| 101 |
Belmont · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
595 |
2,360 |
54
|
304 |
17.8% |
29.2% |
41.3 |
11.6 |
1,811 |
322 |
| 102 |
Torrance · Private
|
Los Angeles |
208 |
844 |
54
|
253 |
21.3% |
29.5% |
40.4 |
9.6 |
526 |
112 |
| 103 |
Pleasanton · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
646 |
2,583 |
54
|
306 |
17.5% |
26.8% |
41.0 |
7.6 |
1,978 |
347 |
| 104 |
Piedmont · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
205 |
733 |
54
|
328 |
16.3% |
20.9% |
40.5 |
12.2 |
673 |
110 |
| 105 |
San Mateo · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
438 |
1,658 |
54
|
271 |
19.8% |
30.6% |
38.1 |
9.1 |
1,189 |
235 |
| 106 |
Dublin · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
823 |
2,771 |
53
|
323 |
16.5% |
27.1% |
37.8 |
9.0 |
2,660 |
440 |
| 107 |
Palm Desert · Private
|
Riverside |
161 |
533 |
53
|
178 |
30.1% |
27.9% |
44.1 |
8.1 |
286 |
86 |
| 108 |
Fullerton · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
614 |
2,337 |
53
|
213 |
25.0% |
26.3% |
40.2 |
8.5 |
1,306 |
327 |
| 109 |
Pleasanton · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
504 |
2,169 |
53
|
305 |
17.4% |
32.6% |
39.5 |
7.1 |
1,538 |
267 |
| 110 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
138 |
410 |
53
|
292 |
18.1% |
19.2% |
35.5 |
12.3 |
403 |
73 |
| 111 |
Davis · Public
|
Yolo |
560 |
1,755 |
53
|
239 |
22.0% |
28.5% |
35.4 |
7.0 |
1,340 |
295 |
| 112 |
San Francisco · Public Holding share
|
San Francisco |
505 |
2,074 |
52
|
228 |
23.1% |
31.7% |
33.9 |
9.5 |
1,149 |
265 |
| 113 |
Valencia · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
449 |
1,777 |
52
|
202 |
25.9% |
23.0% |
42.5 |
9.3 |
906 |
235 |
| 114 |
Long Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
177 |
682 |
51
|
158 |
32.6% |
31.9% |
41.2 |
9.6 |
279 |
91 |
| 115 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
156 |
659 |
51
|
272 |
18.9% |
16.2% |
39.7 |
9.0 |
424 |
80 |
| 116 |
Chatsworth · Private
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
1,096 |
51
|
269 |
19.1% |
11.3% |
40.5 |
16.5 |
325 |
62 |
| 117 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
363 |
1,555 |
51
|
300 |
17.1% |
25.8% |
38.8 |
13.5 |
1,088 |
186 |
| 118 |
Alameda · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
490 |
1,868 |
51
|
215 |
23.8% |
30.7% |
37.5 |
8.0 |
1,055 |
251 |
| 119 |
Walnut · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
549 |
2,148 |
51
|
234 |
21.9% |
29.5% |
37.7 |
7.3 |
1,285 |
281 |
| 120 |
Mountain View · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
609 |
2,187 |
51
|
258 |
19.7% |
22.6% |
39.7 |
8.7 |
1,571 |
310 |
| 121 |
Pacifica · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Mateo |
142 |
471 |
51
|
208 |
24.3% |
37.5% |
36.6 |
8.4 |
296 |
72 |
| 122 |
Calabasas · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
430 |
1,707 |
50
|
175 |
28.9% |
22.6% |
37.7 |
11.6 |
751 |
217 |
| 123 |
Sun Valley · Private
|
Los Angeles |
125 |
1,199 |
50
|
166 |
30.3% |
15.9% |
36.8 |
11.2 |
208 |
63 |
| 124 |
Westlake Village · Public Weak at the gate
|
Ventura |
518 |
1,900 |
50
|
196 |
25.6% |
23.5% |
39.0 |
10.4 |
1,015 |
260 |
| 125 |
Duarte · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
235 |
974 |
49
|
173 |
28.3% |
23.5% |
39.1 |
11.5 |
406 |
115 |
| 126 |
San Diego · Private
|
San Diego |
141 |
1,279 |
49
|
282 |
17.4% |
8.7% |
37.6 |
12.8 |
397 |
69 |
| 127 |
La Jolla · Private
|
San Diego |
119 |
1,099 |
49
|
246 |
19.8% |
6.9% |
32.8 |
10.9 |
293 |
58 |
| 128 |
Santa Monica · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
710 |
2,588 |
49
|
205 |
23.8% |
27.8% |
37.0 |
13.8 |
1,457 |
346 |
| 129 |
Inglewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
142 |
592 |
49
|
196 |
24.8% |
15.9% |
40.1 |
6.3 |
278 |
69 |
| 130 |
Reseda · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
202 |
1,712 |
49
|
192 |
25.3% |
27.6% |
37.1 |
7.9 |
388 |
98 |
| 131 |
La Crescenta · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
625 |
2,624 |
48
|
214 |
22.7% |
24.4% |
38.2 |
9.4 |
1,336 |
303 |
| 132 |
Cerritos · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
541 |
1,996 |
48
|
198 |
24.5% |
29.4% |
38.8 |
6.5 |
1,070 |
262 |
| 133 |
Lakewood · Private
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
557 |
48
|
184 |
26.2% |
13.6% |
39.3 |
10.7 |
225 |
59 |
| 134 |
Albany · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
294 |
1,122 |
48
|
316 |
15.3% |
35.2% |
29.6 |
8.5 |
928 |
142 |
| 135 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
1,202 |
48
|
261 |
18.4% |
19.4% |
40.7 |
15.3 |
391 |
72 |
| 136 |
Newport Beach · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
370 |
2,106 |
48
|
200 |
23.9% |
23.7% |
36.8 |
8.7 |
741 |
177 |
| 137 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
115 |
887 |
48
|
186 |
25.7% |
16.4% |
36.5 |
11.3 |
214 |
55 |
| 138 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
152 |
1,175 |
47
|
210 |
22.6% |
19.4% |
39.5 |
9.2 |
319 |
72 |
| 139 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
114 |
727 |
47
|
301 |
15.7% |
14.8% |
33.3 |
10.5 |
343 |
54 |
| 140 |
North Hollywood · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
535 |
2,444 |
47
|
162 |
29.1% |
23.3% |
37.2 |
8.2 |
869 |
253 |
| 141 |
Danville · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
516 |
2,042 |
47
|
269 |
17.5% |
28.4% |
35.5 |
9.7 |
1,389 |
243 |
| 142 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
459 |
1,884 |
47
|
258 |
18.3% |
29.2% |
36.6 |
6.8 |
1,183 |
216 |
| 143 |
Laguna Beach · Public Sharp downturn
|
Orange |
196 |
815 |
47
|
180 |
26.1% |
30.4% |
39.3 |
11.2 |
352 |
92 |
| 144 |
San Ramon · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
721 |
2,894 |
46
|
259 |
17.9% |
29.6% |
35.9 |
7.8 |
1,868 |
335 |
| 145 |
Lafayette · Public Sharp downturn
|
Contra Costa |
345 |
1,256 |
46
|
216 |
21.5% |
26.9% |
32.2 |
9.3 |
744 |
160 |
| 146 |
La Crescenta · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
257 |
1,136 |
46
|
215 |
21.5% |
22.7% |
38.1 |
8.2 |
553 |
119 |
| 147 |
South Pasadena · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
379 |
1,536 |
46
|
238 |
19.4% |
25.7% |
31.1 |
6.1 |
901 |
175 |
| 148 |
Fresno · Public Weak at the gate
|
Fresno |
613 |
2,360 |
46
|
131 |
35.2% |
18.1% |
35.7 |
6.7 |
801 |
282 |
| 149 |
Irvine · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
540 |
2,232 |
46
|
212 |
21.7% |
25.0% |
38.0 |
8.5 |
1,145 |
248 |
| 150 |
Berkeley · Private
|
Alameda |
151 |
630 |
46
|
250 |
18.3% |
24.6% |
31.1 |
9.9 |
377 |
69 |
| 151 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
484 |
46
|
147 |
31.0% |
22.6% |
37.1 |
6.0 |
171 |
53 |
| 152 |
Goleta · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Barbara |
539 |
2,149 |
46
|
163 |
28.0% |
23.6% |
33.8 |
6.9 |
879 |
246 |
| 153 |
Oakland · Public Compounding decline
|
Alameda |
303 |
1,250 |
46
|
148 |
30.9% |
23.9% |
31.0 |
8.6 |
447 |
138 |
| 154 |
Oakland · Public Demand problem
|
Alameda |
438 |
1,812 |
45
|
238 |
19.1% |
24.6% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
1,042 |
199 |
| 155 |
Sacramento · Public Weak at the gate
|
Sacramento |
392 |
1,655 |
45
|
142 |
32.1% |
28.1% |
29.6 |
10.2 |
555 |
178 |
| 156 |
West Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
274 |
1,237 |
45
|
218 |
20.8% |
22.6% |
35.0 |
8.0 |
596 |
124 |
| 157 |
Santa Cruz · Public Holding share
|
Santa Cruz |
270 |
1,093 |
45
|
169 |
26.8% |
23.8% |
32.2 |
7.8 |
456 |
122 |
| 158 |
Pasadena · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
224 |
1,689 |
45
|
149 |
30.2% |
25.7% |
38.4 |
15.6 |
334 |
101 |
| 159 |
Torrance · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
450 |
1,775 |
45
|
188 |
23.8% |
28.2% |
32.7 |
6.4 |
848 |
202 |
| 160 |
Chino Hills · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Bernardino |
669 |
2,541 |
45
|
176 |
25.5% |
29.7% |
36.2 |
7.5 |
1,175 |
300 |
| 161 |
Los Angeles · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
172 |
819 |
45
|
204 |
21.9% |
23.4% |
40.7 |
8.7 |
351 |
77 |
| 162 |
Scotts Valley · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Cruz |
152 |
611 |
45
|
152 |
29.4% |
14.7% |
31.6 |
7.9 |
231 |
68 |
| 163 |
Burlingame · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
412 |
1,583 |
45
|
240 |
18.6% |
17.4% |
31.6 |
6.8 |
988 |
184 |
| 164 |
Bakersfield · Private
|
Kern |
124 |
509 |
44
|
119 |
37.4% |
12.7% |
33.1 |
7.3 |
147 |
55 |
| 165 |
Walnut Creek · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
433 |
1,577 |
44
|
209 |
21.1% |
27.8% |
31.6 |
7.2 |
905 |
191 |
| 166 |
Carmel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Monterey |
200 |
780 |
44
|
140 |
31.5% |
26.1% |
32.5 |
6.5 |
279 |
88 |
| 167 |
Hayward · Private
|
Alameda |
164 |
806 |
44
|
240 |
18.3% |
27.8% |
32.9 |
10.4 |
394 |
72 |
| 168 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
137 |
607 |
44
|
201 |
21.7% |
23.3% |
32.1 |
9.5 |
276 |
60 |
| 169 |
Huntington Park · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
160 |
729 |
44
|
167 |
26.2% |
14.3% |
36.2 |
8.8 |
267 |
70 |
| 170 |
Pacific Palisades · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
757 |
2,920 |
44
|
204 |
21.4% |
23.0% |
31.4 |
9.6 |
1,546 |
330 |
| 171 |
San Jose · Public Weak at the gate
|
Santa Clara |
699 |
2,703 |
43
|
285 |
15.2% |
29.6% |
33.8 |
7.9 |
1,993 |
304 |
| 172 |
Lancaster · Private
|
Los Angeles |
113 |
561 |
43
|
133 |
32.7% |
22.4% |
36.3 |
6.2 |
150 |
49 |
| 173 |
Irvine · Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
502 |
1,964 |
43
|
236 |
18.2% |
27.3% |
31.3 |
6.4 |
1,185 |
216 |
| 174 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
107 |
534 |
43
|
132 |
32.6% |
23.9% |
35.5 |
11.2 |
141 |
46 |
| 175 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
175 |
1,530 |
43
|
154 |
27.8% |
— |
36.6 |
8.0 |
270 |
75 |
| 176 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
463 |
1,890 |
43
|
241 |
17.8% |
26.3% |
31.8 |
6.0 |
1,115 |
198 |
| 177 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
143 |
545 |
43
|
290 |
14.7% |
9.8% |
32.2 |
5.6 |
414 |
61 |
| 178 |
San Rafael · Private
|
Marin |
113 |
454 |
42
|
267 |
15.9% |
8.3% |
33.6 |
9.7 |
302 |
48 |
| 179 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
111 |
512 |
42
|
234 |
18.1% |
14.9% |
32.4 |
4.5 |
260 |
47 |
| 180 |
Escondido · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
182 |
765 |
42
|
139 |
30.4% |
27.3% |
33.5 |
5.0 |
253 |
77 |
| 181 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
123 |
517 |
42
|
167 |
25.4% |
25.0% |
36.6 |
7.3 |
205 |
52 |
| 182 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
149 |
1,767 |
42
|
209 |
20.3% |
20.6% |
30.2 |
8.1 |
311 |
63 |
| 183 |
Encinitas · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Diego |
547 |
1,843 |
42
|
197 |
21.4% |
30.3% |
31.4 |
8.2 |
1,078 |
231 |
| 184 |
Elk Grove · Public Sharp downturn
|
Sacramento |
549 |
2,109 |
42
|
143 |
29.4% |
30.3% |
28.4 |
4.4 |
787 |
231 |
| 185 |
Norco · Public Sharp downturn
|
Riverside |
168 |
694 |
42
|
192 |
21.7% |
24.3% |
34.5 |
6.0 |
322 |
70 |
| 186 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
407 |
1,654 |
42
|
257 |
16.2% |
16.6% |
31.7 |
8.3 |
1,046 |
169 |
| 187 |
Walnut Creek · Public Sharp downturn
|
Contra Costa |
377 |
1,546 |
41
|
204 |
20.3% |
30.1% |
29.7 |
6.4 |
770 |
156 |
| 188 |
Folsom · Public Best in class
|
Sacramento |
409 |
1,782 |
41
|
192 |
21.5% |
30.2% |
32.5 |
5.9 |
786 |
169 |
| 189 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
642 |
2,536 |
41
|
217 |
19.1% |
25.7% |
32.2 |
7.8 |
1,390 |
265 |
| 190 |
San Francisco · Public Watch — engagement
|
San Francisco |
252 |
1,047 |
41
|
152 |
27.1% |
35.6% |
24.6 |
2.8 |
384 |
104 |
| 191 |
Woodland Hills · Public Demand problem
|
Los Angeles |
478 |
2,221 |
41
|
188 |
22.0% |
28.9% |
31.8 |
7.3 |
897 |
197 |
| 192 |
Westlake Village · Private
|
Los Angeles |
290 |
1,705 |
41
|
202 |
20.3% |
20.2% |
30.3 |
8.3 |
585 |
119 |
| 193 |
San Diego · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Diego |
100 |
412 |
41
|
173 |
23.7% |
24.4% |
31.0 |
9.0 |
173 |
41 |
| 194 |
Watsonville · Private
|
Santa Cruz |
121 |
836 |
40
|
124 |
32.7% |
14.3% |
29.8 |
2.5 |
150 |
49 |
| 195 |
Stockton · Public Best in class
|
San Joaquin |
163 |
694 |
40
|
127 |
31.9% |
27.3% |
27.6 |
4.9 |
207 |
66 |
| 196 |
Santa Ana · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
136 |
842 |
40
|
119 |
34.0% |
14.6% |
32.4 |
5.2 |
162 |
55 |
| 197 |
Healdsburg · Public Material decline
|
Sonoma |
134 |
503 |
40
|
149 |
27.0% |
18.5% |
24.6 |
9.0 |
200 |
54 |
| 198 |
Westminster · Public Holding share
|
Orange |
542 |
2,041 |
40
|
161 |
25.0% |
31.6% |
35.8 |
5.0 |
873 |
218 |
| 199 |
Los Gatos · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
513 |
1,914 |
40
|
257 |
15.6% |
28.8% |
32.0 |
7.2 |
1,317 |
205 |
| 200 |
Carlsbad · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
352 |
1,289 |
40
|
201 |
19.8% |
32.1% |
29.8 |
5.7 |
708 |
140 |