| 101 |
Alameda · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
490 |
1,868 |
51
|
215 |
23.8% |
30.7% |
37.5 |
8.0 |
1,055 |
251 |
| 102 |
Walnut · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
549 |
2,148 |
51
|
234 |
21.9% |
29.5% |
37.7 |
7.3 |
1,285 |
281 |
| 103 |
Pacifica · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Mateo |
142 |
471 |
51
|
208 |
24.3% |
37.5% |
36.6 |
8.4 |
296 |
72 |
| 104 |
Calabasas · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
430 |
1,707 |
50
|
175 |
28.9% |
22.6% |
37.7 |
11.6 |
751 |
217 |
| 105 |
Sun Valley · Private
|
Los Angeles |
125 |
1,199 |
50
|
166 |
30.3% |
15.9% |
36.8 |
11.2 |
208 |
63 |
| 106 |
Westlake Village · Public Weak at the gate
|
Ventura |
518 |
1,900 |
50
|
196 |
25.6% |
23.5% |
39.0 |
10.4 |
1,015 |
260 |
| 107 |
San Diego · Private
|
San Diego |
141 |
1,279 |
49
|
282 |
17.4% |
8.7% |
37.6 |
12.8 |
397 |
69 |
| 108 |
La Jolla · Private
|
San Diego |
119 |
1,099 |
49
|
246 |
19.8% |
6.9% |
32.8 |
10.9 |
293 |
58 |
| 109 |
Santa Monica · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
710 |
2,588 |
49
|
205 |
23.8% |
27.8% |
37.0 |
13.8 |
1,457 |
346 |
| 110 |
Inglewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
142 |
592 |
49
|
196 |
24.8% |
15.9% |
40.1 |
6.3 |
278 |
69 |
| 111 |
La Crescenta · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
625 |
2,624 |
48
|
214 |
22.7% |
24.4% |
38.2 |
9.4 |
1,336 |
303 |
| 112 |
Cerritos · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
541 |
1,996 |
48
|
198 |
24.5% |
29.4% |
38.8 |
6.5 |
1,070 |
262 |
| 113 |
Albany · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
294 |
1,122 |
48
|
316 |
15.3% |
35.2% |
29.6 |
8.5 |
928 |
142 |
| 114 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
1,202 |
48
|
261 |
18.4% |
19.4% |
40.7 |
15.3 |
391 |
72 |
| 115 |
Newport Beach · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
370 |
2,106 |
48
|
200 |
23.9% |
23.7% |
36.8 |
8.7 |
741 |
177 |
| 116 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
152 |
1,175 |
47
|
210 |
22.6% |
19.4% |
39.5 |
9.2 |
319 |
72 |
| 117 |
North Hollywood · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
535 |
2,444 |
47
|
162 |
29.1% |
23.3% |
37.2 |
8.2 |
869 |
253 |
| 118 |
Danville · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
516 |
2,042 |
47
|
269 |
17.5% |
28.4% |
35.5 |
9.7 |
1,389 |
243 |
| 119 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
459 |
1,884 |
47
|
258 |
18.3% |
29.2% |
36.6 |
6.8 |
1,183 |
216 |
| 120 |
Laguna Beach · Public Sharp downturn
|
Orange |
196 |
815 |
47
|
180 |
26.1% |
30.4% |
39.3 |
11.2 |
352 |
92 |
| 121 |
San Ramon · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
721 |
2,894 |
46
|
259 |
17.9% |
29.6% |
35.9 |
7.8 |
1,868 |
335 |
| 122 |
Lafayette · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
345 |
1,256 |
46
|
216 |
21.5% |
26.9% |
32.2 |
9.3 |
744 |
160 |
| 123 |
South Pasadena · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
379 |
1,536 |
46
|
238 |
19.4% |
25.7% |
31.1 |
6.1 |
901 |
175 |
| 124 |
Fresno · Public Weak at the gate
|
Fresno |
613 |
2,360 |
46
|
131 |
35.2% |
18.1% |
35.7 |
6.7 |
801 |
282 |
| 125 |
Irvine · Public Holding share
|
Orange |
540 |
2,232 |
46
|
212 |
21.7% |
25.0% |
38.0 |
8.5 |
1,145 |
248 |
| 126 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
484 |
46
|
147 |
31.0% |
22.6% |
37.1 |
6.0 |
171 |
53 |
| 127 |
Goleta · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Barbara |
539 |
2,149 |
46
|
163 |
28.0% |
23.6% |
33.8 |
6.9 |
879 |
246 |
| 128 |
Oakland · Public Compounding decline
|
Alameda |
303 |
1,250 |
46
|
148 |
30.9% |
23.9% |
31.0 |
8.6 |
447 |
138 |
| 129 |
Oakland · Public Demand problem
|
Alameda |
438 |
1,812 |
45
|
238 |
19.1% |
24.6% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
1,042 |
199 |
| 130 |
Sacramento · Public Weak at the gate
|
Sacramento |
392 |
1,655 |
45
|
142 |
32.1% |
28.1% |
29.6 |
10.2 |
555 |
178 |
| 131 |
West Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
274 |
1,237 |
45
|
218 |
20.8% |
22.6% |
35.0 |
8.0 |
596 |
124 |
| 132 |
Santa Cruz · Public Holding share
|
Santa Cruz |
270 |
1,093 |
45
|
169 |
26.8% |
23.8% |
32.2 |
7.8 |
456 |
122 |
| 133 |
· Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
450 |
1,775 |
45
|
188 |
23.8% |
28.2% |
32.7 |
6.4 |
848 |
202 |
| 134 |
Chino Hills · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Bernardino |
669 |
2,541 |
45
|
176 |
25.5% |
29.7% |
36.2 |
7.5 |
1,175 |
300 |
| 135 |
Scotts Valley · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Cruz |
152 |
611 |
45
|
152 |
29.4% |
14.7% |
31.6 |
7.9 |
231 |
68 |
| 136 |
Burlingame · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
412 |
1,583 |
45
|
240 |
18.6% |
17.4% |
31.6 |
6.8 |
988 |
184 |
| 137 |
Bakersfield · Private
|
Kern |
124 |
509 |
44
|
119 |
37.4% |
12.7% |
33.1 |
7.3 |
147 |
55 |
| 138 |
Walnut Creek · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
433 |
1,577 |
44
|
209 |
21.1% |
27.8% |
31.6 |
7.2 |
905 |
191 |
| 139 |
Carmel · Public Sharp downturn
|
Monterey |
200 |
780 |
44
|
140 |
31.5% |
26.1% |
32.5 |
6.5 |
279 |
88 |
| 140 |
Hayward · Private
|
Alameda |
164 |
806 |
44
|
240 |
18.3% |
27.8% |
32.9 |
10.4 |
394 |
72 |
| 141 |
Pacific Palisade · Public Mid-year churn
|
Los Angeles |
757 |
2,920 |
44
|
204 |
21.4% |
23.0% |
31.4 |
9.6 |
1,546 |
330 |
| 142 |
San Jose · Public Weak at the gate
|
Santa Clara |
699 |
2,703 |
43
|
285 |
15.2% |
29.6% |
33.8 |
7.9 |
1,993 |
304 |
| 143 |
Lancaster · Private
|
Los Angeles |
113 |
561 |
43
|
133 |
32.7% |
22.4% |
36.3 |
6.2 |
150 |
49 |
| 144 |
Irvine · Public Demand problem
|
Orange |
502 |
1,964 |
43
|
236 |
18.2% |
27.3% |
31.3 |
6.4 |
1,185 |
216 |
| 145 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
175 |
1,530 |
43
|
154 |
27.8% |
— |
36.6 |
8.0 |
270 |
75 |
| 146 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
463 |
1,890 |
43
|
241 |
17.8% |
26.3% |
31.8 |
6.0 |
1,115 |
198 |
| 147 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
143 |
545 |
43
|
290 |
14.7% |
9.8% |
32.2 |
5.6 |
414 |
61 |
| 148 |
San Rafael · Private
|
Marin |
113 |
454 |
42
|
267 |
15.9% |
8.3% |
33.6 |
9.7 |
302 |
48 |
| 149 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
111 |
512 |
42
|
234 |
18.1% |
14.9% |
32.4 |
4.5 |
260 |
47 |
| 150 |
Encinitas · Public Holding share
|
San Diego |
547 |
1,843 |
42
|
197 |
21.4% |
30.3% |
31.4 |
8.2 |
1,078 |
231 |
| 151 |
Elk Grove · Public Sharp downturn
|
Sacramento |
549 |
2,109 |
42
|
143 |
29.4% |
30.3% |
28.4 |
4.4 |
787 |
231 |
| 152 |
San Jose · Private
|
Santa Clara |
407 |
1,654 |
42
|
257 |
16.2% |
16.6% |
31.7 |
8.3 |
1,046 |
169 |
| 153 |
Walnut Creek · Public Sharp downturn
|
Contra Costa |
377 |
1,546 |
41
|
204 |
20.3% |
30.1% |
29.7 |
6.4 |
770 |
156 |
| 154 |
· Public Best in class
|
Sacramento |
409 |
1,782 |
41
|
192 |
21.5% |
30.2% |
32.5 |
5.9 |
786 |
169 |
| 155 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
642 |
2,536 |
41
|
217 |
19.1% |
25.7% |
32.2 |
7.8 |
1,390 |
265 |
| 156 |
Westlake Village · Private
|
Ventura |
290 |
1,705 |
41
|
202 |
20.3% |
20.2% |
30.3 |
8.3 |
585 |
119 |
| 157 |
San Diego · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Diego |
100 |
412 |
41
|
173 |
23.7% |
24.4% |
31.0 |
9.0 |
173 |
41 |
| 158 |
Watsonville · Private
|
Santa Cruz |
121 |
836 |
40
|
124 |
32.7% |
14.3% |
29.8 |
2.5 |
150 |
49 |
| 159 |
Santa Ana · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
136 |
842 |
40
|
119 |
34.0% |
14.6% |
32.4 |
5.2 |
162 |
55 |
| 160 |
Healdsburg · Public Material decline
|
Sonoma |
134 |
503 |
40
|
149 |
27.0% |
18.5% |
24.6 |
9.0 |
200 |
54 |
| 161 |
· Public Holding share
|
Orange |
542 |
2,041 |
40
|
161 |
25.0% |
31.6% |
35.8 |
5.0 |
873 |
218 |
| 162 |
Los Gatos · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
513 |
1,914 |
40
|
257 |
15.6% |
28.8% |
32.0 |
7.2 |
1,317 |
205 |
| 163 |
Carlsbad · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
352 |
1,289 |
40
|
201 |
19.8% |
32.1% |
29.8 |
5.7 |
708 |
140 |
| 164 |
Pacific Grove · Public Sharp downturn
|
Monterey |
161 |
552 |
40
|
158 |
25.1% |
28.1% |
29.8 |
5.6 |
255 |
64 |
| 165 |
Redlands · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Bernardino |
521 |
2,189 |
40
|
113 |
35.0% |
23.3% |
31.9 |
5.6 |
589 |
206 |
| 166 |
El Cerrito · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
394 |
1,460 |
39
|
171 |
23.0% |
33.5% |
27.7 |
9.4 |
674 |
155 |
| 167 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
564 |
39
|
120 |
32.6% |
22.9% |
28.7 |
6.6 |
147 |
48 |
| 168 |
San Francisco · Public Holding share
|
San Francisco |
120 |
464 |
39
|
204 |
19.2% |
23.4% |
22.5 |
8.3 |
245 |
47 |
| 169 |
Granite Bay · Public Sharp downturn
|
Placer |
496 |
2,036 |
39
|
168 |
23.2% |
32.0% |
27.4 |
6.2 |
835 |
194 |
| 170 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
440 |
1,800 |
39
|
166 |
23.5% |
37.8% |
34.1 |
2.0 |
731 |
172 |
| 171 |
San Diego · Public
|
San Diego |
103 |
435 |
39
|
167 |
23.3% |
7.5% |
26.2 |
2.9 |
172 |
40 |
| 172 |
Yorba Linda · Public Holding share
|
Orange |
332 |
1,631 |
39
|
192 |
20.1% |
23.4% |
28.6 |
5.1 |
638 |
128 |
| 173 |
Carlsbad · Private
|
San Diego |
120 |
661 |
38
|
250 |
15.3% |
— |
32.5 |
3.3 |
300 |
46 |
| 174 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
136 |
1,242 |
38
|
247 |
15.5% |
5.8% |
31.6 |
14.0 |
336 |
52 |
| 175 |
Richmond · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
136 |
1,078 |
38
|
148 |
25.9% |
17.3% |
23.5 |
8.8 |
201 |
52 |
| 176 |
Victorville · Public Holding share
|
San Bernardino |
173 |
1,136 |
38
|
196 |
19.5% |
28.8% |
36.4 |
7.5 |
339 |
66 |
| 177 |
Napa · Private
|
Napa |
160 |
679 |
38
|
189 |
20.1% |
26.2% |
28.8 |
7.5 |
303 |
61 |
| 178 |
Santa Fe Springs · Private
|
Los Angeles |
105 |
405 |
38
|
168 |
22.7% |
25.0% |
29.5 |
3.8 |
176 |
40 |
| 179 |
· Public Weak at the gate
|
Sacramento |
113 |
1,493 |
38
|
144 |
26.4% |
23.3% |
22.1 |
6.2 |
163 |
43 |
| 180 |
Los Angeles · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
516 |
2,293 |
38
|
158 |
24.0% |
26.5% |
30.6 |
9.7 |
817 |
196 |
| 181 |
San Francisco · Public Best in class
|
San Francisco |
332 |
1,238 |
38
|
193 |
19.6% |
30.9% |
25.0 |
8.4 |
642 |
126 |
| 182 |
Monterey · Public Best in class
|
Monterey |
332 |
1,401 |
38
|
102 |
37.2% |
23.8% |
25.9 |
4.8 |
339 |
126 |
| 183 |
Castro Valley · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
677 |
2,874 |
37
|
197 |
18.9% |
30.9% |
26.4 |
4.1 |
1,336 |
252 |
| 184 |
Carmichael · Private
|
Sacramento |
199 |
917 |
37
|
176 |
21.1% |
36.5% |
25.6 |
7.5 |
351 |
74 |
| 185 |
Rancho San Margarit · Private
|
Orange |
421 |
1,823 |
37
|
172 |
21.6% |
23.1% |
29.9 |
8.6 |
723 |
156 |
| 186 |
Camarillo · Public Best in class
|
Ventura |
192 |
826 |
37
|
153 |
24.1% |
29.6% |
27.1 |
7.8 |
294 |
71 |
| 187 |
Stockton · Private
|
San Joaquin |
187 |
845 |
37
|
123 |
30.0% |
21.7% |
26.7 |
6.4 |
230 |
69 |
| 188 |
Culver City · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
507 |
2,012 |
37
|
171 |
21.4% |
28.5% |
29.0 |
8.1 |
868 |
186 |
| 189 |
Orange · Private
|
Orange |
210 |
1,141 |
37
|
190 |
19.2% |
16.9% |
28.1 |
5.7 |
400 |
77 |
| 190 |
Chula Vista · Public
|
San Diego |
151 |
626 |
36
|
160 |
22.8% |
10.9% |
30.5 |
4.0 |
241 |
55 |
| 191 |
Santa Ana · Private
|
Orange |
514 |
1,849 |
36
|
176 |
20.6% |
28.9% |
30.7 |
7.0 |
906 |
187 |
| 192 |
Beverly Hills · Public Material decline
|
Los Angeles |
308 |
1,173 |
36
|
157 |
23.2% |
15.2% |
28.6 |
8.1 |
483 |
112 |
| 193 |
Saratoga · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
358 |
1,460 |
36
|
167 |
21.7% |
25.4% |
29.6 |
7.0 |
598 |
130 |
| 194 |
· Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
459 |
1,734 |
36
|
196 |
18.4% |
30.9% |
27.7 |
5.7 |
899 |
165 |
| 195 |
San Luis Obispo · Public Best in class
|
San Luis Obispo |
393 |
1,678 |
36
|
140 |
25.4% |
27.1% |
25.9 |
5.6 |
550 |
140 |
| 196 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
470 |
36
|
217 |
16.4% |
27.9% |
24.0 |
5.0 |
263 |
43 |
| 197 |
Mission Viejo · Public Tracking
|
Orange |
496 |
1,991 |
35
|
141 |
25.2% |
29.6% |
29.8 |
5.2 |
699 |
176 |
| 198 |
Redondo Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
739 |
2,921 |
35
|
154 |
23.0% |
21.4% |
28.3 |
6.2 |
1,137 |
262 |
| 199 |
Chula Vista · Private
|
San Diego |
294 |
1,222 |
35
|
187 |
18.9% |
23.1% |
24.1 |
4.8 |
549 |
104 |
| 200 |
San Jose · Public Weak at the gate
|
Santa Clara |
362 |
1,393 |
35
|
172 |
20.6% |
29.7% |
26.5 |
6.9 |
621 |
128 |