| 201 |
Lakewood · Private
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
557 |
48
|
184 |
26.2% |
13.6% |
39.3 |
10.7 |
225 |
59 |
| 202 |
Albany · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
294 |
1,122 |
48
|
316 |
15.3% |
35.2% |
29.6 |
8.5 |
928 |
142 |
| 203 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
1,202 |
48
|
261 |
18.4% |
19.4% |
40.7 |
15.3 |
391 |
72 |
| 204 |
Walnut Creek · Private
|
Contra Costa |
96 |
408 |
48
|
122 |
39.3% |
10.9% |
35.4 |
9.4 |
117 |
46 |
| 205 |
Newport Beach · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
370 |
2,106 |
48
|
200 |
23.9% |
23.7% |
36.8 |
8.7 |
741 |
177 |
| 206 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
115 |
887 |
48
|
186 |
25.7% |
16.4% |
36.5 |
11.3 |
214 |
55 |
| 207 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
42 |
451 |
48
|
183 |
26.0% |
— |
30.9 |
14.3 |
77 |
20 |
| 208 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
152 |
1,175 |
47
|
210 |
22.6% |
19.4% |
39.5 |
9.2 |
319 |
72 |
| 209 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
114 |
727 |
47
|
301 |
15.7% |
14.8% |
33.3 |
10.5 |
343 |
54 |
| 210 |
North Hollywood · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
535 |
2,444 |
47
|
162 |
29.1% |
23.3% |
37.2 |
8.2 |
869 |
253 |
| 211 |
Danville · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
516 |
2,042 |
47
|
269 |
17.5% |
28.4% |
35.5 |
9.7 |
1,389 |
243 |
| 212 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
68 |
264 |
47
|
212 |
22.2% |
— |
32.4 |
— |
144 |
32 |
| 213 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
459 |
1,884 |
47
|
258 |
18.3% |
29.2% |
36.6 |
6.8 |
1,183 |
216 |
| 214 |
Laguna Beach · Public Sharp downturn
|
Orange |
196 |
815 |
47
|
180 |
26.1% |
30.4% |
39.3 |
11.2 |
352 |
92 |
| 215 |
Oakland · Public Watch — engagement
|
Alameda |
71 |
861 |
46
|
199 |
23.4% |
21.2% |
31.0 |
12.7 |
141 |
33 |
| 216 |
San Ramon · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
721 |
2,894 |
46
|
259 |
17.9% |
29.6% |
35.9 |
7.8 |
1,868 |
335 |
| 217 |
Lafayette · Public Sharp downturn
|
Contra Costa |
345 |
1,256 |
46
|
216 |
21.5% |
26.9% |
32.2 |
9.3 |
744 |
160 |
| 218 |
La Crescenta · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
257 |
1,136 |
46
|
215 |
21.5% |
22.7% |
38.1 |
8.2 |
553 |
119 |
| 219 |
South Pasadena · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
379 |
1,536 |
46
|
238 |
19.4% |
25.7% |
31.1 |
6.1 |
901 |
175 |
| 220 |
Fresno · Public Weak at the gate
|
Fresno |
613 |
2,360 |
46
|
131 |
35.2% |
18.1% |
35.7 |
6.7 |
801 |
282 |
| 221 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
74 |
862 |
46
|
238 |
19.3% |
— |
41.9 |
14.9 |
176 |
34 |
| 222 |
Irvine · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
540 |
2,232 |
46
|
212 |
21.7% |
25.0% |
38.0 |
8.5 |
1,145 |
248 |
| 223 |
Berkeley · Private
|
Alameda |
151 |
630 |
46
|
250 |
18.3% |
24.6% |
31.1 |
9.9 |
377 |
69 |
| 224 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
484 |
46
|
147 |
31.0% |
22.6% |
37.1 |
6.0 |
171 |
53 |
| 225 |
Goleta · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Barbara |
539 |
2,149 |
46
|
163 |
28.0% |
23.6% |
33.8 |
6.9 |
879 |
246 |
| 226 |
Oakland · Public Compounding decline
|
Alameda |
303 |
1,250 |
46
|
148 |
30.9% |
23.9% |
31.0 |
8.6 |
447 |
138 |
| 227 |
Oakland · Public Demand problem
|
Alameda |
438 |
1,812 |
45
|
238 |
19.1% |
24.6% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
1,042 |
199 |
| 228 |
Sacramento · Public Weak at the gate
|
Sacramento |
392 |
1,655 |
45
|
142 |
32.1% |
28.1% |
29.6 |
10.2 |
555 |
178 |
| 229 |
West Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
274 |
1,237 |
45
|
218 |
20.8% |
22.6% |
35.0 |
8.0 |
596 |
124 |
| 230 |
Santa Cruz · Public Holding share
|
Santa Cruz |
270 |
1,093 |
45
|
169 |
26.8% |
23.8% |
32.2 |
7.8 |
456 |
122 |
| 231 |
Pasadena · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
224 |
1,689 |
45
|
149 |
30.2% |
25.7% |
38.4 |
15.6 |
334 |
101 |
| 232 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
71 |
484 |
45
|
224 |
20.1% |
9.4% |
35.2 |
14.1 |
159 |
32 |
| 233 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
20 |
72 |
45
|
150 |
30.0% |
— |
15.0 |
— |
30 |
9 |
| 234 |
Torrance · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
450 |
1,775 |
45
|
188 |
23.8% |
28.2% |
32.7 |
6.4 |
848 |
202 |
| 235 |
Chino Hills · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Bernardino |
669 |
2,541 |
45
|
176 |
25.5% |
29.7% |
36.2 |
7.5 |
1,175 |
300 |
| 236 |
Richmond · Private
|
Contra Costa |
96 |
428 |
45
|
223 |
20.1% |
25.6% |
26.0 |
7.3 |
214 |
43 |
| 237 |
Los Angeles · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
172 |
819 |
45
|
204 |
21.9% |
23.4% |
40.7 |
8.7 |
351 |
77 |
| 238 |
Scotts Valley · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Cruz |
152 |
611 |
45
|
152 |
29.4% |
14.7% |
31.6 |
7.9 |
231 |
68 |
| 239 |
Burlingame · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
412 |
1,583 |
45
|
240 |
18.6% |
17.4% |
31.6 |
6.8 |
988 |
184 |
| 240 |
Bakersfield · Private
|
Kern |
124 |
509 |
44
|
119 |
37.4% |
12.7% |
33.1 |
7.3 |
147 |
55 |
| 241 |
Woodland Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
88 |
353 |
44
|
251 |
17.6% |
17.9% |
26.1 |
8.0 |
221 |
39 |
| 242 |
Walnut Creek · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
433 |
1,577 |
44
|
209 |
21.1% |
27.8% |
31.6 |
7.2 |
905 |
191 |
| 243 |
Carmel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Monterey |
200 |
780 |
44
|
140 |
31.5% |
26.1% |
32.5 |
6.5 |
279 |
88 |
| 244 |
Hayward · Private
|
Alameda |
164 |
806 |
44
|
240 |
18.3% |
27.8% |
32.9 |
10.4 |
394 |
72 |
| 245 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
137 |
607 |
44
|
201 |
21.7% |
23.3% |
32.1 |
9.5 |
276 |
60 |
| 246 |
Huntington Park · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
160 |
729 |
44
|
167 |
26.2% |
14.3% |
36.2 |
8.8 |
267 |
70 |
| 247 |
Riverside · Private
|
Riverside |
78 |
331 |
44
|
186 |
23.4% |
17.6% |
33.3 |
7.7 |
145 |
34 |
| 248 |
Pacific Palisades · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
757 |
2,920 |
44
|
204 |
21.4% |
23.0% |
31.4 |
9.6 |
1,546 |
330 |
| 249 |
San Jose · Public Weak at the gate
|
Santa Clara |
699 |
2,703 |
43
|
285 |
15.2% |
29.6% |
33.8 |
7.9 |
1,993 |
304 |
| 250 |
Lancaster · Private
|
Los Angeles |
113 |
561 |
43
|
133 |
32.7% |
22.4% |
36.3 |
6.2 |
150 |
49 |
| 251 |
Richmond · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
72 |
590 |
43
|
140 |
30.7% |
25.8% |
26.4 |
13.9 |
101 |
31 |
| 252 |
Winchester · Public Best in class
|
Riverside |
72 |
1,086 |
43
|
165 |
26.1% |
25.8% |
31.9 |
4.2 |
119 |
31 |
| 253 |
Irvine · Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
502 |
1,964 |
43
|
236 |
18.2% |
27.3% |
31.3 |
6.4 |
1,185 |
216 |
| 254 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
107 |
534 |
43
|
132 |
32.6% |
23.9% |
35.5 |
11.2 |
141 |
46 |
| 255 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
175 |
1,530 |
43
|
154 |
27.8% |
— |
36.6 |
8.0 |
270 |
75 |
| 256 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
463 |
1,890 |
43
|
241 |
17.8% |
26.3% |
31.8 |
6.0 |
1,115 |
198 |
| 257 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
143 |
545 |
43
|
290 |
14.7% |
9.8% |
32.2 |
5.6 |
414 |
61 |
| 258 |
San Rafael · Private
|
Marin |
113 |
454 |
42
|
267 |
15.9% |
8.3% |
33.6 |
9.7 |
302 |
48 |
| 259 |
Alhambra · Private
|
Los Angeles |
85 |
296 |
42
|
185 |
22.9% |
11.1% |
31.8 |
10.6 |
157 |
36 |
| 260 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
111 |
512 |
42
|
234 |
18.1% |
14.9% |
32.4 |
4.5 |
260 |
47 |
| 261 |
Escondido · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
182 |
765 |
42
|
139 |
30.4% |
27.3% |
33.5 |
5.0 |
253 |
77 |
| 262 |
Oakland · Public Demand hides churn
|
Alameda |
52 |
451 |
42
|
213 |
19.8% |
31.8% |
28.9 |
7.7 |
111 |
22 |
| 263 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
123 |
517 |
42
|
167 |
25.4% |
25.0% |
36.6 |
7.3 |
205 |
52 |
| 264 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
149 |
1,767 |
42
|
209 |
20.3% |
20.6% |
30.2 |
8.1 |
311 |
63 |
| 265 |
Encinitas · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Diego |
547 |
1,843 |
42
|
197 |
21.4% |
30.3% |
31.4 |
8.2 |
1,078 |
231 |
| 266 |
Sun Valley · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
90 |
410 |
42
|
126 |
33.6% |
7.9% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
113 |
38 |
| 267 |
Lakewood · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
95 |
336 |
42
|
240 |
17.5% |
32.5% |
29.5 |
5.3 |
228 |
40 |
| 268 |
Elk Grove · Public Sharp downturn
|
Sacramento |
549 |
2,109 |
42
|
143 |
29.4% |
30.3% |
28.4 |
4.4 |
787 |
231 |
| 269 |
Norco · Public Sharp downturn
|
Riverside |
168 |
694 |
42
|
192 |
21.7% |
24.3% |
34.5 |
6.0 |
322 |
70 |
| 270 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
407 |
1,654 |
42
|
257 |
16.2% |
16.6% |
31.7 |
8.3 |
1,046 |
169 |
| 271 |
Walnut Creek · Public Sharp downturn
|
Contra Costa |
377 |
1,546 |
41
|
204 |
20.3% |
30.1% |
29.7 |
6.4 |
770 |
156 |
| 272 |
Folsom · Public Best in class
|
Sacramento |
409 |
1,782 |
41
|
192 |
21.5% |
30.2% |
32.5 |
5.9 |
786 |
169 |
| 273 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
642 |
2,536 |
41
|
217 |
19.1% |
25.7% |
32.2 |
7.8 |
1,390 |
265 |
| 274 |
San Francisco · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Francisco |
252 |
1,047 |
41
|
152 |
27.1% |
35.6% |
24.6 |
2.8 |
384 |
104 |
| 275 |
Woodland Hills · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
478 |
2,221 |
41
|
188 |
22.0% |
28.9% |
31.8 |
7.3 |
897 |
197 |
| 276 |
Monterey · Private
|
Monterey |
34 |
166 |
41
|
250 |
16.5% |
— |
20.6 |
— |
85 |
14 |
| 277 |
Reedley · Public Best in class
|
Fresno |
56 |
255 |
41
|
82 |
50.0% |
13.0% |
23.2 |
5.4 |
46 |
23 |
| 278 |
Westlake Village · Private
|
Los Angeles |
290 |
1,705 |
41
|
202 |
20.3% |
20.2% |
30.3 |
8.3 |
585 |
119 |
| 279 |
San Diego · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Diego |
100 |
412 |
41
|
173 |
23.7% |
24.4% |
31.0 |
9.0 |
173 |
41 |
| 280 |
Santa Clara · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
59 |
183 |
41
|
227 |
17.9% |
45.8% |
20.3 |
— |
134 |
24 |
| 281 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
32 |
153 |
41
|
256 |
15.8% |
23.1% |
40.6 |
31.2 |
82 |
13 |
| 282 |
Watsonville · Private
|
Santa Cruz |
121 |
836 |
40
|
124 |
32.7% |
14.3% |
29.8 |
2.5 |
150 |
49 |
| 283 |
Stockton · Public Best in class
|
San Joaquin |
163 |
694 |
40
|
127 |
31.9% |
27.3% |
27.6 |
4.9 |
207 |
66 |
| 284 |
Santa Ana · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
136 |
842 |
40
|
119 |
34.0% |
14.6% |
32.4 |
5.2 |
162 |
55 |
| 285 |
Santa Barbara · Private
|
Santa Barbara |
62 |
278 |
40
|
147 |
27.5% |
20.0% |
29.0 |
14.5 |
91 |
25 |
| 286 |
Healdsburg · Public Material decline
|
Sonoma |
134 |
503 |
40
|
149 |
27.0% |
18.5% |
24.6 |
9.0 |
200 |
54 |
| 287 |
Westminster · Public Holding share
|
Orange |
542 |
2,041 |
40
|
161 |
25.0% |
31.6% |
35.8 |
5.0 |
873 |
218 |
| 288 |
Los Gatos · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
513 |
1,914 |
40
|
257 |
15.6% |
28.8% |
32.0 |
7.2 |
1,317 |
205 |
| 289 |
Carlsbad · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
352 |
1,289 |
40
|
201 |
19.8% |
32.1% |
29.8 |
5.7 |
708 |
140 |
| 290 |
Pacific Grove · Public Sharp downturn
|
Monterey |
161 |
552 |
40
|
158 |
25.1% |
28.1% |
29.8 |
5.6 |
255 |
64 |
| 291 |
Redlands · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Bernardino |
521 |
2,189 |
40
|
113 |
35.0% |
23.3% |
31.9 |
5.6 |
589 |
206 |
| 292 |
El Cerrito · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
394 |
1,460 |
39
|
171 |
23.0% |
33.5% |
27.7 |
9.4 |
674 |
155 |
| 293 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
564 |
39
|
120 |
32.6% |
22.9% |
28.7 |
6.6 |
147 |
48 |
| 294 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
74 |
317 |
39
|
186 |
21.0% |
17.2% |
25.7 |
10.8 |
138 |
29 |
| 295 |
San Francisco · Public Holding share
|
San Francisco |
120 |
464 |
39
|
204 |
19.2% |
23.4% |
22.5 |
8.3 |
245 |
47 |
| 296 |
Los Angeles · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
281 |
1,381 |
39
|
174 |
22.5% |
28.2% |
30.2 |
8.9 |
489 |
110 |
| 297 |
Granite Bay · Public Sharp downturn
|
Placer |
496 |
2,036 |
39
|
168 |
23.2% |
32.0% |
27.4 |
6.2 |
835 |
194 |
| 298 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
440 |
1,800 |
39
|
166 |
23.5% |
37.8% |
34.1 |
2.0 |
731 |
172 |
| 299 |
Hawthorne · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
123 |
567 |
39
|
168 |
23.2% |
22.9% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
207 |
48 |
| 300 |
Maywood · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
195 |
1,093 |
39
|
149 |
26.2% |
21.1% |
34.9 |
7.7 |
290 |
76 |