County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

816 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp
Folsom · Public
3.84 13.7% -7.5pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

992 schools · 2025 data · Page 5 of 10 (showing 401–500) · 572 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
401
Petaluma · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 296 1,193 22 102 21.1% 23.4% 16.6 2.4 303 64
402
Ojai · Public  Material decline
Ventura 153 576 22 95 22.6% 18.2% 15.0 146 33
403
Templeton · Public  Holding share
San Luis Obispo 204 725 22 74 29.3% 11.4% 13.7 1.5 150 44
404
Long Beach · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 823 3,408 22 117 18.4% 23.7% 17.2 5.6 960 177
405
Palmdale · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 251 2,259 22 78 27.6% 29.6% 19.1 4.0 196 54
406
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 294 1,318 21 78 27.6% 31.8% 20.1 7.1 228 63
407
Palm Springs · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 393 1,497 21 74 29.0% 26.2% 18.8 2.3 290 84
408
Chula Vista · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 712 2,557 21 127 16.8% 32.9% 19.4 3.5 904 152
409
· Public  Best in class
Orange 550 2,049 21 83 25.6% 25.6% 17.4 3.3 457 117
410
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 395 491 21 90 23.7% 29.8% 19.8 4.6 354 84
411
Redwood City · Public  Tracking
San Mateo 475 1,854 21 118 18.0% 16.8% 14.9 5.0 560 101
412
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 273 1,284 21 119 17.8% 22.4% 16.5 4.4 326 58
413
Roseville · Public  Strong demand
Placer 440 2,079 21 95 22.3% 22.6% 13.6 2.5 417 93
414
· Public  Material decline
Alameda 336 1,273 21 117 18.1% 25.4% 13.7 2.7 393 71
415
Westminster · Public  Demand problem
Orange 644 2,529 21 95 22.2% 28.7% 19.1 3.7 613 136
416
Carson · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 320 1,407 21 91 22.9% 25.4% 18.1 5.3 292 67
417
Fullerton · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 441 1,880 21 59 35.1% 20.6% 16.6 3.2 262 92
418
Chula Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 446 1,771 21 62 33.6% 32.3% 17.3 3.1 277 93
419
Ventura · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 457 1,939 21 79 26.4% 16.8% 15.3 4.4 360 95
420
San Bernardino · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 255 1,246 21 71 29.3% 15.1% 16.1 2.8 181 53
421
Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 145 533 21 115 18.0% 16.6 4.8 167 30
422
Carpinteria · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Barbara 145 593 21 71 29.1% 23.3% 16.6 3.5 103 30
423
Ventura · Public  Best in class
Ventura 232 951 21 134 15.5% 18.8% 12.9 3.5 310 48
424
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 257 1,183 21 100 20.5% 28.3% 16.3 2.7 258 53
425
· Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 457 1,664 21 77 26.8% 30.9% 18.6 3.9 351 94
426
Villa Park · Public  Demand problem
Orange 467 2,023 21 92 22.4% 29.2% 15.8 3.0 428 96
427
· Public  Material decline
San Diego 404 1,563 21 83 24.8% 27.7% 17.1 1.5 335 83
428
Modesto · Public  Best in class
Stanislaus 565 2,346 21 59 34.6% 21.6% 13.1 2.3 335 116
429
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 377 1,591 20 73 27.9% 33.8% 18.0 2.6 276 77
430
Garden Grove · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 373 1,439 20 81 25.2% 26.3% 17.4 2.7 301 76
431
Perris · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 615 2,396 20 86 23.6% 18.4% 17.6 3.2 529 125
432
Rocklin · Public  Sharp downturn
Placer 532 1,936 20 92 22.0% 33.3% 14.7 2.6 490 108
433
Livermore · Public  Weak at the gate
Alameda 434 1,827 20 102 19.8% 27.3% 13.6 3.5 444 88
434
· Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 227 908 20 82 24.9% 15.2% 16.3 3.5 185 46
435
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 247 978 20 83 24.5% 6.0% 17.4 4.9 204 50
436
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
437
Burbank · Public
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
438
Salinas · Public  Demand problem
Monterey 662 2,742 20 78 25.7% 27.8% 12.8 2.4 517 133
439
Simi Valley · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 478 1,835 20 64 31.6% 24.0% 16.1 4.4 304 96
440
Santa Ana · Public  Best in class
Orange 595 2,376 20 75 26.7% 27.7% 16.6 3.2 445 119
441
· Public  Strong demand
Merced 461 1,793 20 53 37.7% 23.9% 12.6 3.7 244 92
442
Avenal · Public  Demand problem
Kings 156 762 20 45 44.3% 16.1% 16.0 2.6 70 31
443
Santa Paula · Public  Strong demand
Ventura 353 1,494 20 72 27.6% 5.7% 14.2 2.5 254 70
444
Pico Rivera · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 505 1,995 20 88 22.5% 23.0% 15.6 3.8 445 100
445
Lindsay · Public  Best in class
Tulare 283 1,132 20 54 36.8% 17.9% 16.6 4.2 152 56
446
San Clemente · Public  Demand problem
Orange 745 2,740 20 83 23.8% 26.5% 15.3 2.7 618 147
447
Corona · Public  Holding share
Riverside 832 3,577 20 91 21.7% 28.7% 17.6 3.9 756 164
448
West Sacramento · Public  Demand hides churn
Yolo 551 2,168 20 69 28.5% 38.0% 11.8 1.8 379 108
449
Escondido · Public  Material decline
San Diego 450 1,846 20 75 26.0% 27.3% 15.3 2.4 338 88
450
Riverside · Public  Holding share
Riverside 399 1,780 20 75 26.0% 29.5% 18.8 2.0 300 78
451
Santa Ynez · Public  Sharp downturn
Santa Barbara 221 801 19 71 27.4% 7.0% 14.0 3.2 157 43
452
Rosemead · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 499 1,691 19 85 23.0% 27.8% 15.6 4.2 422 97
453
· Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 649 2,551 19 65 29.6% 23.0% 15.6 3.1 425 126
454
· Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 501 1,864 19 69 27.9% 26.8% 17.8 3.4 347 97
455
Chula Vista · Public
San Diego 501 1,864 19 69 27.9% 26.8% 17.8 3.4 347 97
456
Thousand Oaks · Public  Sharp downturn
Ventura 439 1,703 19 87 22.1% 34.1% 14.1 3.2 384 85
457
San Fernando · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 367 1,608 19 75 25.7% 21.1% 16.4 4.1 276 71
458
American Canyon · Public  Best in class
Napa 404 1,720 19 88 22.0% 23.1% 11.6 3.5 355 78
459
· Public  Strong demand
Yolo 364 1,582 19 67 28.8% 31.4% 10.4 3.0 243 70
460
Arroyo Grande · Public  Weak at the gate
San Luis Obispo 531 2,012 19 69 27.9% 25.5% 14.3 2.5 366 102
461
Fairfield · Public  Best in class
Solano 521 2,111 19 101 18.9% 41.0% 11.1 2.9 528 100
462
· Public  Best in class
Riverside 616 2,537 19 58 32.8% 28.8% 17.1 1.9 360 118
463
Pomona · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 356 1,542 19 71 26.9% 33.8% 15.7 1.4 253 68
464
Panorama City · Private
Los Angeles 126 547 19 122 15.6% 12.5% 13.5 154 24
465
Dana Point · Public  Material decline
Orange 473 1,725 19 92 20.6% 32.2% 16.1 3.4 437 90
466
South Lake Tahoe · Public  Watch — engagement
El Dorado 242 1,076 19 63 30.3% 6.5% 12.8 3.3 152 46
467
Lawndale · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 442 1,981 19 98 19.3% 22.6% 14.5 2.3 435 84
468
Sacramento · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 374 1,679 19 61 31.3% 25.4% 12.6 2.4 227 71
469
Salinas · Public  Material decline
Monterey 475 1,978 19 75 25.4% 17.8% 12.6 2.3 355 90
470
Santa Clara · Public
Santa Clara 481 1,614 19 134 14.1% 33.0% 13.9 1.7 646 91
471
Escondido · Public  Both ends slipping
San Diego 465 1,788 19 67 28.4% 33.0% 14.6 2.6 310 88
472
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 249 942 19 98 19.3% 27.7% 13.2 2.8 243 47
473
Carlsbad · Public  Best in class
San Diego 408 1,774 19 92 20.5% 33.8% 15.7 3.2 376 77
474
South El Monte · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 308 1,125 19 67 28.0% 20.7% 17.5 4.2 207 58
475
West Covina · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 389 1,568 19 86 21.8% 26.0% 15.7 4.4 335 73
476
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 450 19 141 13.3% 18.8 5.4 158 21
477
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 240 971 19 79 23.8% 26.7% 13.3 5.4 189 45
478
Long Beach · Public
Los Angeles 112 701 19 79 23.9% 10.7 88 21
479
Woodland · Public  Compounding decline
Yolo 262 1,155 19 60 31.4% 34.7% 9.9 1.9 156 49
480
Upland · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 723 2,797 19 74 25.1% 28.9% 16.9 2.5 537 135
481
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 370 1,582 19 83 22.6% 13.0% 14.9 3.2 306 69
482
Sacramento · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 413 1,622 19 65 28.8% 19.5% 11.6 1.9 267 77
483
La Quinta · Public  Holding share
Riverside 546 2,425 18 65 28.4% 29.7% 17.4 2.6 355 101
484
Rialto · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 492 1,951 18 74 25.1% 19.8% 16.9 3.5 362 91
485
· Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 516 2,011 18 80 23.0% 36.8% 16.5 3.7 413 95
486
Ripon · Public  Weak at the gate
San Joaquin 261 1,051 18 56 32.6% 25.0% 11.1 1.1 147 48
487
Windsor · Public  Strong demand
Sonoma 426 1,700 18 69 26.7% 28.2% 12.2 2.6 292 78
488
San Pedro · Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 563 2,398 18 86 21.2% 29.1% 15.1 3.4 486 103
489
Garden Grove · Public  Holding share
Orange 405 1,634 18 95 19.3% 39.2% 15.1 1.5 384 74
490
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 625 2,667 18 82 22.3% 30.7% 15.2 2.7 512 114
491
Anaheim · Public  Weak at the gate
Orange 363 1,393 18 87 20.9% 22.7% 14.6 2.8 315 66
492
Oakhurst · Public  Compounding decline
Madera 138 542 18 45 40.3% 32.0% 13.8 62 25
493
Orosi · Public  Weak at the gate
Tulare 199 1,108 18 60 30.0% 11.1 120 36
494
San Bernardino · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 575 2,748 18 70 25.6% 17.5% 13.7 2.4 403 103
495
Downey · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 933 4,051 18 83 21.7% 28.1% 15.3 2.6 771 167
496
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 112 410 18 112 15.9% 15.0% 13.4 126 20
497
Riverside · Public  Demand problem
Riverside 484 2,011 18 69 25.8% 18.6% 15.5 3.5 333 86
498
Alhambra · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 576 2,056 18 115 15.4% 27.4% 13.0 4.0 660 102
499
Simi Valley · Public  Holding share
Ventura 305 1,033 18 94 18.9% 25.9% 13.1 1.3 286 54
500
Castaic · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 294 1,159 18 57 31.1% 25.0% 14.3 2.7 167 52
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →