County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — California · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Stockton · Public
109
3
Santa Ana · Public
100
4
Los Angeles · Public
98
5
Santa Cruz · Public
94
6
Los Angeles · Public
90
7
Fresno · Public
87
8
Tustin · Public
87
9
Los Angeles · Public
82
10
San Bernardino · Public
81

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Irvine · Private
161
4
Los Angeles · Private
121
5
Palo Alto · Private
114
6
Dublin · Private
113
7
Pasadena · Private
104
8
Sacramento · Private
93
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Santa Ana · Charter
96
4
Fresno · Public
95
5
San Diego · Public
93
6
La Jolla · Public
86
7
San Jose · Public
86
8
Wilmington · Public
86
9
Cupertino · Public
85
10
Cypress · Public
84

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Pebble Beach · Private
95
8
Irvine · Private
94
9
San Jose · Private
94
10
Oakland · Private
81

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Oceanside · Public
1
3
Fontana · Public
1
4
San Diego · Public
2
5
Waterford · Public
2
6
Mckinleyville · Public
3
7
Nicolaus · Public
3
8
Menifee · Public
3
9
Colusa · Public
3
10
Gridley · Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Redlands · Private
6
3
Ontario · Private
10
4
Long Beach · Private
13
5
Mission Hills · Private
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
14
7
San Diego · Private
14
8
Modesto · Private
14
9
Cerritos · Private
16
10
Santa Maria · Private
17

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Carson · Public
14
6
Newport Coast · Private
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Newport Coast · Private
12
4
San Jose · Private
11
5
Los Angeles · Private
10
6
Santa Ana · Charter
10
7
San Francisco · Private
9
8
La Canada · Private
9
9
Compton · Public
9
10
Claremont · Private
9

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Victorville · Public
20
5
Los Angeles · Public
19
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Los Angeles · Public
18
9
Redwood City · Public
18
10
Newport Coast · Private
18

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
San Jose · Private
30
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Carson · Public
34
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
San Diego · Public
30
6
San Diego · Public
27
7
Fresno · Public
27
8
Cypress · Public
26
9
Irvine · Private
26
10
Santa Ana · Charter
23

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Sacramento · Public
31
3
Wilmington · Public
28
4
Pebble Beach · Private
27
5
Newport Coast · Private
25
6
San Francisco · Public
24
7
Fresno · Public
24
8
Daly City · Public
24
9
San Lorenzo · Public
23
10
Los Angeles · Public
23

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Richmond · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
San Diego · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
9
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
10
Pasadena · Private
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
8
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
8
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
9
avg 23.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
10
avg 44.8 · σ 2.34
σ 2.34

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
100%
4
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
5
Stockton · n=79 · 2025
99%
6
Gilroy · n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
San Francisco · Public
34 '18 → 70 '25 +36.4pp
San Francisco · Public
25 '18 → 61 '25 +35.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -6.9% +154.0pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.6% +121.5pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +19.8% +115.8pp
San Jose · Santa Clara · Public  Watch — engagement
+129.6% vs +17.0% +112.6pp
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+129.2% vs +19.8% +109.4pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Waterford · Stanislaus · Public  Compounding decline
-65.7% vs +2.3% -67.9pp
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Sharp downturn
-52.4% vs +2.5% -54.9pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

913 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.6pp
Palo Cedro · Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.4pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.8pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
Stockton · Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.4pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -9.2pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.6pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -8.0pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -8.0pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,118 schools · 2025 data · Page 5 of 12 (showing 401–500) · 443 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
401
Fort Bragg · Public  Sharp downturn
Mendocino 132 569 26 81 31.8% 11.8% 20.4 107 34
402
Morro Bay · Public  Weak at the gate
San Luis Obispo 171 751 26 91 28.2% 6.8% 19.3 3.5 156 44
403
Fowler · Public  Holding share
Fresno 199 807 26 73 35.2% 17.6% 18.1 6.5 145 51
404
Concord · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 582 2,373 26 122 21.0% 29.5% 20.1 3.4 709 149
405
El Segundo · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 141 550 26 131 19.5% 8.3% 19.1 6.4 185 36
406
Newport Beach · Public  Strong demand
Orange 526 2,084 25 94 27.2% 29.9% 21.9 3.8 493 134
407
Richmond · Public  Strong demand
Contra Costa 130 546 25 103 24.6% 9.1% 16.1 7.7 134 33
408
Pasadena · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 138 1,053 25 115 22.0% 25.7% 18.1 5.1 159 35
409
Bakersfield · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 576 2,398 25 91 27.9% 24.7% 20.7 3.1 523 146
410
Agoura Hills · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 442 1,709 25 130 19.5% 26.8% 19.7 5.2 574 112
411
San Juan Capistrano · Public  Best in class
Orange 703 2,641 25 111 22.9% 25.3% 19.4 2.6 777 178
412
Delhi · Public  Material decline
Merced 162 710 25 90 28.1% 17.1% 16.1 1.9 146 41
413
Temecula · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 733 2,946 25 125 20.2% 33.5% 21.0 3.1 916 185
414
Sylmar · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 341 1,463 25 89 28.2% 24.4% 22.0 5.3 305 86
415
San Leandro · Public  Material decline
Alameda 599 2,510 25 95 26.4% 32.5% 15.7 2.0 571 151
416
Daly City · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 322 1,278 25 119 21.1% 39.5% 15.5 3.7 384 81
417
Cathedral City · Public  Material decline
Riverside 346 1,334 25 76 33.1% 21.8% 20.8 4.3 263 87
418
Novato · Public  Both ends slipping
Marin 350 1,287 25 105 23.9% 26.1% 18.6 5.4 368 88
419
Valencia · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 611 2,286 25 128 19.6% 31.4% 19.6 5.1 781 153
420
Camarillo · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 416 1,969 25 91 27.4% 26.9% 19.0 1.9 380 104
421
Temecula · Public  Holding share
Riverside 683 2,739 25 102 24.5% 29.4% 21.4 3.4 695 170
422
Newark · Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 345 1,367 25 103 24.0% 27.1% 15.9 4.9 354 85
423
Santa Ana · Public  Best in class
Orange 536 2,126 25 108 22.8% 26.5% 18.3 4.5 580 132
424
Anaheim · Private
Orange 187 767 25 157 15.7% 6.5% 18.2 2.1 294 46
425
Hercules · Public  Material decline
Contra Costa 163 767 25 179 13.8% 37.5% 15.9 7.4 291 40
426
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 400 1,724 24 133 18.5% 33.7% 17.8 3.8 531 98
427
San Marcos · Public  Best in class
San Diego 777 3,067 24 116 21.1% 29.5% 19.6 3.2 901 190
428
Vista · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 119 1,355 24 88 27.6% 34.5% 21.0 2.5 105 29
429
San Jose · Public
Santa Clara 107 421 24 94 25.7% 15.4% 19.6 7.5 101 26
430
Salinas · Public  Material decline
Monterey 611 2,380 24 63 38.6% 22.3% 18.3 2.6 383 148
431
Sonoma · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 256 1,071 24 73 33.0% 14.5% 15.6 5.9 188 62
432
Sunnyvale · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 572 2,060 24 156 15.4% 28.3% 19.6 3.5 895 138
433
Long Beach · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 299 1,260 24 105 22.9% 62.5% 20.7 4.3 315 72
434
Lynwood · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 378 1,633 24 82 29.4% 19.8% 21.2 3.4 309 91
435
Ukiah · Public  Strong demand
Mendocino 378 1,767 24 59 40.6% 18.7% 16.7 2.9 224 91
436
Rowland Heights · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 463 2,016 24 125 19.1% 30.6% 18.4 4.1 580 111
437
Huntington Beach · Public  Material decline
Orange 507 1,997 24 94 25.3% 25.0% 19.3 4.3 475 120
438
Hollywood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 140 599 24 119 19.8% 21.2% 17.1 3.6 167 33
439
Thermal · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 433 1,875 24 67 35.2% 20.6% 19.6 3.2 290 102
440
Huntington Park · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 382 1,479 24 94 25.0% 32.2% 19.6 4.2 360 90
441
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 316 1,263 23 68 34.4% 16.2% 19.6 7.0 215 74
442
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 146 616 23 136 17.1% 14.4 2.7 199 34
443
Novato · Public  Demand problem
Marin 305 1,250 23 135 17.2% 15.5% 16.1 3.3 412 71
444
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 537 1,941 23 80 29.2% 22.4% 19.6 4.5 428 125
445
Mission Viejo · Public  Demand problem
Orange 597 2,475 23 101 23.1% 29.5% 18.4 3.5 601 139
446
Baldwin Park · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 393 1,650 23 75 30.9% 19.8% 21.6 4.1 295 91
447
Santa Rosa · Private
Sonoma 108 567 23 150 15.4% 17.6 2.8 162 25
448
Harbor City · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 402 1,549 23 90 25.7% 24.7% 19.6 3.5 362 93
449
Gonzales · Public  Sharp downturn
Monterey 204 751 23 56 41.2% 14.9% 15.7 4.4 114 47
450
Concord · Private
Contra Costa 252 1,025 23 132 17.5% 25.9% 17.9 6.8 332 58
451
Nuevo · Public  Best in class
Riverside 170 667 23 74 31.2% 15.4% 20.6 1.8 125 39
452
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 384 1,582 23 118 19.4% 20.4% 19.8 5.0 453 88
453
Bell · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 441 2,088 23 101 22.8% 22.8% 19.7 4.1 444 101
454
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 140 1,031 23 174 13.2% 34.4% 22.9 8.6 243 32
455
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 425 1,891 23 97 23.4% 32.0% 13.9 3.3 414 97
456
Union City · Public  Material decline
Alameda 832 3,096 23 120 19.0% 34.4% 15.4 3.7 995 189
457
Los Angeles · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 106 431 23 108 20.9% 25.0% 16.0 3.8 115 24
458
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 137 585 23 112 20.1% 14.6 154 31
459
Corona · Public  Demand problem
Riverside 673 2,712 23 86 26.3% 23.0% 20.1 4.5 578 152
460
South San Francisco · Public  Demand problem
San Mateo 271 1,053 23 126 17.8% 29.5% 14.0 3.3 342 61
461
Moreno Valley · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 476 2,101 22 87 26.0% 29.0% 18.7 1.9 412 107
462
El Monte · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 423 1,638 22 84 26.6% 30.5% 20.3 4.0 357 95
463
Granada Hills · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 512 2,152 22 87 26.0% 21.7% 17.8 3.3 443 115
464
La Verne · Private
Los Angeles 156 696 22 154 14.5% 17.1% 16.0 1.9 241 35
465
South Gate · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 499 1,990 22 109 20.7% 29.5% 17.4 3.2 542 112
466
Placentia · Public  Strong demand
Orange 433 1,998 22 103 21.8% 25.8% 18.7 3.7 446 97
467
Whittier · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 256 1,000 22 102 21.8% 19.3% 16.4 4.3 261 57
468
Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 117 474 22 95 23.4% 11.5% 19.7 111 26
469
Perris · Public  Material decline
Riverside 405 1,630 22 79 28.2% 22.2% 19.3 1.5 319 90
470
Felton · Public  Material decline
Santa Cruz 163 578 22 72 30.5% 8.3% 17.8 4.9 118 36
471
San Diego · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 557 2,187 22 99 22.2% 30.9% 19.6 4.5 554 123
472
Chula Vista · Public  Holding share
San Diego 654 2,440 22 109 20.2% 30.6% 18.6 3.2 711 144
473
Fresno · Public  Demand problem
Fresno 518 2,339 22 62 35.3% 23.7% 15.6 5.2 323 114
474
Rancho Cucamonga · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 769 3,221 22 94 23.5% 30.2% 17.6 3.5 719 169
475
Arcata · Public  Demand problem
Humboldt 264 1,007 22 69 31.7% 24.1% 16.7 3.4 183 58
476
San Diego · Public  Demand problem
San Diego 146 535 22 83 26.4% 28.1% 19.2 4.8 121 32
477
Fillmore · Public  Strong demand
Ventura 247 1,007 22 55 39.4% 9.3% 19.4 4.9 137 54
478
Elk Grove · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 613 2,536 22 99 22.0% 37.3% 13.4 1.6 608 134
479
Castroville · Public  Watch — engagement
Monterey 316 1,250 22 62 35.4% 13.0% 15.5 2.9 195 69
480
Covina · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 252 1,056 22 89 24.6% 9.1% 17.9 2.4 224 55
481
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 423 1,568 22 82 26.4% 37.0% 19.4 2.6 348 92
482
Petaluma · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 296 1,193 22 102 21.1% 23.4% 16.6 2.4 303 64
483
Ojai · Public  Material decline
Ventura 153 576 22 95 22.6% 18.2% 15.0 146 33
484
Templeton · Public  Holding share
San Luis Obispo 204 725 22 74 29.3% 11.4% 13.7 1.5 150 44
485
Long Beach · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 823 3,408 22 117 18.4% 23.7% 17.2 5.6 960 177
486
Palmdale · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 251 2,259 22 78 27.6% 29.6% 19.1 4.0 196 54
487
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 294 1,318 21 78 27.6% 31.8% 20.1 7.1 228 63
488
Palm Springs · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 393 1,497 21 74 29.0% 26.2% 18.8 2.3 290 84
489
Chula Vista · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 712 2,557 21 127 16.8% 32.9% 19.4 3.5 904 152
490
Huntington Beach · Public  Best in class
Orange 550 2,049 21 83 25.6% 25.6% 17.4 3.3 457 117
491
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 395 491 21 90 23.7% 29.8% 19.8 4.6 354 84
492
Redwood City · Public  Tracking
San Mateo 475 1,854 21 118 18.0% 16.8% 14.9 5.0 560 101
493
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 273 1,284 21 119 17.8% 22.4% 16.5 4.4 326 58
494
Roseville · Public  Strong demand
Placer 440 2,079 21 95 22.3% 22.6% 13.6 2.5 417 93
495
Fremont · Public  Material decline
Alameda 336 1,273 21 117 18.1% 25.4% 13.7 2.7 393 71
496
Westminster · Public  Demand problem
Orange 644 2,529 21 95 22.2% 28.7% 19.1 3.7 613 136
497
Carson · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 320 1,407 21 91 22.9% 25.4% 18.1 5.3 292 67
498
Fullerton · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 441 1,880 21 59 35.1% 20.6% 16.6 3.2 262 92
499
Chula Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 446 1,771 21 62 33.6% 32.3% 17.3 3.1 277 93
500
Ventura · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 457 1,939 21 79 26.4% 16.8% 15.3 4.4 360 95
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →

Related reading

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next