County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size, summing each campus — measured against a school's entire graduating class, across the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

This board needs a class of 100+ seniors. Schools smaller than that are ranked on the small-schools board below — which is where California's highest UC Reach Score actually sits.

Small schools — California · 2025

Ranked separately because they graduate 25–99 seniors — magnet programs, specialized charters and small privates. A class of 60 swings far more year to year than a class of 600, so mixing them into the boards above would compare unlike things. The state's single highest UC Reach Score sits on this board, not the one above it.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
Stockton · Public
109
3
Santa Ana · Public
100
4
Los Angeles · Public
98
5
Santa Cruz · Public
94
6
Los Angeles · Public
90
7
Fresno · Public
87
8
Tustin · Public
87
9
Los Angeles · Public
82
10
San Bernardino · Public
81

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Irvine · Private
161
4
Los Angeles · Private
121
5
Palo Alto · Private
114
6
Dublin · Private
113
7
Pasadena · Private
104
8
Sacramento · Private
93
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Carson · Public
129
2
Cerritos · Public
126
3
Santa Ana · Charter
96
4
Fresno · Public
95
5
San Diego · Public
93
6
La Jolla · Public
86
7
San Jose · Public
86
8
Wilmington · Public
86
9
Cupertino · Public
85
10
Cypress · Public
84

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Pebble Beach · Private
95
8
Irvine · Private
94
9
San Jose · Private
94
10
Oakland · Private
81

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Oceanside · Public
1
3
Fontana · Public
1
4
San Diego · Public
2
5
Waterford · Public
2
6
Mckinleyville · Public
3
7
Nicolaus · Public
3
8
Menifee · Public
3
9
Colusa · Public
3
10
Gridley · Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Redlands · Private
6
3
Ontario · Private
10
4
Long Beach · Private
13
5
Mission Hills · Private
13
6
Los Angeles · Private
14
7
San Diego · Private
14
8
Modesto · Private
14
9
Cerritos · Private
16
10
Santa Maria · Private
17

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Carson · Public
14
6
Newport Coast · Private
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Los Angeles · Public
12
2
Carson · Public
12
3
Newport Coast · Private
12
4
San Jose · Private
11
5
Los Angeles · Private
10
6
Santa Ana · Charter
10
7
San Francisco · Private
9
8
La Canada · Private
9
9
Compton · Public
9
10
Claremont · Private
9

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Carson · Public
34
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Victorville · Public
20
5
Los Angeles · Public
19
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Los Angeles · Public
18
9
Redwood City · Public
18
10
Newport Coast · Private
18

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
San Jose · Private
30
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Carson · Public
34
4
Claremont · Private
30
5
San Diego · Public
30
6
San Diego · Public
27
7
Fresno · Public
27
8
Cypress · Public
26
9
Irvine · Private
26
10
Santa Ana · Charter
23

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Claremont · Private
34
2
Sacramento · Public
31
3
Wilmington · Public
28
4
Pebble Beach · Private
27
5
Newport Coast · Private
25
6
San Francisco · Public
24
7
Fresno · Public
24
8
Daly City · Public
24
9
San Lorenzo · Public
23
10
Los Angeles · Public
23

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
Carson · Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
5
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
6
Richmond · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Huntington Park · Public
100.0%
9
San Diego · Public
100.0%
10
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Los Angeles · Public
100.0%
8
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
9
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
10
Pasadena · Private
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
Los Angeles · Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
City Of Industry · Public
134:1
8
Los Angeles · Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
8
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
9
avg 23.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31
10
avg 44.8 · σ 2.34
σ 2.34

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
100%
4
Carson · n=157 · 2025
99%
5
Stockton · n=79 · 2025
99%
6
Gilroy · n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
Wilmington · n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
Carson · n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
Grass Valley · n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
San Francisco · Public
34 '18 → 70 '25 +36.4pp
San Francisco · Public
25 '18 → 61 '25 +35.6pp
Los Angeles · Public
30 '18 → 65 '25 +34.7pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Lancaster · Public
106 '21 → 56 '25 -50.1pp
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Duarte · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -4.7% +176.9pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -8.5% +169.3pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -6.9% +154.0pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.6% +121.5pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +19.8% +115.8pp
San Jose · Santa Clara · Public  Watch — engagement
+129.6% vs +17.0% +112.6pp
Stockton · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+129.2% vs +19.8% +109.4pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -5.3% +94.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -4.7% +89.3pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
+83.1% vs -5.3% +88.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Waterford · Stanislaus · Public  Compounding decline
-65.7% vs +2.3% -67.9pp
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Sharp downturn
-52.4% vs +2.5% -54.9pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Pomona · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-55.0% vs -5.3% -49.8pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -5.3% -45.1pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

913 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.6pp
Palo Cedro · Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.4pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.8pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
Stockton · Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.4pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -16.8pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.36 21.1% -15.2pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -14.5pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -9.2pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.6pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.6pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -8.0pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -8.0pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

1,118 schools · 2025 data · Page 6 of 12 (showing 501–600) · 443 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
501
San Bernardino · Public  Demand hides churn
San Bernardino 255 1,246 21 71 29.3% 15.1% 16.1 2.8 181 53
502
Los Angeles · Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 145 533 21 115 18.0% 16.6 4.8 167 30
503
Carpinteria · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Barbara 145 593 21 71 29.1% 23.3% 16.6 3.5 103 30
504
Ventura · Public  Best in class
Ventura 232 951 21 134 15.5% 18.8% 12.9 3.5 310 48
505
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 257 1,183 21 100 20.5% 28.3% 16.3 2.7 258 53
506
Garden Grove · Public  Both ends slipping
Orange 457 1,664 21 77 26.8% 30.9% 18.6 3.9 351 94
507
Villa Park · Public  Demand problem
Orange 467 2,023 21 92 22.4% 29.2% 15.8 3.0 428 96
508
San Diego · Public  Material decline
San Diego 404 1,563 21 83 24.8% 27.7% 17.1 1.5 335 83
509
Modesto · Public  Best in class
Stanislaus 565 2,346 21 59 34.6% 21.6% 13.1 2.3 335 116
510
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 377 1,591 20 73 27.9% 33.8% 18.0 2.6 276 77
511
Garden Grove · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 373 1,439 20 81 25.2% 26.3% 17.4 2.7 301 76
512
Perris · Public  Watch — engagement
Riverside 615 2,396 20 86 23.6% 18.4% 17.6 3.2 529 125
513
Rocklin · Public  Sharp downturn
Placer 532 1,936 20 92 22.0% 33.3% 14.7 2.6 490 108
514
Livermore · Public  Weak at the gate
Alameda 434 1,827 20 102 19.8% 27.3% 13.6 3.5 444 88
515
Compton · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 227 908 20 82 24.9% 15.2% 16.3 3.5 185 46
516
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 247 978 20 83 24.5% 6.0% 17.4 4.9 204 50
517
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 109 457 20 79 25.6% 27.3% 20.2 2.8 86 22
518
Burbank · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
519
Burbank · Public
Los Angeles 622 2,457 20 107 18.8% 25.6% 15.8 4.3 665 125
520
Salinas · Public  Material decline
Monterey 662 2,742 20 78 25.7% 27.8% 12.8 2.4 517 133
521
Simi Valley · Public  Demand problem
Ventura 478 1,835 20 64 31.6% 24.0% 16.1 4.4 304 96
522
Santa Ana · Public  Holding share
Orange 595 2,376 20 75 26.7% 27.7% 16.6 3.2 445 119
523
Merced · Public  Strong demand
Merced 461 1,793 20 53 37.7% 23.9% 12.6 3.7 244 92
524
Avenal · Public  Demand problem
Kings 156 762 20 45 44.3% 16.1% 16.0 2.6 70 31
525
Santa Paula · Public  Strong demand
Ventura 353 1,494 20 72 27.6% 5.7% 14.2 2.5 254 70
526
Pico Rivera · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 505 1,995 20 88 22.5% 23.0% 15.6 3.8 445 100
527
Lindsay · Public  Best in class
Tulare 283 1,132 20 54 36.8% 17.9% 16.6 4.2 152 56
528
San Clemente · Public  Demand problem
Orange 745 2,740 20 83 23.8% 26.5% 15.3 2.7 618 147
529
Corona · Public  Holding share
Riverside 832 3,577 20 91 21.7% 28.7% 17.6 3.9 756 164
530
West Sacramento · Public  Demand hides churn
Yolo 551 2,168 20 69 28.5% 38.0% 11.8 1.8 379 108
531
Escondido · Public  Material decline
San Diego 450 1,846 20 75 26.0% 27.3% 15.3 2.4 338 88
532
Riverside · Public  Holding share
Riverside 399 1,780 20 75 26.0% 29.5% 18.8 2.0 300 78
533
Santa Ynez · Public  Sharp downturn
Santa Barbara 221 801 19 71 27.4% 7.0% 14.0 3.2 157 43
534
Rosemead · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 499 1,691 19 85 23.0% 27.8% 15.6 4.2 422 97
535
Clovis · Public  Sharp downturn
Fresno 649 2,551 19 65 29.6% 23.0% 15.6 3.1 425 126
536
Chula Vista · Public  Compounding decline
San Diego 501 1,864 19 69 27.9% 26.8% 17.8 3.4 347 97
537
Chula Vista · Public
San Diego 501 1,864 19 69 27.9% 26.8% 17.8 3.4 347 97
538
Thousand Oaks · Public  Sharp downturn
Ventura 439 1,703 19 87 22.1% 34.1% 14.1 3.2 384 85
539
San Fernando · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 367 1,608 19 75 25.7% 21.1% 16.4 4.1 276 71
540
American Canyon · Public  Best in class
Napa 404 1,720 19 88 22.0% 23.1% 11.6 3.5 355 78
541
Riverside · Public
Riverside 654 2,699 19 86 22.5% 27.8% 16.5 3.2 561 126
542
Woodland · Public  Best in class
Yolo 364 1,582 19 67 28.8% 31.4% 10.4 3.0 243 70
543
Arroyo Grande · Public  Weak at the gate
San Luis Obispo 531 2,012 19 69 27.9% 25.5% 14.3 2.5 366 102
544
Fairfield · Public  Best in class
Solano 521 2,111 19 101 18.9% 41.0% 11.1 2.9 528 100
545
Winchester · Public  Best in class
Riverside 616 2,537 19 58 32.8% 28.8% 17.1 1.9 360 118
546
San Francisco · Public  Watch — engagement
San Francisco 115 397 19 90 21.1% 18.2% 9.6 104 22
547
Pomona · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 356 1,542 19 71 26.9% 33.8% 15.7 1.4 253 68
548
Panorama City · Private
Los Angeles 126 547 19 122 15.6% 12.5% 13.5 154 24
549
Dana Point · Public  Material decline
Orange 473 1,725 19 92 20.6% 32.2% 16.1 3.4 437 90
550
South Lake Tahoe · Public  Watch — engagement
El Dorado 242 1,076 19 63 30.3% 6.5% 12.8 3.3 152 46
551
Lawndale · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 442 1,981 19 98 19.3% 22.6% 14.5 2.3 435 84
552
Sacramento · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 374 1,679 19 61 31.3% 25.4% 12.6 2.4 227 71
553
Salinas · Public  Material decline
Monterey 475 1,978 19 75 25.4% 17.8% 12.6 2.3 355 90
554
Santa Clara · Public
Santa Clara 481 1,614 19 134 14.1% 33.0% 13.9 1.7 646 91
555
Escondido · Public  Both ends slipping
San Diego 465 1,788 19 67 28.4% 33.0% 14.6 2.6 310 88
556
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 249 942 19 98 19.3% 27.7% 13.2 2.8 243 47
557
Carlsbad · Public  Best in class
San Diego 408 1,774 19 92 20.5% 33.8% 15.7 3.2 376 77
558
South El Monte · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 308 1,125 19 67 28.0% 20.7% 17.5 4.2 207 58
559
San Fernando · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 170 2,629 19 88 21.5% 9.4% 15.3 4.1 149 32
560
West Covina · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 389 1,568 19 86 21.8% 26.0% 15.7 4.4 335 73
561
Burbank · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 533 2,283 19 113 16.7% 30.0% 13.3 3.2 600 100
562
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 112 450 19 141 13.3% 18.8 5.4 158 21
563
Los Angeles · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 240 971 19 79 23.8% 26.7% 13.3 5.4 189 45
564
Long Beach · Public
Los Angeles 112 701 19 79 23.9% 10.7 88 21
565
Woodland · Public  Compounding decline
Yolo 262 1,155 19 60 31.4% 34.7% 9.9 1.9 156 49
566
Upland · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 723 2,797 19 74 25.1% 28.9% 16.9 2.5 537 135
567
Compton · Public  Strong demand
Los Angeles 370 1,582 19 83 22.6% 13.0% 14.9 3.2 306 69
568
Sacramento · Public  Strong demand
Sacramento 413 1,622 19 65 28.8% 19.5% 11.6 1.9 267 77
569
La Quinta · Public  Holding share
Riverside 546 2,425 18 65 28.4% 29.7% 17.4 2.6 355 101
570
Rialto · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 492 1,951 18 74 25.1% 19.8% 16.9 3.5 362 91
571
San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
San Diego 516 2,011 18 80 23.0% 36.8% 16.5 3.7 413 95
572
Ripon · Public  Weak at the gate
San Joaquin 261 1,051 18 56 32.6% 25.0% 11.1 1.1 147 48
573
Windsor · Public  Strong demand
Sonoma 426 1,700 18 69 26.7% 28.2% 12.2 2.6 292 78
574
San Pedro · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 563 2,398 18 86 21.2% 29.1% 15.1 3.4 486 103
575
Garden Grove · Public  Holding share
Orange 405 1,634 18 95 19.3% 39.2% 15.1 1.5 384 74
576
Anaheim · Public  Compounding decline
Orange 625 2,667 18 82 22.3% 30.7% 15.2 2.7 512 114
577
Anaheim · Public  Weak at the gate
Orange 363 1,393 18 87 20.9% 22.7% 14.6 2.8 315 66
578
Oakhurst · Public  Compounding decline
Madera 138 542 18 45 40.3% 32.0% 13.8 62 25
579
Orosi · Public  Weak at the gate
Tulare 199 1,108 18 60 30.0% 11.1 120 36
580
Hayward · Public  Strong demand
Alameda 433 1,865 18 76 23.9% 17.9% 11.1 2.5 327 78
581
San Bernardino · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 575 2,748 18 70 25.6% 17.5% 13.7 2.4 403 103
582
Downey · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 933 4,051 18 83 21.7% 28.1% 15.3 2.6 771 167
583
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 179 1,297 18 95 18.8% 12.8 4.5 170 32
584
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 112 410 18 112 15.9% 15.0% 13.4 126 20
585
Riverside · Public  Demand problem
Riverside 484 2,011 18 69 25.8% 18.6% 15.5 3.5 333 86
586
Alhambra · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 576 2,056 18 115 15.4% 27.4% 13.0 4.0 660 102
587
Simi Valley · Public  Holding share
Ventura 305 1,033 18 94 18.9% 25.9% 13.1 1.3 286 54
588
Castaic · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 294 1,159 18 57 31.1% 25.0% 14.3 2.7 167 52
589
Fresno · Public  Watch — engagement
Fresno 651 2,858 18 61 29.0% 18.3% 12.1 2.0 396 115
590
West Covina · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 437 1,756 18 93 18.9% 31.2% 13.0 1.8 407 77
591
San Bernardino · Public  Material decline
San Bernardino 301 1,431 18 54 32.3% 5.7% 15.3 3.3 164 53
592
San Jose · Public  Compounding decline
Santa Clara 375 1,590 18 78 22.7% 28.8% 11.7 3.5 291 66
593
Folsom · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 739 2,901 18 129 13.7% 40.0% 11.4 2.2 951 130
594
Murrieta · Public  Best in class
Riverside 803 3,328 18 66 26.4% 36.9% 15.8 2.0 534 141
595
Azusa · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 422 1,609 18 60 29.0% 23.0% 15.9 3.1 255 74
596
Duarte · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 206 756 17 75 23.2% 16.7% 15.1 1.9 155 36
597
Murrieta · Public  Weak at the gate
Riverside 515 2,104 17 59 29.8% 23.3% 13.2 2.5 302 90
598
Pasadena · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 269 1,206 17 79 22.2% 17.0% 13.8 4.5 212 47
599
El Cajon · Public  Material decline
San Diego 464 1,728 17 69 25.4% 34.6% 14.9 3.5 319 81
600
Maywood · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 242 1,012 17 68 25.4% 14.3% 14.1 1.2 165 42
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Campus admits are SUMMED — UC publishes no per-school unique-student count, so a senior admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses is counted at each, and values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →

Related reading

The data Newsom asked for already exists — school by school

UC testing review · August 25, 2026

How to spot an elite high school in the data

Behind the data · August 24, 2026

All stories from the data →

What families ask next