| 201 |
Burlingame · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
412 |
1,583 |
45
|
240 |
18.6% |
17.4% |
31.6 |
6.8 |
988 |
184 |
| 202 |
Bakersfield · Private
|
Kern |
124 |
509 |
44
|
119 |
37.4% |
12.7% |
33.1 |
7.3 |
147 |
55 |
| 203 |
Woodland Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
88 |
353 |
44
|
251 |
17.6% |
17.9% |
26.1 |
8.0 |
221 |
39 |
| 204 |
Walnut Creek · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
433 |
1,577 |
44
|
209 |
21.1% |
27.8% |
31.6 |
7.2 |
905 |
191 |
| 205 |
Carmel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Monterey |
200 |
780 |
44
|
140 |
31.5% |
26.1% |
32.5 |
6.5 |
279 |
88 |
| 206 |
Hayward · Private
|
Alameda |
164 |
806 |
44
|
240 |
18.3% |
27.8% |
32.9 |
10.4 |
394 |
72 |
| 207 |
Pacific Palisade · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
757 |
2,920 |
44
|
204 |
21.4% |
23.0% |
31.4 |
9.6 |
1,546 |
330 |
| 208 |
San Jose · Public Weak at the gate
|
Santa Clara |
699 |
2,703 |
43
|
285 |
15.2% |
29.6% |
33.8 |
7.9 |
1,993 |
304 |
| 209 |
Lancaster · Private
|
Los Angeles |
113 |
561 |
43
|
133 |
32.7% |
22.4% |
36.3 |
6.2 |
150 |
49 |
| 210 |
Winchester · Public Best in class
|
Riverside |
72 |
1,086 |
43
|
165 |
26.1% |
25.8% |
31.9 |
4.2 |
119 |
31 |
| 211 |
Irvine · Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
502 |
1,964 |
43
|
236 |
18.2% |
27.3% |
31.3 |
6.4 |
1,185 |
216 |
| 212 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
175 |
1,530 |
43
|
154 |
27.8% |
— |
36.6 |
8.0 |
270 |
75 |
| 213 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
463 |
1,890 |
43
|
241 |
17.8% |
26.3% |
31.8 |
6.0 |
1,115 |
198 |
| 214 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
143 |
545 |
43
|
290 |
14.7% |
9.8% |
32.2 |
5.6 |
414 |
61 |
| 215 |
San Rafael · Private
|
Marin |
113 |
454 |
42
|
267 |
15.9% |
8.3% |
33.6 |
9.7 |
302 |
48 |
| 216 |
Alhambra · Private
|
Los Angeles |
85 |
296 |
42
|
185 |
22.9% |
11.1% |
31.8 |
10.6 |
157 |
36 |
| 217 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
111 |
512 |
42
|
234 |
18.1% |
14.9% |
32.4 |
4.5 |
260 |
47 |
| 218 |
Oakland · Public Demand hides churn
|
Alameda |
52 |
451 |
42
|
213 |
19.8% |
31.8% |
28.9 |
7.7 |
111 |
22 |
| 219 |
Encinitas · Public Holding share
|
San Diego |
547 |
1,843 |
42
|
197 |
21.4% |
30.3% |
31.4 |
8.2 |
1,078 |
231 |
| 220 |
Sun Valley · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
90 |
410 |
42
|
126 |
33.6% |
7.9% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
113 |
38 |
| 221 |
Lakewood · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
95 |
336 |
42
|
240 |
17.5% |
32.5% |
29.5 |
5.3 |
228 |
40 |
| 222 |
Elk Grove · Public Sharp downturn
|
Sacramento |
549 |
2,109 |
42
|
143 |
29.4% |
30.3% |
28.4 |
4.4 |
787 |
231 |
| 223 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
407 |
1,654 |
42
|
257 |
16.2% |
16.6% |
31.7 |
8.3 |
1,046 |
169 |
| 224 |
Walnut Creek · Public Sharp downturn
|
Contra Costa |
377 |
1,546 |
41
|
204 |
20.3% |
30.1% |
29.7 |
6.4 |
770 |
156 |
| 225 |
· Public Best in class
|
Sacramento |
409 |
1,782 |
41
|
192 |
21.5% |
30.2% |
32.5 |
5.9 |
786 |
169 |
| 226 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
642 |
2,536 |
41
|
217 |
19.1% |
25.7% |
32.2 |
7.8 |
1,390 |
265 |
| 227 |
Monterey · Private
|
Monterey |
34 |
166 |
41
|
250 |
16.5% |
— |
20.6 |
— |
85 |
14 |
| 228 |
Reedley · Public Best in class
|
Fresno |
56 |
255 |
41
|
82 |
50.0% |
13.0% |
23.2 |
5.4 |
46 |
23 |
| 229 |
Westlake Village · Private
|
Ventura |
290 |
1,705 |
41
|
202 |
20.3% |
20.2% |
30.3 |
8.3 |
585 |
119 |
| 230 |
San Diego · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Diego |
100 |
412 |
41
|
173 |
23.7% |
24.4% |
31.0 |
9.0 |
173 |
41 |
| 231 |
Santa Clara · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
59 |
183 |
41
|
227 |
17.9% |
45.8% |
20.3 |
— |
134 |
24 |
| 232 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
32 |
153 |
41
|
256 |
15.8% |
23.1% |
40.6 |
31.2 |
82 |
13 |
| 233 |
Watsonville · Private
|
Santa Cruz |
121 |
836 |
40
|
124 |
32.7% |
14.3% |
29.8 |
2.5 |
150 |
49 |
| 234 |
Santa Ana · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
136 |
842 |
40
|
119 |
34.0% |
14.6% |
32.4 |
5.2 |
162 |
55 |
| 235 |
Santa Barbara · Private
|
Santa Barbara |
62 |
278 |
40
|
147 |
27.5% |
20.0% |
29.0 |
14.5 |
91 |
25 |
| 236 |
Healdsburg · Public Material decline
|
Sonoma |
134 |
503 |
40
|
149 |
27.0% |
18.5% |
24.6 |
9.0 |
200 |
54 |
| 237 |
· Public Holding share
|
Orange |
542 |
2,041 |
40
|
161 |
25.0% |
31.6% |
35.8 |
5.0 |
873 |
218 |
| 238 |
Los Gatos · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
513 |
1,914 |
40
|
257 |
15.6% |
28.8% |
32.0 |
7.2 |
1,317 |
205 |
| 239 |
Carlsbad · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
352 |
1,289 |
40
|
201 |
19.8% |
32.1% |
29.8 |
5.7 |
708 |
140 |
| 240 |
Pacific Grove · Public Sharp downturn
|
Monterey |
161 |
552 |
40
|
158 |
25.1% |
28.1% |
29.8 |
5.6 |
255 |
64 |
| 241 |
Redlands · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Bernardino |
521 |
2,189 |
40
|
113 |
35.0% |
23.3% |
31.9 |
5.6 |
589 |
206 |
| 242 |
El Cerrito · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
394 |
1,460 |
39
|
171 |
23.0% |
33.5% |
27.7 |
9.4 |
674 |
155 |
| 243 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
564 |
39
|
120 |
32.6% |
22.9% |
28.7 |
6.6 |
147 |
48 |
| 244 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
74 |
317 |
39
|
186 |
21.0% |
17.2% |
25.7 |
10.8 |
138 |
29 |
| 245 |
San Francisco · Public Holding share
|
San Francisco |
120 |
464 |
39
|
204 |
19.2% |
23.4% |
22.5 |
8.3 |
245 |
47 |
| 246 |
Granite Bay · Public Sharp downturn
|
Placer |
496 |
2,036 |
39
|
168 |
23.2% |
32.0% |
27.4 |
6.2 |
835 |
194 |
| 247 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
440 |
1,800 |
39
|
166 |
23.5% |
37.8% |
34.1 |
2.0 |
731 |
172 |
| 248 |
San Diego · Public
|
San Diego |
103 |
435 |
39
|
167 |
23.3% |
7.5% |
26.2 |
2.9 |
172 |
40 |
| 249 |
Yorba Linda · Public Holding share
|
Orange |
332 |
1,631 |
39
|
192 |
20.1% |
23.4% |
28.6 |
5.1 |
638 |
128 |
| 250 |
Torrance · Private
|
Los Angeles |
26 |
148 |
38
|
223 |
17.2% |
— |
26.9 |
— |
58 |
10 |
| 251 |
Carlsbad · Private
|
San Diego |
120 |
661 |
38
|
250 |
15.3% |
— |
32.5 |
3.3 |
300 |
46 |
| 252 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
136 |
1,242 |
38
|
247 |
15.5% |
5.8% |
31.6 |
14.0 |
336 |
52 |
| 253 |
Richmond · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
136 |
1,078 |
38
|
148 |
25.9% |
17.3% |
23.5 |
8.8 |
201 |
52 |
| 254 |
Victorville · Public Holding share
|
San Bernardino |
173 |
1,136 |
38
|
196 |
19.5% |
28.8% |
36.4 |
7.5 |
339 |
66 |
| 255 |
Napa · Private
|
Napa |
160 |
679 |
38
|
189 |
20.1% |
26.2% |
28.8 |
7.5 |
303 |
61 |
| 256 |
Ojai · Private
|
Ventura |
21 |
307 |
38
|
329 |
11.6% |
— |
19.1 |
— |
69 |
8 |
| 257 |
Santa Fe Springs · Private
|
Los Angeles |
105 |
405 |
38
|
168 |
22.7% |
25.0% |
29.5 |
3.8 |
176 |
40 |
| 258 |
· Public Weak at the gate
|
Sacramento |
113 |
1,493 |
38
|
144 |
26.4% |
23.3% |
22.1 |
6.2 |
163 |
43 |
| 259 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
71 |
361 |
38
|
163 |
23.3% |
— |
32.4 |
9.9 |
116 |
27 |
| 260 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
516 |
2,293 |
38
|
158 |
24.0% |
26.5% |
30.6 |
9.7 |
817 |
196 |
| 261 |
San Francisco · Public Best in class
|
San Francisco |
332 |
1,238 |
38
|
193 |
19.6% |
30.9% |
25.0 |
8.4 |
642 |
126 |
| 262 |
Monterey · Public Best in class
|
Monterey |
332 |
1,401 |
38
|
102 |
37.2% |
23.8% |
25.9 |
4.8 |
339 |
126 |
| 263 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
69 |
726 |
38
|
197 |
19.1% |
— |
27.5 |
10.1 |
136 |
26 |
| 264 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
99 |
420 |
37
|
361 |
10.4% |
— |
23.2 |
11.1 |
357 |
37 |
| 265 |
Stockton · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Joaquin |
83 |
410 |
37
|
184 |
20.3% |
35.5% |
16.9 |
3.6 |
153 |
31 |
| 266 |
West Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
75 |
319 |
37
|
204 |
18.3% |
10.7% |
24.0 |
8.0 |
153 |
28 |
| 267 |
Castro Valley · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
677 |
2,874 |
37
|
197 |
18.9% |
30.9% |
26.4 |
4.1 |
1,336 |
252 |
| 268 |
Carmichael · Private
|
Sacramento |
199 |
917 |
37
|
176 |
21.1% |
36.5% |
25.6 |
7.5 |
351 |
74 |
| 269 |
Rancho San Margarit · Private
|
Orange |
421 |
1,823 |
37
|
172 |
21.6% |
23.1% |
29.9 |
8.6 |
723 |
156 |
| 270 |
Camarillo · Public Best in class
|
Ventura |
192 |
826 |
37
|
153 |
24.1% |
29.6% |
27.1 |
7.8 |
294 |
71 |
| 271 |
Stockton · Private
|
San Joaquin |
187 |
845 |
37
|
123 |
30.0% |
21.7% |
26.7 |
6.4 |
230 |
69 |
| 272 |
San Diego · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Diego |
98 |
355 |
37
|
151 |
24.3% |
19.4% |
28.6 |
11.2 |
148 |
36 |
| 273 |
Culver City · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
507 |
2,012 |
37
|
171 |
21.4% |
28.5% |
29.0 |
8.1 |
868 |
186 |
| 274 |
Orange · Private
|
Orange |
210 |
1,141 |
37
|
190 |
19.2% |
16.9% |
28.1 |
5.7 |
400 |
77 |
| 275 |
Costa Mesa · Public Sharp downturn
|
Orange |
52 |
177 |
37
|
190 |
19.2% |
15.8% |
23.1 |
— |
99 |
19 |
| 276 |
Chula Vista · Public
|
San Diego |
151 |
626 |
36
|
160 |
22.8% |
10.9% |
30.5 |
4.0 |
241 |
55 |
| 277 |
Santa Ana · Private
|
Orange |
514 |
1,849 |
36
|
176 |
20.6% |
28.9% |
30.7 |
7.0 |
906 |
187 |
| 278 |
Beverly Hills · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
308 |
1,173 |
36
|
157 |
23.2% |
15.2% |
28.6 |
8.1 |
483 |
112 |
| 279 |
Ventura · Private
|
Ventura |
77 |
412 |
36
|
122 |
29.8% |
— |
26.0 |
5.2 |
94 |
28 |
| 280 |
Saratoga · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
358 |
1,460 |
36
|
167 |
21.7% |
25.4% |
29.6 |
7.0 |
598 |
130 |
| 281 |
· Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
459 |
1,734 |
36
|
196 |
18.4% |
30.9% |
27.7 |
5.7 |
899 |
165 |
| 282 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
67 |
284 |
36
|
154 |
23.3% |
16.7% |
31.3 |
6.0 |
103 |
24 |
| 283 |
San Luis Obispo · Public Best in class
|
San Luis Obispo |
393 |
1,678 |
36
|
140 |
25.4% |
27.1% |
25.9 |
5.6 |
550 |
140 |
| 284 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
470 |
36
|
217 |
16.4% |
27.9% |
24.0 |
5.0 |
263 |
43 |
| 285 |
Mission Viejo · Public Tracking
|
Orange |
496 |
1,991 |
35
|
141 |
25.2% |
29.6% |
29.8 |
5.2 |
699 |
176 |
| 286 |
Redondo Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
739 |
2,921 |
35
|
154 |
23.0% |
21.4% |
28.3 |
6.2 |
1,137 |
262 |
| 287 |
Chula Vista · Private
|
San Diego |
294 |
1,222 |
35
|
187 |
18.9% |
23.1% |
24.1 |
4.8 |
549 |
104 |
| 288 |
San Jose · Public Weak at the gate
|
Santa Clara |
362 |
1,393 |
35
|
172 |
20.6% |
29.7% |
26.5 |
6.9 |
621 |
128 |
| 289 |
El Segundo · Private
|
Los Angeles |
68 |
222 |
35
|
246 |
14.4% |
12.5% |
25.0 |
— |
167 |
24 |
| 290 |
Los Angeles · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
332 |
2,031 |
35
|
165 |
21.3% |
25.6% |
26.2 |
9.6 |
549 |
117 |
| 291 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
88 |
435 |
35
|
182 |
19.4% |
— |
21.6 |
10.2 |
160 |
31 |
| 292 |
Temecula · Private
|
Riverside |
111 |
1,208 |
35
|
130 |
27.1% |
7.7% |
26.1 |
— |
144 |
39 |
| 293 |
Eastvale · Public Best in class
|
Riverside |
1,083 |
4,353 |
35
|
123 |
28.2% |
32.4% |
29.6 |
4.6 |
1,337 |
377 |
| 294 |
Redding · Public Best in class
|
Shasta |
124 |
1,009 |
35
|
98 |
35.5% |
18.6% |
24.2 |
5.7 |
121 |
43 |
| 295 |
Watsonville · Private
|
Santa Cruz |
52 |
214 |
35
|
154 |
22.5% |
16.7% |
19.2 |
— |
80 |
18 |
| 296 |
Fremont · Private
|
Alameda |
29 |
406 |
34
|
276 |
12.5% |
— |
24.1 |
— |
80 |
10 |
| 297 |
Aliso Viejo · Public Tracking
|
Orange |
683 |
2,563 |
34
|
134 |
25.6% |
23.4% |
26.8 |
4.4 |
917 |
235 |
| 298 |
Rosemead · Private
|
Los Angeles |
67 |
351 |
34
|
252 |
13.6% |
26.1% |
26.9 |
4.5 |
169 |
23 |
| 299 |
Mountain View · Private
|
Santa Clara |
426 |
1,782 |
34
|
251 |
13.7% |
23.3% |
26.3 |
7.0 |
1,069 |
146 |
| 300 |
Alhambra · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
582 |
2,201 |
34
|
173 |
19.8% |
31.2% |
25.6 |
5.5 |
1,005 |
199 |