0% |
5.8% |
8.5 |
1.6 |
208 |
52 |
| 798 |
Ontario · Private
|
San Bernardino |
117 |
469 |
10
|
97 |
10.6% |
— |
10.3 |
— |
113 |
12 |
| 799 |
California City · Public Both ends slipping
|
Kern |
147 |
604 |
10
|
35 |
28.9% |
26.7% |
8.2 |
— |
52 |
15 |
| 800 |
Imperial · Public Best in class
|
Imperial |
343 |
1,439 |
10
|
28 |
36.1% |
28.6% |
10.2 |
0.9 |
97 |
35 |