| 1 |
Newport Coast · Private
|
Orange |
148 |
590 |
151
|
447 |
33.7% |
6.3% |
125.7 |
25.7 |
661 |
223 |
| 2 |
Claremont · Private
|
Los Angeles |
101 |
401 |
144
|
413 |
34.8% |
8.3% |
109.9 |
25.7 |
417 |
145 |
| 3 |
Cerritos · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
176 |
1,024 |
126
|
422 |
29.9% |
25.7% |
104.5 |
21.0 |
742 |
222 |
| 4 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
195 |
1,939 |
126
|
516 |
24.4% |
10.6% |
103.1 |
24.1 |
1,006 |
245 |
| 5 |
El Monte · Public Tracking
|
Los Angeles |
273 |
1,123 |
114
|
575 |
19.7% |
22.6% |
88.6 |
19.4 |
1,571 |
310 |
| 6 |
Los Angeles · Public
|
Los Angeles |
241 |
502 |
110
|
477 |
23.1% |
31.7% |
71.0 |
19.9 |
1,149 |
265 |
| 7 |
Fresno · Public Weak at the gate
|
Fresno |
122 |
498 |
107
|
412 |
25.8% |
27.7% |
84.4 |
21.3 |
503 |
130 |
| 8 |
La Canada · Private
|
Los Angeles |
106 |
537 |
103
|
375 |
27.5% |
9.2% |
83.0 |
25.5 |
397 |
109 |
| 9 |
Anaheim · Private
|
Orange |
156 |
619 |
101
|
371 |
27.3% |
22.1% |
78.8 |
19.2 |
578 |
158 |
| 10 |
Santa Ana · Charter Best in class
|
Orange |
393 |
1,806 |
96
|
288 |
33.4% |
20.1% |
80.2 |
20.9 |
1,133 |
378 |
| 11 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
415 |
1,637 |
96
|
350 |
27.4% |
19.1% |
75.9 |
15.4 |
1,451 |
397 |
| 12 |
Irvine · Private
|
Orange |
285 |
1,126 |
94
|
258 |
36.5% |
15.6% |
71.9 |
10.2 |
736 |
269 |
| 13 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
546 |
2,147 |
93
|
402 |
23.0% |
20.0% |
70.3 |
13.4 |
2,196 |
506 |
| 14 |
Riverside · Public
|
Riverside |
137 |
548 |
92
|
409 |
22.5% |
27.8% |
78.8 |
15.3 |
561 |
126 |
| 15 |
La Jolla · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
115 |
825 |
86
|
311 |
27.6% |
37.4% |
73.0 |
17.4 |
358 |
99 |
| 16 |
San Jose · Public Holding share
|
Santa Clara |
420 |
1,702 |
86
|
450 |
19.0% |
19.7% |
74.0 |
13.6 |
1,892 |
360 |
| 17 |
Cupertino · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Clara |
454 |
1,630 |
85
|
441 |
19.4% |
27.1% |
70.5 |
13.4 |
2,003 |
388 |
| 18 |
Cypress · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
201 |
1,315 |
84
|
363 |
23.2% |
26.6% |
67.2 |
14.4 |
729 |
169 |
| 19 |
Sacramento · Public Weak at the gate
|
Sacramento |
219 |
907 |
82
|
217 |
37.9% |
30.6% |
51.6 |
11.9 |
475 |
180 |
| 20 |
Oakland · Private
|
Alameda |
304 |
1,259 |
81
|
311 |
26.1% |
24.7% |
60.5 |
17.8 |
945 |
247 |
| 21 |
Cupertino · Public Weak at the gate
|
Santa Clara |
506 |
1,800 |
78
|
355 |
21.9% |
26.2% |
63.6 |
12.4 |
1,796 |
393 |
| 22 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
106 |
625 |
77
|
294 |
26.3% |
13.4% |
61.3 |
22.6 |
312 |
82 |
| 23 |
Calabasas · Private
|
Los Angeles |
108 |
1,131 |
77
|
268 |
28.7% |
6.0% |
56.5 |
20.4 |
289 |
83 |
| 24 |
San Diego · Public Holding share
|
San Diego |
543 |
2,116 |
74
|
264 |
28.1% |
28.5% |
62.6 |
8.7 |
1,432 |
403 |
| 25 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
643 |
2,557 |
74
|
307 |
23.9% |
30.2% |
61.7 |
9.5 |
1,975 |
473 |
| 26 |
Saratoga · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
332 |
1,161 |
73
|
397 |
18.4% |
16.9% |
59.0 |
12.3 |
1,318 |
242 |
| 27 |
San Juan Capistrano · Private
|
Orange |
102 |
1,159 |
73
|
295 |
24.6% |
— |
55.9 |
11.8 |
301 |
74 |
| 28 |
San Marino · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
209 |
886 |
72
|
296 |
24.4% |
21.2% |
54.1 |
14.8 |
619 |
151 |
| 29 |
Fullerton · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
648 |
2,504 |
72
|
295 |
24.3% |
20.0% |
56.5 |
13.3 |
1,912 |
464 |
| 30 |
Irvine · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
603 |
2,244 |
71
|
298 |
23.7% |
25.3% |
51.7 |
10.1 |
1,799 |
427 |
| 31 |
Rolling Hills Estat · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
571 |
2,075 |
71
|
274 |
25.8% |
23.5% |
56.9 |
11.7 |
1,565 |
404 |
| 32 |
San Francisco · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Francisco |
642 |
2,571 |
71
|
321 |
22.0% |
33.8% |
52.2 |
10.3 |
2,058 |
453 |
| 33 |
Fremont · Public Sharp downturn
|
Alameda |
435 |
1,794 |
70
|
450 |
15.6% |
19.3% |
56.8 |
15.6 |
1,958 |
305 |
| 34 |
Palo Alto · Public
|
Santa Clara |
495 |
1,891 |
70
|
344 |
20.3% |
17.1% |
53.7 |
13.7 |
1,702 |
346 |
| 35 |
Redwood City · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
138 |
567 |
70
|
308 |
22.6% |
18.8% |
53.6 |
13.0 |
425 |
96 |
| 36 |
Fremont · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
619 |
2,618 |
68
|
349 |
19.6% |
27.4% |
54.6 |
9.7 |
2,163 |
423 |
| 37 |
Irvine · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
624 |
2,693 |
67
|
299 |
22.6% |
26.4% |
49.0 |
9.1 |
1,865 |
421 |
| 38 |
Berkeley · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
799 |
3,218 |
67
|
249 |
27.0% |
22.1% |
52.2 |
13.3 |
1,993 |
539 |
| 39 |
· Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
572 |
2,307 |
67
|
308 |
21.9% |
23.4% |
51.0 |
10.3 |
1,760 |
385 |
| 40 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
134 |
778 |
66
|
260 |
25.5% |
10.1% |
54.5 |
14.2 |
349 |
89 |
| 41 |
Irvine · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
672 |
2,776 |
66
|
244 |
27.0% |
25.5% |
53.1 |
9.2 |
1,641 |
443 |
| 42 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
420 |
1,776 |
65
|
338 |
19.4% |
20.7% |
52.4 |
8.6 |
1,419 |
275 |
| 43 |
Sunnyvale · Private
|
Santa Clara |
162 |
1,205 |
65
|
304 |
21.3% |
17.1% |
50.0 |
11.1 |
492 |
105 |
| 44 |
San Mateo · Private
|
San Mateo |
108 |
952 |
65
|
375 |
17.3% |
4.3% |
47.2 |
23.1 |
405 |
70 |
| 45 |
Diamond Bar · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
647 |
2,563 |
65
|
300 |
21.6% |
26.6% |
47.3 |
13.4 |
1,940 |
418 |
| 46 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
111 |
546 |
64
|
256 |
25.0% |
4.2% |
47.8 |
18.0 |
284 |
71 |
| 47 |
San Ramon · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
837 |
3,039 |
63
|
412 |
15.3% |
30.1% |
47.4 |
10.3 |
3,451 |
528 |
| 48 |
La Jolla · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Diego |
288 |
1,174 |
62
|
243 |
25.8% |
19.4% |
48.6 |
12.8 |
699 |
180 |
| 49 |
Atherton · Private
|
San Mateo |
149 |
805 |
62
|
348 |
17.9% |
10.8% |
49.7 |
19.5 |
519 |
93 |
| 50 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
299 |
1,289 |
62
|
275 |
22.6% |
11.8% |
48.2 |
15.1 |
823 |
186 |
| 51 |
Studio City · Private
|
Los Angeles |
283 |
1,616 |
62
|
317 |
19.5% |
9.1% |
49.5 |
15.6 |
898 |
175 |
| 52 |
Mountain House · Public Best in class
|
San Joaquin |
580 |
2,428 |
62
|
262 |
23.5% |
33.9% |
42.6 |
7.9 |
1,519 |
357 |
| 53 |
San Jose · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Clara |
385 |
1,471 |
61
|
315 |
19.5% |
26.7% |
49.6 |
12.2 |
1,212 |
236 |
| 54 |
Arcadia · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
817 |
2,939 |
61
|
289 |
21.0% |
27.7% |
44.7 |
11.0 |
2,362 |
495 |
| 55 |
Fremont · Public Sharp downturn
|
Alameda |
538 |
2,157 |
61
|
367 |
16.5% |
28.8% |
46.8 |
10.4 |
1,976 |
326 |
| 56 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
111 |
488 |
60
|
309 |
19.5% |
11.9% |
46.0 |
16.2 |
343 |
67 |
| 57 |
Oakland · Private
|
Alameda |
100 |
902 |
60
|
454 |
13.2% |
10.0% |
45.0 |
18.0 |
454 |
60 |
| 58 |
Manhattan Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
653 |
2,473 |
60
|
236 |
25.4% |
22.8% |
50.2 |
12.9 |
1,540 |
391 |
| 59 |
Temple City · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
437 |
1,779 |
60
|
262 |
22.8% |
33.0% |
43.9 |
8.7 |
1,144 |
261 |
| 60 |
La Canada · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
355 |
1,989 |
59
|
320 |
18.6% |
17.5% |
47.0 |
12.1 |
1,135 |
211 |
| 61 |
Millbrae · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Mateo |
275 |
1,115 |
59
|
283 |
20.9% |
28.2% |
43.6 |
10.2 |
779 |
163 |
| 62 |
Fresno · Private
|
Fresno |
112 |
438 |
59
|
122 |
48.2% |
6.1% |
46.4 |
9.8 |
137 |
66 |
| 63 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
280 |
1,192 |
59
|
248 |
23.6% |
29.9% |
43.9 |
10.0 |
694 |
164 |
| 64 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
367 |
58
|
245 |
23.6% |
25.4% |
44.8 |
9.5 |
284 |
67 |
| 65 |
San Lorenzo · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
158 |
662 |
58
|
253 |
22.8% |
25.3% |
34.2 |
8.9 |
399 |
91 |
| 66 |
Orinda · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
309 |
1,167 |
57
|
294 |
19.5% |
22.6% |
42.1 |
11.0 |
908 |
177 |
| 67 |
San Francisco · Public
|
San Francisco |
262 |
993 |
57
|
151 |
38.0% |
23.3% |
40.1 |
15.7 |
395 |
150 |
| 68 |
Moraga · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
324 |
1,340 |
57
|
272 |
21.0% |
27.6% |
42.3 |
11.4 |
881 |
185 |
| 69 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
326 |
1,438 |
57
|
275 |
20.8% |
27.4% |
39.9 |
8.6 |
896 |
186 |
| 70 |
Palos Verdes Estate · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
337 |
1,484 |
57
|
228 |
25.0% |
18.8% |
47.2 |
12.5 |
768 |
192 |
| 71 |
Burbank · Private Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
120 |
497 |
57
|
252 |
22.4% |
22.1% |
45.0 |
16.7 |
303 |
68 |
| 72 |
Oak Park · Public Best in class
|
Ventura |
326 |
1,483 |
56
|
277 |
20.4% |
27.2% |
40.8 |
6.8 |
904 |
184 |
| 73 |
San Francisco · Public
|
San Francisco |
510 |
2,068 |
56
|
245 |
23.0% |
32.1% |
36.5 |
7.2 |
1,248 |
287 |
| 74 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
135 |
554 |
56
|
238 |
23.4% |
21.3% |
45.2 |
6.7 |
321 |
75 |
| 75 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
139 |
559 |
55
|
379 |
14.6% |
24.7% |
44.6 |
23.0 |
527 |
77 |
| 76 |
Mill Valley · Public Material decline
|
Marin |
419 |
1,470 |
55
|
264 |
20.9% |
21.2% |
41.8 |
10.5 |
1,106 |
231 |
| 77 |
Concord · Private
|
Contra Costa |
207 |
840 |
55
|
204 |
27.0% |
23.7% |
40.6 |
12.6 |
422 |
114 |
| 78 |
Compton · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
556 |
55
|
230 |
23.8% |
32.8% |
46.7 |
13.9 |
281 |
67 |
| 79 |
· Public Best in class
|
San Bernardino |
175 |
1,058 |
55
|
174 |
31.6% |
17.7% |
46.3 |
6.3 |
304 |
96 |
| 80 |
Cupertino · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
603 |
2,224 |
55
|
302 |
18.1% |
25.2% |
44.1 |
8.3 |
1,822 |
329 |
| 81 |
Larkspur · Public Holding share
|
Marin |
409 |
1,722 |
55
|
264 |
20.7% |
28.7% |
42.3 |
12.0 |
1,078 |
223 |
| 82 |
El Segundo · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
346 |
1,232 |
54
|
199 |
27.2% |
22.9% |
40.2 |
7.8 |
690 |
188 |
| 83 |
· Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
547 |
2,170 |
54
|
288 |
18.9% |
18.5% |
43.5 |
9.7 |
1,576 |
297 |
| 84 |
Sacramento · Private
|
Sacramento |
201 |
728 |
54
|
227 |
23.9% |
24.8% |
39.3 |
9.0 |
457 |
109 |
| 85 |
Belmont · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
595 |
2,360 |
54
|
304 |
17.8% |
29.2% |
41.3 |
11.6 |
1,811 |
322 |
| 86 |
Torrance · Private
|
Los Angeles |
208 |
844 |
54
|
253 |
21.3% |
29.5% |
40.4 |
9.6 |
526 |
112 |
| 87 |
Pleasanton · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
646 |
2,583 |
54
|
306 |
17.5% |
26.8% |
41.0 |
7.6 |
1,978 |
347 |
| 88 |
Piedmont · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
205 |
733 |
54
|
328 |
16.3% |
20.9% |
40.5 |
12.2 |
673 |
110 |
| 89 |
San Mateo · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
438 |
1,658 |
54
|
271 |
19.8% |
30.6% |
38.1 |
9.1 |
1,189 |
235 |
| 90 |
Dublin · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
823 |
2,771 |
53
|
323 |
16.5% |
27.1% |
37.8 |
9.0 |
2,660 |
440 |
| 91 |
Palm Desert · Private
|
Riverside |
161 |
533 |
53
|
178 |
30.1% |
27.9% |
44.1 |
8.1 |
286 |
86 |
| 92 |
Fullerton · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
614 |
2,337 |
53
|
213 |
25.0% |
26.3% |
40.2 |
8.5 |
1,306 |
327 |
| 93 |
· Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
504 |
2,169 |
53
|
305 |
17.4% |
32.6% |
39.5 |
7.1 |
1,538 |
267 |
| 94 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
138 |
410 |
53
|
292 |
18.1% |
19.2% |
35.5 |
12.3 |
403 |
73 |
| 95 |
Davis · Public
|
Yolo |
560 |
1,755 |
53
|
239 |
22.0% |
28.5% |
35.4 |
7.0 |
1,340 |
295 |
| 96 |
Valencia · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
449 |
1,777 |
52
|
202 |
25.9% |
23.0% |
42.5 |
9.3 |
906 |
235 |
| 97 |
Long Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
177 |
682 |
51
|
158 |
32.6% |
31.9% |
41.2 |
9.6 |
279 |
91 |
| 98 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
156 |
659 |
51
|
272 |
18.9% |
16.2% |
39.7 |
9.0 |
424 |
80 |
| 99 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
363 |
1,555 |
51
|
300 |
17.1% |
25.8% |
38.8 |
13.5 |
1,088 |
186 |
| 100 |
Chatsworth · Private
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
1,096 |
51
|
269 |
19.1% |
11.3% |
40.5 |
16.5 |
325 |
62 |