County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — California · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Stockton · Public
109
3
Santa Ana · Public
100
4
Los Angeles · Public
98
5
Santa Cruz · Public
94
6
Los Angeles · Public
90
7
Fresno · Public
87
8
Tustin · Public
87
9
Los Angeles · Public
82
10
San Bernardino · Public
81

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Irvine · Private
161
4
Los Angeles · Private
121
5
Palo Alto · Private
114
6
Dublin · Private
113
7
Pasadena · Private
104
8
Sacramento · Private
93
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Santa Ana · Charter
96
4
Fresno · Public
95
5
San Diego · Public
93
6
La Jolla · Public
86
7
San Jose · Public
86
8
Wilmington · Public
86
9
Cupertino · Public
85
10
Cypress · Public
84

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Pebble Beach · Private
95
8
Irvine · Private
94
9
San Jose · Private
94
10
Oakland · Private
81

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Oceanside · Public
1
3
Fontana · Public
1
4
San Diego · Public
2
5
Waterford · Public
2
6
Mckinleyville · Public
3
7
Nicolaus · Public
3
8
Menifee · Public
3
9
Colusa · Public
3
10
Gridley · Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Redlands · Private
6
3
Ontario · Private
10
4
Long Beach · Private
13
5
Mission Hills · Private
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
14
7
San Diego · Private
14
8
Modesto · Private
14
9
Cerritos · Private
16
10
Santa Maria · Private
17

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Carson · Public
14
6
Newport Coast · Private
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Newport Coast · Private
12
4
San Jose · Private
11
5
Los Angeles · Private
10
6
Santa Ana · Charter
10
7
San Francisco · Private
9
8
La Canada · Private
9
9
Compton · Public
9
10
Claremont · Private
9

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Victorville · Public
20
5
Los Angeles · Public
19
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Los Angeles · Public
18
9
Redwood City · Public
18
10
Newport Coast · Private
18

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
San Jose · Private
30
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Carson · Public
34
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
San Diego · Public
30
6
San Diego · Public
27
7
Fresno · Public
27
8
Cypress · Public
26
9
Irvine · Private
26
10
Santa Ana · Charter
23

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Sacramento · Public
31
3
Wilmington · Public
28
4
Pebble Beach · Private
27
5
Newport Coast · Private
25
6
San Francisco · Public
24
7
Fresno · Public
24
8
Daly City · Public
24
9
San Lorenzo · Public
23
10
Los Angeles · Public
23

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Richmond · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
San Diego · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
9
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
10
Pasadena · Private
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
8
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
8
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
9
avg 23.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
10
avg 44.8 · σ 2.34
σ 2.34

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
100%
4
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
5
Stockton · n=79 · 2025
99%
6
Gilroy · n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
San Francisco · Public
34 '18 → 70 '25 +36.4pp
San Francisco · Public
25 '18 → 61 '25 +35.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -6.9% +154.0pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.6% +121.5pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +19.8% +115.8pp
San Jose · Santa Clara · Public  Watch — engagement
+129.6% vs +17.0% +112.6pp
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+129.2% vs +19.8% +109.4pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Waterford · Stanislaus · Public  Compounding decline
-65.7% vs +2.3% -67.9pp
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Sharp downturn
-52.4% vs +2.5% -54.9pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

913 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.6pp
Palo Cedro · Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.4pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.8pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
Stockton · Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.4pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -9.2pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.6pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -8.0pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -8.0pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,118 schools · 2025 data · Page 4 of 12 (showing 301–400) · 443 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
301
Los Angeles · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 498 2,055 31 120 25.6% 15.0% 25.5 8.6 598 153
302
Downey · Private
Los Angeles 111 591 31 153 20.0% 27.0 6.3 170 34
303
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 180 694 31 94 32.4% 16.4% 24.4 6.7 170 55
304
Cypress · Public  Best in class
Orange 682 2,685 30 145 21.0% 33.6% 25.2 4.2 991 208
305
Kentfield · Private
Marin 191 718 30 185 16.4% 27.6% 20.4 5.2 354 58
306
Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 392 1,497 30 172 17.7% 29.4% 25.8 6.1 674 119
307
San Jose · Public  Demand problem
Santa Clara 379 1,543 30 123 24.6% 30.4% 22.2 5.0 468 115
308
Chula Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 578 2,289 30 129 23.4% 29.1% 25.4 3.1 748 175
309
Morgan Hill · Public  Tracking
Santa Clara 377 1,511 30 142 21.3% 33.3% 22.0 3.7 536 114
310
Atherton · Public  Strong demand
San Mateo 571 2,158 30 180 16.8% 25.6% 21.5 6.7 1,025 172
311
Los Angeles · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 127 546 30 123 24.4% 27.6 5.5 156 38
312
San Anselmo · Public  Best in class
Marin 288 1,141 30 175 17.0% 32.6% 19.8 5.9 505 86
313
Pleasant Hill · Public  Demand problem
Contra Costa 477 1,948 30 127 23.5% 29.6% 19.7 4.0 605 142
314
San Lorenzo · Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 373 1,499 30 118 25.3% 34.2% 19.3 4.0 439 111
315
Sacramento · Private
Sacramento 236 1,132 30 134 22.1% 31.4% 19.9 5.1 316 70
316
Half Moon Bay · Public  Tracking
San Mateo 233 911 30 112 26.4% 18.8% 21.5 5.2 261 69
317
Antioch · Public  Holding share
Contra Costa 156 681 29 96 30.7% 17.4% 17.9 7.0 150 46
318
Chula Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 489 1,960 29 114 25.8% 34.7% 25.1 5.1 558 144
319
Reseda · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 333 1,339 29 92 31.9% 22.4% 24.0 5.4 307 98
320
Lawndale · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 415 1,403 29 97 30.2% 27.1% 26.8 5.1 404 122
321
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 143 629 29 126 23.3% 38.1% 14.7 7.7 180 42
322
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 167 589 29 102 28.8% 16.3% 23.9 7.2 170 49
323
La Canada · Private
Los Angeles 150 623 29 209 14.1% 22.7% 22.7 7.3 313 44
324
Lake Balboa · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 713 3,162 29 130 22.6% 27.3% 22.7 5.6 925 209
325
Chino Hills · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 744 2,748 29 131 22.4% 32.6% 23.2 4.3 972 218
326
Coronado · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 263 999 29 144 20.4% 23.4% 19.0 5.7 378 77
327
Milpitas · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Clara 694 2,926 29 193 15.2% 34.0% 20.6 5.2 1,338 203
328
Huntington Park · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 113 565 29 151 19.3% 15.2% 29.2 8.0 171 33
329
Carson · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 120 474 29 113 25.7% 22.9% 26.7 8.3 136 35
330
Santa Ana · Public  Sharp downturn
Orange 415 1,687 29 101 28.8% 28.1% 23.6 3.6 420 121
331
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 127 1,850 29 111 26.2% 37.8% 18.9 3.1 141 37
332
Palm Desert · Public  Best in class
Riverside 468 2,079 29 96 30.2% 19.1% 23.7 4.3 450 136
333
Salinas · Public  Strong demand
Monterey 369 1,600 29 92 31.4% 14.9% 21.4 7.3 341 107
334
Chatsworth · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 429 1,743 29 97 29.7% 20.2% 22.1 5.8 418 124
335
Anaheim · Public  Best in class
Orange 520 2,183 29 179 16.1% 34.0% 25.0 4.8 931 150
336
Torrance · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 430 1,812 29 108 26.7% 27.4% 22.6 4.7 465 124
337
Torrance · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 452 1,879 29 124 23.3% 33.9% 22.6 4.4 559 130
338
Tracy · Public  Weak at the gate
San Joaquin 400 1,587 29 106 27.1% 27.8% 18.0 2.8 425 115
339
Campbell · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 407 1,682 29 162 17.7% 30.8% 21.9 3.0 661 117
340
Van Nuys · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 515 1,969 29 115 25.1% 29.1% 23.9 6.6 590 148
341
Carson · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 105 438 29 96 29.7% 10.0% 20.9 2.9 101 30
342
Sacramento · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 508 2,194 29 95 30.0% 26.9% 17.9 4.1 484 145
343
Santa Rosa · Public  Best in class
Sonoma 372 1,584 28 99 28.7% 15.1% 21.0 3.8 369 106
344
Laguna Hills · Public  Demand problem
Orange 330 1,317 28 99 28.8% 18.1% 24.2 4.5 327 94
345
Aptos · Public  Demand problem
Santa Cruz 292 1,274 28 114 25.0% 33.7% 19.2 4.5 332 83
346
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 268 1,130 28 127 22.4% 30.3% 22.8 4.5 340 76
347
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 113 484 28 198 14.3% 9.4% 20.4 8.0 224 32
348
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 378 1,495 28 105 26.9% 26.2% 22.2 6.3 397 107
349
Fountain Valley · Public  Weak at the gate
Orange 803 3,171 28 143 19.8% 36.1% 23.4 4.2 1,145 227
350
La Puente · Private
Los Angeles 223 977 28 120 23.5% 22.2% 22.4 4.9 268 63
351
Santa Cruz · Public  Tracking
Santa Cruz 223 1,013 28 84 33.5% 12.7% 21.1 4.5 188 63
352
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 117 598 28 128 22.0% 27.3% 24.8 8.6 150 33
353
San Jose · Public  Sharp downturn
Santa Clara 536 2,139 28 150 18.8% 30.5% 19.2 5.0 803 151
354
Los Angeles · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 531 2,237 28 118 23.8% 28.9% 25.2 5.1 627 149
355
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 139 515 28 161 17.4% 7.7% 19.4 7.2 224 39
356
Fullerton · Private
Orange 107 462 28 124 22.6% 10.0% 20.6 133 30
357
Poway · Public  Holding share
San Diego 550 2,101 28 102 27.5% 31.8% 20.7 2.7 560 154
358
Los Angeles · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 418 1,842 28 155 18.0% 25.6% 23.4 6.5 649 117
359
Oceanside · Public  Best in class
San Diego 398 1,670 28 130 21.5% 35.1% 20.6 3.3 517 111
360
Reseda · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 567 2,719 28 122 22.8% 24.7% 19.4 5.8 693 158
361
Placentia · Public  Tracking
Orange 618 2,411 28 132 21.0% 27.3% 20.7 4.0 818 172
362
South Gate · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 101 867 28 95 29.2% 10.7% 27.7 6.9 96 28
363
Soquel · Public  Best in class
Santa Cruz 264 1,074 28 123 22.5% 20.6% 19.7 4.5 325 73
364
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 596 2,569 28 89 30.9% 27.4% 19.3 3.9 531 164
365
Hawthorne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 131 552 27 178 15.4% 11.1% 19.9 5.3 233 36
366
Santa Barbara · Public  Material decline
Santa Barbara 557 1,924 27 113 24.4% 26.1% 18.9 4.5 628 153
367
San Jose · Public  Holding share
Santa Clara 539 2,134 27 123 22.4% 24.3% 20.2 4.3 661 148
368
Alameda · Public  Material decline
Alameda 230 1,280 27 155 17.7% 23.8% 17.4 4.3 356 63
369
Rancho Cucamonga · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 698 2,759 27 129 21.2% 27.8% 22.5 4.6 899 191
370
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 117 512 27 115 23.7% 9.4% 19.7 2.6 135 32
371
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 601 2,485 27 128 21.3% 26.8% 20.1 2.8 771 164
372
Pasadena · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 339 1,303 27 130 20.9% 15.2% 21.5 7.7 440 92
373
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 258 1,001 27 90 30.0% 21.4% 20.2 5.0 233 70
374
Sun Valley · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 118 1,100 27 140 19.4% 12.5% 21.2 4.2 165 32
375
Inglewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 144 588 27 165 16.4% 20.5% 18.1 2.1 238 39
376
Garden Grove · Public  Material decline
Orange 425 1,701 27 117 23.1% 34.8% 24.2 4.5 497 115
377
Porterville · Public  Sharp downturn
Tulare 115 509 27 74 36.5% 20.0 4.3 85 31
378
La Mesa · Public  Best in class
San Diego 621 2,554 27 127 21.1% 31.7% 19.6 3.4 791 167
379
Benicia · Public  Sharp downturn
Solano 317 1,335 27 117 22.9% 28.2% 17.7 4.1 371 85
380
Elk Grove · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 675 2,650 27 129 20.8% 38.7% 17.0 3.7 870 181
381
Huntington Beach · Public  Tracking
Orange 698 2,645 27 119 22.4% 34.2% 22.4 5.3 834 187
382
Oakland · Public  Strong demand
Alameda 112 828 27 133 20.1% 17.0 5.4 149 30
383
Panorama City · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 492 27 180 14.8% 10.0% 21.4 2.7 202 30
384
Rocklin · Public  Holding share
Placer 449 2,041 27 118 22.7% 30.8% 18.0 4.0 529 120
385
Newbury Park · Public  Weak at the gate
Ventura 539 2,047 27 111 24.2% 24.3% 21.1 4.6 596 144
386
Long Beach · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 992 3,890 27 101 26.5% 24.1% 22.1 6.2 1,000 265
387
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 139 1,862 27 110 24.2% 24.3% 24.5 2.9 153 37
388
Livermore · Public  Best in class
Alameda 568 2,156 27 123 21.7% 26.5% 20.4 4.0 697 151
389
La Verne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 467 1,911 27 87 30.6% 27.4% 22.3 4.3 405 124
390
Van Nuys · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 136 1,229 26 99 26.7% 8.3% 22.8 5.2 135 36
391
Danville · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 510 2,036 26 137 19.3% 33.3% 19.6 7.2 700 135
392
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 121 494 26 126 20.9% 15.6% 21.5 7.4 153 32
393
Venice · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 110 335 26 130 20.3% 22.7 9.1 143 29
394
Carlsbad · Public  Best in class
San Diego 573 2,336 26 94 27.9% 26.5% 20.4 4.2 541 151
395
San Bernardino · Private
San Bernardino 137 645 26 130 20.2% 25.0% 23.4 2.2 178 36
396
Colfax · Public  Material decline
Placer 138 611 26 60 43.4% 11.1% 18.8 6.5 83 36
397
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 265 1,240 26 129 20.1% 21.7% 16.6 4.5 343 69
398
Modesto · Public  Weak at the gate
Stanislaus 591 2,304 26 81 32.1% 22.9% 17.9 3.0 477 153
399
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 480 1,602 26 102 25.2% 33.1% 20.6 4.4 492 124
400
Van Nuys · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 426 1,774 26 94 27.4% 23.6% 21.6 4.5 402 110
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →

Related reading

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next