County Sort table by Diagnosis Type Year

🏆 Top 10 in California — UC Reach Score

California · 2025 · ≥50 seniors
What is UC Reach? UC Reach = unique top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size — the share of a school's entire graduating class that reaches the six most selective UCs (Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine, Davis). It's a better gauge of school-wide success than admit rate, which only reflects the handful of students who applied.
Why it beats admit rate: if 6 students apply to the top UCs and all get in, that's a 100% admit rate — but at a 1,000-senior school it's a UC Reach Score of just 0.6 (6 ÷ 1,000). By contrast, a school where 250 of 1,000 seniors land a top-UC admit has a UC Reach Score of 25 — far stronger, even though its admit rate is lower.
Why some schools are over 100? Out of every 100 seniors at these schools, the class is generating more than 100 admissions to the six most selective UCs — meaning the typical strong student is getting in at multiple top campuses (UCLA + UCSD, or Berkeley + UCSB + Irvine, for example). It's a rare achievement: fewer than 1% of California high schools clear a UC Reach Score of 100.

Leaderboards by type — California (2025)

Top and bottom schools by UC Reach, split public/charter vs private (≥50 seniors). Pick a County above to rank within it.

▲ Top 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Cerritos · Public
126
2
El Monte · Public
114
3
Los Angeles · Public
110
4
Fresno · Public
107
5
Santa Ana · Charter
96
6
San Diego · Public
93
7
Riverside · Public
92
8
La Jolla · Public
86
9
San Jose · Public
86
10
Cupertino · Public
85

▲ Top 10 Private

California

1
Newport Coast · Private
151
2
Claremont · Private
144
3
San Jose · Private
126
4
La Canada · Private
103
5
Anaheim · Private
101
6
San Jose · Private
96
7
Irvine · Private
94
8
Oakland · Private
81
9
Los Angeles · Private
77
10
Calabasas · Private
77

▼ Bottom 10 Public + Charter

California

1
Los Angeles · Public
1
2
Fontana · Public
1
3
San Diego · Public
2
4
Waterford · Public
2
5
Mckinleyville · Public
3
6
Menifee · Public
3
7
Colusa · Public
3
8
Gridley · Public
3
9
Susanville · Public
3
10
· Public
3

▼ Bottom 10 Private

California

1
El Cajon · Private
2
2
Ontario · Private
10
3
Long Beach · Private
13
4
Mission Hills · Private
13
5
Los Angeles · Private
14
6
San Diego · Private
14
7
Modesto · Private
14
8
Cerritos · Private
16
9
Ojai · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
18

🎯 Specialized high schools — California · 2025

Top UC Reach for schools with senior classes of 25–99. These are typically magnet programs, specialized charters, and small Catholic preps — too small to compare cleanly against comprehensive public high schools, but the most UC-effective small schools in California are here.

▲ Top 10 Small Public + Charter

California

1
North Hollywood · Public
109
2
· Public
109
3
· Public
100
4
Tustin · Public
87
5
· Public
84
6
Los Angeles · Public
82
7
· Public
81
8
· Public
80
9
Oxnard · Public
75
10
· Public
71

▲ Top 10 Small Private

California

1
Fremont · Private
212
2
San Jose · Private
194
3
Los Angeles · Private
121
4
Palo Alto · Private
114
5
Dublin · Private
113
6
Pasadena · Private
104
7
Sacramento · Private
93
8
Morgan Hill · Private
88
9
Inglewood · Private
86
10
Alameda · Private
83

Top 10 by individual UC campus — California · 2025

Where each UC campus lands its admits, as a share of each high school's senior class. Same 50-senior floor.

Top 10 — UCB Reach

UC Berkeley

1
Claremont · Private
17
2
San Mateo · Private
17
3
La Canada · Private
16
4
Calabasas · Private
15
5
Newport Coast · Private
14
6
Los Angeles · Public
14
7
San Francisco · Private
14
8
San Jose · Private
13
9
Cerritos · Public
13
10
San Francisco · Public
13

Top 10 — UCLA Reach

UCLA

1
Fresno · Public
14
2
Newport Coast · Private
12
3
San Jose · Private
11
4
Los Angeles · Private
10
5
Santa Ana · Charter
10
6
San Francisco · Private
9
7
La Canada · Private
9
8
Compton · Public
9
9
Claremont · Private
9
10
El Monte · Public
8

Top 10 — UCSD Reach

UC San Diego

1
La Jolla · Public
39
2
Fresno · Public
25
3
Claremont · Private
25
4
Los Angeles · Public
22
5
· Public
20
6
Cerritos · Public
19
7
San Jose · Private
18
8
Redwood City · Public
18
9
Newport Coast · Private
18
10
Los Angeles · Private
17

Top 10 — UCSB Reach

UC Santa Barbara

1
Newport Coast · Private
43
2
San Jose · Private
41
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
El Monte · Public
29
5
La Canada · Private
29
6
San Jose · Public
29
7
San Diego · Public
28
8
Cerritos · Public
28
9
Cupertino · Public
28
10
San Jose · Private
28

Top 10 — UCI Reach

UC Irvine

1
Newport Coast · Private
39
2
Cerritos · Public
37
3
Claremont · Private
30
4
San Diego · Public
30
5
San Diego · Public
27
6
Cypress · Public
26
7
Irvine · Private
26
8
Santa Ana · Charter
23
9
San Jose · Private
22
10
San Francisco · Public
22

Top 10 — UCD Reach

UC Davis

1
Los Angeles · Public
39
2
Claremont · Private
34
3
Sacramento · Public
31
4
Newport Coast · Private
25
5
El Monte · Public
25
6
San Lorenzo · Public
23
7
San Jose · Private
23
8
Irvine · Private
22
9
Anaheim · Private
22
10
San Diego · Public
22

Beyond UC Reach — more lenses on California

UC Reach measures who gets in. These lenses measure the upstream pipeline (A-G), the downstream outcome (UC graduation), the capacity that drives the pipeline (counselors), reliability over time (consistency), grade-11 academic preparation (CAASPP SBAC ELA & Math), and private-school financial strength. Click any school for its full profile.

Top 10 — A-G Completion

% of graduates meeting UC/CSU course requirements · 2024-25 cohort

1
· Public
100.0%
2
San Lorenzo · Public
100.0%
3
San Diego · Public
100.0%
4
Richmond · Public
100.0%
5
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
6
· Public
100.0%
7
· Public
100.0%
8
· Public
100.0%
9
Compton · Public
100.0%
10
· Public
100.0%

Top 10 — UC 6-Yr Grad Rate

% of UC entrants who finished in 6 years · cohort N ≥ 20

1
Atherton · Public
100.0%
2
Mountain House · Public
100.0%
3
Lafayette · Public
100.0%
4
Santa Clarita · Public
100.0%
5
Antelope · Public
100.0%
6
Santa Rosa · Public
100.0%
7
Sacramento · Public
100.0%
8
Sebastopol · Public
100.0%
9
Pasadena · Private
100.0%
10
Lodi · Public
100.0%

Top 10 — Best Counselor Capacity

Lowest students-per-counselor (ASCA target 250:1) · public/charter, ≥500 students

1
Los Angeles · Public
100:1
2
La Puente · Public
107:1
3
Daly City · Public
123:1
4
Arleta · Public
125:1
5
· Public
129:1
6
Pacifica · Public
131:1
7
· Public
134:1
8
· Public
137:1
9
Beverly Hills · Public
138:1
10
Fresno · Public
144:1

Top 10 — Most Consistent

Lowest UC Reach std-dev across 5 years (above-CA-median mean)

1
avg 19.7 · σ 0.87
σ 0.87
2
avg 30.5 · σ 1.08
σ 1.08
3
avg 19.9 · σ 1.77
σ 1.77
4
avg 53.9 · σ 1.8
σ 1.8
5
avg 40.6 · σ 1.82
σ 1.82
6
avg 25.2 · σ 1.93
σ 1.93
7
avg 18.4 · σ 2.03
σ 2.03
8
avg 18.5 · σ 2.09
σ 2.09
9
avg 19.0 · σ 2.16
σ 2.16
10
avg 28.8 · σ 2.31
σ 2.31

Top 10 — SBAC ELA met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
100%
2
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
3
· n=36 · 2025
100%
4
· n=157 · 2025
99%
5
· n=79 · 2025
99%
6
· n=72 · 2025
99%
7
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
98%
8
· n=108 · 2025
98%
9
Fresno · n=121 · 2025
98%
10
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%

Top 10 — SBAC Math met/exceeded

% Met or Exceeded Standard · Grade 11 CAASPP · public/charter · tested ≥30

1
Riverside · n=57 · 2025
100%
2
Cerritos · n=170 · 2025
99%
3
Los Angeles · n=36 · 2025
97%
4
Cypress · n=185 · 2025
95%
5
· n=157 · 2025
95%
6
North Hollywood · n=58 · 2025
95%
7
San Jose · n=411 · 2025
93%
8
· n=36 · 2025
89%
9
Fremont · n=420 · 2025
89%
10
San Diego · n=559 · 2025
86%

Top 10 — Private Net Assets

Wealthiest CA private high schools · IRS Form 990 · latest fiscal year

1
Studio City · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$656.3M
2
San Jose · Nonsectarian · FY 2024
$290.3M
3
Atherton · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$243.0M
4
Carpinteria · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$193.0M
5
Pasadena · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$167.8M
6
Santa Monica · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$152.2M
7
Palo Alto · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$146.9M
8
Los Angeles · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$142.4M
9
Santa Rosa · FY 2023
$114.8M
10
San Francisco · Nonsectarian · FY 2023
$110.3M

Reach momentum — biggest gains & declines over time

≥50 seniors · earliest→latest year

Which schools are moving a growing — or shrinking — share of their graduating class into the six most selective UCs. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Biggest gains

SchoolThen → NowΔ
Claremont · Private
63 '21 → 144 '25 +80.6pp
Sacramento · Public
27 '18 → 82 '25 +55.1pp
Mountain House · Public
12 '18 → 62 '25 +49.3pp
Los Angeles · Public
3 '20 → 46 '25 +42.9pp
El Monte · Public
71 '18 → 114 '25 +42.6pp
Cerritos · Public
86 '18 → 126 '25 +40.2pp
Redwood City · Public
32 '18 → 70 '25 +37.5pp
Los Angeles · Public
75 '18 → 110 '25 +35.2pp
San Francisco · Private
24 '20 → 59 '25 +34.5pp
El Segundo · Public
20 '18 → 54 '25 +34.0pp

▼ Biggest declines

SchoolThen → NowΔ
San Jose · Public
122 '18 → 86 '25 -36.4pp
Fremont · Public
102 '18 → 70 '25 -31.8pp
San Jose · Private
73 '20 → 43 '25 -30.2pp
Chula Vista · Public
65 '18 → 36 '25 -29.0pp
Cypress · Public
110 '18 → 84 '25 -26.3pp
Richmond · Public
63 '21 → 38 '25 -25.1pp
Perris · Public
34 '18 → 10 '25 -24.1pp
Carlsbad · Private
62 '20 → 38 '25 -24.0pp
San Francisco · Private
79 '20 → 55 '25 -23.3pp
Cerritos · Private
39 '20 → 16 '25 -22.6pp

Demand momentum — biggest gaps vs the county baseline

grade-12 enrollment Δ vs. county · ≥80 students

The demographic tide is shrinking CA enrollment ~10% over 7 years statewide, so absolute decline alone is noise. The gap vs the county baseline is the actionable signal — schools losing share faster than their demographic floor are the ones to watch. Reflects the current county/type filter.

▲ Outperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
· Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+172.2% vs -8.1% +180.3pp
El Segundo · Los Angeles · Public  Strong demand
+160.8% vs -11.2% +172.0pp
San Diego · San Diego · Public  Demand hides churn
+147.1% vs -7.8% +154.9pp
San Jacinto · Riverside · Public  Best in class
+118.9% vs -2.7% +121.6pp
Mountain House · San Joaquin · Public  Best in class
+135.6% vs +21.8% +113.9pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+89.7% vs -8.2% +97.9pp
Compton · Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
+84.6% vs -8.1% +92.7pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Strong demand
+93.0% vs +5.8% +87.1pp
Oakland · Alameda · Public  Demand hides churn
+82.9% vs +0.6% +82.2pp
Tahoe City · Placer · Public  Best in class
+93.8% vs +16.4% +77.4pp

▼ Underperforming the county the most

SchoolSchool · CountyGap
Paradise · Butte · Public  Material decline
-46.3% vs +19.8% -66.1pp
Fresno · Fresno · Public  Compounding decline
-53.4% vs +6.7% -60.0pp
· San Diego · Public  Compounding decline
-66.2% vs -7.8% -58.4pp
Lincoln · Placer · Public  Material decline
-33.5% vs +16.4% -49.9pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Compounding decline
-29.9% vs +16.4% -46.2pp
Mckinleyville · Humboldt · Public  Material decline
-4.3% vs +41.0% -45.3pp
Oakhurst · Madera · Public  Compounding decline
-36.7% vs +6.9% -43.6pp
Venice · Los Angeles · Public  Sharp downturn
-50.3% vs -8.2% -42.1pp
Los Angeles · Los Angeles · Public  Compounding decline
-54.2% vs -12.1% -42.1pp
Roseville · Placer · Public  Material decline
-25.0% vs +16.4% -41.4pp

GPA Performance — over/under their predicted UC admit rate

816 schools eligible · 2025

Each dot is one school. The diagonal is the per-campus GPA expectation — points above it admit students at higher rates than their GPA mix predicts; points below admit at lower rates. Schools need ≥30 top-6 UC applications and data across ≥3 campuses to appear.

▲ Top 10 outperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Oroville · Public
4.08 64.5% +38.7pp
· Public
4.01 62.9% +33.6pp
Farmersville · Public
3.92 59.5% +33.5pp
Olivehurst · Public
3.96 51.4% +30.7pp
Avenal · Public
3.85 53.4% +30.0pp
Oakdale · Public
4.00 57.6% +29.5pp
Caruthers · Public
3.86 56.1% +28.5pp
· Public
3.91 56.8% +28.5pp
Hanford · Public
4.02 56.5% +27.9pp
Tehachapi · Public
4.12 50.7% +27.5pp

▼ Top 10 underperformers

School GPA Actual Δ vs exp.
Inglewood · Public
3.24 25.0% -15.1pp
North Hollywood · Public
3.46 13.5% -13.4pp
Los Angeles · Public
3.38 21.1% -13.3pp
Perris · Public
3.57 17.6% -8.8pp
Pacifica · Public
3.90 19.6% -8.7pp
Panorama City · Public
3.48 17.1% -8.3pp
Bloomington · Public
3.48 20.4% -8.2pp
Lake Forest · Public
3.85 13.5% -7.9pp
Hercules · Public
3.86 15.9% -7.9pp
Folsom · Public
3.84 13.7% -7.5pp

Full rankings — every California high school by UC Reach Score

Sortable by any column. Click a column header to sort. Click any school row to open its profile.

992 schools · 2025 data · Page 2 of 10 (showing 101–200) · 572 hidden (under 100 seniors)
Show all schools (no floor) Compare selected schools →
# School County Seniors Total Enroll UC Reach Score App Reach Score Admit Rate Yield Selective Reach Elite Reach Raw Apps Raw Admits
101
Alameda · Public  Best in class
Alameda 490 1,868 51 215 23.8% 30.7% 37.5 8.0 1,055 251
102
Walnut · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 549 2,148 51 234 21.9% 29.5% 37.7 7.3 1,285 281
103
Pacifica · Public  Sharp downturn
San Mateo 142 471 51 208 24.3% 37.5% 36.6 8.4 296 72
104
Calabasas · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 430 1,707 50 175 28.9% 22.6% 37.7 11.6 751 217
105
Sun Valley · Private
Los Angeles 125 1,199 50 166 30.3% 15.9% 36.8 11.2 208 63
106
Westlake Village · Public  Weak at the gate
Ventura 518 1,900 50 196 25.6% 23.5% 39.0 10.4 1,015 260
107
San Diego · Private
San Diego 141 1,279 49 282 17.4% 8.7% 37.6 12.8 397 69
108
La Jolla · Private
San Diego 119 1,099 49 246 19.8% 6.9% 32.8 10.9 293 58
109
Santa Monica · Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 710 2,588 49 205 23.8% 27.8% 37.0 13.8 1,457 346
110
Inglewood · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 142 592 49 196 24.8% 15.9% 40.1 6.3 278 69
111
La Crescenta · Public  Holding share
Los Angeles 625 2,624 48 214 22.7% 24.4% 38.2 9.4 1,336 303
112
Cerritos · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 541 1,996 48 198 24.5% 29.4% 38.8 6.5 1,070 262
113
Albany · Public  Best in class
Alameda 294 1,122 48 316 15.3% 35.2% 29.6 8.5 928 142
114
Santa Monica · Private
Los Angeles 150 1,202 48 261 18.4% 19.4% 40.7 15.3 391 72
115
Newport Beach · Public  Weak at the gate
Orange 370 2,106 48 200 23.9% 23.7% 36.8 8.7 741 177
116
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 152 1,175 47 210 22.6% 19.4% 39.5 9.2 319 72
117
North Hollywood · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 535 2,444 47 162 29.1% 23.3% 37.2 8.2 869 253
118
Danville · Public  Weak at the gate
Contra Costa 516 2,042 47 269 17.5% 28.4% 35.5 9.7 1,389 243
119
San Jose · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 459 1,884 47 258 18.3% 29.2% 36.6 6.8 1,183 216
120
Laguna Beach · Public  Sharp downturn
Orange 196 815 47 180 26.1% 30.4% 39.3 11.2 352 92
121
San Ramon · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 721 2,894 46 259 17.9% 29.6% 35.9 7.8 1,868 335
122
Lafayette · Public  Weak at the gate
Contra Costa 345 1,256 46 216 21.5% 26.9% 32.2 9.3 744 160
123
South Pasadena · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 379 1,536 46 238 19.4% 25.7% 31.1 6.1 901 175
124
Fresno · Public  Weak at the gate
Fresno 613 2,360 46 131 35.2% 18.1% 35.7 6.7 801 282
125
Irvine · Public  Holding share
Orange 540 2,232 46 212 21.7% 25.0% 38.0 8.5 1,145 248
126
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 116 484 46 147 31.0% 22.6% 37.1 6.0 171 53
127
Goleta · Public  Sharp downturn
Santa Barbara 539 2,149 46 163 28.0% 23.6% 33.8 6.9 879 246
128
Oakland · Public  Compounding decline
Alameda 303 1,250 46 148 30.9% 23.9% 31.0 8.6 447 138
129
Oakland · Public  Demand problem
Alameda 438 1,812 45 238 19.1% 24.6% 33.3 8.9 1,042 199
130
Sacramento · Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 392 1,655 45 142 32.1% 28.1% 29.6 10.2 555 178
131
West Hills · Private
Los Angeles 274 1,237 45 218 20.8% 22.6% 35.0 8.0 596 124
132
Santa Cruz · Public  Holding share
Santa Cruz 270 1,093 45 169 26.8% 23.8% 32.2 7.8 456 122
133
· Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 450 1,775 45 188 23.8% 28.2% 32.7 6.4 848 202
134
Chino Hills · Public  Weak at the gate
San Bernardino 669 2,541 45 176 25.5% 29.7% 36.2 7.5 1,175 300
135
Scotts Valley · Public  Sharp downturn
Santa Cruz 152 611 45 152 29.4% 14.7% 31.6 7.9 231 68
136
Burlingame · Public  Best in class
San Mateo 412 1,583 45 240 18.6% 17.4% 31.6 6.8 988 184
137
Bakersfield · Private
Kern 124 509 44 119 37.4% 12.7% 33.1 7.3 147 55
138
Walnut Creek · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 433 1,577 44 209 21.1% 27.8% 31.6 7.2 905 191
139
Carmel · Public  Sharp downturn
Monterey 200 780 44 140 31.5% 26.1% 32.5 6.5 279 88
140
Hayward · Private
Alameda 164 806 44 240 18.3% 27.8% 32.9 10.4 394 72
141
Pacific Palisade · Public  Mid-year churn
Los Angeles 757 2,920 44 204 21.4% 23.0% 31.4 9.6 1,546 330
142
San Jose · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Clara 699 2,703 43 285 15.2% 29.6% 33.8 7.9 1,993 304
143
Lancaster · Private
Los Angeles 113 561 43 133 32.7% 22.4% 36.3 6.2 150 49
144
Irvine · Public  Demand problem
Orange 502 1,964 43 236 18.2% 27.3% 31.3 6.4 1,185 216
145
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 175 1,530 43 154 27.8% 36.6 8.0 270 75
146
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 463 1,890 43 241 17.8% 26.3% 31.8 6.0 1,115 198
147
San Jose · Private
Santa Clara 143 545 43 290 14.7% 9.8% 32.2 5.6 414 61
148
San Rafael · Private
Marin 113 454 42 267 15.9% 8.3% 33.6 9.7 302 48
149
San Jose · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 111 512 42 234 18.1% 14.9% 32.4 4.5 260 47
150
Encinitas · Public  Holding share
San Diego 547 1,843 42 197 21.4% 30.3% 31.4 8.2 1,078 231
151
Elk Grove · Public  Sharp downturn
Sacramento 549 2,109 42 143 29.4% 30.3% 28.4 4.4 787 231
152
San Jose · Private
Santa Clara 407 1,654 42 257 16.2% 16.6% 31.7 8.3 1,046 169
153
Walnut Creek · Public  Sharp downturn
Contra Costa 377 1,546 41 204 20.3% 30.1% 29.7 6.4 770 156
154
· Public  Best in class
Sacramento 409 1,782 41 192 21.5% 30.2% 32.5 5.9 786 169
155
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 642 2,536 41 217 19.1% 25.7% 32.2 7.8 1,390 265
156
Westlake Village · Private
Ventura 290 1,705 41 202 20.3% 20.2% 30.3 8.3 585 119
157
San Diego · Public  Sharp downturn
San Diego 100 412 41 173 23.7% 24.4% 31.0 9.0 173 41
158
Watsonville · Private
Santa Cruz 121 836 40 124 32.7% 14.3% 29.8 2.5 150 49
159
Santa Ana · Public  Best in class
Orange 136 842 40 119 34.0% 14.6% 32.4 5.2 162 55
160
Healdsburg · Public  Material decline
Sonoma 134 503 40 149 27.0% 18.5% 24.6 9.0 200 54
161
· Public  Holding share
Orange 542 2,041 40 161 25.0% 31.6% 35.8 5.0 873 218
162
Los Gatos · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 513 1,914 40 257 15.6% 28.8% 32.0 7.2 1,317 205
163
Carlsbad · Public  Best in class
San Diego 352 1,289 40 201 19.8% 32.1% 29.8 5.7 708 140
164
Pacific Grove · Public  Sharp downturn
Monterey 161 552 40 158 25.1% 28.1% 29.8 5.6 255 64
165
Redlands · Public  Sharp downturn
San Bernardino 521 2,189 40 113 35.0% 23.3% 31.9 5.6 589 206
166
El Cerrito · Public  Weak at the gate
Contra Costa 394 1,460 39 171 23.0% 33.5% 27.7 9.4 674 155
167
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 122 564 39 120 32.6% 22.9% 28.7 6.6 147 48
168
San Francisco · Public  Holding share
San Francisco 120 464 39 204 19.2% 23.4% 22.5 8.3 245 47
169
Granite Bay · Public  Sharp downturn
Placer 496 2,036 39 168 23.2% 32.0% 27.4 6.2 835 194
170
San Diego · Public  Best in class
San Diego 440 1,800 39 166 23.5% 37.8% 34.1 2.0 731 172
171
San Diego · Public
San Diego 103 435 39 167 23.3% 7.5% 26.2 2.9 172 40
172
Yorba Linda · Public  Holding share
Orange 332 1,631 39 192 20.1% 23.4% 28.6 5.1 638 128
173
Carlsbad · Private
San Diego 120 661 38 250 15.3% 32.5 3.3 300 46
174
Los Angeles · Private
Los Angeles 136 1,242 38 247 15.5% 5.8% 31.6 14.0 336 52
175
Richmond · Public  Best in class
Contra Costa 136 1,078 38 148 25.9% 17.3% 23.5 8.8 201 52
176
Victorville · Public  Holding share
San Bernardino 173 1,136 38 196 19.5% 28.8% 36.4 7.5 339 66
177
Napa · Private
Napa 160 679 38 189 20.1% 26.2% 28.8 7.5 303 61
178
Santa Fe Springs · Private
Los Angeles 105 405 38 168 22.7% 25.0% 29.5 3.8 176 40
179
· Public  Weak at the gate
Sacramento 113 1,493 38 144 26.4% 23.3% 22.1 6.2 163 43
180
Los Angeles · Public  Watch — engagement
Los Angeles 516 2,293 38 158 24.0% 26.5% 30.6 9.7 817 196
181
San Francisco · Public  Best in class
San Francisco 332 1,238 38 193 19.6% 30.9% 25.0 8.4 642 126
182
Monterey · Public  Best in class
Monterey 332 1,401 38 102 37.2% 23.8% 25.9 4.8 339 126
183
Castro Valley · Public  Weak at the gate
Alameda 677 2,874 37 197 18.9% 30.9% 26.4 4.1 1,336 252
184
Carmichael · Private
Sacramento 199 917 37 176 21.1% 36.5% 25.6 7.5 351 74
185
Rancho San Margarit · Private
Orange 421 1,823 37 172 21.6% 23.1% 29.9 8.6 723 156
186
Camarillo · Public  Best in class
Ventura 192 826 37 153 24.1% 29.6% 27.1 7.8 294 71
187
Stockton · Private
San Joaquin 187 845 37 123 30.0% 21.7% 26.7 6.4 230 69
188
Culver City · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 507 2,012 37 171 21.4% 28.5% 29.0 8.1 868 186
189
Orange · Private
Orange 210 1,141 37 190 19.2% 16.9% 28.1 5.7 400 77
190
Chula Vista · Public
San Diego 151 626 36 160 22.8% 10.9% 30.5 4.0 241 55
191
Santa Ana · Private
Orange 514 1,849 36 176 20.6% 28.9% 30.7 7.0 906 187
192
Beverly Hills · Public  Material decline
Los Angeles 308 1,173 36 157 23.2% 15.2% 28.6 8.1 483 112
193
Saratoga · Public  Best in class
Santa Clara 358 1,460 36 167 21.7% 25.4% 29.6 7.0 598 130
194
· Public  Weak at the gate
Los Angeles 459 1,734 36 196 18.4% 30.9% 27.7 5.7 899 165
195
San Luis Obispo · Public  Best in class
San Luis Obispo 393 1,678 36 140 25.4% 27.1% 25.9 5.6 550 140
196
Los Angeles · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 121 470 36 217 16.4% 27.9% 24.0 5.0 263 43
197
Mission Viejo · Public  Tracking
Orange 496 1,991 35 141 25.2% 29.6% 29.8 5.2 699 176
198
Redondo Beach · Public  Best in class
Los Angeles 739 2,921 35 154 23.0% 21.4% 28.3 6.2 1,137 262
199
Chula Vista · Private
San Diego 294 1,222 35 187 18.9% 23.1% 24.1 4.8 549 104
200
San Jose · Public  Weak at the gate
Santa Clara 362 1,393 35 172 20.6% 29.7% 26.5 6.9 621 128
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class size. Where UCOP has not published unique-student totals, campus admits are summed — students admitted to more than one of the 6 campuses are counted at each, so values above 100 indicate strong students winning multiple competitive UC offers. Schools with fewer than 100 seniors are excluded from the leaderboard by default — a small cohort with one strong year can otherwise dominate. See methodology →