| 101 |
Manhattan Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
653 |
2,473 |
60
|
236 |
25.4% |
22.8% |
50.2 |
12.9 |
1,540 |
391 |
| 102 |
Temple City · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
437 |
1,779 |
60
|
262 |
22.8% |
33.0% |
43.9 |
8.7 |
1,144 |
261 |
| 103 |
La Canada · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
355 |
1,989 |
59
|
320 |
18.6% |
17.5% |
47.0 |
12.1 |
1,135 |
211 |
| 104 |
Millbrae · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Mateo |
275 |
1,115 |
59
|
283 |
20.9% |
28.2% |
43.6 |
10.2 |
779 |
163 |
| 105 |
Fresno · Private
|
Fresno |
112 |
438 |
59
|
122 |
48.2% |
6.1% |
46.4 |
9.8 |
137 |
66 |
| 106 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
280 |
1,192 |
59
|
248 |
23.6% |
29.9% |
43.9 |
10.0 |
694 |
164 |
| 107 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
367 |
58
|
245 |
23.6% |
25.4% |
44.8 |
9.5 |
284 |
67 |
| 108 |
San Lorenzo · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
158 |
662 |
58
|
253 |
22.8% |
25.3% |
34.2 |
8.9 |
399 |
91 |
| 109 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
66 |
259 |
58
|
221 |
26.0% |
18.4% |
43.9 |
12.1 |
146 |
38 |
| 110 |
Orinda · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
309 |
1,167 |
57
|
294 |
19.5% |
22.6% |
42.1 |
11.0 |
908 |
177 |
| 111 |
San Francisco · Public
|
San Francisco |
262 |
993 |
57
|
151 |
38.0% |
23.3% |
40.1 |
15.7 |
395 |
150 |
| 112 |
Moraga · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
324 |
1,340 |
57
|
272 |
21.0% |
27.6% |
42.3 |
11.4 |
881 |
185 |
| 113 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
326 |
1,438 |
57
|
275 |
20.8% |
27.4% |
39.9 |
8.6 |
896 |
186 |
| 114 |
Palos Verdes Estate · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
337 |
1,484 |
57
|
228 |
25.0% |
18.8% |
47.2 |
12.5 |
768 |
192 |
| 115 |
Riverside · Public Best in class
|
Riverside |
51 |
665 |
57
|
314 |
18.1% |
13.8% |
43.1 |
7.8 |
160 |
29 |
| 116 |
Burbank · Private Demand hides churn
|
Los Angeles |
120 |
497 |
57
|
252 |
22.4% |
22.1% |
45.0 |
16.7 |
303 |
68 |
| 117 |
Oak Park · Public Best in class
|
Ventura |
326 |
1,483 |
56
|
277 |
20.4% |
27.2% |
40.8 |
6.8 |
904 |
184 |
| 118 |
San Francisco · Public
|
San Francisco |
510 |
2,068 |
56
|
245 |
23.0% |
32.1% |
36.5 |
7.2 |
1,248 |
287 |
| 119 |
Oakland · Public Sharp downturn
|
Alameda |
77 |
330 |
56
|
184 |
30.3% |
37.2% |
35.1 |
16.9 |
142 |
43 |
| 120 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
135 |
554 |
56
|
238 |
23.4% |
21.3% |
45.2 |
6.7 |
321 |
75 |
| 121 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
139 |
559 |
55
|
379 |
14.6% |
24.7% |
44.6 |
23.0 |
527 |
77 |
| 122 |
Mill Valley · Public Material decline
|
Marin |
419 |
1,470 |
55
|
264 |
20.9% |
21.2% |
41.8 |
10.5 |
1,106 |
231 |
| 123 |
Concord · Private
|
Contra Costa |
207 |
840 |
55
|
204 |
27.0% |
23.7% |
40.6 |
12.6 |
422 |
114 |
| 124 |
Compton · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
122 |
556 |
55
|
230 |
23.8% |
32.8% |
46.7 |
13.9 |
281 |
67 |
| 125 |
· Public Best in class
|
San Bernardino |
175 |
1,058 |
55
|
174 |
31.6% |
17.7% |
46.3 |
6.3 |
304 |
96 |
| 126 |
Cupertino · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
603 |
2,224 |
55
|
302 |
18.1% |
25.2% |
44.1 |
8.3 |
1,822 |
329 |
| 127 |
Larkspur · Public Holding share
|
Marin |
409 |
1,722 |
55
|
264 |
20.7% |
28.7% |
42.3 |
12.0 |
1,078 |
223 |
| 128 |
El Segundo · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
346 |
1,232 |
54
|
199 |
27.2% |
22.9% |
40.2 |
7.8 |
690 |
188 |
| 129 |
· Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
547 |
2,170 |
54
|
288 |
18.9% |
18.5% |
43.5 |
9.7 |
1,576 |
297 |
| 130 |
Sacramento · Private
|
Sacramento |
201 |
728 |
54
|
227 |
23.9% |
24.8% |
39.3 |
9.0 |
457 |
109 |
| 131 |
Belmont · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
595 |
2,360 |
54
|
304 |
17.8% |
29.2% |
41.3 |
11.6 |
1,811 |
322 |
| 132 |
Torrance · Private
|
Los Angeles |
208 |
844 |
54
|
253 |
21.3% |
29.5% |
40.4 |
9.6 |
526 |
112 |
| 133 |
Pleasanton · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
646 |
2,583 |
54
|
306 |
17.5% |
26.8% |
41.0 |
7.6 |
1,978 |
347 |
| 134 |
Piedmont · Public Weak at the gate
|
Alameda |
205 |
733 |
54
|
328 |
16.3% |
20.9% |
40.5 |
12.2 |
673 |
110 |
| 135 |
San Mateo · Public Best in class
|
San Mateo |
438 |
1,658 |
54
|
271 |
19.8% |
30.6% |
38.1 |
9.1 |
1,189 |
235 |
| 136 |
Dublin · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
823 |
2,771 |
53
|
323 |
16.5% |
27.1% |
37.8 |
9.0 |
2,660 |
440 |
| 137 |
Palm Desert · Private
|
Riverside |
161 |
533 |
53
|
178 |
30.1% |
27.9% |
44.1 |
8.1 |
286 |
86 |
| 138 |
Fullerton · Public Best in class
|
Orange |
614 |
2,337 |
53
|
213 |
25.0% |
26.3% |
40.2 |
8.5 |
1,306 |
327 |
| 139 |
· Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
504 |
2,169 |
53
|
305 |
17.4% |
32.6% |
39.5 |
7.1 |
1,538 |
267 |
| 140 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
138 |
410 |
53
|
292 |
18.1% |
19.2% |
35.5 |
12.3 |
403 |
73 |
| 141 |
Sherman Oaks · Private
|
Los Angeles |
87 |
829 |
53
|
232 |
22.8% |
6.5% |
41.4 |
14.9 |
202 |
46 |
| 142 |
Danville · Private
|
Contra Costa |
93 |
528 |
53
|
370 |
14.2% |
8.2% |
37.6 |
6.5 |
344 |
49 |
| 143 |
Davis · Public
|
Yolo |
560 |
1,755 |
53
|
239 |
22.0% |
28.5% |
35.4 |
7.0 |
1,340 |
295 |
| 144 |
Valencia · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
449 |
1,777 |
52
|
202 |
25.9% |
23.0% |
42.5 |
9.3 |
906 |
235 |
| 145 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
23 |
138 |
52
|
157 |
33.3% |
— |
52.2 |
13.0 |
36 |
12 |
| 146 |
San Diego · Private
|
San Diego |
27 |
390 |
52
|
256 |
20.3% |
— |
37.0 |
— |
69 |
14 |
| 147 |
Malibu · Public Sharp downturn
|
Los Angeles |
93 |
387 |
52
|
196 |
26.4% |
10.4% |
41.9 |
14.0 |
182 |
48 |
| 148 |
Long Beach · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
177 |
682 |
51
|
158 |
32.6% |
31.9% |
41.2 |
9.6 |
279 |
91 |
| 149 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
156 |
659 |
51
|
272 |
18.9% |
16.2% |
39.7 |
9.0 |
424 |
80 |
| 150 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
363 |
1,555 |
51
|
300 |
17.1% |
25.8% |
38.8 |
13.5 |
1,088 |
186 |
| 151 |
Chatsworth · Private
|
Los Angeles |
121 |
1,096 |
51
|
269 |
19.1% |
11.3% |
40.5 |
16.5 |
325 |
62 |
| 152 |
Alameda · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
490 |
1,868 |
51
|
215 |
23.8% |
30.7% |
37.5 |
8.0 |
1,055 |
251 |
| 153 |
Walnut · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
549 |
2,148 |
51
|
234 |
21.9% |
29.5% |
37.7 |
7.3 |
1,285 |
281 |
| 154 |
Ross · Private
|
Marin |
86 |
395 |
51
|
287 |
17.8% |
— |
43.0 |
12.8 |
247 |
44 |
| 155 |
Eureka · Public Best in class
|
Humboldt |
45 |
154 |
51
|
173 |
29.5% |
43.5% |
33.3 |
15.6 |
78 |
23 |
| 156 |
Pacifica · Public Sharp downturn
|
San Mateo |
142 |
471 |
51
|
208 |
24.3% |
37.5% |
36.6 |
8.4 |
296 |
72 |
| 157 |
Carpinteria · Private
|
Santa Barbara |
73 |
306 |
51
|
253 |
20.0% |
13.5% |
41.1 |
17.8 |
185 |
37 |
| 158 |
Glendora · Private
|
Los Angeles |
79 |
240 |
51
|
205 |
24.7% |
— |
44.3 |
10.1 |
162 |
40 |
| 159 |
Calabasas · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
430 |
1,707 |
50
|
175 |
28.9% |
22.6% |
37.7 |
11.6 |
751 |
217 |
| 160 |
Sun Valley · Private
|
Los Angeles |
125 |
1,199 |
50
|
166 |
30.3% |
15.9% |
36.8 |
11.2 |
208 |
63 |
| 161 |
Westlake Village · Public Weak at the gate
|
Ventura |
518 |
1,900 |
50
|
196 |
25.6% |
23.5% |
39.0 |
10.4 |
1,015 |
260 |
| 162 |
Santa Rosa · Private
|
Sonoma |
79 |
336 |
49
|
259 |
19.0% |
25.6% |
32.9 |
11.4 |
205 |
39 |
| 163 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
61 |
343 |
49
|
307 |
16.0% |
23.3% |
34.4 |
11.5 |
187 |
30 |
| 164 |
San Diego · Private
|
San Diego |
141 |
1,279 |
49
|
282 |
17.4% |
8.7% |
37.6 |
12.8 |
397 |
69 |
| 165 |
Alameda · Private
|
Alameda |
82 |
395 |
49
|
245 |
19.9% |
22.5% |
29.3 |
11.0 |
201 |
40 |
| 166 |
La Jolla · Private
|
San Diego |
119 |
1,099 |
49
|
246 |
19.8% |
6.9% |
32.8 |
10.9 |
293 |
58 |
| 167 |
Santa Monica · Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
710 |
2,588 |
49
|
205 |
23.8% |
27.8% |
37.0 |
13.8 |
1,457 |
346 |
| 168 |
Inglewood · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
142 |
592 |
49
|
196 |
24.8% |
15.9% |
40.1 |
6.3 |
278 |
69 |
| 169 |
La Crescenta · Public Holding share
|
Los Angeles |
625 |
2,624 |
48
|
214 |
22.7% |
24.4% |
38.2 |
9.4 |
1,336 |
303 |
| 170 |
Cerritos · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
541 |
1,996 |
48
|
198 |
24.5% |
29.4% |
38.8 |
6.5 |
1,070 |
262 |
| 171 |
Albany · Public Best in class
|
Alameda |
294 |
1,122 |
48
|
316 |
15.3% |
35.2% |
29.6 |
8.5 |
928 |
142 |
| 172 |
Santa Monica · Private
|
Los Angeles |
150 |
1,202 |
48
|
261 |
18.4% |
19.4% |
40.7 |
15.3 |
391 |
72 |
| 173 |
Walnut Creek · Private
|
Contra Costa |
96 |
408 |
48
|
122 |
39.3% |
10.9% |
35.4 |
9.4 |
117 |
46 |
| 174 |
Newport Beach · Public Weak at the gate
|
Orange |
370 |
2,106 |
48
|
200 |
23.9% |
23.7% |
36.8 |
8.7 |
741 |
177 |
| 175 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
42 |
451 |
48
|
183 |
26.0% |
— |
30.9 |
14.3 |
77 |
20 |
| 176 |
San Diego · Public Best in class
|
San Diego |
152 |
1,175 |
47
|
210 |
22.6% |
19.4% |
39.5 |
9.2 |
319 |
72 |
| 177 |
North Hollywood · Public Watch — engagement
|
Los Angeles |
535 |
2,444 |
47
|
162 |
29.1% |
23.3% |
37.2 |
8.2 |
869 |
253 |
| 178 |
Danville · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
516 |
2,042 |
47
|
269 |
17.5% |
28.4% |
35.5 |
9.7 |
1,389 |
243 |
| 179 |
Pasadena · Private
|
Los Angeles |
68 |
264 |
47
|
212 |
22.2% |
— |
32.4 |
— |
144 |
32 |
| 180 |
San Jose · Public Best in class
|
Santa Clara |
459 |
1,884 |
47
|
258 |
18.3% |
29.2% |
36.6 |
6.8 |
1,183 |
216 |
| 181 |
Laguna Beach · Public Sharp downturn
|
Orange |
196 |
815 |
47
|
180 |
26.1% |
30.4% |
39.3 |
11.2 |
352 |
92 |
| 182 |
Oakland · Public Watch — engagement
|
Alameda |
71 |
861 |
46
|
199 |
23.4% |
21.2% |
31.0 |
12.7 |
141 |
33 |
| 183 |
San Ramon · Public Best in class
|
Contra Costa |
721 |
2,894 |
46
|
259 |
17.9% |
29.6% |
35.9 |
7.8 |
1,868 |
335 |
| 184 |
Lafayette · Public Weak at the gate
|
Contra Costa |
345 |
1,256 |
46
|
216 |
21.5% |
26.9% |
32.2 |
9.3 |
744 |
160 |
| 185 |
South Pasadena · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
379 |
1,536 |
46
|
238 |
19.4% |
25.7% |
31.1 |
6.1 |
901 |
175 |
| 186 |
Fresno · Public Weak at the gate
|
Fresno |
613 |
2,360 |
46
|
131 |
35.2% |
18.1% |
35.7 |
6.7 |
801 |
282 |
| 187 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
74 |
862 |
46
|
238 |
19.3% |
— |
41.9 |
14.9 |
176 |
34 |
| 188 |
Irvine · Public Holding share
|
Orange |
540 |
2,232 |
46
|
212 |
21.7% |
25.0% |
38.0 |
8.5 |
1,145 |
248 |
| 189 |
Los Angeles · Public Best in class
|
Los Angeles |
116 |
484 |
46
|
147 |
31.0% |
22.6% |
37.1 |
6.0 |
171 |
53 |
| 190 |
Goleta · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Barbara |
539 |
2,149 |
46
|
163 |
28.0% |
23.6% |
33.8 |
6.9 |
879 |
246 |
| 191 |
Oakland · Public Compounding decline
|
Alameda |
303 |
1,250 |
46
|
148 |
30.9% |
23.9% |
31.0 |
8.6 |
447 |
138 |
| 192 |
Oakland · Public Demand problem
|
Alameda |
438 |
1,812 |
45
|
238 |
19.1% |
24.6% |
33.3 |
8.9 |
1,042 |
199 |
| 193 |
Sacramento · Public Weak at the gate
|
Sacramento |
392 |
1,655 |
45
|
142 |
32.1% |
28.1% |
29.6 |
10.2 |
555 |
178 |
| 194 |
West Hills · Private
|
Los Angeles |
274 |
1,237 |
45
|
218 |
20.8% |
22.6% |
35.0 |
8.0 |
596 |
124 |
| 195 |
Santa Cruz · Public Holding share
|
Santa Cruz |
270 |
1,093 |
45
|
169 |
26.8% |
23.8% |
32.2 |
7.8 |
456 |
122 |
| 196 |
Los Angeles · Private
|
Los Angeles |
71 |
484 |
45
|
224 |
20.1% |
9.4% |
35.2 |
14.1 |
159 |
32 |
| 197 |
San Francisco · Private
|
San Francisco |
20 |
72 |
45
|
150 |
30.0% |
— |
15.0 |
— |
30 |
9 |
| 198 |
· Public Weak at the gate
|
Los Angeles |
450 |
1,775 |
45
|
188 |
23.8% |
28.2% |
32.7 |
6.4 |
848 |
202 |
| 199 |
Chino Hills · Public Weak at the gate
|
San Bernardino |
669 |
2,541 |
45
|
176 |
25.5% |
29.7% |
36.2 |
7.5 |
1,175 |
300 |
| 200 |
Scotts Valley · Public Sharp downturn
|
Santa Cruz |
152 |
611 |
45
|
152 |
29.4% |
14.7% |
31.6 |
7.9 |
231 |
68 |