County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

816 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp
Folsom · Public
3.84 13.7% -7.5pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

992 schools · 2025 data · Page 4 of 10 (showing 301–400) · 572 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
301
Hawthorne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 131 552 27 178 15.4% 11.1% 19.9 5.3 233 36
302
San Jose · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 539 2,134 27 123 22.4% 24.3% 20.2 4.3 661 148
303
Rancho Cucamonga · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 698 2,759 27 129 21.2% 27.8% 22.5 4.6 899 191
304
· Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 136 797 27 215 12.6% 35.1% 24.3 4.4 293 37
305
Pasadena · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 339 1,303 27 130 20.9% 15.2% 21.5 7.7 440 92
306
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 258 1,001 27 90 30.0% 21.4% 20.2 5.0 233 70
307
Garden Grove · Public  Demand problem
Orange 425 1,701 27 117 23.1% 34.8% 24.2 4.5 497 115
308
Porterville · Public  Sharp downturn
Tulare 115 509 27 74 36.5% 20.0 4.3 85 31
309
La Mesa · Public  Best in class
San Diego 621 2,554 27 127 21.1% 31.7% 19.6 3.4 791 167
310
Benicia · Public  Sharp downturn
Solano 317 1,335 27 117 22.9% 28.2% 17.7 4.1 371 85
311
Elk Grove · Public  Holding share
Sacramento 675 2,650 27 129 20.8% 38.7% 17.0 3.7 870 181
312
Huntington Beach · Public  Tracking
Orange 698 2,645 27 119 22.4% 34.2% 22.4 5.3 834 187
313
Oakland · Public  Strong demand
Alameda 112 828 27 133 20.1% 17.0 5.4 149 30
314
Panorama City · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 492 27 180 14.8% 10.0% 21.4 2.7 202 30
315
Rocklin · Public  Holding share
Placer 449 2,041 27 118 22.7% 30.8% 18.0 4.0 529 120
316
Newbury Park · Public  Weak at the gate
Ventura 539 2,047 27 111 24.2% 24.3% 21.1 4.6 596 144
317
Long Beach · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 992 3,890 27 101 26.5% 24.1% 22.1 6.2 1,000 265
318
Livermore · Public  Best in class
Alameda 568 2,156 27 123 21.7% 26.5% 20.4 4.0 697 151
319
La Verne · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 467 1,911 27 87 30.6% 27.4% 22.3 4.3 405 124
320
Danville · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 510 2,036 26 137 19.3% 33.3% 19.6 7.2 700 135
321
Venice · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 110 335 26 130 20.3% 22.7 9.1 143 29
322
Carlsbad · Public  Best in class
San Diego 573 2,336 26 94 27.9% 26.5% 20.4 4.2 541 151
323
San Bernardino · Private
San Bernardino 137 645 26 130 20.2% 25.0% 23.4 2.2 178 36
324
Colfax · Public  Material decline
Placer 138 611 26 60 43.4% 11.1% 18.8 6.5 83 36
325
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 265 1,240 26 129 20.1% 21.7% 16.6 4.5 343 69
326
Modesto · Public  Weak at the gate
Stanislaus 591 2,304 26 81 32.1% 22.9% 17.9 3.0 477 153
327
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 480 1,602 26 102 25.2% 33.1% 20.6 4.4 492 124
328
Van Nuys · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 426 1,774 26 94 27.4% 23.6% 21.6 4.5 402 110
329
Fort Bragg · Public  Sharp downturn
Mendocino 132 569 26 81 31.8% 11.8% 20.4 107 34
330
Morro Bay · Public  Weak at the gate
San Luis Obispo 171 751 26 91 28.2% 6.8% 19.3 3.5 156 44
331
Fowler · Public  Holding share
Fresno 199 807 26 73 35.2% 17.6% 18.1 6.5 145 51
332
· Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 582 2,373 26 122 21.0% 29.5% 20.1 3.4 709 149
333
El Segundo · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 141 550 26 131 19.5% 8.3% 19.1 6.4 185 36
334
Newport Beach · Public  Strong demand
Orange 526 2,084 25 94 27.2% 29.9% 21.9 3.8 493 134
335
Pasadena · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 138 1,053 25 115 22.0% 25.7% 18.1 5.1 159 35
336
Bakersfield · Public  Weak at the gate
Kern 576 2,398 25 91 27.9% 24.7% 20.7 3.1 523 146
337
Agoura Hills · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 442 1,709 25 130 19.5% 26.8% 19.7 5.2 574 112
338
San Juan Capistrano · Public  Best in class
Orange 703 2,641 25 111 22.9% 25.3% 19.4 2.6 777 178
339
Delhi · Public  Material decline
Merced 162 710 25 90 28.1% 17.1% 16.1 1.9 146 41
340
Temecula · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 733 2,946 25 125 20.2% 33.5% 21.0 3.1 916 185
341
San Leandro · Public  Demand problem
Alameda 599 2,510 25 95 26.4% 32.5% 15.7 2.0 571 151
342
Daly City · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 322 1,278 25 119 21.1% 39.5% 15.5 3.7 384 81
343
Cathedral City · Public  Material decline
Riverside 346 1,334 25 76 33.1% 21.8% 20.8 4.3 263 87
344
Novato · Public  Both ends slipping
Marin 350 1,287 25 105 23.9% 26.1% 18.6 5.4 368 88
345
· Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 611 2,286 25 128 19.6% 31.4% 19.6 5.1 781 153
346
Camarillo · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 416 1,969 25 91 27.4% 26.9% 19.0 1.9 380 104
347
Temecula · Public  Holding share
Riverside 683 2,739 25 102 24.5% 29.4% 21.4 3.4 695 170
348
Newark · Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 345 1,367 25 103 24.0% 27.1% 15.9 4.9 354 85
349
· Public  Best in class
Orange 536 2,126 25 108 22.8% 26.5% 18.3 4.5 580 132
350
Anaheim · Private
Orange 187 767 25 157 15.7% 6.5% 18.2 2.1 294 46
351
Hercules · Public  Material decline
Contra Costa 163 767 25 179 13.8% 37.5% 15.9 7.4 291 40
352
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 400 1,724 24 133 18.5% 33.7% 17.8 3.8 531 98
353
San Marcos · Public  Best in class
San Diego 777 3,067 24 116 21.1% 29.5% 19.6 3.2 901 190
354
San Jose · Public
Santa Clara 107 421 24 94 25.7% 15.4% 19.6 7.5 101 26
355
Salinas · Public  Material decline
Monterey 611 2,380 24 63 38.6% 22.3% 18.3 2.6 383 148
356
Sonoma · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 256 1,071 24 73 33.0% 14.5% 15.6 5.9 188 62
357
· Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 572 2,060 24 156 15.4% 28.3% 19.6 3.5 895 138
358
Long Beach · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 299 1,260 24 105 22.9% 62.5% 20.7 4.3 315 72
359
Lynwood · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 378 1,633 24 82 29.4% 19.8% 21.2 3.4 309 91
360
Ukiah · Public  Strong demand
Mendocino 378 1,767 24 59 40.6% 18.7% 16.7 2.9 224 91
361
Rowland Heights · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 463 2,016 24 125 19.1% 30.6% 18.4 4.1 580 111
362
Huntington Beach · Public  Material decline
Orange 507 1,997 24 94 25.3% 25.0% 19.3 4.3 475 120
363
Thermal · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 433 1,875 24 67 35.2% 20.6% 19.6 3.2 290 102
364
Huntington Park · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 382 1,479 24 94 25.0% 32.2% 19.6 4.2 360 90
365
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 316 1,263 23 68 34.4% 16.2% 19.6 7.0 215 74
366
Novato · Public  Demand problem
Marin 305 1,250 23 135 17.2% 15.5% 16.1 3.3 412 71
367
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 537 1,941 23 80 29.2% 22.4% 19.6 4.5 428 125
368
Mission Viejo · Public  Demand problem
Orange 597 2,475 23 101 23.1% 29.5% 18.4 3.5 601 139
369
Baldwin Park · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 393 1,650 23 75 30.9% 19.8% 21.6 4.1 295 91
370
Santa Rosa · Private
Sonoma 108 567 23 150 15.4% 17.6 2.8 162 25
371
· Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 402 1,549 23 90 25.7% 24.7% 19.6 3.5 362 93
372
Gonzales · Public  Sharp downturn
Monterey 204 751 23 56 41.2% 14.9% 15.7 4.4 114 47
373
Concord · Private
Contra Costa 252 1,025 23 132 17.5% 25.9% 17.9 6.8 332 58
374
Nuevo · Public  Best in class
Riverside 170 667 23 74 31.2% 15.4% 20.6 1.8 125 39
375
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 384 1,582 23 118 19.4% 20.4% 19.8 5.0 453 88
376
Bell · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 441 2,088 23 101 22.8% 22.8% 19.7 4.1 444 101
377
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 425 1,891 23 97 23.4% 32.0% 13.9 3.3 414 97
378
Union City · Public  Material decline
Alameda 832 3,096 23 120 19.0% 34.4% 15.4 3.7 995 189
379
Los Angeles · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 106 431 23 108 20.9% 25.0% 16.0 3.8 115 24
380
· Public  Demand problem
Riverside 673 2,712 23 86 26.3% 23.0% 20.1 4.5 578 152
381
South San Francisco · Public  Demand problem
San Mateo 271 1,053 23 126 17.8% 29.5% 14.0 3.3 342 61
382
Moreno Valley · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 476 2,101 22 87 26.0% 29.0% 18.7 1.9 412 107
383
El Monte · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 423 1,638 22 84 26.6% 30.5% 20.3 4.0 357 95
384
· Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 512 2,152 22 87 26.0% 21.7% 17.8 3.3 443 115
385
La Verne · Private
Los Angeles 156 696 22 154 14.5% 17.1% 16.0 1.9 241 35
386
South Gate · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 499 1,990 22 109 20.7% 29.5% 17.4 3.2 542 112
387
Placentia · Public  Strong demand
Orange 433 1,998 22 103 21.8% 25.8% 18.7 3.7 446 97
388
· Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 256 1,000 22 102 21.8% 19.3% 16.4 4.3 261 57
389
Perris · Public  Material decline
Riverside 405 1,630 22 79 28.2% 22.2% 19.3 1.5 319 90
390
Felton · Public  Material decline
Santa Cruz 163 578 22 72 30.5% 8.3% 17.8 4.9 118 36
391
San Diego · Public  Strong demand
San Diego 557 2,187 22 99 22.2% 30.9% 19.6 4.5 554 123
392
Chula Vista · Public  Holding share
San Diego 654 2,440 22 109 20.2% 30.6% 18.6 3.2 711 144
393
Fresno · Public  Demand problem
Fresno 518 2,339 22 62 35.3% 23.7% 15.6 5.2 323 114
394
Rancho Cucamonga · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 769 3,221 22 94 23.5% 30.2% 17.6 3.5 719 169
395
Arcata · Public  Demand problem
Humboldt 264 1,007 22 69 31.7% 24.1% 16.7 3.4 183 58
396
Fillmore · Public  Strong demand
Ventura 247 1,007 22 55 39.4% 9.3% 19.4 4.9 137 54
397
Elk Grove · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 613 2,536 22 99 22.0% 37.3% 13.4 1.6 608 134
398
Castroville · Public  Watch — engagement
Monterey 316 1,250 22 62 35.4% 13.0% 15.5 2.9 195 69
399
Covina · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 252 1,056 22 89 24.6% 9.1% 17.9 2.4 224 55
400
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 423 1,568 22 82 26.4% 37.0% 19.4 2.6 348 92
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →