County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

816 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp
Folsom · Public
3.84 13.7% -7.5pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

992 schools · 2025 data · Page 6 of 10 (showing 501–600) · 572 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
501
Fresno · Public  Watch — engagement
Fresno 651 2,858 18 61 29.0% 18.3% 12.1 2.0 396 115
502
West Covina · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 437 1,756 18 93 18.9% 31.2% 13.0 1.8 407 77
503
Ojai · Private
Ventura 602 3,535 18 54 32.5% 10.4% 13.5 2.8 326 106
504
San Bernardino · Public  Material decline
San Bernardino 301 1,431 18 54 32.3% 5.7% 15.3 3.3 164 53
505
· Public  Compounding decline
Santa Clara 375 1,590 18 78 22.7% 28.8% 11.7 3.5 291 66
506
Folsom · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 739 2,901 18 129 13.7% 40.0% 11.4 2.2 951 130
507
Murrieta · Public  Best in class
Riverside 803 3,328 18 66 26.4% 36.9% 15.8 2.0 534 141
508
Azusa · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 422 1,609 18 60 29.0% 23.0% 15.9 3.1 255 74
509
Duarte · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 206 756 17 75 23.2% 16.7% 15.1 1.9 155 36
510
Murrieta · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 515 2,104 17 59 29.8% 23.3% 13.2 2.5 302 90
511
Pasadena · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 269 1,206 17 79 22.2% 17.0% 13.8 4.5 212 47
512
El Cajon · Public  Material decline
San Diego 464 1,728 17 69 25.4% 34.6% 14.9 3.5 319 81
513
Maywood · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 242 1,012 17 68 25.4% 14.3% 14.1 1.2 165 42
514
Elk Grove · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 595 2,263 17 90 19.2% 39.8% 8.6 1.0 535 103
515
Montebello · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 549 2,121 17 67 26.0% 23.2% 14.8 2.9 366 95
516
Whittier · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 406 1,652 17 87 19.8% 20.0% 13.6 1.2 354 70
517
Tujunga · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 267 1,195 17 86 20.0% 10.9% 14.6 4.5 230 46
518
Indio · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 482 1,962 17 55 31.6% 20.5% 16.2 2.5 263 83
519
Tahoe City · Public  Best in class
Placer 128 468 17 95 18.0% 12.5 2.3 122 22
520
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 210 738 17 69 25.0% 16.7% 14.8 3.3 144 36
521
Chula Vista · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 333 1,363 17 53 32.6% 21.1% 13.8 2.4 175 57
522
Fountain Valley · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 375 1,430 17 71 24.1% 26.6% 15.2 3.2 266 64
523
Madera · Public  Strong demand
Madera 511 2,017 17 59 28.8% 18.4% 11.2 2.9 302 87
524
San Jose · Public  Compounding decline
Santa Clara 600 2,289 17 76 22.3% 24.5% 9.7 1.8 457 102
525
Glendora · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 521 2,069 17 94 18.0% 33.0% 12.9 2.5 488 88
526
Reedley · Public  Best in class
Fresno 393 1,804 17 55 30.7% 15.2% 13.2 2.0 215 66
527
Fontana · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 462 1,660 17 70 23.8% 15.6% 13.2 2.8 324 77
528
Whittier · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 554 2,372 17 96 17.2% 26.1% 13.7 2.9 534 92
529
Moreno Valley · Public  Both ends slipping
Riverside 495 2,251 17 74 22.4% 12.2% 14.9 2.0 366 82
530
Tracy · Public  Material decline
San Joaquin 537 1,920 17 50 32.8% 29.2% 11.6 1.1 271 89
531
Petaluma · Public  Strong demand
Sonoma 401 1,653 16 66 25.1% 27.3% 10.5 2.0 263 66
532
· Public  Demand problem
Tulare 275 1,206 16 51 32.1% 20.0% 13.4 3.6 140 45
533
· Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 523 2,046 16 54 30.1% 23.5% 12.8 2.3 282 85
534
Cudahy · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 142 1,257 16 84 19.3% 13.4 2.1 119 23
535
· Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 105 1,489 16 61 26.6% 16.2 2.9 64 17
536
Quartz Hill · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 822 3,175 16 67 24.1% 27.1% 12.7 2.5 551 133
537
Thermal · Public  Sharp downturn
Riverside 557 2,300 16 60 26.7% 34.4% 13.6 2.1 337 90
538
Norwalk · Public
Los Angeles 198 882 16 64 25.4% 13.1 1.5 126 32
539
Tustin · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 458 1,627 16 69 23.5% 28.4% 13.3 1.3 315 74
540
Cerritos · Private
Los Angeles 137 527 16 88 18.2% 13.6% 13.9 2.9 121 22
541
Buena Park · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 424 1,682 16 61 26.5% 13.2% 14.9 3.3 257 68
542
El Monte · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 368 1,383 16 74 21.6% 28.8% 14.4 3.0 273 59
543
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 131 555 16 106 15.1% 28.6% 10.7 2.3 139 21
544
Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 495 1,949 16 65 24.4% 22.8% 13.3 1.4 324 79
545
Cerritos · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 395 1,739 16 52 30.4% 36.5% 11.4 1.5 207 63
546
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 138 564 16 88 18.0% 11.6 122 22
547
· Public  Best in class
Riverside 541 2,142 16 74 21.5% 25.6% 13.3 2.4 400 86
548
Desert Hot Springs · Public  Both ends slipping
Riverside 403 1,687 16 49 32.6% 18.8% 12.4 2.5 196 64
549
Corcoran · Public  Strong demand
Kings 208 931 16 45 35.5% 15.2% 13.5 5.8 93 33
550
San Bernardino · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 435 1,810 16 83 19.1% 11.6% 14.0 2.5 362 69
551
Escondido · Public  Best in class
San Diego 248 932 16 78 20.2% 10.3% 12.1 1.2 193 39
552
Roseville · Public  Compounding decline
Placer 356 1,290 16 59 26.5% 35.7% 10.1 2.8 211 56
553
· Public  Demand hides churn
Sacramento 446 1,987 16 44 36.1% 8.6% 9.9 3.6 194 70
554
Lynwood · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 448 1,858 16 70 22.3% 18.6% 12.9 1.3 314 70
555
Covina · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 314 1,247 16 63 24.9% 12.2% 12.4 2.2 197 49
556
South Gate · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 405 1,681 16 87 17.9% 19.1% 13.6 4.2 351 63
557
Turlock · Public  Holding share
Stanislaus 476 1,986 16 57 27.3% 31.1% 10.9 2.1 271 74
558
Napa · Public  Material decline
Napa 393 1,622 16 56 27.6% 31.1% 7.6 2.5 221 61
559
La Puente · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 374 1,535 16 90 17.2% 36.2% 14.4 2.4 338 58
560
Moreno Valley · Public  Tracking
Riverside 646 2,699 15 57 26.9% 22.0% 13.8 1.9 371 100
561
Loomis · Public  Material decline
Placer 390 1,634 15 61 25.4% 16.7% 11.5 3.6 236 60
562
Etiwanda · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 852 3,446 15 65 23.5% 35.9% 13.7 1.8 557 131
563
Pittsburg · Public  Demand hides churn
Contra Costa 803 3,403 15 57 27.0% 30.9% 11.0 2.5 456 123
564
Saugus · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 537 2,317 15 78 19.5% 30.5% 12.1 2.6 420 82
565
Covina · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 295 1,259 15 57 26.6% 24.4% 12.2 2.4 169 45
566
Mission Viejo · Public  Material decline
Orange 394 1,566 15 88 17.3% 23.3% 11.7 2.5 347 60
567
Newman · Public  Strong demand
Stanislaus 230 925 15 53 28.9% 34.3% 9.6 121 35
568
· Public  Best in class
Tulare 519 2,490 15 60 25.2% 22.8% 10.6 2.7 314 79
569
· Public  Watch — engagement
Merced 434 1,917 15 47 32.5% 16.7% 9.9 2.1 203 66
570
· Public  Material decline
San Diego 664 2,290 15 69 22.2% 34.6% 13.9 2.3 455 101
571
Santa Ana · Public  Strong demand
Orange 337 1,451 15 61 25.0% 21.6% 12.8 1.8 204 51
572
La Puente · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 205 813 15 68 22.3% 22.6% 11.7 1.5 139 31
573
Palmdale · Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 582 2,349 15 61 24.7% 35.2% 12.0 1.7 356 88
574
Pomona · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 246 993 15 49 30.8% 32.4% 12.2 1.2 120 37
575
Hawthorne · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 426 1,675 15 75 20.0% 20.3% 12.4 1.4 320 64
576
Montebello · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 493 1,907 15 55 27.5% 20.3% 13.0 2.6 269 74
577
Santa Maria · Public  Strong demand
Santa Barbara 793 3,143 15 60 25.1% 28.6% 10.1 1.5 474 119
578
Santa Maria · Public  Strong demand
Santa Barbara 760 3,080 15 53 28.1% 21.1% 11.1 2.2 405 114
579
Bellflower · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 341 1,997 15 67 22.3% 15.7% 12.0 2.4 229 51
580
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 623 2,368 15 63 23.6% 35.5% 8.8 0.6 394 93
581
Inglewood · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 114 407 15 73 20.5% 11.4 2.6 83 17
582
Sanger · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 631 2,426 15 35 42.1% 24.5% 10.9 1.7 223 94
583
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 289 1,159 15 53 28.1% 18.6% 14.9 1.4 153 43
584
Madera · Public  Material decline
Madera 390 1,869 15 46 32.0% 24.1% 11.3 2.6 181 58
585
Lincoln · Public  Best in class
Placer 291 1,317 15 45 32.6% 39.5% 7.6 132 43
586
· Public  Demand hides churn
Orange 454 1,908 15 53 27.9% 20.9% 12.8 2.0 240 67
587
Elk Grove · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 556 2,142 15 68 21.8% 29.3% 9.2 1.6 377 82
588
Santa Fe Springs · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 523 1,865 15 67 21.9% 31.2% 13.6 1.9 351 77
589
Chino · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 449 2,077 15 55 26.5% 10.6% 13.6 1.8 249 66
590
Tulare · Public  Sharp downturn
Tulare 483 1,927 15 40 37.0% 9.9% 12.4 1.2 192 71
591
Spring Valley · Public  Best in class
San Diego 525 2,198 15 85 17.3% 31.2% 10.7 1.9 446 77
592
Santee · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 396 1,624 15 51 28.7% 31.0% 12.6 2.8 202 58
593
Fresno · Public  Holding share
Fresno 514 2,184 15 68 21.6% 20.0% 12.7 2.3 348 75
594
Corona · Public  Material decline
Riverside 576 2,307 15 60 24.4% 25.0% 13.7 1.9 344 84
595
Fontana · Public  Best in class
San Bernardino 634 2,725 15 52 27.7% 26.1% 13.4 1.6 332 92
596
Imperial Beach · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 290 1,216 14 66 21.9% 16.7% 12.1 1.0 192 42
597
Costa Mesa · Public  Tracking
Orange 304 1,730 14 64 22.6% 27.3% 12.5 1.3 195 44
598
South San Francisco · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 304 1,239 14 66 21.8% 22.7% 9.9 2.0 202 44
599
Newhall · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 560 1,941 14 78 18.7% 29.6% 12.1 2.1 434 81
600
North Hills · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 450 1,905 14 78 18.6% 21.5% 9.8 1.3 350 65
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →