County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

816 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp
Folsom · Public
3.84 13.7% -7.5pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

992 schools · 2025 data · Page 3 of 10 (showing 201–300) · 572 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
201
Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 332 2,031 35 165 21.3% 25.6% 26.2 9.6 549 117
202
Temecula · Private
Riverside 111 1,208 35 130 27.1% 7.7% 26.1 144 39
203
Eastvale · Public  Best in class
Riverside 1,083 4,353 35 123 28.2% 32.4% 29.6 4.6 1,337 377
204
Redding · Public  Best in class
Shasta 124 1,009 35 98 35.5% 18.6% 24.2 5.7 121 43
205
Aliso Viejo · Public  Tracking
Orange 683 2,563 34 134 25.6% 23.4% 26.8 4.4 917 235
206
Mountain View · Private
Santa Clara 426 1,782 34 251 13.7% 23.3% 26.3 7.0 1,069 146
207
Alhambra · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 582 2,201 34 173 19.8% 31.2% 25.6 5.5 1,005 199
208
Bakersfield · Private
Kern 164 663 34 101 33.9% 5.4% 25.0 3.0 165 56
209
Delano · Public  Best in class
Kern 135 1,845 34 129 26.4% 26.1% 22.2 3.0 174 46
210
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 538 2,210 34 150 22.7% 33.9% 28.6 2.4 807 183
211
Fremont · Public  Demand problem
Alameda 492 1,957 34 175 19.4% 26.9% 24.4 5.5 859 167
212
Garden Grove · Public  Material decline
Orange 529 2,148 34 114 29.6% 32.0% 30.8 4.7 602 178
213
· Public  Sharp downturn
Santa Barbara 434 1,926 34 111 30.3% 26.0% 24.4 6.5 482 146
214
San Jose · Public  Tracking
Santa Clara 447 1,612 34 107 31.4% 24.7% 24.2 6.0 478 150
215
Oakland · Public  Strong demand
Alameda 352 1,579 34 136 24.6% 30.5% 22.4 5.4 479 118
216
Solana Beach · Private
San Diego 114 1,095 33 129 25.9% 7.9% 26.3 5.3 147 38
217
San Diego · Private
San Diego 181 722 33 179 18.5% 11.7% 23.2 6.6 324 60
218
San Gabriel · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 471 1,761 33 145 22.8% 37.2% 24.8 4.2 685 156
219
San Jose · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 481 1,820 33 178 18.6% 25.8% 25.8 5.4 854 159
220
San Mateo · Public  Compounding decline
San Mateo 394 1,557 33 197 16.7% 23.1% 24.6 7.4 777 130
221
San Diego · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 388 1,465 33 177 18.7% 28.1% 25.0 4.6 686 128
222
Granada Hills · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 1,154 5,927 33 173 19.0% 29.2% 26.5 6.3 2,000 380
223
Live Oak · Public  Strong demand
Sutter 143 603 33 147 22.4% 29.8% 21.7 9.1 210 47
224
San Diego · Private
San Diego 399 1,661 33 153 21.4% 24.4% 24.6 6.5 611 131
225
San Juan Capistrano · Private
Orange 320 1,282 33 142 23.1% 20.0% 26.9 7.5 455 105
226
Los Alamitos · Public  Weak at the gate
Orange 756 2,915 33 132 24.8% 25.4% 27.1 5.6 1,001 248
227
Panorama City · Public  Demand hides churn
Los Angeles 330 1,316 33 122 26.9% 27.8% 25.4 6.4 401 108
228
Brea · Public  Holding share
Orange 444 1,676 33 139 23.6% 18.6% 26.1 5.2 615 145
229
Orcutt · Public  Best in class
Santa Barbara 157 812 32 80 40.5% 11.8% 26.1 8.9 126 51
230
San Rafael · Public  Demand problem
Marin 330 1,248 32 155 20.9% 26.2% 22.7 5.5 513 107
231
San Francisco · Public
San Francisco 145 522 32 152 21.3% 36.2% 20.0 8.3 221 47
232
San Mateo · Public  Strong demand
San Mateo 411 1,585 32 163 19.7% 23.5% 22.9 5.8 670 132
233
Hacienda Heights · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 355 1,456 32 170 18.7% 31.0% 23.1 6.5 603 113
234
Woodside · Public  Strong demand
San Mateo 435 1,660 32 151 21.0% 27.5% 24.8 6.4 656 138
235
Rancho San Margarit · Public  Sharp downturn
Orange 552 2,030 32 158 20.0% 32.2% 24.5 3.8 870 174
236
El Dorado Hills · Public  Weak at the gate
El Dorado 635 2,346 32 137 23.0% 29.0% 21.9 4.4 868 200
237
San Gabriel · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 378 1,438 31 179 17.6% 34.5% 23.0 6.9 678 119
238
Claremont · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 535 2,065 31 136 23.1% 26.2% 25.2 5.4 727 168
239
Bellflower · Private
Los Angeles 183 869 31 168 18.5% 12.3% 25.7 6.6 308 57
240
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 264 1,025 31 121 25.6% 23.2% 26.5 8.0 320 82
241
San Jose · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Clara 494 1,918 31 185 16.8% 30.1% 23.3 5.5 912 153
242
Pomona · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 117 458 31 197 15.6% 25.0% 24.8 4.3 231 36
243
San Marcos · Public  Best in class
San Diego 680 2,751 31 104 29.6% 30.6% 25.0 2.8 706 209
244
Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 498 2,055 31 120 25.6% 15.0% 25.5 8.6 598 153
245
Downey · Private
Los Angeles 111 591 31 153 20.0% 27.0 6.3 170 34
246
· Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 180 694 31 94 32.4% 16.4% 24.4 6.7 170 55
247
Cypress · Public  Best in class
Orange 682 2,685 30 145 21.0% 33.6% 25.2 4.2 991 208
248
Kentfield · Private
Marin 191 718 30 185 16.4% 27.6% 20.4 5.2 354 58
249
Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
Los Angeles 392 1,497 30 172 17.7% 29.4% 25.8 6.1 674 119
250
San Jose · Public  Watch — engagement
Santa Clara 379 1,543 30 123 24.6% 30.4% 22.2 5.0 468 115
251
Lakewood · Private
Los Angeles 122 557 30 97 31.4% 21.6% 27.1 5.7 118 37
252
Chula Vista · Public  Demand problem
San Diego 578 2,289 30 129 23.4% 29.1% 25.4 3.1 748 175
253
Morgan Hill · Public  Strong demand
Santa Clara 377 1,511 30 142 21.3% 33.3% 22.0 3.7 536 114
254
Atherton · Public  Strong demand
San Mateo 571 2,158 30 180 16.8% 25.6% 21.5 6.7 1,025 172
255
San Anselmo · Public  Best in class
Marin 288 1,141 30 175 17.0% 32.6% 19.8 5.9 505 86
256
Pleasant Hill · Public  Tracking
Contra Costa 477 1,948 30 127 23.5% 29.6% 19.7 4.0 605 142
257
· Public  Sharp downturn
Alameda 373 1,499 30 118 25.3% 34.2% 19.3 4.0 439 111
258
Sacramento · Private
Sacramento 236 1,132 30 134 22.1% 31.4% 19.9 5.1 316 70
259
Half Moon Bay · Public  Tracking
San Mateo 233 911 30 112 26.4% 18.8% 21.5 5.2 261 69
260
Antioch · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 156 681 29 96 30.7% 17.4% 17.9 7.0 150 46
261
Chula Vista · Public  Material decline
San Diego 489 1,960 29 114 25.8% 34.7% 25.1 5.1 558 144
262
Lawndale · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 415 1,403 29 97 30.2% 27.1% 26.8 5.1 404 122
263
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 143 629 29 126 23.3% 38.1% 14.7 7.7 180 42
264
La Canada · Private
Los Angeles 150 623 29 209 14.1% 22.7% 22.7 7.3 313 44
265
· Public  Tracking
Los Angeles 713 3,162 29 130 22.6% 27.3% 22.7 5.6 925 209
266
Chino Hills · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 744 2,748 29 131 22.4% 32.6% 23.2 4.3 972 218
267
Coronado · Public  Weak at the gate
San Diego 263 999 29 144 20.4% 23.4% 19.0 5.7 378 77
268
Milpitas · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Clara 694 2,926 29 193 15.2% 34.0% 20.6 5.2 1,338 203
269
· Public  Best in class
Sacramento 127 1,850 29 111 26.2% 37.8% 18.9 3.1 141 37
270
Palm Desert · Public  Best in class
Riverside 468 2,079 29 96 30.2% 19.1% 23.7 4.3 450 136
271
Salinas · Public  Strong demand
Monterey 369 1,600 29 92 31.4% 14.9% 21.4 7.3 341 107
272
· Public  Both ends slipping
Los Angeles 429 1,743 29 97 29.7% 20.2% 22.1 5.8 418 124
273
Anaheim · Public  Best in class
Orange 520 2,183 29 179 16.1% 34.0% 25.0 4.8 931 150
274
· Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 430 1,812 29 108 26.7% 27.4% 22.6 4.7 465 124
275
Torrance · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 452 1,879 29 124 23.3% 33.9% 22.6 4.4 559 130
276
Tracy · Public  Sharp downturn
San Joaquin 400 1,587 29 106 27.1% 27.8% 18.0 2.8 425 115
277
Campbell · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 407 1,682 29 162 17.7% 30.8% 21.9 3.0 661 117
278
Van Nuys · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 515 1,969 29 115 25.1% 29.1% 23.9 6.6 590 148
279
Carson · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 105 438 29 96 29.7% 10.0% 20.9 2.9 101 30
280
Sacramento · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 508 2,194 29 95 30.0% 26.9% 17.9 4.1 484 145
281
Santa Rosa · Public  Best in class
Sonoma 372 1,584 28 99 28.7% 15.1% 21.0 3.8 369 106
282
Laguna Hills · Public  Demand problem
Orange 330 1,317 28 99 28.8% 18.1% 24.2 4.5 327 94
283
Aptos · Public  Demand problem
Santa Cruz 292 1,274 28 114 25.0% 33.7% 19.2 4.5 332 83
284
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 113 484 28 198 14.3% 9.4% 20.4 8.0 224 32
285
Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
Los Angeles 378 1,495 28 105 26.9% 26.2% 22.2 6.3 397 107
286
Fountain Valley · Public  Weak at the gate
Orange 803 3,171 28 143 19.8% 36.1% 23.4 4.2 1,145 227
287
La Puente · Private
Los Angeles 223 977 28 120 23.5% 22.2% 22.4 4.9 268 63
288
Santa Cruz · Public  Tracking
Santa Cruz 223 1,013 28 84 33.5% 12.7% 21.1 4.5 188 63
289
Los Angeles · Public
Los Angeles 117 598 28 128 22.0% 27.3% 24.8 8.6 150 33
290
San Jose · Public  Sharp downturn
Santa Clara 536 2,139 28 150 18.8% 30.5% 19.2 5.0 803 151
291
Los Angeles · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 531 2,237 28 118 23.8% 28.9% 25.2 5.1 627 149
292
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 139 515 28 161 17.4% 7.7% 19.4 7.2 224 39
293
Fullerton · Private
Orange 107 462 28 124 22.6% 10.0% 20.6 133 30
294
Poway · Public  Holding share
San Diego 550 2,101 28 102 27.5% 31.8% 20.7 2.7 560 154
295
Los Angeles · Public  Demand problem
Los Angeles 418 1,842 28 155 18.0% 25.6% 23.4 6.5 649 117
296
Oceanside · Public  Best in class
San Diego 398 1,670 28 130 21.5% 35.1% 20.6 3.3 517 111
297
Placentia · Public  Tracking
Orange 618 2,411 28 132 21.0% 27.3% 20.7 4.0 818 172
298
· Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 235 974 28 159 17.4% 23.1% 21.3 7.7 373 65
299
Soquel · Public  Best in class
Santa Cruz 264 1,074 28 123 22.5% 20.6% 19.7 4.5 325 73
300
Sacramento · Public  Best in class
Sacramento 596 2,569 28 89 30.9% 27.4% 19.3 3.9 531 164
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →