| 201 |
Pacific Grove · Public Sharp downturn
|
Monterey |
161 |
552 |
40
|
158 |
25.1% |
28.1% |
29.8 |
5.6 |
255 |
64 |
| 202 |
Redlands · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Bernardino |
521 |
2,189 |
40
|
113 |
35.0% |
23.3% |
31.9 |
5.6 |
589 |
206 |
| 203 |
El Cerrito · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
394 |
1,460 |
39
|
171 |
23.0% |
33.5% |
27.7 |
9.4 |
674 |
155 |
| 204 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
564 |
39
|
120 |
32.6% |
22.9% |
28.7 |
6.6 |
147 |
48 |
| 205 |
San Francisco · Public Holding share
|
San Francisco |
120 |
464 |
39
|
204 |
19.2% |
23.4% |
22.5 |
8.3 |
245 |
47 |
| 206 |
Los Angeles · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
281 |
1,381 |
39
|
174 |
22.5% |
28.2% |
30.2 |
8.9 |
489 |
110 |
| 207 |
Granite Bay · Public Sharp downturn
|
Placer |
496 |
2,036 |
39
|
168 |
23.2% |
32.0% |
27.4 |
6.2 |
835 |
194 |
| 208 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
440 |
1,800 |
39
|
166 |
23.5% |
37.8% |
34.1 |
2.0 |
731 |
172 |
| 209 |
Hawthorne · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
123 |
567 |
39
|
168 |
23.2% |
22.9% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
207 |
48 |
| 210 |
Maywood · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
195 |
1,093 |
39
|
149 |
26.2% |
21.1% |
34.9 |
7.7 |
290 |
76 |
| 211 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
126 |
456 |
39
|
139 |
28.0% |
26.5% |
30.9 |
7.9 |
175 |
49 |
| 212 |
San Diego · Public
|
San Diego |
103 |
435 |
39
|
167 |
23.3% |
7.5% |
26.2 |
2.9 |
172 |
40 |
| 213 |
Yorba Linda · Public Holding share
|
Orange |
332 |
1,631 |
39
|
192 |
20.1% |
23.4% |
28.6 |
5.1 |
638 |
128 |
| 214 |
Carlsbad · Private
|
San Diego |
120 |
661 |
38
|
250 |
15.3% |
— |
32.5 |
3.3 |
300 |
46 |
| 215 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
136 |
1,242 |
38
|
247 |
15.5% |
5.8% |
31.6 |
14.0 |
336 |
52 |
| 216 |
Richmond · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
136 |
1,078 |
38
|
148 |
25.9% |
17.3% |
23.5 |
8.8 |
201 |
52 |
| 217 |
North Hollywood · Private
|
Los Angeles |
131 |
1,162 |
38
|
211 |
18.1% |
6.0% |
29.0 |
9.9 |
277 |
50 |
| 218 |
Victorville · Public Holding share
|
San Bernardino |
173 |
1,136 |
38
|
196 |
19.5% |
28.8% |
36.4 |
7.5 |
339 |
66 |
| 219 |
Napa · Private
|
Napa |
160 |
679 |
38
|
189 |
20.1% |
26.2% |
28.8 |
7.5 |
303 |
61 |
| 220 |
Santa Fe Springs · Private
|
Los Angeles |
105 |
405 |
38
|
168 |
22.7% |
25.0% |
29.5 |
3.8 |
176 |
40 |
| 221 |
Sacramento · Public Weak at the gate
|
Sacramento |
113 |
1,493 |
38
|
144 |
26.4% |
23.3% |
22.1 |
6.2 |
163 |
43 |
| 222 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
516 |
2,293 |
38
|
158 |
24.0% |
26.5% |
30.6 |
9.7 |
817 |
196 |
| 223 |
San Francisco · Public Both ends slipping
|
San Francisco |
108 |
382 |
38
|
106 |
35.6% |
31.7% |
21.3 |
5.6 |
115 |
41 |
| 224 |
San Francisco · Public Best in class
|
San Francisco |
332 |
1,238 |
38
|
193 |
19.6% |
30.9% |
25.0 |
8.4 |
642 |
126 |
| 225 |
Monterey · Public Best in class
|
Monterey |
332 |
1,401 |
38
|
102 |
37.2% |
23.8% |
25.9 |
4.8 |
339 |
126 |
| 226 |
Los Angeles · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
348 |
1,385 |
37
|
145 |
25.8% |
23.9% |
29.6 |
7.5 |
503 |
130 |
| 227 |
Castro Valley · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
677 |
2,874 |
37
|
197 |
18.9% |
30.9% |
26.4 |
4.1 |
1,336 |
252 |
| 228 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
129 |
558 |
37
|
138 |
27.0% |
6.2% |
30.2 |
5.4 |
178 |
48 |
| 229 |
Carmichael · Private
|
Sacramento |
199 |
917 |
37
|
176 |
21.1% |
36.5% |
25.6 |
7.5 |
351 |
74 |
| 230 |
Rancho San Margarit · Private
|
Orange |
421 |
1,823 |
37
|
172 |
21.6% |
23.1% |
29.9 |
8.6 |
723 |
156 |
| 231 |
Camarillo · Public Best in class
|
Ventura |
192 |
826 |
37
|
153 |
24.1% |
29.6% |
27.1 |
7.8 |
294 |
71 |
| 232 |
Huntington Park · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
149 |
615 |
37
|
142 |
25.9% |
21.8% |
30.2 |
10.7 |
212 |
55 |
| 233 |
Stockton · Private
|
San Joaquin |
187 |
845 |
37
|
123 |
30.0% |
21.7% |
26.7 |
6.4 |
230 |
69 |
| 234 |
Culver City · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
507 |
2,012 |
37
|
171 |
21.4% |
28.5% |
29.0 |
8.1 |
868 |
186 |
| 235 |
Orange · Private
|
Orange |
210 |
1,141 |
37
|
190 |
19.2% |
16.9% |
28.1 |
5.7 |
400 |
77 |
| 236 |
Chula Vista · Public
|
San Diego |
151 |
626 |
36
|
160 |
22.8% |
10.9% |
30.5 |
4.0 |
241 |
55 |
| 237 |
Santa Ana · Private
|
Orange |
514 |
1,849 |
36
|
176 |
20.6% |
28.9% |
30.7 |
7.0 |
906 |
187 |
| 238 |
Beverly Hills · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
308 |
1,173 |
36
|
157 |
23.2% |
15.2% |
28.6 |
8.1 |
483 |
112 |
| 239 |
Saratoga · Public Holding share
|
Santa Clara |
358 |
1,460 |
36
|
167 |
21.7% |
25.4% |
29.6 |
7.0 |
598 |
130 |
| 240 |
Torrance · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
459 |
1,734 |
36
|
196 |
18.4% |
30.9% |
27.7 |
5.7 |
899 |
165 |
| 241 |
Huntington Park · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
109 |
541 |
36
|
117 |
30.5% |
7.7% |
29.4 |
7.3 |
128 |
39 |
| 242 |
Santa Ana · Public Demand hides churn
|
Orange |
115 |
427 |
36
|
215 |
16.6% |
21.9% |
32.2 |
3.5 |
247 |
41 |
| 243 |
San Luis Obispo · Public Best in class
|
San Luis Obispo |
393 |
1,678 |
36
|
140 |
25.4% |
27.1% |
25.9 |
5.6 |
550 |
140 |
| 244 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
470 |
36
|
217 |
16.4% |
27.9% |
24.0 |
5.0 |
263 |
43 |
| 245 |
Mission Viejo · Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
496 |
1,991 |
35
|
141 |
25.2% |
29.6% |
29.8 |
5.2 |
699 |
176 |
| 246 |
Redondo Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
739 |
2,921 |
35
|
154 |
23.0% |
21.4% |
28.3 |
6.2 |
1,137 |
262 |
| 247 |
Chula Vista · Private
|
San Diego |
294 |
1,222 |
35
|
187 |
18.9% |
23.1% |
24.1 |
4.8 |
549 |
104 |
| 248 |
San Jose · Public Weak at the gate
|
Santa Clara |
362 |
1,393 |
35
|
172 |
20.6% |
29.7% |
26.5 |
6.9 |
621 |
128 |
| 249 |
Los Angeles · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
332 |
2,031 |
35
|
165 |
21.3% |
25.6% |
26.2 |
9.6 |
549 |
117 |
| 250 |
Temecula · Private
|
Riverside |
111 |
1,208 |
35
|
130 |
27.1% |
7.7% |
26.1 |
— |
144 |
39 |
| 251 |
Eastvale · Public Best in class
|
Riverside |
1,083 |
4,353 |
35
|
123 |
28.2% |
32.4% |
29.6 |
4.6 |
1,337 |
377 |
| 252 |
Hayward · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
138 |
573 |
35
|
160 |
21.7% |
35.4% |
20.3 |
6.5 |
221 |
48 |
| 253 |
Redding · Public Best in class
|
Shasta |
124 |
1,009 |
35
|
98 |
35.5% |
18.6% |
24.2 |
5.7 |
121 |
43 |
| 254 |
San Mateo · Private
|
San Mateo |
215 |
890 |
34
|
211 |
16.3% |
13.5% |
23.7 |
3.7 |
454 |
74 |
| 255 |
Aliso Viejo · Public Tracking
|
Orange |
683 |
2,563 |
34
|
134 |
25.6% |
23.4% |
26.8 |
4.4 |
917 |
235 |
| 256 |
Mountain View · Private
|
Santa Clara |
426 |
1,782 |
34
|
251 |
13.7% |
23.3% |
26.3 |
7.0 |
1,069 |
146 |
| 257 |
Alhambra · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
582 |
2,201 |
34
|
173 |
19.8% |
31.2% |
25.6 |
5.5 |
1,005 |
199 |
| 258 |
Bakersfield · Private
|
Kern |
164 |
663 |
34
|
101 |
33.9% |
5.4% |
25.0 |
3.0 |
165 |
56 |
| 259 |
Delano · Public Best in class
|
Kern |
135 |
1,845 |
34
|
129 |
26.4% |
26.1% |
22.2 |
3.0 |
174 |
46 |
| 260 |
Los Angeles · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
241 |
913 |
34
|
140 |
24.3% |
18.3% |
29.9 |
8.7 |
338 |
82 |
| 261 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
538 |
2,210 |
34
|
150 |
22.7% |
33.9% |
28.6 |
2.4 |
807 |
183 |
| 262 |
Fremont · Public Demand problem
|
Alameda |
492 |
1,957 |
34
|
175 |
19.4% |
26.9% |
24.4 |
5.5 |
859 |
167 |
| 263 |
Garden Grove · Public Material decline
|
Orange |
529 |
2,148 |
34
|
114 |
29.6% |
32.0% |
30.8 |
4.7 |
602 |
178 |
| 264 |
Santa Barbara · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Barbara |
434 |
1,926 |
34
|
111 |
30.3% |
26.0% |
24.4 |
6.5 |
482 |
146 |
| 265 |
San Jose · Public Tracking
|
Santa Clara |
447 |
1,612 |
34
|
107 |
31.4% |
24.7% |
24.2 |
6.0 |
478 |
150 |
| 266 |
Oakland · Public Strong demand
|
Alameda |
352 |
1,579 |
34
|
136 |
24.6% |
30.5% |
22.4 |
5.4 |
479 |
118 |
| 267 |
Solana Beach · Private
|
San Diego |
114 |
1,095 |
33
|
129 |
25.9% |
7.9% |
26.3 |
5.3 |
147 |
38 |
| 268 |
San Diego · Private
|
San Diego |
181 |
722 |
33
|
179 |
18.5% |
11.7% |
23.2 |
6.6 |
324 |
60 |
| 269 |
Atherton · Private
|
San Mateo |
154 |
1,125 |
33
|
223 |
14.8% |
7.8% |
27.9 |
9.7 |
344 |
51 |
| 270 |
San Gabriel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
471 |
1,761 |
33
|
145 |
22.8% |
37.2% |
24.8 |
4.2 |
685 |
156 |
| 271 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
481 |
1,820 |
33
|
178 |
18.6% |
25.8% |
25.8 |
5.4 |
854 |
159 |
| 272 |
San Mateo · Public Compounding decline
|
San Mateo |
394 |
1,557 |
33
|
197 |
16.7% |
23.1% |
24.6 |
7.4 |
777 |
130 |
| 273 |
San Diego · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Diego |
388 |
1,465 |
33
|
177 |
18.7% |
28.1% |
25.0 |
4.6 |
686 |
128 |
| 274 |
Granada Hills · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
1,154 |
5,927 |
33
|
173 |
19.0% |
29.2% |
26.5 |
6.3 |
2,000 |
380 |
| 275 |
San Diego · Private
|
San Diego |
399 |
1,661 |
33
|
153 |
21.4% |
24.4% |
24.6 |
6.5 |
611 |
131 |
| 276 |
San Juan Capistrano · Private
|
Orange |
320 |
1,282 |
33
|
142 |
23.1% |
20.0% |
26.9 |
7.5 |
455 |
105 |
| 277 |
Los Alamitos · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
756 |
2,915 |
33
|
132 |
24.8% |
25.4% |
27.1 |
5.6 |
1,001 |
248 |
| 278 |
Panorama City · Public Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
330 |
1,316 |
33
|
122 |
26.9% |
27.8% |
25.4 |
6.4 |
401 |
108 |
| 279 |
Santa Clara · Public
|
Santa Clara |
483 |
1,663 |
33
|
139 |
23.6% |
27.9% |
24.4 |
4.8 |
671 |
158 |
| 280 |
Brea · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
444 |
1,676 |
33
|
139 |
23.6% |
18.6% |
26.1 |
5.2 |
615 |
145 |
| 281 |
Orcutt · Public Best in class
|
Santa Barbara |
157 |
812 |
32
|
80 |
40.5% |
11.8% |
26.1 |
8.9 |
126 |
51 |
| 282 |
San Rafael · Public Demand problem
|
Marin |
330 |
1,248 |
32
|
155 |
20.9% |
26.2% |
22.7 |
5.5 |
513 |
107 |
| 283 |
San Francisco · Public
|
San Francisco |
145 |
522 |
32
|
152 |
21.3% |
36.2% |
20.0 |
8.3 |
221 |
47 |
| 284 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
130 |
500 |
32
|
172 |
18.8% |
35.7% |
25.4 |
6.2 |
223 |
42 |
| 285 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
130 |
557 |
32
|
195 |
16.6% |
14.3% |
28.5 |
3.1 |
253 |
42 |
| 286 |
San Mateo · Public Strong demand
|
San Mateo |
411 |
1,585 |
32
|
163 |
19.7% |
23.5% |
22.9 |
5.8 |
670 |
132 |
| 287 |
Hacienda Heights · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
355 |
1,456 |
32
|
170 |
18.7% |
31.0% |
23.1 |
6.5 |
603 |
113 |
| 288 |
Long Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
126 |
552 |
32
|
213 |
14.9% |
25.0% |
26.2 |
7.9 |
269 |
40 |
| 289 |
Woodside · Public Strong demand
|
San Mateo |
435 |
1,660 |
32
|
151 |
21.0% |
27.5% |
24.8 |
6.4 |
656 |
138 |
| 290 |
Rancho San Margarit · Public Sharp downturn
|
Orange |
552 |
2,030 |
32
|
158 |
20.0% |
32.2% |
24.5 |
3.8 |
870 |
174 |
| 291 |
El Dorado Hills · Public Weak at the gate
|
El Dorado |
635 |
2,346 |
32
|
137 |
23.0% |
29.0% |
21.9 |
4.4 |
868 |
200 |
| 292 |
San Gabriel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
378 |
1,438 |
31
|
179 |
17.6% |
34.5% |
23.0 |
6.9 |
678 |
119 |
| 293 |
Claremont · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
535 |
2,065 |
31
|
136 |
23.1% |
26.2% |
25.2 |
5.4 |
727 |
168 |
| 294 |
Los Angeles · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
115 |
493 |
31
|
174 |
18.0% |
— |
26.1 |
7.0 |
200 |
36 |
| 295 |
San Fernando · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
112 |
444 |
31
|
139 |
22.4% |
— |
23.2 |
2.7 |
156 |
35 |
| 296 |
Bellflower · Private
|
Los Angeles |
183 |
869 |
31
|
168 |
18.5% |
12.3% |
25.7 |
6.6 |
308 |
57 |
| 297 |
Los Angeles · Public Compounding decline
|
Los Angeles |
264 |
1,025 |
31
|
121 |
25.6% |
23.2% |
26.5 |
8.0 |
320 |
82 |
| 298 |
San Jose · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Clara |
494 |
1,918 |
31
|
185 |
16.8% |
30.1% |
23.3 |
5.5 |
912 |
153 |
| 299 |
Pomona · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
117 |
458 |
31
|
197 |
15.6% |
25.0% |
24.8 |
4.3 |
231 |
36 |
| 300 |
San Marcos · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
680 |
2,751 |
31
|
104 |
29.6% |
30.6% |
25.0 |
2.8 |
706 |
209 |